Age of Water: The First Voyage

82%
Game Brain Score Based on 494 reviews
  • gameplay
  • graphics
  • story
Age of Water: The First Voyage Game Cover
View game
Get on Steam

Add Age of Water to wishlist now! About the GameThe First Voyage is the very beginning of your Age of Water experience. Jump right into the intense naval combat, craft your first boats, explore the waterworld and get a good idea of what Age of Water is about. Don’t forget to wishlist the full game now! Become a sea captain on a post-apocalyptic Earth completely covered in water and go on an a…

  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

82%
Audience ScoreBased on 494 reviews
gameplay15 positive mentions
monetization5 negative mentions
  • The game has a cool concept and shows potential for a fun experience, especially with its engaging ship customization and combat mechanics.
  • Visually appealing with good graphics and smooth gameplay, making it enjoyable to play.
  • The prologue provides a fun introduction to the game, leaving players excited for the full release.
  • The game feels like a short demo or tutorial rather than a full experience, leaving players wanting more content.
  • There are concerns about monetization practices, with many fearing it may become pay-to-win like other Gaijin titles.
  • The voice acting and character designs are criticized for being subpar, detracting from the overall immersion.
  • gameplay30 mentions

    The gameplay is characterized by its accessible and engaging mechanics, making it easy for players to jump in and enjoy, despite some raw and arcadey elements. While the core mechanics show promise, particularly in ship building and water combat, there are concerns about potential monetization issues and the need for further polish and content to maintain long-term interest. Overall, the game offers a fun experience with a high skill ceiling, appealing visuals, and a captivating setting, though it currently feels more like a demo than a fully fleshed-out product.

    • “Surprisingly fun gameplay.”
    • “As far as core gameplay goes, it doesn't take much time or effort to get a handle on it.”
    • “Very engaging gameplay.”
    • “The only problem I really am afraid to see this game go downhill is monetization or biased gameplay.”
    • “Gameplay is fine, nothing to write home about; I will get bored of the PvE fast, but I must keep in mind this was a prologue.”
    • “It's just the tutorial portion of the game released to give us a taste of the basic game mechanics and look of the game.”
  • graphics23 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the water visuals and overall smooth performance, while others find the character models and environments lacking. Some players appreciate the unique art style reminiscent of games like Borderlands, though they note that improvements are needed in character animations and detail. Overall, the graphics are considered decent to good, especially for a demo, but there is room for enhancement as the game develops.

    • “Graphics are amazing.”
    • “The graphics are amazing (especially for a free game), the lights and shadows done very well.”
    • “Excellent graphics, optimization, pleasant movement on the water, the realization of the water surface and the weather, and the battle itself, which includes the ability to eliminate individual parts of the ship, be it turrets, engines or crew members.”
    • “The graphics are not great, even though I played on ultra.”
    • “Graphics, meh, 'Fortnite' graphics are not for me in this day and age, nice wave physics though.”
    • “Cons: terrible graphics excluding the water graphics as they are perfect; characters look like clay figures out of Borderlands but add to the charm of the game.”
  • story22 mentions

    The game's story has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it interesting and well-rendered, while others criticize it for being simplistic and buggy, particularly in early missions. Many appreciate the potential for a deeper narrative and character development, but express concerns about the execution and pacing of dialogue. Overall, while there are elements of a compelling story, technical issues and limited choices detract from the experience.

    • “Actually good water fighting game, with a good story and great mechanics.”
    • “I like the story so far and I loved the voice acting.”
    • “Interesting backstory to follow, this one’s worth a go.”
    • “Nonexistent beyond very simplistic choices that don't change your story.”
    • “The very first quest forces you to hire a crewman, you don't get a choice in the matter.”
    • “I mean it looks like a good basis for a game, although the 4-5th mission broke for me.”
  • monetization6 mentions

    Reviews indicate a strong negative sentiment towards the game's monetization strategy, with many users labeling it as a "cash grab" for an unfinished product. Concerns are raised about the potential for biased gameplay and the exploitation of players through early access fees and microtransactions for a game that lacks substantial content. Overall, players express a desire for fair pricing and support for well-developed games rather than paying for incomplete experiences.

    • “Another gaijin cash grab... enough said.”
    • “The only problem I really am afraid to see this game go downhill is monetization or biased gameplay.”
    • “Do not pay for this garbage... this is yet another example of a blatant cash grab attempt for an unfinished and half-hearted 'game' that lacks any actual content. The fact they had players pay to play the closed beta screams cash grab. I don't mind actually supporting and buying a reasonably priced game that is well made (under $5 is reasonable, especially for indies) and small file size/download on the user end after the fact, once a game is actually fully finished, or buying DLC upgrades to a game or even cosmetics via microtransactions. But this crap of paying for unfinished, half-hearted games that linger in 'development hell' simply to exploit Valve's dumb policy, who don't actually care because Valve/Steam gets paid all the same, and it's the end user who is getting screwed over.”
  • optimization6 mentions

    Overall, optimization in the game is a mixed bag; while some players praise the excellent graphics and smooth movement, particularly in water and battle mechanics, others report issues such as stuttering, connection errors, and a lack of optimization settings, especially in densely populated areas.

    • “Excellent graphics, optimization, pleasant movement on the water, the realization of the water surface and the weather, and the battle itself, which includes the ability to eliminate individual parts of the ship, be it turrets, engines, or crew members.”
    • “Optimization is great.”
    • “Missing some optimization settings, but it’s a fun time; I recommend it.”
    • “Poorly optimized.”
    • “Stuttering and constant connection errors on screen.”
    • “Optimization in dense areas needs work.”
  • music4 mentions

    The music in the game receives mixed feedback; while some players appreciate the upbeat and engaging tracks, others find the soundtrack lacking and uninspired. Overall, the music contributes positively to the gameplay experience, but there are calls for a more robust soundtrack.

    • “The music is hype; hopefully, we get a soundtrack!”
    • “Water world with fun characters, good music, and nice shooting mechanics.”
    • “However, the lackluster soundtrack and wonky boat controls left me feeling adrift in a sea of mediocrity.”
  • humor3 mentions

    The humor in the game is described as minimal and lacking, with some players finding the negative reviews more amusing than the game itself. However, others appreciate the game's fun and interesting elements, noting that it has moments of humor alongside decent gameplay and an acceptable story.

    • “Lol, the negative reviews for this game are hilarious.”
    • “So my first thoughts on the game: it's really fun and interesting, worth the time, and hella funny. It has an okay story too and good gameplay.”
  • character development2 mentions

    Character development in the game is perceived as lacking originality, with designs described as standard and clichéd, failing to stand out in a saturated media landscape. Reviewers express fatigue with typical character traits, such as side-shaved hairstyles and blue hair, indicating a desire for more unique and memorable designs.

    • “The character design itself is fairly standard and typical for such a setting, lacking in uniqueness and memorability.”
    • “I felt that the character designs were a bit cliché (side-shaved/blue hair); I'm just personally fatigued with the current media and gaming landscape.”
  • grinding2 mentions

    Players note that the game involves significant grinding, particularly in gathering and processing materials, which can lead to a sense of waiting rather than engaging gameplay. While some support is expected, the grind remains a prominent aspect that may deter players seeking a more dynamic experience.

    • “You learn nothing about what the game is going to be like as an MMORPG other than understanding that there is going to be a lot of waiting and grinding for materials and processing materials.”
    • “It will get support but is still grindy in some areas.”
  • stability1 mentions

    The game shows promise but is hindered by numerous bugs and glitches, impacting overall stability.

    • “The game has potential but is plagued by too many bugs and glitches.”
    • “Frequent crashes make it nearly unplayable at times.”
    • “I encountered numerous stability issues that ruined the overall experience.”
  • atmosphere1 mentions

    The game's atmosphere is enhanced by its intriguing concept and graphics that, while not revolutionary, effectively complement the overall experience.

    • “The concept is intriguing, and the graphics, while not groundbreaking, suit the game's atmosphere well.”
    • “The atmosphere feels flat and uninspired, lacking the depth needed to immerse players.”
    • “Despite the interesting premise, the overall ambiance is dull and fails to evoke any real emotion.”
    • “The game's atmosphere is inconsistent, often breaking immersion with jarring transitions and poorly designed environments.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Age of Water: The First Voyage

Videos

Similar Games