Age of Water

About

Age of Water is a multiplayer action adventure game. It was developed by Three Whales Studio and was released on January 16, 2025. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Age of Water - Gold Edition" offers enhanced starting resources with 3000 Corks and 250,000 Medallions for purchasing in-game goods and decorations. The edition also includes upgraded boats and crew members. You'll start with a Pirate Boat, and have access to Alter Ego, Kitty Sark, and Jack Wiley, each with different early-level skills. Note that all currency and upgrades are earned through gameplay, with no microtransactions.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,487 reviews

story45 positive mentions

grinding105 negative mentions

The game features beautiful graphics and immersive water physics, creating a captivating atmosphere.
Ship customization is extensive, allowing players to build unique vessels tailored to their playstyle.
The gameplay is engaging, with a mix of exploration, combat, and crafting that keeps players entertained.

The game suffers from balance issues, with enemies often being overpowered and spawning too frequently, leading to frustrating gameplay.
Progression can feel grindy, with resource scarcity making it difficult to upgrade ships and complete quests.
The lack of clear instructions and tutorials can leave players confused about game mechanics and objectives.

story
386 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
80%
8%
The game's story is often described as simplistic and repetitive, primarily revolving around fetch quests and combat missions that lack depth and engaging character development. While some players appreciate the humorous elements and environmental storytelling, many criticize the quest design for being tedious and poorly balanced, with difficulty spikes that can hinder progression. Overall, the narrative fails to captivate, leaving players feeling frustrated with the grind and lack of meaningful content after completing the main missions.
- “The game also presents a subtle narrative woven through environmental storytelling.”
- “Rather than relying on explicit dialogue or cutscenes, Age of Water encourages players to uncover the story of the ecosystem and their place within it by exploring ruins, interacting with other creatures, and observing changes in the environment.”
- “The storyline is both engaging and delightfully ridiculous, with characters that keep you entertained, even if some of their antics veer into 'hold my beer' levels of logic.”
- “The story is nothing special.”
- “Don't expect much from the quests in terms of story depth and character development, as that doesn't seem to really be the focus of the game.”
- “The quests are terrible fetch quests.”
gameplay
159 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
59%
6%
The gameplay of "Age of Water" is generally praised for its smooth mechanics, engaging ship customization, and a mix of PvE and PvP elements that allow for varied playstyles. Players appreciate the exploration, crafting, and progression systems, although some express frustration with certain mechanics being poorly explained and the grindiness of quests. While the game shows potential with its unique theme and fun core loop, it suffers from balance issues and occasional bugs that detract from the overall experience.
- “Awesome concept with tons of customization, huge map, lots of points of interest, base/ship building, crafting, hunger/thirst mechanic, and apparently devs who care and respond to the issues at hand when they arise.”
- “The gameplay centers around exploration, resource gathering, and adaptation.”
- “The main thing I liked was the game world, the atmosphere and role-playing, quests, interaction with other players, a huge number of small mechanics that make the gameplay really exciting, create a bunch of unique gaming situations, and give an incredible gaming experience.”
- “The game has potential, but it’s currently bogged down by frustrating mechanics, poor UI design, and uninspired writing.”
- “The crafting and customization options, though advertised as a major feature, seem limited and add little to gameplay diversity.”
- “There is nothing more to the gameplay journey than doing kill and fetch quests over and over in increasingly bigger boats.”
grinding
106 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
99%
The grinding aspect of the game has received mixed feedback from players. While some appreciate the grind as a means to progress and enjoy the farming mechanics, many find it excessively tedious and frustrating, particularly in the late game where resource acquisition becomes a chore. Overall, the consensus suggests that while grinding can be enjoyable in moderation, the current implementation often detracts from the overall fun and engagement of the game.
- “Not grindy and easy to understand and get into.”
- “Game is fun, but it's a grind fest... the cost to get weapons to tier 5+ is insane then you have to keep grinding to keep them repaired.”
- “The tedious sailing, lack of useful in-game information, and infuriating inventory management make it a chore to play rather than an adventure to enjoy.”
- “It's just a grind fest that makes the game monotonous, boring, and brain-numbingly tedious.”
graphics
81 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
59%
37%
4%
The graphics in the game are generally praised for their stunning visuals, realistic water effects, and immersive atmosphere, contributing to an engaging gameplay experience. While many players appreciate the art style and optimization, some express a desire for more customization options and higher-quality models. Overall, the graphics are considered a strong point, enhancing the game's appeal despite occasional performance issues.
- “The graphics are super, like in a real sea with different waves, big and small waves, and the boat or ship goes exactly like in a real sea.”
- “This game has amazing graphics with detailed underwater and above-water locations.”
- “The graphics are a great mix of beauty and almost cartoonish at times animated; the water and buildings look great, and the sharks look really ominous.”
- “The graphics are mediocre, and the overall presentation feels underwhelming.”
- “The few fun aspects of the game such as shooting things is quickly suppressed by the annoying mandatory busywork and the game running poorly regardless of lowered graphical details.”
- “Cons: npc spawn camping you, progression locked behind disabling npc ships (which includes destroying every single weapon and the helm, but not killing the crew, or sinking the ship while using super jankie controls, and a churning sea, that seems to only affect your accuracy but not the npcs), npc ships with blown helms outrunning you and training you through multiple enemy spawns, lack of any meaningful story, dialog that was written by a 3rd grader, and lack luster graphics.”
stability
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
85%
The stability of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and performance issues that disrupt gameplay and hinder mission completion. While some users noted that the game runs well on older systems and has moments of fun, the overall experience is marred by game-breaking problems and a lack of polish, leading to widespread disappointment and recommendations against purchasing it.
- “This game runs great and the water physics are top-notch.”
- “Near bug-free and a fun experience for everyone.”
- “Overall, I really like the look of the game graphically, and it runs great on my 12-year-old system (GTX 1080, 32GB RAM, and old i4790K processor outputting to a 32" monitor).”
- “Game is full of bugs. I can't complete missions, the game freezes. It is terrible all around.”
- “This game is riddled with glitches, missing information, etc. Plus, they had to delay release a week to fix these issues.”
- “Completely ruined by game-breaking bugs and glitches, insanely unbalanced gameplay, and unexplained game mechanics.”
monetization
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
69%
19%
The monetization aspect of the game has elicited mixed reactions from players. While many appreciate the absence of intrusive microtransactions at launch, concerns persist about potential future pay-to-win mechanics and the overall monetization strategy, with some players feeling that the game may lean towards a cash grab model. Overall, the current buy-to-play model is seen as a positive, but uncertainty about future monetization remains a point of contention.
- “I love it so far! At first, I thought this would be like Crossout with microtransactions, but there are none. Once I got into it, I fell in love with it. It reminds me of the movie Waterworld and it's pretty fun. It was on sale for $11.99.”
- “You can get anything in the game, no additional microtransactions (a miracle in this day and age).”
- “Also absolutely zero microtransactions!”
- “Monetization concerns: while the game is buy-to-play, there have been discussions about potential microtransactions, causing some players to worry about a pay-to-win scenario.”
- “Game has terrible monetization with more money allowing you to enter into this mainly single player experience at a different point and need to grind.”
- “When you play this game you realize really fast that the entire basis of the game is built around the idea of microtransactions.”
optimization
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its smooth performance on lower-end hardware and stable graphics, while others report significant issues such as server lag, stuttering, and occasional bugs. Although many find the game enjoyable and addictive, the need for further optimization patches is noted, particularly regarding server performance and gameplay disruptions. Overall, while some aspects are well-optimized, there are still areas that require improvement.
- “Art style/visuals/optimization 10/10 (this game runs on ultra on a Ryzen 3 and a Nvidia GT 1030 with 0 lag or frame drops)”
- “Game is well optimized graphically and the equipping system is intuitive and unique.”
- “This game has nice visuals and I have not had any performance issues.”
- “As of right now, I think the game is poorly optimized.”
- “The game design simply isn't good, and the game is not optimized and runs poorly even on 'low' detail and low resolutions.”
- “Everything was fine, but the optimization of the game is currently lame.”
atmosphere
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
25%
15%
The atmosphere of "Age of Water" is widely praised for its stunning visuals, immersive sound design, and a unique blend of serenity and adventure, creating a meditative experience that stands out in the survival and exploration genre. Players appreciate the game's beautiful graphics, especially during sunsets and nighttime, as well as the sense of freedom it offers through various activities like trading and treasure hunting. While some find the pace slow, the overall ambiance and attention to detail contribute to a captivating and engaging world that enhances the gameplay experience.
- “Its thoughtful design, atmospheric visuals, and nuanced mechanics create a meditative yet engaging experience that sets it apart from typical survival or exploration games.”
- “The sound design complements the visuals perfectly, with ambient underwater sounds, gentle currents, and subtle creature noises creating a serene yet immersive atmosphere.”
- “The ocean and atmosphere are gorgeous and quite lifelike.”
- “The sound creates an atmosphere of mystery and danger.”
- “Despite all problems with servers and some bugs, I really liked this one because of its setting and atmosphere.”
- “Great music and soundtrack will help you immerse yourself in the atmosphere of the post-apocalypse.”
humor
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely praised, featuring hilarious dialogue, amusing voice acting, and unexpected comedic moments that keep players entertained. While some players note bugs that can be frustrating, the overall experience is described as fun and lighthearted, making it a great choice for those seeking a humorous gaming experience. The blend of action and comedy, especially in multiplayer settings, adds to its appeal, despite some critiques of the storyline and balance issues.
- “Crafting, looting, questing, and some kid-friendly 'eye candy' with hilarious dialogue that will just make you shake your head.”
- “Mind you, the voice acting is a bit crude, but it results in some really funny, 'wait, what?' moments.”
- “This is the game for anyone disappointed with Skull and Bones; it does not pretend to be anything other than fantastic fun and hilarious PvP. Get a boat, get your crew, and get some fun!”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
86%
14%
The music in the game is widely praised for its ability to enhance the overall atmosphere, with a soundtrack that blends seamlessly with environmental sounds to create a sense of tranquility and immersion, particularly in the post-apocalyptic and marine-themed settings. Players appreciate the cool and pleasant soundtrack, which complements the gameplay and visuals, despite some minor optimization issues. Overall, the music significantly contributes to the game's engaging experience.
- “The soundtrack further enhances this tranquility, blending seamlessly with the environmental sounds to evoke a sense of wonder and calm.”
- “Great music and soundtrack will help you immerse yourself in the atmosphere of the post-apocalypse.”
- “The game is set in a unique marine-themed environment with excellent visuals and music.”
replayability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The game's replayability is mixed; while some players appreciate the distinct evolutionary paths that encourage experimentation, others find the missions repetitive and lacking in variety once the main content is completed. Overall, the potential for replayability exists, but it may not be fully realized for all players.
- “This system encourages experimentation and replayability, as each evolutionary path offers a distinct way to interact with the environment.”
- “Much replayability to enjoy.”
- “Very poor replay value.”
- “The missions that are playable are largely just 'hey, can you deliver this letter or message to this person at this place?'”
- “But what after you're all teched up and researched? Where is the replayability?”
emotional
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game offers an emotional depth that enhances the gameplay experience, making it feel significant beyond just survival. However, some players find the voice acting lacking in genuine emotion. Overall, the journey is described as impactful, with moments that evoke strong feelings, despite some inconsistencies in execution.
- “It adds an emotional layer to the gameplay, making your journey feel meaningful beyond mere survival.”
- “Resolving these problems will bring about a successful and blessed experience for you, allowing you to fully enjoy the emotional journey that the game promises.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Character development in the game receives mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the decent storyline and character growth, others feel that the quests lack depth and that the character design does not align with their expectations for a more serious tone. Overall, the focus on character development appears to be inconsistent, with some players enjoying it and others finding it lacking.
- “Awesome game! I played it in beta, and it has a decent storyline and good character development. I wish scrap iron was a bit easier to get because you need so much of it, but other than that, I have enjoyed this game very much. Great job overall.”
- “Don't expect much from the quests in terms of story depth and character development, as that doesn't seem to really be the focus of the game.”
- “Stupid character design; I was expecting a serious tone akin to Waterworld with a little quirkiness.”