Age of Cavemen

About

Age of Cavemen is a multiplayer survival strategy game. It was developed by Fuero Games and was released on May 24, 2016. It received neutral reviews from players.

Build a strong village, train a huge army and explore paleo-lithic world!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

43%

Audience ScoreBased on 212 reviews

story3 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

Fun and enjoyable gameplay as a PC alternative to Clash of Clans with simple city-building and strategic elements.
Free to play with opportunities to progress by managing resources and patience without mandatory spending.
Decent graphics and cute, cartoony art style fitting the caveman theme; includes tutorial and clan features.

Highly pay-to-win monetization model with long wait times for building and unit training, pushing spending to progress.
Game is bug-ridden and unstable with frequent crashes, glitches, server issues, lost progress, and poor matchmaking.
Lacks originality, heavily criticized as a low-quality Clash of Clans clone with little added uniqueness or innovation.

graphics
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
55%
27%
The graphics are generally described as cute, cartoony, and typical of city defense games, though some find them crude or inferior compared to similar titles like Clash of Clans. While a few users appreciate the unique theme and decent visuals, many feel the graphics could be significantly improved.
- “I kinda like the game even though there is lots of hate, like me, I don't have an iOS or Android device to get Clash of Clans but this game is pretty good and even though it is like it, the graphics seem nice and there are some good ideas in the game.”
- “Well this is the typical city defense style as others but different graphics.”
- “Graphics is crude, cute, and cartoony.”
- “It's an exact copy of Clash of Clans, ported to PC, with worse graphics and other names and designs.”
- “Graphics could be much better.”
gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The gameplay is generally considered average but plagued by glitches, long wait times, and unoriginal mechanics reminiscent of Clash of Clans. Players also report issues like getting kicked from gameplay and bugs during tutorials, which hinder the overall experience.
- “The game's mechanics in itself are okay, but you can easily tell it's just a copy of Clash of Clans. If you don't have a phone and only a PC, go for it. But if you have Clash of Clans and you play this, that's fine. In my opinion, I don't like it.”
- “Nice gameplay if it wasn't such a long wait to get to the battle.”
- “Be that as it may, if that's the gameplay you are looking for I would have to recommend you try it.”
- “Be wary of the lack of a playerbase and the overall game mechanics are scuffed.”
- “The game's mechanics in itself are okay but you can easily tell it's just a copy of Clash of Clans. If you don't have a phone and only a PC, go for it, but if you have Clash of Clans and you play this, that's fine; in my opinion I don't like it.”
- “I downloaded this game with the intention of enjoying it with my mom, and I have to say that I was unimpressed within 20 minutes. We were repeatedly kicked from gameplay, if you move your buildings too much in the tutorial it locks up so you miss half of what you need to know, one of my protective walls disappeared under the map, and overall it was very glitchy.”
story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The story is widely praised as engaging and one of the best players have experienced, enhancing the overall game experience. Many users express strong positive emotions toward the narrative, considering it a key highlight.
- “Best game I have ever played, best story. It's just a masterpiece of a game. I love it when I think of this game, and it's only free! What a great buy, must get.”
- “Good story”
- “Story: 3”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization is heavily focused on aggressive microtransactions, resembling a pay-to-win, Clash of Clans-style model that feels like a lazy cash grab. Frequent prompts to purchase items and watch ads disrupt gameplay, with buggy tutorials further compounding frustration. Overall, the approach to monetization is widely criticized for being intrusive and exploitative.
- “Classic base building pay to win model, Clash of Clans clone, nothing but a lazy cash grab.”
- “I played long enough that it would let me leave a review... and in that time (about 10 minutes) I was asked to buy items 5 times, highlighted that I could do it faster with more builders (cost), the same had to restart, the tutorial bugged out and it wanted me to waste my life watching advertising for pay.”
- “Please, for the love of god, don't support 'devs' that make these cash grabs.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, frequently freezing at the end of battles and requiring players to exit, which causes loss of progress including trophies and honor points. These bugs severely impact the overall gameplay experience.
- “This game is very, very buggy.”
- “Every battle just freezes at the end, forcing you to press ESC and exit the game, causing all progress to be reset to before the battle, including trophies and honor points which are nearly impossible to earn.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users indicate that grinding in the game requires additional lives or attempts, suggesting it can be time-consuming or challenging without extra resources.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Replayability is enhanced by ongoing updates that continuously improve the game, making it increasingly enjoyable despite some remaining bugs.
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is poorly optimized, causing excessive processor usage that may risk damaging your PC.
- “This game is not optimized, using excessive processor power and potentially harming your PC.”