War of Beach

About

War of Beach is a single player and multiplayer strategy game. It was developed by LUCKY GIRLS LIMITED and was released on October 15, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

This is an Early Access version that offers you to experience this game in advance. It is of great importance that we hope to have your advice and suggestions for our game, as we are willing to develop a game that belongs both you and us. Your precious idea will boost the development of this game.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

51%

Audience ScoreBased on 246 reviews

story1 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

War of Beach offers engaging gameplay with a variety of units and strategic options, making it enjoyable for casual players.
The cartoonish graphics and intuitive interface make the game visually appealing and easy to navigate, even for newcomers.
Despite being a clone of Boom Beach, some players appreciate the ability to play a similar game on PC, finding it a fun way to pass the time.

The game is plagued by technical issues, including frequent crashes and connection problems, making it unplayable for many users.
It is widely criticized for being a blatant copy of Boom Beach, lacking originality and offering poor graphics and sound quality.
The presence of pay-to-win mechanics and long wait times for upgrades frustrates players, leading to a negative overall experience.

graphics
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
64%
27%
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized for their low quality, resembling early 2000s visuals despite being released in 2015. Many reviewers note that the graphics are inferior to those of the original "Boom Beach," with calls for better optimization and enhancements for a PC platform. Overall, the consensus is that the game's visual presentation is subpar and lacks polish.
- “To all reviews out there... no duh it's a rip-off of Boom Beach, can be seen from space that it's a rip-off. Only complaint I have is that since it is for Steam/PC, it should be optimized as such, true 1080p upscale and more graphics/audio tweaks and optimization... hope devs are listening.”
- “Its graphics look like they're from the early 2000s, but it's made around 2015.”
- “Sure, the graphics are not as polished as the tablet/mobile versions of these types of games.”
- “The downside... the graphics are poor and the wording is stupid.”
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it infinitely interesting while others criticize it for being a poorly executed clone of games like Boom Beach and Clash of Clans. Key complaints include unintelligent military unit behavior, lack of strategic depth, and a reliance on time-based mechanics that detract from the overall experience. While some enjoy the basic gameplay, many feel it lacks innovation and is overly focused on monetization.
- “Infinitely interesting gameplay; if it's a clone of Boom Beach, thank you for bringing this great game to the forefront.”
- “The basic gameplay works, and if you like those kinds of games, then you'll find enjoyment in this.”
- “Has a time mechanic.”
- “The mechanics of the game are frustrating; the military units are unresponsive and attack the nearest target without strategy. They often get destroyed by towers while ignoring the real threats, making the gameplay feel chaotic and poorly designed. It seems like the game prioritizes monetization over quality.”
- “No innovation, very cookie-cutter; it uses a time-based mechanic for building, making it feel like a poor version of Clash of Clans in every aspect.”
- “Inferior graphics, sound, animation, strategy, and gameplay.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The story aspect is criticized for lacking uniqueness and depth, with suggestions for improvement including the addition of a compelling backstory and engaging cutscenes, while also addressing issues related to micromanagement that detract from the overall experience.
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The monetization strategy of the game features microtransactions typical of mobile titles; however, it is noted for not being overly aggressive or intrusive, allowing players to enjoy the experience without constant pressure to spend money.
- “I wouldn't know that, to be honest. All I can say is it clearly has all the mobile signs: microtransactions, etc. But at least, unlike most of them, it isn't constantly tugging at your arm, screaming 'buy me, buy me,' like some kind of irritating toddler.”
- “It clearly has all the mobile signs: microtransactions, etc. But at least, unlike most of them, it isn't constantly tugging at your arm screaming 'buy me, buy me' like some kind of irritating toddler.”
- “The monetization model feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without being bombarded by constant prompts to spend money.”
- “I appreciate that the game doesn't force you to spend, but the presence of microtransactions is still very noticeable and detracts from the overall experience.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Reviews indicate that while the combat is enjoyable and emphasizes strategic planning, some players feel that grinding is necessary to progress, suggesting a mixed experience with this aspect.
- “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
- “The grind is satisfying and offers a real sense of progression.”
- “The combat is satisfying, and the game rewards smart planning over grinding.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers express disappointment with the music in the game, citing a lack of variety and insufficient music loops. Comparisons to "Boom Beach" highlight a perceived decline in quality across graphics, music, and overall presentation.
- “The game needs many more music loops.”
- “They just took the game 'Boom Beach' and made the graphics, the music, and even the grammar worse.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is initially engaging, with some players finding the title "War of Beach" amusing; however, it tends to diminish as the gameplay progresses, particularly due to the resource demands for upgrades.
- “I thought the name was a bit funny: 'War of Beach'.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Reviewers express disappointment with the game's optimization on PC, noting that it lacks proper 1080p upscaling and sufficient graphics and audio adjustments. There is a strong desire for developers to address these issues to enhance the overall experience.
- “To all reviews out there... no duh it's a rip-off of Boom Beach, can be seen from space that it's a rip-off. My only complaint is that since it is for Steam/PC, it should be optimized as such, true 1080p upscale and more graphics/audio tweaks and optimization. Hope the devs are listening.”