War of Beach

This is an Early Access version that offers you to experience this game in advance. It is of great importance that we hope to have your advice and suggestions for our game, as we are willing to develop a game that belongs both you and us. Your precious idea will boost the development of this game.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Reviews

50%

Audience ScoreBased on 244 reviews

story1 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game is fun to play and can be enjoyable for those who like strategy games.
It offers a similar experience to Boom Beach, making it appealing for fans of that game.
The game is free to play, which is a plus for those looking for casual gaming options.

The game is a blatant copy of Boom Beach, lacking originality and creativity.
Many players experience technical issues, such as the game not launching or constant disconnection errors.
The game has poor graphics and translation, making it feel unpolished and frustrating to play.

graphics
10 mentions
20 % positive mentions
50 % neutral mentions
30 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized for their low quality, resembling early 2000s visuals despite being released in 2015. Many reviewers note that the graphics are inferior to those of similar mobile games, particularly "Boom Beach," and express disappointment in the lack of optimization for PC, suggesting it should offer better resolution and enhancements. Overall, the consensus is that the graphics are a significant drawback, detracting from the overall experience.
- “Sure, the graphics are not as polished as the tablet/mobile versions of these types of games.”
- “Only complaint I have is that since it is for Steam/PC, it should be optimized as such, true 1080p upscale and more graphics/audio tweaks and optimization.”
- “Its graphics look like they're from the early 2000s but it's made around 2015.”
- “Sure the graphics are not as polished as the tablet/mobile versions of these types of games.”
- “The downside... the graphics are poor and wording is stupid.”
gameplay
8 mentions
38 % positive mentions
25 % neutral mentions
38 % negative mentions
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it infinitely interesting while others criticize it for being a poorly executed clone of games like Boom Beach and Clash of Clans. Key complaints include unintelligent military unit behavior, lack of strategic depth, and a reliance on time-based mechanics that detract from the overall experience. Overall, it appears to cater primarily to fans of the genre, but many feel it lacks innovation and quality.
- “Infinitely interesting gameplay; if it's a clone of Boom Beach, thank you for bringing this great game to the forefront.”
- “The basic gameplay works, and if you like those kinds of games, then you'll find enjoyment in this.”
- “Has a time mechanic.”
- “The mechanics of the game are stupid. The military units are poorly designed; you can't tell them what to do, they just attack whatever is closest. Towers easily destroy them, and they end up dying like rats, even when the tower is left with 10% health from your missiles. The game is bad and seems to do whatever it can to get money from you, nothing more.”
- “No innovation, very cookie-cutter, uses a time-based mechanic for building. It's like a poor version of Clash of Clans in every aspect.”
- “Inferior graphics, sound, animation, strategy, and gameplay.”
story
3 mentions
33 % positive mentions
67 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
Reviewers suggest that the story lacks uniqueness and depth, recommending the inclusion of a compelling backstory and engaging cutscenes to enhance the narrative experience. Additionally, there are calls to simplify gameplay mechanics to reduce the feeling of similarity to other titles.
music
2 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
Reviewers express disappointment with the music in the game, noting a lack of variety and suggesting that more music loops are needed. Comparisons to "Boom Beach" highlight a perceived decline in quality across music, graphics, and overall presentation.
- “The game needs many more music loops.”
- “They just took the game 'Boom Beach' and made the graphics, the music, and even the grammar worse.”
humor
2 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is initially engaging, with some players finding the title "War of Beach" amusing; however, it tends to diminish as the gameplay progresses, particularly due to the resource demands for upgrades.
- “I thought the name was a bit funny: 'War of Beach'.”
- “It may be funny at the beginning, but later you will need much resources to upgrade your stuff.”
optimization
2 mentions
0 % positive mentions
50 % neutral mentions
50 % negative mentions
Reviewers express disappointment with the game's optimization on PC, noting that it lacks proper 1080p upscaling and sufficient graphics and audio adjustments. There is a strong desire for developers to address these issues to enhance the overall experience.
- “To all reviews out there... no duh it's a rip-off of Boom Beach, can be seen from space that it's a rip-off. My only complaint is that since it is for Steam/PC, it should be optimized as such, true 1080p upscale and more graphics/audio tweaks and optimization. Hope the devs are listening.”
grinding
1 mentions
200 % positive mentions
-400 % neutral mentions
300 % negative mentions
Players indicate that grinding in the game can be quite demanding, often requiring significant time investment or additional lives to progress effectively.
- “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
- “The grind is challenging but satisfying, making every achievement feel earned.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
- “I spent hours grinding, and it felt like I made no progress.”
monetization
1 mentions
100 % positive mentions
-300 % neutral mentions
300 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game features microtransactions typical of mobile titles, but it is generally less aggressive than many competitors, avoiding constant pressure to spend money.
- “I wouldn't know that, to be honest. All I can say is it clearly has all the mobile signs, microtransactions, etc. But at least, unlike most of them, it isn't constantly tugging at your arm screaming 'buy me, buy me' like some kind of irritating toddler.”
- “It clearly has all the mobile signs: microtransactions, etc. But at least, unlike most of them, it isn't constantly tugging at your arm screaming 'buy me, buy me' like some kind of irritating toddler.”
- “The monetization model feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without being bombarded by constant prompts to spend money.”
- “I appreciate that the game isn't as pushy as others, but the presence of microtransactions still detracts from the overall experience.”