365 Days

About

365 Days is a single player role playing game. It was developed by Mugle Studio and was released on February 25, 2019. It received negative reviews from players.

To survive in the wilderness always seems to be something dangerous and scary. But in this game you'll stay alone with nature, which does not want to kill you. Wild animals are aggressive here, but they just defend their territory and themselves, and they never attack first. Animals will study you and your habits. Will you live in harmony with nature or will you kill it - depends only on you.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

38%

Audience ScoreBased on 13 reviews

humor1 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game offers an intriguing concept of long-term survival in a dynamic environment, encouraging players to adapt and manage resources effectively.
Some players appreciate the minimalist graphics and sound design, finding them charming and fitting for the survival theme.
There is potential for the game to evolve into a more engaging experience as it continues to develop, with some early features already providing entertainment.

The game suffers from numerous technical issues, including unresponsive controls, bugs, and glitches that disrupt gameplay and immersion.
Many players find the graphics outdated and the user interface clunky, making basic tasks frustrating and complicating the overall experience.
The lack of meaningful content, variety in activities, and progression systems leads to a feeling of emptiness and reduces long-term engagement.

graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The game's graphics feature a simple, low-poly aesthetic that prioritizes functionality over realism, which some players find charming. However, many reviewers criticize the visuals as outdated and lacking refinement, leading to a sense of immersion being compromised by technical issues and a dated appearance reminiscent of early computer graphics. Overall, while the minimalist style has its strengths, it ultimately detracts from the game's intended atmosphere.
- “Visually, the game employs a simple, low-poly aesthetic that emphasizes functionality over realism.”
- “On the plus side, the graphics, while simple, are very charming in my opinion.”
- “While the minimalist style can convey a sense of isolation and quiet, many players have noted that the graphics feel dated and lack refinement, which can detract from the game’s intended atmosphere.”
- “Its strengths lie in the concept and the potential for immersive gameplay, but its execution is marred by technical issues, outdated visuals, and limited progression.”
- “Achievements that are for walking into invisible walls, AI still in T-pose in the first area, moments that instantly teleport you into other areas without context, non-interactive AI with an 'achievement' for not being able to interact with them, no sprint (at least in the first zones), graphics look like Windows 95, and there is no option to change any of the audio settings.”
gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
Gameplay offers a traditional survival experience focused on resource gathering, crafting, and health management, which can be engaging and immersive. However, inconsistencies in AI behavior, technical issues like unresponsive controls and inventory bugs, and outdated visuals detract from the overall experience, leading to frustration and an uneven survival challenge. Despite its potential, the execution falls short due to these persistent problems.
- “Its strengths lie in the concept and the potential for immersive gameplay, but its execution is marred by technical issues, outdated visuals, and limited progression.”
- “I attached a gameplay video below that shows you pretty much everything in the game as it is on day 1.”
- “While this concept adds depth and engagement, inconsistencies in AI behavior and game mechanics can sometimes disrupt immersion, making the survival experience feel uneven.”
- “However, technical issues—including unresponsive controls, bugs in the inventory system, and glitches in AI interactions—can interrupt the flow of gameplay and create frustration.”
- “Gameplay centers on traditional survival activities: gathering resources, crafting tools, constructing shelters, and maintaining health, hunger, and stamina.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the minimalist style for its ability to evoke feelings of isolation and tranquility; however, the dated graphics and lack of refinement have been cited as factors that diminish the overall atmospheric experience.
- “While the minimalist style can convey a sense of isolation and quiet, many players have noted that the graphics feel dated and lack refinement, which can detract from the game’s intended atmosphere.”
- “The sound design is underwhelming and fails to immerse players in the environment, leaving the atmosphere feeling flat and uninspired.”
- “Despite the game's ambitious setting, the lack of dynamic elements and environmental interactions makes the atmosphere feel lifeless and unengaging.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is currently hindered by various technical issues, such as unresponsive controls, inventory bugs, and AI glitches, which can disrupt gameplay and lead to frustration. While players acknowledge these problems, many remain optimistic about the game's potential as it continues to develop in early access.
- “However, technical issues—including unresponsive controls, bugs in the inventory system, and glitches in AI interactions—can interrupt the flow of gameplay and create frustration.”
- “I like the game, but it is still in development and has a lot to be added. I play the game as it is and try to work around the early access glitches; overall, it sounds like it's going to be a great game.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the grinding aspect of the game, noting that it offers a different experience compared to similar titles like Rust, particularly due to the absence of constant base destruction. However, some find the farming mechanics limited, as currently, the only crop available is blueberries, which may detract from the overall depth of gameplay.
- “Then there is farming; the only thing you can grow is blueberries by placing an allocated plot vertically.”
- “If you like Rust but don't enjoy the constant destruction of your base or home, then you might enjoy this game. However, it can be a bit hard to get used to the grinding mechanics.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game "365 Days" is primarily a single-player experience, lacking multiplayer or social features, which significantly diminishes its replayability and may disappoint players looking for cooperative or competitive gameplay.
- “Additionally, 365 Days is a purely single-player experience, with no multiplayer or social features, which further reduces its replayability and limits engagement for players seeking cooperative or competitive interactions.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game has been criticized for being insensitive, as it often involves laughing at others and can lead to negative interactions, suggesting that it may not resonate well with all players.
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story aspect of the game is minimal, focusing primarily on a simplistic farming mechanic where players can only grow blueberries in designated vertical plots.