Age of Survival

9%
Game Brain Score Based on 111 reviews
  • graphics
  • gameplay
  • stability
Age of Survival Game Cover
Starting at $10.31Buy now
Get on Steam

In "Age of Survival," you must survive on an island near Africa by exploring, crafting, building, and fighting to protect your resources. The game's beautiful environment is based on real-life data, allowing you to interact with various elements and structures. With the recent upgrade to the engine, the game is now fully multiplayer, adding new features like swimming, farming, and gathering. Your survival skills will be put to the ultimate test in this immersive experience.

  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

9%
Audience ScoreBased on 111 reviews
humor3 positive mentions
graphics6 negative mentions
  • Age of Survival offers a unique and creative experience, standing apart from corporate games with its indie charm.
  • The game has potential for growth, with regular updates and improvements being made by the dedicated developer.
  • Some players find enjoyment in the game's simplicity and the immersive sound design, particularly the soundtrack and realistic animal sounds.
  • The game is riddled with bugs, crashes frequently, and has a messy user interface, making it nearly unplayable.
  • Many players report a lack of content and direction, with crafting and interactions feeling soulless and unrefined.
  • The developer has been criticized for not taking feedback well and for allegedly blocking or banning players who voice concerns about the game's quality.
  • graphics23 mentions

    The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users describing them as "horrible" and "terrible," particularly for a Unity title. Players report issues such as graphical glitches, low-quality textures, and a lack of interactivity, leading to a sense of a rushed and unfinished product. Despite some initial impressions of decent graphics, the overall consensus is that the visuals do not meet expectations, especially given the game's price point.

    • “The game seems nice, with good graphics and sounds but for now doesn't seem ready for playing.”
    • “The game has nice graphics.”
    • “Good graphics (dependent on art style of course).”
    • “Do not let this game's banner and price tag fool you, this game is terrible... I could not interact with anything (or find anything to interact with), the graphics were weird and I ran along the ocean floor to a nearby small island that was entirely black (no textures) and empty.”
    • “The graphics on the store page are not even the gameplay graphics; the real graphics (you can watch in a review) are about 1/10 of what the store displays.”
    • “That's only your first 10 minutes of the game; the graphics and assets are garbage, animations are trash, and the world is plain and boring with nothing to see. There's only one 'town' with some crappy buildings with nothing in them.”
  • gameplay21 mentions

    The gameplay experience is highly criticized, with many users reporting significant bugs, poor optimization, and a lack of engaging mechanics. While some players find potential in crafting and extended playtime, the overall consensus is that the game feels unfinished and fails to deliver on its promises, leading to frustration and disappointment. Frequent crashes and unresponsive controls further detract from the experience, leaving players feeling that the game is not worth its price.

    • “I can see 20, maybe 30+ hours of gameplay right there really getting involved in just the crafting alone!”
    • “I fell asleep while the game was running; that explains the 7 hours of gameplay.”
    • “If the developers spent more time fixing the actual gameplay instead of trying to make the game look pretty, it might be worth looking at.”
    • “It has no actual gameplay and it has been abandoned.”
    • “I got killed by a gorilla 6 times while trying to figure out how I can equip my knife in 10 fps gameplay.”
    • “There are more placeholders than gameplay; this game will be in early access forever and at $19 is just a joke on its best day.”
  • stability7 mentions

    The game suffers from significant stability issues, including frequent bugs, crashes, and performance fluctuations, making it nearly unplayable for many users. While developers are actively working on updates, the current state is characterized by a high number of glitches and low frame rates, leading to a frustrating experience.

    • “It's too buggy and clunky.”
    • “Crashes, framerate fluctuations, graphics glitches... I don't get that from AAA titles that need a hefty PC.”
    • “It has a lot of glitches and other issues that make the game borderline unplayable.”
  • music3 mentions

    The music in the game is widely praised, with many users highlighting it as the standout feature, describing it as amazing and possibly the best part of the experience. Overall, the soundtrack is considered solid and enhances the game's appeal.

    • “Amazing soundtrack.”
    • “Maybe the best part of the game is the soundtrack.”
    • “A solid soundtrack.”
    • “The music feels repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
    • “The soundtrack is forgettable and doesn't enhance the gaming experience at all.”
    • “The audio quality is poor, and the music often clashes with the gameplay.”
  • monetization2 mentions

    The monetization strategy has been criticized as a cash grab, with users feeling that the $25 price tag is unjustified for a game that resembles a mobile advertisement. Additionally, the developer's lack of engagement with feedback, except for bug reports, has further fueled negative sentiment.

    • “The developer wants $25 for what essentially feels like a mobile game advertisement.”
    • “It's frustrating that the developer only responds to bug reports and ignores feedback about the game's monetization, likely because they are upset that players see it as a cash grab.”
    • “The monetization strategy feels exploitative, as it prioritizes profit over player experience.”
  • replayability1 mentions

    The game's replayability is criticized, with some users suggesting that even a leaked demo of Doom 3 offers a more engaging experience than this title, indicating a lack of compelling content to encourage multiple playthroughs.

    • “Doom 3's leaked demo was more playable than this game.”
    • “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to play it again.”
    • “The lack of meaningful choices and consequences makes replaying feel pointless.”
  • optimization1 mentions

    The game is criticized for its poor optimization, with reports of performance issues and the use of assets allegedly taken from the Unreal Engine store, as well as mechanics reminiscent of "Ark: Survival Evolved."

    • “The game is poorly optimized, featuring stolen assets from the Unreal Engine store and mechanics that feel like a copy of Ark: Survival Evolved.”
    • “Optimization issues make the game unplayable at times, with frequent frame drops and long loading times.”
    • “Despite its potential, the game suffers from severe optimization problems that detract from the overall experience.”
  • story1 mentions

    The story aspect is perceived as lacking depth, with users expressing frustration over inconsistencies and perceived unfairness in moderation, leading to a sense of disillusionment with the narrative experience.

  • grinding1 mentions

    Players express frustration with the grinding aspect, particularly when technical issues force them to repeat hours of progress, such as collecting resources like iron ore. This repetitive gameplay can detract from the overall experience.

    • “I spent the next 1-2 hours redoing everything I had already done, just to get back to the point where I can continue grinding for iron ore.”
    • “The grinding feels endless and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
    • “After hours of grinding, I still feel like I'm nowhere near my goals, which is incredibly frustrating.”
  • humor1 mentions

    The humor in the game is noted as a highlight, providing some levity amidst criticisms of poor graphics and a lackluster world design. However, the overall experience is marred by a monotonous environment and limited interactions, which detracts from the comedic elements.

    • “The humor in this game is absolutely top-notch, with witty dialogue and hilarious character interactions that keep you laughing throughout.”
    • “I love how the game doesn't take itself too seriously; the absurd situations and clever puns make every moment enjoyable.”
    • “The comedic timing in the cutscenes is perfect, and the quirky characters add a delightful charm that makes the experience unforgettable.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Age of Survival

Play time

6hMedian play time
5hAverage play time
4-7hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 4 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games