Age of Survival

About

Age of Survival is a single player and multiplayer role playing game. It was developed by Silky Sullivan and was released on August 25, 2015. It received negative reviews from players.

Age of Survival is survival simulation crafting game from Seattletek. Your player has been stranded on an island not far off of the coast of Africa where you will encounter creatures like boar, elephant, lions, hippos, crocs, rhinos, and tons of sea life.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

10%

Audience ScoreBased on 114 reviews

humor1 positive mentions

graphics7 negative mentions

The game has potential and offers a unique survival experience that stands apart from corporate titles.
The developer shows dedication and has made noticeable updates and improvements over time.
Some players find the game entertaining and appreciate its creative aspects despite its current issues.

The game is riddled with bugs, crashes frequently, and is largely unplayable in its current state.
The user interface and crafting systems are confusing and poorly designed, leading to frustration.
Many players feel the game was released too early and lacks essential features, making it a poor investment.

graphics
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
54%
29%
The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users reporting poor performance, frequent crashes, and significant graphical glitches. While some players noted that the art style could be appealing, the actual in-game visuals are described as subpar, lacking detail and polish, and not matching the promotional materials. Overall, the consensus is that the graphics are disappointing, especially for a game at its price point, and require substantial updates to improve.
- “The game seems nice, with good graphics and sounds but for now doesn't seem ready for playing.”
- “The game has nice graphics.”
- “Graphics are acceptable for a Unity engine game.”
- “Do not let this game's banner and price tag fool you, this game is terrible... I could not interact with anything (or find anything to interact with), the graphics were weird and I ran along the ocean floor to a nearby small island that was entirely black (no textures) and empty.”
- “The graphics are horrible for a Unity game.”
- “The graphics on the store page are not even the gameplay graphics; the real graphics (you can watch in a review) are about 1/10 of what the store displays.”
gameplay
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
70%
15%
The gameplay experience is highly criticized, with users reporting significant bugs, poor mechanics, and a lack of engaging content. Many feel that the game fails to deliver on its promises, with frustrating controls and frequent crashes overshadowing any potential enjoyment. Overall, the gameplay is seen as unfinished and in need of substantial improvements before it can be considered worthwhile.
- “I can see 20, maybe 30+ hours of gameplay right there really getting involved in just the crafting alone!”
- “I just lost 2-3 hours of gameplay.”
- “If the developers spent more time fixing the actual gameplay instead of trying to make the game look pretty, it might be worth looking at.”
- “It has no actual gameplay and it has been abandoned.”
- “I got killed by a gorilla 6 times while trying to figure out how I can equip my knife in 10 fps gameplay.”
- “There are more placeholders than gameplay; this game will be in early access forever and at $19 is just a joke on its best day.”
stability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, including frequent crashes, framerate fluctuations, and numerous bugs and glitches that hinder gameplay. While developers are actively working on updates, many users find the game borderline unplayable due to its persistent technical problems.
- “It's too buggy and clunky.”
- “Crashes, framerate fluctuations, graphics glitches... I don't get that from AAA titles that need a hefty PC.”
- “It has a lot of glitches and other issues that make the game borderline unplayable.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The music in the game is widely praised, with many users highlighting it as the standout feature, describing it as amazing and possibly the best part of the experience. Overall, the soundtrack is considered solid and enhances the game's appeal.
- “Amazing soundtrack.”
- “Maybe the best part of the game is the soundtrack.”
- “A solid soundtrack.”
- “The soundtrack feels repetitive and lacks variety.”
- “The music doesn't match the game's atmosphere, making it feel disjointed.”
- “I found the audio quality to be subpar, which detracted from the overall experience.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's replayability is criticized, with some users suggesting that even a leaked demo of Doom 3 offers a more engaging experience than this title, indicating a lack of compelling reasons to revisit the game.
- “Doom 3's leaked demo was more playable than this game.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to play it again.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices and consequences makes replaying feel pointless.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express frustration with the grinding aspect, particularly when it involves repetitive tasks like collecting resources, which can be exacerbated by technical issues such as crashes that force them to redo progress.
- “I spent the next 1-2 hours redoing everything I had already done, just to get back to the point where I can continue grinding for iron ore.”
- “The grinding feels endless and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
- “After hours of grinding, I still feel like I'm nowhere closer to my goals, which is incredibly frustrating.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy has been criticized for charging $25 for a game that feels more like a mobile advertisement, leading to perceptions of it being a cash grab. Additionally, the developer's lack of engagement with player feedback, aside from addressing bugs, has further fueled dissatisfaction among users.
- “The difference is that the developer wants $25 for delivering basically a mobile game advertisement (you know, the ones you can 'play').”
- “Not to mention, he will not comment on anything but the bug section because he got upset that no one likes his cash grab.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story aspect is perceived as lacking depth, with users expressing frustration over inconsistencies and perceived unfairness in moderation, leading to a sense of disillusionment with the narrative experience.
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is noted as a highlight, providing some levity amidst criticisms of poor graphics and a lackluster world design. However, the overall experience is marred by a dull environment and limited interactions, which detracts from the comedic elements.