Zulu Response

About

Zulu Response is a single player and multiplayer strategy game. It was developed by Web Interactive Solutions. and was released on June 12, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Zulu Response" is a tactical first-person shooter where players lead a counter-terrorism unit. Engage in intense gunfights, rescue hostages, and defuse bombs in various high-stakes missions. Communication and strategic teamwork are crucial for success in this unforgiving and immersive gameplay experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+11

Skip User Reviews

46%

Audience ScoreBased on 74 reviews

atmosphere2 positive mentions

graphics8 negative mentions

The game has a fascinating historical context and offers a unique experience of the Zulu wars, which is appreciated by history buffs.
Once players get used to the controls, the gameplay can be very fun and engaging, providing a variety of playstyles and challenging battles.
The developers are actively communicating with the community and have shown commitment to fixing bugs and improving the game over time.

The game is plagued by numerous bugs, crashes, and performance issues, making it feel unfinished and frustrating to play.
Controls and command systems are clunky and unintuitive, leading to confusion and difficulty in managing units effectively.
Graphics and audio quality are subpar, with many players noting that the visuals feel outdated and the voice acting is poor.

graphics
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
60%
29%
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized as outdated and subpar, often compared unfavorably to titles from the 1990s. Many players express disappointment, noting that the visuals do not meet modern standards and detract from the overall experience, although some appreciate the low-spec accessibility. Overall, there is a consensus that significant improvements are needed to enhance the game's visual appeal and align it with contemporary expectations.
- “First off, do not play this game for the graphics; they're getting there.”
- “I'm okay with the low graphics; for a low-spec PC player, it's nice to have a game that isn't all about graphics for a change.”
- “Please note, if you have a good PC or laptop and you have NVIDIA, then you can up the graphic capabilities in the NVIDIA control panel, and the game can look significantly better.”
- “Graphics are a joke, but that I can live with.”
- “Dissapointed, the game can be improved going forward. Graphics are the biggest disappointment; they seem like they are not up to the standards of 2016, more like the games of the 1990s. You have figures floating in the air; it just needs a lot of work right now. For me, it's unplayable for now.”
- “The visuals are very outdated, with player models looking more like tin soldiers than lifelike characters.”
stability
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, including frequent bugs, lag, and crashes, even on high-end systems. Many users express disappointment over the game's premature release, highlighting problems with AI behavior and menu design, which detract from its potential. Overall, the consensus is that the game requires urgent fixes to improve its stability and performance.
- “Had high hopes for this game but incredibly buggy, lags even if you play on a NASA computer, and overall underperforms. This genre of game has such great potential and they could have been rich if they had just made this game right.”
- “Oh dear, released too early, really buggy game - I don't know where to start - has potential.”
- “This game has potential but the commands are so buggy they need fixing ASAP. In the tutorial, it says when soldiers are highlighted they are selected, but actually in-game it's the opposite and sometimes they don't obey at all.”
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
37%
38%
The gameplay has been widely criticized for its lack of depth and poor execution, with many reviewers expressing disappointment in both the mechanics and graphics. While some acknowledge that the audio and combat mechanics show potential, the overall experience is deemed unsatisfactory, especially when compared to other games and mods in the genre. Improvements in visuals and command systems are deemed necessary for a more engaging experience.
- “To be sure, the visuals need a complete overhaul to complement the 'realistic gameplay' and the animations need a lot of attention, but those are relatively easy to accomplish compared to if the command system was lacking in historical detail.”
- “Having almost reached the 2-hour mark now, I can say that I was slightly too harsh on the audio and combat mechanics.”
- “Graphics very poor, gameplay very poor; not even any great depth to it. If I were a developer, I would be ashamed to release this. What the hell is wrong with you people?”
- “If you want to play a Zulu game, there is a good mod for Mount and Blade: Warband. The graphics are better as well as the gameplay in every conceivable way.”
- “To be sure, the visuals need a complete overhaul to complement the 'realistic gameplay,' and the animations need a lot of attention. However, those are relatively easier to accomplish than if the command system was lacking in historical detail.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
Users express concerns about performance optimization, particularly when using integrated graphics, which can lead to subpar performance. There are also worries regarding security and the overall capability of the host system to deliver adequate performance.
- “I was having issues with performance on my laptop; however, I noticed it was running on the integrated graphics card.”
- “I am kind of worried about security and also how much performance I can provide as a host.”
- “Update: I was having issues with performance on my laptop; however, I noticed it was running on the integrated graphics card.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for its limited missions and lack of customization, as players can only progress through a predetermined sequence without the option to create or choose their own missions. This restriction has led to frustration among users who desire more freedom in how they experience the narrative.
- “The missions are limited and there is no ability to create your own. You can only play a couple of missions on my version. I won one to get another one, but I want to play in my own order.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate a general dissatisfaction with the humor in the game, with players feeling that the content is poorly executed and not amusing. Many express frustration over the game's unfinished state, suggesting that the lack of polish detracts from any intended comedic elements. Overall, the humor is perceived as falling flat and failing to meet expectations.
- “Firstly, what is it with developers nowadays releasing a so-called game that is nowhere near finished and so bad it's not funny.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers consistently highlight the game's atmosphere as "wonderful," indicating a strong and immersive environment that enhances the overall experience.
- “Wonderful atmosphere.”
- “Wonderful atmosphere.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game, featuring the rousing songs of the men of Harleck and the Zulus, significantly enhances the overall experience, adding depth to an otherwise simplistic combat system. While the fighting sounds may lack complexity, the accompanying music elevates the emotional impact of the gameplay.
- “The music that accompanies the action, featuring the men of Harleck and the Zulus singing, is rousing to the soul and intensifies what is otherwise a bland combat experience.”
- “Whilst the fighting sounds are rather simple, the music which accompanies the action, with the men of Harleck and the Zulus singing, is rousing to the soul and does intensify what is rather a bland combat experience as of now.”