War of Rights

About

War of Rights is a multiplayer strategy game. It was developed by Campfire Games and was released on December 3, 2018. It received positive reviews from players.

"War of Rights" is a multiplayer game set in the American Civil War, specifically the Maryland Campaign of 1862. It offers massive battles with 300 players, and a formation buff mechanic that rewards sticking together with benefits such as reduced suppression and morale costs. The game features multiple army branches, period-correct uniforms, weapons, and battlefields, with 135 regiments and batteries available for a historically accurate experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+23

Skip User Reviews

89%

Audience ScoreBased on 8,909 reviews

gameplay253 positive mentions

stability173 negative mentions

gameplay
675 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
37%
58%
5%
The gameplay in "War of Rights" is characterized by its emphasis on historical accuracy and teamwork, requiring players to engage in organized line battles with slow, methodical mechanics that reflect the realities of Civil War combat. While many players appreciate the immersive experience and strategic depth, others find the gameplay clunky and repetitive, with a steep learning curve that may deter casual gamers. Overall, the game offers a unique blend of tactical gameplay and community interaction, but its slower pace and reliance on teamwork may not appeal to everyone.
- “The gameplay is immersive, historically accurate, and offers an engaging and unique gameplay experience.”
- “The reliance on teamwork adds a strategic layer to the gameplay, forcing players to coordinate and communicate effectively.”
- “The mechanics are really well thought out and highly incentivize 'playing right'.”
- “Gameplay is extremely sluggish feeling, which could be understood in a sense, if any of it made sense.”
- “The gameplay consists of: deploy, load, run around aimlessly for a while, stop, make a lot of smoke, die.”
- “The gameplay is clunky, slow, boring and even its seemingly quickly dying.”
graphics
574 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
69%
29%
2%
The graphics of the game have received a mixed response from players, with many praising their stunning realism and attention to detail, particularly in character models and environments. However, some users have reported performance issues, such as lag and low frame rates, especially on lower-end systems, which detracts from the overall experience. Overall, while the visuals are often described as beautiful and immersive, optimization remains a concern for many players.
- “The graphics are stunning.”
- “The game boasts outstanding graphics and physics, setting a new standard for visually stunning large-scale games.”
- “The graphics are beautiful along with the audio.”
- “The graphics are lacking, can't see opposing forces, and can't really tell between Union and Confederate.”
- “The game ran fine at first on a training server with around 30 people in it, max graphics settings, not a single hiccup.”
- “I have to turn down the beauty of the game (graphics) to fix the lag and stuff, but overall it runs okay.”
stability
181 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
96%
The game's stability is a significant concern, with numerous players reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and crashes that hinder gameplay. While some users have experienced smooth performance, many others face issues such as freezing during critical moments, server connection problems, and unresponsive menus. Overall, the game is still in alpha, and while it shows potential, its current state is marred by instability and a lack of timely updates from the developers.
- “Often updated, not buggy, looks good overall.”
- “Game runs great and is very realistic.”
- “Runs great maxed out 3440x1440 on 12700k, 2070 super, 32g ram, nothing overclocked.”
- “I can't play for more than 5, 10 minutes max before the game freezes and I have to restart my computer.”
- “However, the game devs have shown that they have no desire to try to continue improving the game in any meaningful way and as it stands now the game is still extremely buggy and unbalanced even after being in development for over 4 years.”
- “Game crashes when you try leaving a server - this game has potential but it's still in early alpha meaning there's still many bugs and glitches - I'll come back to it when they improve it.”
optimization
172 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
54%
27%
Overall, the game's optimization is a significant concern among players, with many describing it as poorly optimized and experiencing severe performance issues, even on high-end systems. While some users note improvements over time and express hope for future updates, the consensus is that the game requires substantial optimization to enhance playability and performance. Many recommend waiting for further development before fully committing to the game due to its current state.
- “Incredible graphics and atmosphere, very good performance too if you don't overload your settings.”
- “The most immersive game I have ever played, amazingly optimized and genuinely fun even with the few maps and game modes it consistently provides at this moment :)”
- “Multiple updates have polished and smoothed over the optimization for this game immensely!”
- “The worst optimized game I have ever played.”
- “Just a horribly optimized game all around, even for an early access game this is bad.”
- “I genuinely like the concept and gameplay from what little I've played, but as of now this game is the most poorly optimized game I've ever played.”
humor
160 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
99%
1%
The humor in the game is a standout feature, characterized by chaotic and hilarious interactions facilitated by proximity chat, where players engage in funny banter and unexpected roleplay moments. While the community is generally friendly and supportive, it also has a tendency towards edgy humor, including instances of offensive language that some players find amusing. Overall, the game offers a mix of immersive gameplay and comedic experiences, making it a memorable and entertaining environment for players.
- “The voice chat alone will have you laughing for hours.”
- “It's been a wild ride, full of thrilling battles, hilarious mishaps, and unexpected friendships.”
- “The community is hilarious and playing in a game that pretty much demands teamwork is awesome.”
- “Terrible game filled with unfunny spastic boomers and their enablers.”
music
107 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
75%
7%
The music in the game is praised for its historical authenticity and immersive quality, with players enjoying traditional Civil War songs and battle hymns that enhance the atmosphere. However, the experience is often marred by disruptive players blasting inappropriate or modern music through voice chat, which detracts from the intended immersion and communication. Overall, while the soundtrack and sound design are well-received, the community's behavior regarding music can significantly impact enjoyment.
- “The music is the first thing that hits me when launching War of Rights, and you immediately know what kind of game you are in for.”
- “I had a blast with 300 other players singing rebel songs and charging with bayonets; simply nothing like it.”
- “They are clearly very knowledgeable about the American Civil War period, paying attention to detail in the maps, uniforms, and the music.”
- “The game is good but there's too many people ruining the game by playing music on mic, but not the war music, just some meme songs.”
- “However, too often these moments of joy and investment are broken clean off by the long trudge back to my teammates after being killed while in a long reload animation or by community members themselves, blasting racist songs and slurs through VoIP.”
- “At times, you may have an officer who has no clue what he's doing and leads you all to your deaths, other times, you have people playing music and stupid sounds through their voice chat system when you're trying to listen to orders or communicate with your unit.”
atmosphere
60 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
62%
33%
5%
The atmosphere in "War of Rights" is widely praised for its immersive and realistic portrayal of the American Civil War, enhanced by stunning graphics and sound design. Players appreciate the intense, team-oriented gameplay that fosters camaraderie and historical authenticity, making each battle feel genuinely chaotic and engaging. Despite some technical issues, the overall experience is described as captivating, with many players feeling a strong connection to the game's environment and community.
- “The atmosphere is incredible; the gameplay is highly team-oriented, and the mechanics of the game discourage solo 'ramboing', which is why people will get annoyed with you if you do so.”
- “The whole atmosphere of the game is amazing, from the visuals to the sound design.”
- “War of Rights truly encapsulates the hellish atmosphere of the American Civil War.”
- “My first impression when I bought this game around Christmas time 2019, I wasn't overly impressed. The game was buggy and crashed a lot, so I left it there for a few months. I recently picked it back up again and the improvements were staggering. Once I got into a match, the atmosphere was electric and the spirit of the period shone brightly as we charged and turned some Yankee scum into kebabs.”
- “I knew what this game is, but still for the price and technical issues, plus the atmosphere of elitism from both players and developers, make me not want to come back.”
- “Great game, nice atmosphere, but holy shit getting drops into the 20's fps is not acceptable for a 4790k and GTX 1080.”
story
57 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
69%
19%
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of a structured narrative or campaign, with many players noting that it feels more like a series of disconnected experiences rather than a cohesive story. While some appreciate the historical context and unique backstories created through gameplay, the overall sentiment is that the game would benefit from a more developed storyline and mission-based content.
- “There is a unique story formed with every map, every regiment that you are a part of.”
- “I was gonna write a detailed review about how this is the most realistic depiction of the Civil War in a video game I've ever seen with some of the most beautiful graphics and most detailed reloading animations I've ever seen, but instead I'm gonna regale you with this story:”
- “I like the historical storytelling; I also like the community. Sometimes it gets pretty dry and hair-pulling, but if you find a good group, it's awesome.”
- “This game is great you meet a lot of fun goofy people on here, but if you want to know how I got here we need to go way back to the start (intro music).”
- “Why can't this game have a storyline or campaign?”
- “It is basic, bare bones, lacks any mission playthrough options and is not worth the price.”
grinding
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Overall, players find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessively time-consuming, often requiring an unrealistic commitment of hours to progress. While some acknowledge that the gameplay can be action-packed and immersive, many express frustration with its tediousness and the need for improvements to make it more enjoyable. The consensus suggests that while grinding is a significant part of the experience, it detracts from overall enjoyment and accessibility.
- “Now I cannot play roles without grinding for thirty-eight hours straight.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “It's just a tedious game for smooth-brain history nerds who are bad at video games.”
replayability
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
Overall, users highlight a strong sense of replayability in the game, particularly due to recent updates and the potential for future content expansions. While some note that the community aspect and optimization could improve, many find the multiplayer experience engaging and fun, suggesting that the game has significant long-term replay value.
- “I also see lots of replay value, and the game is still in early access.”
- “✅ infinitely replayable.”
- “One of the most fun and replayable multiplayer online games I've ever bought, and it continues to get better and better over the years.”
- “There doesn't seem to be an active community or much replay value though.”
- “Whilst still being early access and perhaps not the most amazingly optimized game in the world, the replay value and community spirit in this game is amazing.”
- “It's still low but much more playable now.”
monetization
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
9%
73%
The monetization strategy of the game is generally well-received, as it features no microtransactions or intrusive ads, allowing players to enjoy a more immersive experience. However, there are concerns about the game's visibility and player retention, with calls for better advertising and content updates to attract and maintain a larger player base. Overall, while the lack of monetization pressure is appreciated, the game's success may hinge on improved marketing efforts.
- “If you make these two changes, your monetization will soar.”
- “If you enjoy games that have no microtransactions, no ads, and enormous maps, you will love this game.”
- “Nobody pushes points and everyone tries to shoot each other from distances so far the enemy is the size of ants while ads.”
- “I love this game but the devs did a horrible job with the advertising.”
- “Only complaint I have is that the devs need to invest in some advertising or do a free weekend at some point to draw more players to the game.”
emotional
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
"War of Rights" evokes a profound emotional response, immersing players in a hauntingly realistic portrayal of warfare that elicits both fascination and sorrow. The game fosters a sense of camaraderie among players, allowing for meaningful team interactions amidst the backdrop of historical conflict, while also sparking intense discussions and reactions related to its themes. Overall, it stands out as a unique experience that deeply engages players' emotions through its immersive reenactments.
- “War of Rights is almost hypnotic in tickling one's fascination of the perverse, wrangling away one's free will to avert the eyes from a scenery so sad, so desolate, so heart-wrenching, that one's mind cannot cope.”
- “No other war game has ever made me feel more like I was actually there than this game.”
- “I play War of Rights as a corporal (low-ranking officer class) and let me tell you - this game can offer you some of the very best platforms for really wholesome team play.”
character development
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
Reviewers express a desire for enhanced character development in the game, suggesting that tracking individual victories and losses could improve player engagement. However, they acknowledge that such features might encourage selfish playstyles that could negatively impact team dynamics. Overall, there is a call for a balance between personal growth and team cohesion.
- “The character development in this game is impressive, as it allows players to grow and evolve their characters based on their experiences and choices throughout the game.”
- “I appreciate how the game emphasizes teamwork, but I wish there was more focus on individual character development to reflect personal victories and losses.”
- “The lack of tracking for kills and character development encourages players to work together rather than go solo, which ultimately enhances the team dynamic.”
- “I love the game itself, but they need to add character development to keep track of your victories and losses. Even though this is a team effort game, not following the formation hurts the whole team's morale.”
- “I understand why they don't track kills and character development, as it encourages players to go solo and chase kills, which ultimately harms the entire team when they die.”
- “The lack of character development makes it difficult to feel a sense of progression or investment in the game, which detracts from the overall experience.”