War of Rights

About

"War of Rights" is a multiplayer game set in the American Civil War, specifically the Maryland Campaign of 1862. It offers massive battles with 300 players, and a formation buff mechanic that rewards sticking together with benefits such as reduced suppression and morale costs. The game features multiple army branches, period-correct uniforms, weapons, and battlefields, with 135 regiments and batteries available for a historically accurate experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+23

88%

Audience ScoreBased on 10,386 reviews

gameplay288 positive mentions

stability198 negative mentions

gameplay
833 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
60%
5%
The gameplay in "War of Rights" is characterized by its emphasis on historical accuracy and teamwork, requiring players to engage in organized line battles and adhere to period-specific mechanics, such as slow reload times and formation tactics. While many players appreciate the immersive experience and community-driven events, others find the gameplay sluggish and clunky, with some mechanics feeling unpolished or overly punishing for solo play. Overall, the game offers a unique and engaging experience for those who enjoy tactical, team-oriented gameplay, but it may not appeal to casual players seeking fast-paced action.
- “The gameplay is quite nice, with good animations such as the cannons, guns, and bayonet effects.”
- “I think this game is amazing both because of the dedication to fun gameplay mechanics and historical accuracy.”
- “The attention to detail, immersive gameplay, and realistic mechanics all come together to create an unforgettable gaming experience.”
- “This game is trash, the concept is great but the functions are bad, very sluggish movement, terrible aiming mechanics, even when running this game on low-end graphics you still can't see the enemy team 30 feet in front of you. When you bayonet charge someone, you revert back to your normal stance instead of staying in the charge stance, so you have to press V to get back into the charge stance, but good luck with that because your character is going to be unresponsive when you do this and doesn't know whether he wants to aim or just hold the gun.”
- “The gameplay sucks, combat mechanics are shallow. There's no variety in weapons whatsoever either; what you experience in the first 5 minutes of your gameplay is the only thing that you'll be experiencing from that point onwards. It's bare-bones with minimal thought given to combat mechanics, which really is the center of the game as it's strictly combat-oriented.”
- “The gameplay is very user-unfriendly and the core player base forms a vocal minority which is highly resistant to any suggested quality of life changes that they might deem 'too casual'.”
graphics
657 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
69%
29%
2%
The graphics of the game have received widespread acclaim for their stunning realism and attention to detail, effectively immersing players in the historical setting of the Civil War. Many reviewers highlight the beautiful landscapes, character models, and environmental effects, although some mention performance issues and optimization challenges, particularly on lower-end systems. Overall, the visuals are considered a standout feature, contributing significantly to the game's immersive experience.
- “The graphics are stunning, the community is amazing and friendly.”
- “The graphics are absolutely beautiful and the game is much less buggy than it was 6 months ago when I got it.”
- “The graphics are amazing, the audio feels like you are legit on the battlefield, and the gameplay involves you so much that you kind of start creating a bond for that side you are playing on.”
- “Would be a great game if it didn't have dogshit graphics with too much glare, too much gun bob, too slow of reaction times getting the rifle up to shoot...fucking thing bobs like shit and sways for a second before you can even aim then doesn't stop bobbing even when pressing stabilize, no prone only crouch....fucking guns bob around like a fat kid that doesn't know how to swim....do not waste your 30 bucks if you have a potato it will run like complete shit.”
- “The only thing this game has is high quality graphics and historically authentic aesthetics and good character customization; that is it, everything else is a practically unplayable infuriatingly disgusting excuse of a game.”
- “The graphics look alright but between the mess of textures, lack of color, and the fact the gun sways like you've never held one before, it's tough to tell what you're shooting at and even if you hit someone you don't know unless you see them drop.”
stability
209 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
95%
The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and crashes that hinder gameplay. While some players have experienced smooth performance, especially on high-end systems, the overall consensus is that the game remains in a buggy state, particularly given its early access status. Users express frustration over persistent issues like freezing during gameplay and difficulties connecting to servers, indicating a need for ongoing development and optimization.
- “The game is fine-tuned to a point where there are no glitches, no exploits, no crashes, or compatibility problems.”
- “Often updated, not buggy, looks good overall.”
- “Game runs great and is very realistic.”
- “There are many glitches that can make the game tedious.”
- “I can't play for more than 5, 10 minutes max before the game freezes and I have to restart my computer.”
- “However, the game devs have shown that they have no desire to try to continue improving the game in any meaningful way and as it stands now the game is still extremely buggy and unbalanced even after being in development for over 4 years.”
optimization
204 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
53%
27%
The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with many players experiencing significant performance issues, particularly during large-scale battles, which can lead to drops in frame rates, especially on older hardware. While some users report improvements following updates and praise the game's graphics and overall performance on high-end systems, others find it poorly optimized and unplayable on mid-range setups. Overall, the game is still in alpha, and while there are signs of progress, many players feel that further optimization is necessary for a smoother experience.
- “Good graphics, good optimization, one of the best ACW games.”
- “It is very well optimized, so even a decent PC can run about 150 players with a solid 50-60 frames.”
- “The most immersive game I have ever played, amazingly optimized and genuinely fun even with the few maps and game modes it consistently provides at this moment.”
- “The worst optimized game I have ever played.”
- “This game is poorly optimized and I do not recommend it.”
- “I genuinely like the concept and gameplay from what little I've played, but as of now this game is the most poorly optimized game I've ever played.”
humor
196 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
98%
2%
The humor in the game is a standout feature, with players frequently praising the hilarious interactions and banter that arise during gameplay, particularly through voice chat. While the community is often described as chaotic and sometimes offensive, many find the mix of dark humor and absurdity to be entertaining, contributing to a fun and immersive experience. Overall, the game's comedic elements, combined with its historical setting, create a unique and enjoyable atmosphere for players.
- “The banter in this game is truly hilarious.”
- “One of the most chaotic, hilarious, and epic games I have ever played!”
- “The voice chat alone will have you laughing for hours.”
- “Great game, but the Union and Confederates have such god-awful communities filled with painfully unfunny, insufferable toxic LARPers that repeat the same two jokes 300+ times, making the game a horrid chore to play.”
- “Terrible game filled with unfunny, spastic boomers and their enablers.”
- “This is kinda what playing this game feels like, you know? Getting bombarded with artillery rounds every minute turns a man into the Joker. We truly live in a (insert outdated unfunny meme here).”
music
131 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
79%
6%
The music aspect of the game receives mixed reviews, with players appreciating the historical accuracy and atmospheric quality of the soundtrack, while also expressing frustration over the disruptive presence of players mic-spamming various songs, often inappropriate or annoying. While some enjoy the spontaneous musical moments that enhance immersion, many find that the chaotic audio environment detracts from gameplay and communication, leading to a less enjoyable experience overall. The community's tendency to play music during matches is seen as both a source of fun and a significant annoyance, highlighting the need for better moderation or features to manage audio interactions.
- “The random music and yelling over proximity voice chat really makes me feel like I'm a front-line soldier during the Battle of Antietam; this game is amazing.”
- “Sound design is great, and so is the music.”
- “I had a blast with 300 other players singing rebel songs and charging with bayonets; simply nothing like it.”
- “It's a good game, but half your time will be spent trying to mute people who are mic-spamming with music.”
- “At times, you may have an officer who has no clue what he's doing and leads you all to your deaths, other times, you have people playing music and stupid sounds through their voice chat system when you're trying to listen to orders or communicate with your unit.”
- “The game is good, but there's too much people ruining the experience by playing music on mic, but not the war music, just some meme songs.”
atmosphere
79 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
59%
37%
4%
The atmosphere in "War of Rights" is widely praised for its immersive and historically accurate representation of the American Civil War, enhanced by stunning visuals, detailed sound design, and a dedicated community. Players report feeling deeply engaged in the chaotic yet organized battlefield environment, where teamwork and camaraderie are essential. Overall, the game successfully captures the somber and gritty essence of the era, making it a standout experience for fans of historical military simulations.
- “Immersive atmosphere: the game's visuals, sound design, and environmental details effectively capture the atmosphere of the Civil War, enhancing the sense of being on a 19th-century battlefield.”
- “The atmosphere is incredible; the gameplay is highly team-oriented, and the mechanics of the game discourage solo 'ramboing', which is why people will get annoyed with you if you do so.”
- “The atmosphere of the maps is enveloping, with the sounds of footsteps, cannonballs whizzing overhead, and the smoke from recently shot powder lingering in the air, gently passing by with the wind.”
- “The atmosphere in this game is crazy.”
- “War of Rights truly encapsulates the hellish atmosphere of the American Civil War.”
- “The atmosphere of the maps is enveloping, with the sounds of footsteps, cannonballs whizzing overhead, and the smoke from recently shot powder lingering in the air.”
story
63 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
71%
17%
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of a structured narrative or campaign, with many users noting it feels basic and bare-bones. While some appreciate the historical context of the maps and the unique stories that emerge from gameplay, the overall consensus is that the game would benefit from a more developed storyline and mission-based play. Players seeking a rich narrative experience may find this game lacking.
- “I like the historical storytelling; I also like the community. Sometimes it gets pretty dry and hair-pulling, but if you find a good group, it's awesome.”
- “There is a unique story formed with every map, every regiment that you are a part of.”
- “I was going to write a detailed review about how this is the most realistic depiction of the Civil War in a video game I've ever seen, with some of the most beautiful graphics and most detailed reloading animations I've ever seen, but instead, I'm going to regale you with this story.”
- “It is basic, bare bones, lacks any mission playthrough options and is not worth the price.”
- “Tldr; good game, low population, no story, no gain.”
- “Why can't this game have a storyline or campaign?”
grinding
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
56%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring an unrealistic commitment of hours to progress. Many express frustration with the rank system and the slow pace of leveling, which detracts from the overall enjoyment and exploration of the game. While some acknowledge that the grind can lead to rewarding experiences, the consensus leans towards it being a significant drawback that hampers fun and engagement.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Now I cannot play roles without grinding for thirty-eight hours straight.”
- “The Halloween event used to be fun, but the devs created some ridiculously grindy and stupid achievements for it.”
monetization
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
6%
75%
The game's monetization strategy is praised for avoiding cash grabs and microtransactions, reflecting the developers' commitment to delivering quality content without exploiting players. Reviewers appreciate the absence of ads and loot crates, emphasizing the game's focus on realism and player experience. However, there are calls for better advertising to attract a larger player base, as the game is seen as deserving more attention.
- “If you make these two changes, your monetization will soar.”
- “And if you like games that have no microtransactions, no ads, and enormous maps, you will enjoy this game.”
- “If this game can continue to improve over time without microtransactions.”
- “The addition of loot crates and other microtransactions is something I cannot stand behind.”
- “With all the crap coming out these days, that perverts history and is only interested in a cash grab.”
- “You can tell that this game means a lot to them and it's not just a cash grab.”
replayability
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
53%
20%
Overall, the game's replayability is highly praised, with many players highlighting the active and passionate community that organizes events and maintains lively servers. While some users express concerns about limited content and optimization, the majority find the gameplay engaging and continuously improving, contributing to a strong sense of replay value. The potential for future updates and additional content further enhances the game's longevity in the eyes of its players.
- “Active community: the community is passionate and dedicated, which ensures coordinated events and active servers, adding to the game's replayability.”
- “One of the most fun and replayable multiplayer online games I've ever bought, and it continues to get better and better over the years.”
- “Where is the replay value of musket volleys, cannon-fire, and bayonet charges?”
- “There doesn't seem to be an active community or much replay value though.”
- “Whilst still being early access and perhaps not the most amazingly optimized game in the world, the replay value and community spirit in this game is amazing.”
emotional
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of "War of Rights" is characterized by a unique blend of wholesome camaraderie and intense, often heart-wrenching experiences that evoke a deep connection to the game's historical context. Players report feeling a profound sense of presence and engagement, despite the presence of toxicity and controversial themes, highlighting the game's ability to foster both euphoric team play and a reflective exploration of warfare's darker elements. Overall, it stands out as a game that elicits strong emotional responses, making players feel as if they are truly part of the historical reenactment.
- “War of Rights is almost hypnotic in tickling one's fascination of the perverse, wrangling away one's free will to avert the eyes from a scenery so sad, so desolate, so heart-wrenching, that one's mind cannot cope.”
- “No other war game has ever made me feel more like I was actually there than this game.”
- “No other game has made me feel this way before.”
character development
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
100%
Reviewers express a desire for enhanced character development in the game, suggesting that tracking individual victories and losses could improve player engagement. However, they acknowledge that such features might encourage solo play, potentially undermining team dynamics and morale. Overall, there is a call for a balance between personal growth and teamwork.
- “The character development in this game is impressive, as it allows players to grow and evolve their characters based on their experiences and choices throughout the gameplay.”
- “I appreciate how the game emphasizes teamwork, but I wish there was more focus on individual character development to reflect personal victories and losses.”
- “The lack of tracking for character development can lead to players prioritizing personal achievements over team strategy, which can impact overall morale.”
- “I love the game itself, but they need to add character development to keep track of your victories and losses. Even though this is a team effort game, not following the formation hurts the whole team's morale.”
- “I understand why they don't track kills and character development, but it encourages players to go solo and try to get kills, which ultimately harms the entire team when they die.”