World of Fate

About

World of Fate is a single player and multiplayer strategy game. It was developed by NIK's Games and was released on December 24, 2022. It received neutral reviews from players.

"World of Fate is a massive strategy game that allows you to establish your empire on a real-life map, using advanced tech to render and utilize street and building data. Start by setting up your HQ in a building of your choice, then expand your territory by claiming and modifying buildings for various purposes, engaging in tactical battles to take over contested sectors. Manage your empire from your HQ, striving to become a dominant force on the global stage."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

44%

Audience ScoreBased on 132 reviews

gameplay6 positive mentions

stability8 negative mentions

The game features an innovative concept that allows players to build and manage empires using real-world geography, providing a unique and immersive experience.
Many players appreciate the potential for strategic depth and the ability to take over real-life buildings, which adds complexity to gameplay.
The developer is active and responsive, with some players noting improvements and updates that enhance the game experience.

The game suffers from numerous technical issues and bugs, including disappearing units and navigation problems, leading to a frustrating experience.
There is a significant lack of tutorials and clear objectives, making it difficult for new players to understand the mechanics and enjoy the game.
Concerns about the developer's commitment to ongoing support and updates have led many players to feel that the game is abandoned or not worth the current price.

gameplay
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
57%
14%
Gameplay in this title offers a unique blend of real-world geography and strategy, appealing to players who enjoy administrative and systems-driven mechanics. However, many users find the experience tedious due to basic mechanics, lack of tutorials, and significant bugs, which hinder enjoyment and accessibility. While the concept is promising, the current execution leaves much to be desired, with players expressing hope for future improvements.
- “Gameplay begins by selecting any real-world building as the foundation of your faction.”
- “The concept of integrating real-world geography into gameplay is intriguing, offering a unique experience for strategy enthusiasts.”
- “The gameplay feels like a mix of Worldbox, but grounded in a more realistic, real-world setting, which adds a refreshing twist.”
- “There is a strong administrative flavor to the gameplay, as much of your time is spent managing sectors, assigning functions, and optimizing layouts.”
- “The mechanics are underwhelming, and the animations don't add much to the experience.”
- “Technical issues and bugs: many users have reported significant bugs, such as squads disappearing from the map and issues with unit navigation, leading to a frustrating gameplay experience.”
stability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is widely criticized for its numerous bugs and instability, with players reporting significant glitches that detract from the overall experience. While some acknowledge its potential, the current state is deemed unacceptable, leading to a lack of recommendations, especially given its price. Despite minor fixes, many feel that the game remains unstable and unfinished.
- “I thought that this game would not be so bad despite all of the negative comments, because what I saw on TikTok, but this game is just trash and buggy.”
- “This game does have a lot of potential, but it's incredibly buggy and I have no idea what I'm doing.”
- “I understand that this is the place for games that are not yet finished, but this is a game that is not yet at a point that it could get a sensible review without pointing out massive amounts of glitches.”
graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the use of Google Earth data for immersive environments, while others criticize the visuals as low-quality and buggy, likening it to a cash grab. Many users report performance issues, particularly on non-Nvidia graphics cards, leading to lag and crashes, which detracts from the overall experience. Overall, the graphical quality appears to be a significant drawback for many players.
- “This game is awesome with the graphics and the buildings, utilizing data from Google Earth. The fact that you can start from almost anywhere on the planet to begin your world domination is impressive. Although it's very challenging, it's a game you can enjoy at your own pace, whether slow or fast. It's very enjoyable, and I give it a 10/10. The developer is clearly working hard to provide the best experience, and I hope others who are considering buying the game have the same enjoyable experience as I did.”
- “The graphics in this game are stunning, showcasing detailed environments and realistic buildings that enhance the overall gameplay experience.”
- “The visuals are impressive, with a vibrant color palette and intricate designs that make exploring the game world a delight.”
- “It's trash, just a cash grab. The developer probably made it in a week with bad graphics using a Google Maps generator. Half the game doesn't work, and the only things that work well are the features he advertised. I wouldn't recommend it.”
- “If you can get this game to work, wonderful, but it wouldn't work for me on a decent PC. In the end, it's just a low-end graphics overlay of Google Maps.”
- “The game is pretty buggy, and the visuals could be better. Currently, I do not recommend the game for the amount of money that it costs.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization of the game is widely criticized as a cash grab, with users expressing disappointment over its poor quality and lack of updates. Many feel that the developer prioritizes profit over genuine game development, leading to a sense of abandonment and frustration among players. Overall, the game's monetization strategy is viewed negatively, with users recommending against supporting it.
- “This game really does have the potential to be something great, and I'd rather buy 7 of these small studio's games in hopes that one will pan out than support the next AAA game's cash grab (sorry, I mean game) year after year.”
- “Update: been a few years with no work, everything made by this kid is a cash grab scam.”
- “Update years later, nothing's changed; the game has been abandoned and is just a cash grab. Other games by them have done the same.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere is criticized for being underdeveloped, providing only a superficial outline without any engaging gameplay elements to support it.
- “All you get is an outline of the atmosphere, but nothing else works; you can't even play it.”
- “The atmosphere feels empty and lifeless, lacking any real immersion or engagement.”
- “Despite the potential for a rich environment, the atmosphere falls flat and fails to draw you in.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding in the game is seen as a double-edged sword; it appeals to players who appreciate patient, systems-driven gameplay, but can feel tedious for those seeking more dynamic experiences. Additionally, some users report significant lag even after just a few hours of grinding, which can detract from the overall enjoyment.
- “This can be appealing to players who enjoy patient, systems-driven gameplay, but it may feel tedious to those expecting dramatic events or frequent turning points.”
- “I will post pictures to show the 5 hours of progress as well as the amount of lag that occurs with just this little bit of time spent grinding.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Overall, the game's optimization is generally positive, with players reporting good performance and minimal bugs. However, there are some areas that require further fixes and optimization to enhance the experience.
- “Honestly, this is a really good game so far. It is enjoyable to play, and I haven't had any problems with performance or bugs in the game.”
- “There are some things that need to be fixed and optimized, but this game is very interesting and very, very big.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's story is praised for its compelling concept of building and managing a global empire based on real locations, which allows for a unique and strategic narrative experience that sets it apart from other titles.
- “The idea of building and managing a global empire rooted in real locations is genuinely compelling and opens the door to strategic storytelling that few games attempt.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers express a desire for the inclusion of ambient music, suggesting that it could enhance the overall gaming experience.
- “Some ambient music would be awesome.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a complex emotional response to the game, indicating a desire to revisit it in the future despite currently feeling disconnected, likening the experience to a detached view of reality. This suggests that while the game may evoke some emotional resonance, it also leaves players feeling distant or unengaged at times.