Stonehearth Game Cover
Starting at €16.79Buy now

Stonehearth is a sandbox simulation game where players lead a group of settlers to build a bustling town. They must manage resources, assign jobs, and defend against enemies, while making strategic decisions for the town's development. With a variety of customization options, players can create unique structures and craft items to shape their own medieval kingdom.

Reviews

73%
Audience ScoreBased on 5,627 reviews
gameplay170 positive mentions
stability471 negative mentions
  • Charming art style and cute characters that create an enjoyable atmosphere.
  • Creative building mechanics that allow for customization and unique town designs.
  • Engaging gameplay with a mix of resource management, crafting, and combat.
  • Game is abandoned by developers, leading to numerous bugs and performance issues.
  • Severe lag and crashes occur when the population exceeds a certain limit, making late-game play frustrating.
  • Lack of updates and unfinished features from the original Kickstarter promises.
  • gameplay539 mentions

    The gameplay of Stonehearth is characterized by its charming voxel-based design and flexible building mechanics, which many players find enjoyable and relaxing. However, it suffers from significant technical issues, including bugs, poor optimization, and clunky controls, particularly in the building system, which can detract from the overall experience. While the game has potential and is supported by a dedicated modding community that enhances gameplay, many users feel it remains unfinished and lacks depth, making it difficult to recommend without reservations.

    • “I love the graphics, the modding community is amazing, the gameplay is like a chilled and relaxing version of Oxygen Not Included.”
    • “The gameplay itself is simply fascinating for those gamers that like to really get in close and micromanage their colonies exactly how they want.”
    • “The gameplay is very soothing and allows for a lot of relaxation, even when enemies are set on normal.”
    • “However, every update was super small in scope, mostly trying to fix things that are part of the core gameplay features, and mostly just adding very minor things here and there.”
    • “The building mechanics are a little unforgiving at the moment; if you want to change anything, it can be a pain.”
    • “Dull and simplistic gameplay, performance issues, difficult to use building designer, and lots of game-breaking bugs make this game wholly unenjoyable.”
  • stability482 mentions

    The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent crashes, bugs, and glitches that severely impact gameplay. While some players find the game enjoyable despite these issues, the overall consensus is that it feels unfinished and poorly optimized, often requiring extensive troubleshooting. The community has attempted to support the game through mods, but the lack of official updates and persistent instability leave many feeling frustrated and unable to recommend it.

    • “I currently play with more than 20 citizens and the game still runs great at 2x speed or even 3x speed!”
    • “The pros though is the game is beautifully done and it runs smooth and mostly feels bug free.”
    • “I only encountered one bug, which left a permanent 'cloud' in an area, which doesn't even bother me, signaling that this game is mostly bug free.”
    • “It is an amazing game, but it is so buggy that it is nearly unplayable.”
    • “The game is a buggy mess, bless the mod team for trying to fix it but even they can't fix base game issues.”
    • “It's buggy, unsupported, and quite frankly incomplete as a game.”
  • graphics450 mentions

    The graphics of the game are widely praised for their charming voxel art style, which many players find cute and appealing. However, there are significant concerns regarding performance issues, with reports of lag and crashes, especially when managing larger settlements. While the visuals contribute positively to the game's ambiance, the optimization and technical stability remain problematic for many users.

    • “Stonehearth holds the promise of being among my top 5 games, with its charming blocky art style, adorable facial animations, and vibrant personalities.”
    • “The graphics are smooth, clear, and crisp, often reminding me of Minecraft due to its simplicity.”
    • “The art style is extraordinarily cute and the mechanics are cool, albeit buggy at times.”
    • “The blocky art style, initially endearing, quickly loses its appeal when overshadowed by persistent technical problems.”
    • “Good game, okay graphics, bad optimization; late game crashes a lot.”
    • “The main issue for me personally is FPS and performance in general (and no, this is not from my side, many are complaining about it).”
  • optimization394 mentions

    The game's optimization is widely criticized, with players reporting severe performance issues, particularly as the number of villagers increases. Many users note that the game becomes unplayable or experiences significant lag and crashes after reaching around 20-30 hearthlings, indicating that it is poorly optimized and has not received adequate support since its early access phase. Despite its fun gameplay and potential, the lack of optimization severely detracts from the overall experience, making it difficult to recommend without significant improvements.

    • “The game is well made, it could just be optimized more.”
    • “It's a great game with a ton of potential but it's terribly optimized, so you get upwards of 15 people in your little village and the game's performance begins to absolutely tank.”
    • “Despite the cuteness and the fact I am recommending this game, I am not currently recommending it until some more optimization is brought into the mix.”
    • “The game is far too crashy, buggy, and unoptimized nowadays.”
    • “Unfortunately, the game was abandoned, and remains poorly optimized.”
    • “The performance issues are much worse.”
  • story309 mentions

    The game's story is often described as minimal and lacking depth, with many players noting that it feels unfinished or underdeveloped. While there are some interesting quests and character interactions, the overall narrative is considered simplistic and repetitive, leading to a sense of stagnation after a few hours of gameplay. However, community mods have been praised for enhancing the story experience, suggesting that the potential for a richer narrative exists if further developed.

    • “The game tells both the story of settlers trying to build a home in a forgotten land and the secrets of the world called Stonehearth.”
    • “The story of the game reflects both your own journey and your relationship with other characters.”
    • “There are mini quests and stories that your town becomes involved in which have some nice touches and lend the game a lot of character.”
    • “The story is very sandboxy, and while it comes off to me as randomly generated, you definitely get invested in the fate of your people.”
    • “The story elements are thin, and the gameplay cannot support a significant number of characters-- even though the game design practically requires that you develop a large town.”
    • “The short story is that the developers bit off more than they could chew, and so decided to call it quits.”
  • music149 mentions

    The music in the game is widely praised for its charm and soothing qualities, enhancing the overall atmosphere and gameplay experience. Many players find the soundtrack delightful and fitting, often describing it as relaxing and enjoyable, with some even listening to it outside of the game. However, there are occasional complaints about repetitive battle music and bugs that cause the music to get stuck, which can detract from the experience.

    • “The game's soundtrack is also very nice and appropriate.”
    • “The music is beautiful and the gameplay is simple yet addicting.”
    • “The soundtrack is soothing to listen to.”
    • “For example, the bug that the battle music just keeps playing sometimes is really annoying, but the devs just chose to deny that.”
    • “I've had a few problems with combat, but it mostly had to do with the battle music playing in an infinite loop.”
    • “The game would either launch with a black screen and music playing, or it launched full with no sound.”
  • grinding75 mentions

    The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring players to invest significant hours to achieve progress. Many reviewers note that tasks such as farming, building, and resource management can become monotonous, especially as the game progresses and performance issues arise. While some players appreciate the depth and variety of gameplay, the overall sentiment suggests that the grinding can detract from the enjoyment, leading to frustration and a desire for more streamlined mechanics.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “It is very tedious and uninteresting seeing as there is no challenge in digging up half the map or smelting several hundreds of bars of metal.”
    • “The game is not optimized particularly well, and thus, all this great content to be explored becomes a tedious drag as you wait for your game to 'wake up' and move again.”
  • replayability71 mentions

    The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with some players praising its potential due to mod support and various gameplay options, while others criticize it for lacking depth and content. Many reviews highlight that while the game can be enjoyable and addictive, frequent bugs and repetitive elements detract from the overall experience. Overall, the replayability is seen as decent, especially with mods, but it varies significantly among players' experiences.

    • “It has tons of replayability; it is really fun to build your own settlement, and I get kind of emotionally attached to every single one of the hearthlings in my town.”
    • “The game’s biggest selling point is its replayability.”
    • “Great replayability; you can go through many different runs and won't get bored.”
    • “The replayability of the game is very low.”
    • “There isn't really much replayability, which is sad considering the sandbox nature of this game.”
    • “Zero replayability.”
  • emotional48 mentions

    The emotional aspect of the game is highlighted by players' deep attachment to their hearthlings, with many expressing feelings of joy, heartbreak, and nostalgia as they navigate the challenges of building and managing their settlements. The charming art style and wholesome soundtrack enhance the overall experience, making players feel invested in their characters' lives, even as they face frustrating bugs and unfinished elements. Despite its shortcomings, the game fosters a strong emotional connection, leading to both heartwarming moments and poignant losses.

    • “The story of the game is very funny and touching.”
    • “Honestly if you've really connected with your village, seeing your entire village sad because one of your hearthlings died is just heartbreaking.”
    • “To watch your small village grow into a town is heartwarming knowing you guided them there.”
  • humor36 mentions

    The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding the story, characters, and gameplay mechanics to be both funny and charming. Many enjoy the quirky animations and glitches, which often add to the comedic experience rather than detract from it. Overall, the game is described as cute, humorous, and engaging, making it a delightful experience despite its early access status and occasional bugs.

    • “The quest generation is very natural and had me laughing with surprise a few times, even on the second playthrough.”
    • “The hearthlings are unique, with their different traits and opinions, which are oddly specific and funny, making them feel like real people and not just NPCs in the game.”
    • “It's funny to see the development of my little village.”
  • atmosphere27 mentions

    The atmosphere of the game is widely praised for its charming, peaceful, and immersive qualities, enhanced by beautiful music and appealing visuals. Players appreciate the game's ability to create a warm and inviting environment, making it enjoyable to return to despite some gameplay issues. However, some users note that control problems can detract from the overall experience, impacting the fluidity of gameplay.

    • “Brilliant calm atmospheres accompanied by beautiful music.”
    • “Overall, this game is a great purchase and it always feels great to come back to it every once in a while and get lost in the beautiful atmosphere of Stonehearth as I create a new town of my design.”
    • “The atmosphere is so laid back and watching your hearthlings build your town up and defend against goblin attacks is a lot of fun.”
    • “The controls ruin the atmosphere and fluidity of the game.”
    • “Ignore positive reviews - most of them didn't play long or deep enough to see the true horrors of this game and were just charmed by the initial atmosphere and music.”
    • “While combining the pixel art and endless building possibilities of Minecraft with the challenges of normal survival city-building games, it lacks its own style, game physics, and atmosphere.”
  • monetization7 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game is heavily criticized, with users labeling it as a "cash grab" that fails to deliver on its promises, particularly after the introduction of multiplayer. Many players express frustration over the lack of updates and the prevalence of microtransactions, likening it to other disappointing early access titles that prioritize profit over quality.

    • “If there were updates, I would recommend it; otherwise, as of right now, it's just a cash grab game and forgotten.”
    • “I waited and waited to see if they would ever start delivering on all the promises they set forth. I finally bought it when they released multiplayer, and I realize now that it was one final cash grab before they gave up development.”
    • “Other games I have purchased in early access were a disaster; unresponsive developers, focus on pay-elements and microtransactions, while the game is more or less unplayable.”
  • character development1 mentions

    Character development is positively noted for its appealing character designs and artwork, enhancing the overall visual experience. However, players express a desire for more achievements related to character progression, despite the presence of trading cards.

    • “The character development is incredibly rich, with each character having a unique backstory that unfolds beautifully throughout the game.”
    • “I love how the characters evolve based on the choices I make; it really makes me feel invested in their journeys.”
    • “The artwork for the character designs and story images is stunning, adding depth to the overall experience.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Stonehearth

Play time

22hMedian play time
80hAverage play time
7-50hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 53 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games