World Conqueror 3-WW2 Strategy

83%
Game Brain Score Based on 10,000 reviews
  • story
  • graphics
  • gameplay
World Conqueror 3-WW2 Strategy Game Cover
View game
Get on Play Store

"World Conqueror 3-WW2 Strategy" is a turn-based strategy game set during World War 2, offering a good story and splendid gameplay with a touch of humor. The game boasts wonderful visuals, but be prepared for plenty of grinding and some bugs that may impact gameplay. The game description promises an authentic World War 2 strategy experience.

  • Phone
  • Android
  • Mobile Platform
  • Tablet
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

83%
Audience ScoreBased on 10,000 reviews
story36 positive mentions
monetization26 negative mentions
  • story233 mentions

    The game's story is engaging, featuring a mix of historical campaigns and alien invasions, but many players find the difficulty of missions frustratingly high, often requiring the purchase of powerful generals to progress. While the narrative offers a fun experience, the reliance on in-game purchases and the poor performance of AI allies detracts from the overall enjoyment, leading to a sense of imbalance in gameplay. Players express a desire for clearer mission objectives and more accessible ways to earn resources, as well as improvements to AI behavior to enhance the cooperative aspect of the campaign.

    • “The campaign/story is fun with multiple eras of fighting (including alien invasion).”
    • “One of the best war games I've ever played; it perfectly represents World War II in the battles, and I love how you can choose a side. The way it shows the map and the evolution of the story is pretty great too.”
    • “I absolutely love this game; it's the best one they have yet. I'm addicted to it, I love the commander system and all the stuff you can unlock, and the side missions for the commanders.”
    • “The game is so frustrating; even the extra missions (which are supposed to help weak players) are very hard.”
    • “The story is unplayable because of the brainless AI which is meant to be my ally that has three quarters of all the units and captures cities which could have won the game for me.”
    • “It's impossible to 3-star on most missions because your allies don't help.”
  • graphics188 mentions

    The graphics of the game have received generally positive feedback, with many users praising their quality, clarity, and smoothness, especially for a mobile title. While some players noted that the graphics could be improved or are somewhat basic compared to newer games, the overall consensus is that they effectively complement the gameplay and strategy elements. Additionally, there are requests for enhancements and updates to further elevate the visual experience.

    • “The graphics are impressive, and the historical accuracy adds depth to the experience.”
    • “The graphics are really good and it's really fun to play; I recommend playing HQ levels first.”
    • “Wonderful graphics, great playing experience and amazing strategy efforts needed.”
    • “The graphics are basic type, probably a 2D map.”
    • “Good gameplay, poor graphics.”
    • “It's a great game, but this game is poor on graphics.”
  • gameplay158 mentions

    The gameplay of this strategy game is generally praised for its smooth mechanics, engaging challenges, and immersive experience, allowing players to invest significant time without the burden of excessive microtransactions. However, many users express a desire for improvements, such as the addition of multiplayer modes, better AI, and more diverse playable countries, while some note issues with balance and repetitive elements. Overall, the game is considered enjoyable and accessible, though it could benefit from further enhancements and clearer mechanics.

    • “The gameplay is great; it gives you a challenge, but doesn't make it impossible for you to win.”
    • “Great strategy game, very nice theme to it, and there's lots of variety in gameplay and game modes.”
    • “World Conqueror 3 - WW2 strategy is an exceptional game that offers immersive World War II-themed strategy gameplay.”
    • “The game is honestly not very good; the tanks are anti-infantry for some reason, the artillery is severely under-powered considering what artillery is supposed to do, the map is horribly wrong, and the gameplay is mediocre.”
    • “Gameplay is repetitive and boring after a while.”
    • “Objectives are unclear, units are overpowered with generals (beyond what's realistic), and gameplay is tedious.”
  • monetization71 mentions

    The monetization strategy of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over the reliance on in-app purchases to progress effectively. While some appreciate the absence of intrusive ads, others feel that the game incentivizes spending money to unlock better characters and upgrades, leading to a perception of greed from the developers. Overall, players suggest that the game could benefit from a more balanced approach to resource availability and monetization, allowing for a more enjoyable experience without the pressure to spend.

    • “My only possible complaint is that some of the best generals are locked behind paywalls, but I understand that the game needs to make money with no ads.”
    • “No money needed to play, yet pretty in-depth and no ads.”
    • “There are microtransactions, but you don't need them to win.”
    • “I feel like you have to make in-game purchases to really succeed.”
    • “The monetization aspect is also troubling.”
    • “The game has potential, but as far as strategy goes, the only thing you will be thinking about is how to spend money out of your wallet. This game lacks in strategy and makes up for it in greed.”
  • grinding24 mentions

    Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and time-consuming, often requiring significant effort to progress without spending money. While recent updates have made grinding more rewarding and reduced the time needed to achieve goals, many still feel that the process is overly repetitive and can lead to frustration, especially with account transfer limitations and the need for in-game purchases to avoid excessive grinding. Overall, the grinding experience is seen as a major drawback, detracting from the enjoyment of the game.

    • “It's just a grinding slog with no strategy, just build and attack.”
    • “The only thing I wish they could have improved on is how quickly you can get medals because I have hit a point where I have to almost pay to progress unless you want to spend literal days grinding and waiting.”
    • “Last, there's a game-mechanic paywall, where you can no longer advance without buying expensive ($20 - $50) game items, or grinding for a few hundred hours.”
  • humor13 mentions

    The humor in the game is described as both confusing and entertaining, with players finding amusement in absurd scenarios, such as weak units defeating stronger ones and historical figures being portrayed in unexpected roles. Many reviews highlight the game's nostalgic charm and the potential for humorous gameplay experiences, especially when players devise unconventional strategies. Overall, the humor adds a lighthearted element to the gameplay, making it enjoyable despite some frustrations.

    • “It's both confusing and kind of funny to be honest... I can take their oil rigs and keep them... I can make a meme of that if I could... but this game is still amazing no matter what... it's a big nostalgic game to my heart.”
    • “Also, Hermann Göring being an 'economics and industrial expert' is hilarious.”
    • “Lol, funny sometimes how a weak rifleman can beat an infantry tank.”
  • replayability12 mentions

    Overall, the game is praised for its high replayability, offering diverse scenarios, strategies, and missions that keep players engaged. While many users appreciate the current content, there are suggestions for additional playable countries and features like custom scenario creation to enhance the experience further. The balance and smooth gameplay contribute to its addictive nature, making it a favorite among strategy game enthusiasts.

    • “Has great replayability with different scenarios and an interesting 'what if the Cold War went hot' scenario.”
    • “Excellent game, easily replayable, many choices and strategies.”
    • “This game is really fun and addictive, but can you please add a custom scenario maker or random scenario where playable countries are randomized and are placed in alliances.”
    • “Very well done war game for the phone; it's balanced, easy to play, and has replay value.”
    • “The variety of missions, campaigns, and playable factions provide endless replay value.”
  • stability11 mentions

    The stability of the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising its smooth performance and lack of lag, while others report significant issues such as freezing, bugs, and crashes, particularly during campaign mode. Many users express frustration over glitches that disrupt gameplay and require restarts, leading to a negative impact on their overall experience. Overall, while some find the game well-made with few issues, others encounter persistent problems that hinder their enjoyment.

    • “Your ads are not working, it either has a bug or you do it on purpose, but it just freezes right after watching it. Please fix it or I will have to delete your game and move on to another that works correctly. One star rating for that until you fix it.”
    • “The game is very buggy on my phone which is a Tecno Camon 5G.”
    • “It's a great game but every time I try to play a campaign mission it just freezes on me.”
  • music10 mentions

    The music in the game receives mixed feedback from users; while some praise it as enjoyable and integral to their gaming experience, others report issues such as repetitive tracks or music that continues to play even after closing the game. Overall, the soundtrack is appreciated by many, but there are calls for improvements and more variety.

    • “I love the music, graphics, and the overall planning towards a victory!”
    • “All I need to survive is the soundtrack of this game.”
    • “Love the music.”
    • “Since for the past few days, whenever I open this game, this weird music starts to play in the background and doesn't stop until I close the game.”
    • “Hi devs, the reason I'm giving 3 stars is because when I enter the game, I'm greeted with a black screen and music playing in the background. I won't delete it; it looks like a pretty fun game, but can you please help me? It may be my device, but I've restarted it countless times. I'd really appreciate the help, thanks :)”
    • “Could you send me the titles of the music played?”
  • emotional3 mentions

    Players express a strong emotional connection to the game, experiencing a range of feelings from joy and pride upon overcoming challenges to frustration and self-doubt during difficult levels. The highs and lows of gameplay evoke genuine emotional responses, including tears of joy and laughter, highlighting the game's ability to engage players on a deeper level.

    • “I passed 1939 and 1943 easily, but when I got stuck on 1950, I cried literal tears of joy when I finally beat it. I was like, 'Yes, 1960!' It's the same thing with like 2 different countries. I got angry but laughed. Well done!”
  • optimization3 mentions

    The game's optimization is criticized for missing screen elements and poor AI performance, particularly in the world conqueror mode, where allies are ineffective and easily overwhelmed. While the game is generally well-received, the lack of control over allied nations and the disparity in AI capabilities detracts from the overall experience.

    • “Overall, it is an excellent game, but the problem is the AI when playing in the World Conqueror mode. All your allies are simply stupid AI; they get destroyed very easily without taking any initiative, and you are overwhelmed by the enemy. The option to control all the allied nations or all the Axis nations must be allowed. Overall, a great game, but the friendly AI needs to be compatible with the performance of the enemy AI.”
    • “Optimized properly, a right part of the screen is missing, therefore unable.”
    • “Overall it is an excellent game but the problem is the AI when playing in the World Conqueror mode. All your allies are simply stupid AI; they get destroyed very easily without taking any initiative, and you are simply overwhelmed by the enemy. The option must be allowed to control all the allied nations or to control all the Axis nations. Overall a great game, but the friendly AI needs to be compatible with the performance of the enemy AI.”
  • character development1 mentions

    Character development in the game is praised for its solid structure, featuring well-scaled promotion and research costs, which contribute to a balanced and engaging experience. Players appreciate the extensive variety of units available, enhancing the depth of character progression.

    • “Fantastic and solid turn-based strategy game with well-scaled promotion, research, and requisition costs, character development, and a huge selection of balanced units.”
  • atmosphere1 mentions

    Reviewers highlight the game's ability to evoke a distinct southern atmosphere reminiscent of South Africa, creating an immersive experience that captures the region's unique cultural and environmental elements.

    • “The game fails to capture the essence of the southern atmosphere, making it feel more like a generic setting than a unique experience.”
    • “I expected a rich and immersive atmosphere, but it felt flat and uninspired, lacking the depth I was hoping for.”
    • “The attempts at creating a southern atmosphere fell short, leaving the environment feeling lifeless and disconnected.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy World Conqueror 3-WW2 Strategy

Play time

22hMedian play time
50hAverage play time
5-50hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 7 analyzed playthroughs

Similar Games