1941 Frozen Front

About

"1941 Frozen Front" is a free, turn-based World War 2 strategy game featuring campaigns and multiplayer battles across the Eastern Front. Command German or Soviet troops and utilize infantry, artillery, tanks, and warplanes while managing resources and fortifications. With stunning graphics and challenging missions, this game offers a thrilling and immersive experience for strategy enthusiasts.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

82%

Audience ScoreBased on 4,681 reviews

story25 positive mentions

monetization241 negative mentions

The game offers a challenging and strategic gameplay experience, reminiscent of classic turn-based strategy games.
Players can complete all levels without spending money, making it accessible for those who prefer not to make in-game purchases.
The game features a variety of units and requires players to think critically about their moves and resource management.

The game is plagued by excessive ads, which can disrupt gameplay and frustrate players.
Loading times can be slow, and the game occasionally crashes, leading to a frustrating experience.
The AI can be unbalanced, often overwhelming players with more units, making it difficult to progress without purchasing additional resources.

monetization
254 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
4%
95%
The monetization strategy of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with players expressing frustration over the excessive and intrusive ads that disrupt gameplay. Many users report that the ads are not only frequent but also cover significant portions of the screen, making the game difficult to enjoy. While some players appreciate the option to pay to remove ads, the general consensus is that the ad load is excessive and detracts from the overall gaming experience.
- “No microtransactions necessary.”
- “Unlike other games, this game doesn't make you buy lots of in-game purchases; I had a good time playing.”
- “The game is challenging without being so ridiculous that microtransactions are required, and the level of depth and complexity is quite impressive for a mobile game.”
- “The game is nice, but the ads are unreal!”
- “This game is not fun enough to be redeemed for the amount of ads you have to endure.”
- “Good game, ruined by ads.”
story
173 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
84%
2%
The game's story is generally well-received, with players appreciating the intense and strategic nature of the missions, though many express a desire for more content and variety. While some players find the missions challenging and engaging, others criticize the difficulty spikes and the need for in-game currency to progress, which can hinder the experience. Overall, the storyline is considered compelling, but the demand for additional missions and improvements in gameplay mechanics is a common theme among reviews.
- “Excellent storyline with good graphics.”
- “Addicting game, nice strategy, good graphics, and awesome storyline!”
- “I absolutely loved every mission and I hope they keep adding more or make a sequel (or both!)”
- “The game is really easy to learn, but the missions get real hard real fast. I can't get past the third mission in the first chapter.”
- “Without gold, it's impossible to complete a mission, and gold costs money... so it's a clever money-making game.”
- “Game play was good but it would lag or not start at times. I wasted money to get gold, then found out later that if you replay any of the 3 missions of the 4 stages, you keep the gold you earned. The storyline was very short and I would only recommend it to people that like wasting money.”
graphics
123 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
35%
8%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the quality and aesthetic as fitting for a strategy game, while others criticize them as outdated or lacking detail. Many users appreciate the visuals for enhancing gameplay, but there are frequent calls for improvements, particularly regarding clarity and modernity. Overall, while some find the graphics enjoyable and well-suited to the genre, others feel they fall short of expectations.
- “The background music, the realistic tight graphics, and the realism are all 3 superb!”
- “Absolutely adore this game, the graphics, sounds and gameplay are superb.”
- “Brilliant design, great detail, quality graphics and sound.”
- “However, the graphics are not that good compared to the World Conqueror series.”
- “Graphics are very bad; improve it.”
- “Poor graphics, just retarded mindless.”
gameplay
80 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
54%
43%
4%
The gameplay is generally praised for its strategic depth and engaging mechanics, with many players enjoying the balance between challenge and accessibility. However, frequent interruptions from ads and issues with the gold currency mechanic detract from the overall experience. While the graphics and user experience receive positive remarks, some users find the gameplay clunky or overly reliant on monetization, impacting their enjoyment.
- “Love the board game type aesthetic and gameplay.”
- “Absolutely adore this game, the graphics, sounds, and gameplay are superb.”
- “Fun turn-based gameplay that reminds me of many tabletop wargames, but simplified for mobile; it's quite challenging, but very rewarding to beat missions and move on to the next.”
- “Gameplay is continuously interrupted by video ads.”
- “Persistent and invasive ads on top never go away during gameplay is horrible.”
- “Ok game but it's ruined by the gold currency mechanic.”
stability
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
94%
The stability of the game is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent freezes, crashes, and glitches that disrupt gameplay. While some players have experienced minimal issues, the overall consensus indicates that the game suffers from serious stability problems, particularly related to ads and memory consumption, leading to frustration and uninstallation for some. Despite its engaging gameplay, the persistent technical issues detract from the overall experience.
- “Turned base with no glitches and good graphics.”
- “No glitches or hassles so far; a good time waster.”
- “Too buggy.”
- “Game freezes up after a few rounds of a map.”
- “The title screen has video glitches, can't get past the first level without it crashing and resetting data back a few minutes, obnoxiously putting up 'watch this video and get 50 gold' in the middle of the screen getting in the way of the game.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
29%
29%
The music in the game is generally praised for its quality and effectiveness, enhancing the overall experience with superb background tracks and sound effects. However, some users noted issues such as music muting mid-game and inconsistencies in mission-specific audio cues. Overall, while the music contributes positively to the gameplay, there are areas that require attention for improvement.
- “The background music, the realistic tight graphics, and the realism are all superb!”
- “Best game awarded; nice music and nice tactics. Wish there would be more missions.”
- “Excellent music and sounds, by the way.”
- “Also, the music and sound effects get muted out mid-game.”
- “Yeah, it's just like Panzer Commander, all the way down to cheesy music.”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be a significant drawback, often feeling that it is necessary to rely on free gold and ad-watching to progress. Many missions are perceived as overly lengthy, leading to repetitive strategies like hit-and-run tactics. While the game is enjoyable, the reliance on grinding and the imbalance in player matchups can make it tedious and frustrating.
- “Great game but impossible to do without the free gold, and after grinding out many of the challenges, I didn't receive my free gold, which put me off completely.”
- “Some of the missions are a bit too long; I find myself almost always resorting to hit and run or grinding the enemy down with artillery.”
- “Fun if you don't mind that it is gamey, unrealistic, abstract, and has a lot of grinding and healing and reinforcements based on gold, which can be earned by... watching ad videos.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
The game offers high replayability, though some players note that its competitive player vs player mode is infrequent, which may limit overall replay value for certain users.
- “Very replayable.”
- “The replayability is impressive, with numerous choices that lead to different outcomes.”
- “Each playthrough offers a unique experience, making you want to dive back in.”
- “Replayability is limited, and player vs. player is a rare occurrence.”
- “Once you complete the game, there's little incentive to play through it again.”
- “The lack of diverse gameplay options makes replaying feel tedious.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is well-received, with players finding it amusing, particularly in the context of its World War II theme and the experience of playing as the Axis powers.
- “Good, funny.”
- “I love the WWII theme, and playing as the Axis is hilarious.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express frustration with the game's mechanics, feeling that the developers show a lack of consideration for their experience, which detracts from the emotional engagement with the game. The cumbersome controls contribute to a sense of disconnection and dissatisfaction.
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game is generally well-optimized and runs smoothly, though some users have reported encountering a download error (error 492).
- “Absolutely great game that runs smoothly.”
- “The optimization is impressive, allowing for seamless gameplay.”
- “I love how well-optimized the game is; it enhances the overall experience.”