World Conqueror 4-WW2 Strategy

About

"World Conqueror 4-WW2 Strategy" is a single-player turn-based war game set in WW2, featuring a good plot, spectacular gameplay, and fantastic graphics. However, it can be quite grinding with frequent ads and bugs, which may hinder the overall experience. The game allows you to command and win battles by deploying strategies in an offline setting.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

World Conqueror 4-WW2 Strategy screenshot

76%

Audience ScoreBased on 7,615 reviews

story37 positive mentions

monetization54 negative mentions

Great graphics and gameplay, making it an enjoyable strategy game.
Challenging and requires strategic thinking, which keeps the game engaging.
The game offers a variety of generals and units, enhancing the gameplay experience.

The AI is often unbalanced, making it difficult to win, especially in conquest mode.
Progression can be frustratingly slow, requiring significant grinding or in-app purchases for generals.
Many players report losing progress or data, which diminishes the overall experience.

story
259 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
80%
5%
The game's story mode is generally well-received for its historical context and strategic gameplay, but many players find the difficulty level excessively high, often requiring in-game purchases for better generals to progress. Users express frustration over the lack of clear objectives, the imbalance in AI performance, and the tediousness of grinding for resources, which detracts from the overall enjoyment of the missions. While the game has potential, the overwhelming challenge of certain missions and the perceived pay-to-win mechanics hinder a fully satisfying experience.
- “The story mode is great and tactful, and the full world war mode is amazing.”
- “I love this game overall, and it's really fun but for some reason I don't have access to the legions and sometimes it gets annoying because I can't complete any of the exercises or do any of the legion missions.”
- “The game is updated every now and then with new units and new missions.”
- “The story campaign seems to get too hard beyond a certain point, making it frustrating to progress.”
- “The missions are absolute trash; they are too difficult and poorly designed.”
- “The game is good, however, the story mode is not good and lacks clear objectives.”
gameplay
164 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
38%
5%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its strategic depth, improved mechanics, and graphics. However, several users expressed frustration over the difficulty level, lack of clear objectives, and issues with AI performance, which can detract from the overall experience. While the game is considered fun and engaging, players desire more balance, clearer tutorials, and the return of certain features from previous installments.
- “Absolutely love this game; the strategy and game mechanics are fun and engaging, never got bored with it.”
- “Great game, good graphics, excellent gameplay, but I had to stop playing the game; it just takes more skill than I have.”
- “The gameplay starts out strong but eventually starts to get very repetitive.”
- “The gameplay honestly in the scenario mode at about mission 6 for the axis, and 7 for the allies on the first campaign are far too hard and grindy, and I also believe that the generals and traits and other such things should have a slight price reduction for medals with how grindy it is.”
- “The gameplay is solid, but might be a bit much for people that don't like to keep track of a lot of units on a grand strategy map.”
graphics
153 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
61%
33%
5%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the improvements over previous installments and noting their overall quality and realism. However, some users express dissatisfaction, citing issues like eye strain, a lack of immersion, and a desire for a return to older art styles. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered good, there are calls for further enhancements and refinements.
- “The graphics are amazing and the game offers a great alternate history.”
- “Great graphics, it feels like I have arrived in 1939, 1943.”
- “I am glad to say that this game has great graphics and a huge amount of fun.”
- “The graphics are odd and mess with my eyes; it takes a second to get used to.”
- “It's terrible graphics; the interface is garbage.”
- “The graphics are terrible and the game was obviously rushed.”
monetization
94 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
31%
57%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over the high costs of in-app purchases and the perceived necessity of microtransactions to progress effectively. While some appreciate the absence of intrusive ads, others report issues with ad rewards not functioning, which limits their ability to earn bonuses without spending money. Overall, players desire a balance between monetization and gameplay enjoyment, with some suggesting a one-time purchase option to eliminate ongoing microtransactions.
- “Been playing for a while now, and although it does get a bit grindy at times, especially if you don't use microtransactions and just do the daily invasion and tasks, it still is a pretty enjoyable game, and I found myself able to get to the modern stages without any direct spending.”
- “Although paying for in-app purchases is optional, it is a pretty solid game in campaign.”
- “Microtransactions but the whole game is free, highly recommended.”
- “It feels like its only purpose is monetization, and to draw out the game.”
- “Nothing but a cash grab.”
- “The problem in your game is in-app purchases that ruin the feeling in your game.”
grinding
43 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players consistently highlight that the game requires extensive grinding to progress, particularly for unit upgrades and generals, making it feel tedious and often frustrating. While some enjoy the challenge and find the game fun, many express that the grinding can be overwhelming, especially without spending real money, leading to a sense of imbalance and difficulty in later stages. Overall, the grinding aspect is a significant point of contention, with calls for adjustments to make progression more manageable.
- “The scenario likes to put you in a position that without grinding the game for unit upgrades or generals, the battles are almost never winnable.”
- “Generals take way too long to earn; even low-level bronze generals will take days of grinding just to get enough medals, and basically after mission 06, the game becomes unbeatable without generals.”
- “The only problem is that it is either endless grinding for better commanders or paying for them with real-life money.”
stability
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game has received mixed reviews, with many users reporting frequent bugs and glitches that hinder gameplay, such as freezing during videos and losing progress. While some players enjoy the game and find it well-designed, the recurring issues have made it unplayable for others, leading to frustration and requests for improvements. Overall, the game's stability is a significant concern for a large portion of the player base.
- “Since the newest update, anytime I try to watch a video to speed up or get daily rewards, it freezes after the video and I get no rewards.”
- “The only issue I have is a major problem where the game freezes on a screen that says 'unexpected issue' and only starts up when I uninstall and then reinstall.”
- “Idk if it's my device or the game that makes it so buggy, but it's unplayable at times.”
optimization
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
20%
30%
Overall, the game's optimization has received mixed reviews. While many players appreciate the smooth performance and constant updates, there are significant concerns regarding AI behavior and difficulty balance, particularly in certain missions. Additionally, some users have reported issues with compatibility on specific devices, affecting their ability to play.
- “After some further thought, I have given one more star due to the constant optimizations and patches.”
- “I love this game; it is pretty optimized and the game mechanics are also good, but I think you need to improve the 5th mission of the Axis. It's so hard, and please add General Student in the store.”
- “The scenario mode is amazing and the level of difficulty is optimized so that you have to really struggle and test different strategies to defeat the AI.”
- “Nothing to say except the AI... it's just horrible. Your allies earn less and spend more for less with low-quality performance. The AI in general, especially in mods where there are all front battles, only attacks without defending, leading to the loss of all their units. In the late game, they are completely ineffective, never creating defense lines or showing any intelligence. Sometimes they earn way more than you with fewer cities, so they spam constantly. Please, improve the AI to be better and more historically accurate, whether in campaign or conquest.”
- “No way, impossible, funny dream. It's absolutely hard to win as Japan in conquest. It's a very sad, good, mighty game, but the performance is terrible.”
- “I was not even able to play... it's not optimized for the Pixel 2 XL screen, so I can't even click 'exit' or 'next' in the bottom right corner.”
replayability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game offers nearly limitless replayability, with players enjoying its challenging nature and variety of gameplay options. However, some users express concerns about the pay-to-win elements, which can hinder free-to-play experiences. Suggestions for additional playable countries indicate a desire for even more content to enhance replay value.
- “What this game has in its favor is almost limitless replayability.”
- “Replayable and a challenge, highly recommend.”
- “Challenging game that's plenty of fun to play, plenty of replayability.”
- “One of the best war games I ever played; I only wish that the game was more playable for free-to-play users. You need so many medals, which can be bought with money, to unlock good generals, and it's hard to get them.”
- “If it were playable offline, I would give a 5.0 star review.”
- “Yea, the game is very good, but I have a suggestion: in the next update, could you add more playable countries like Mexico, Switzerland, etc.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews highlight that the game features a well-designed and humorous experience, though some players feel that the humor is overshadowed by the game's reliance on strong generals and monetary investment. Additionally, there are criticisms regarding the developers' perceived insincerity, particularly in their marketing choices. Overall, while the humor is appreciated, it is often seen as secondary to gameplay challenges.
- “Funny they use movie actors for their images.”
- “The game is really well designed and really funny.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's atmosphere is highly praised, with players appreciating the immersive experience of watching their territory expand as they conquer towns and advance in the game. This engaging environment enhances the overall enjoyment for fans of the genre.
- “The gaming atmosphere is very good.”
- “As a follower of EasyTech, I really enjoyed the overall atmosphere of the game and how you can see your territory moving as you advance, take towns, and more!”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's soundtrack is highly praised for its memorable quality, complementing the historically accurate graphics and overall immersive experience. Players appreciate how the music enhances the game's thematic elements, making it a standout feature.
- “This game is very historically accurate, its graphics are great, and its soundtrack is stuck in my mind. This game made me appreciate the impact of war.”
- “They are a very historical game, and their graphics and music are great.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is highlighted by users' appreciation for its wholesome elements, particularly noting the positive portrayal of characters like Keanu Reeves, which contributes to an uplifting and heartfelt experience.