European War 6: 1804 -Napoleon

About

European War 6: 1804 - Napoleon is a turn-based military strategy game that lets you build your own empire and become a legendary commander. With ingenious mechanics, fantastic visuals, and a focus on empire-building and warfare, it provides an immersive and challenging experience. However, it can be very grinding and may contain disruptive ads. The game allows you to create your own war legends and relive historical battles.

Genres & Tags

Strategy

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

European War 6: 1804 -Napoleon screenshot

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,599 reviews

graphics63 positive mentions

monetization18 negative mentions

The game offers a rich historical experience, allowing players to engage in significant battles and campaigns.
The graphics and gameplay mechanics have improved significantly compared to previous versions, making it visually appealing and engaging.
The game provides a challenging experience that encourages strategic thinking and planning.

The AI is often overpowered, making it difficult for players to win battles, especially in conquest mode.
There are issues with balance, as enemies can spawn units and resources at an unrealistic rate compared to the player.
The game can feel like a pay-to-win model, as players may need to spend money to acquire powerful generals and progress effectively.

graphics
95 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
66%
29%
4%
The graphics of the game have received widespread acclaim, with many users praising their quality, detail, and overall aesthetic appeal. While some players feel the new graphics are a significant improvement over previous versions, others express mixed feelings, citing issues with gameplay balance and difficulty. Overall, the visuals are highlighted as a standout feature, contributing positively to the gaming experience.
- “This game is amazing in terms of graphics and mechanics.”
- “The graphics are the best I have ever seen, the controls are easy to use and it offers amazing maps!”
- “Graphics are just phenomenal.”
- “I don't like the graphics, that's all.”
- “Game is far worse than its previous versions... graphics of the nations have been decreased and conquest mode is the worst part; you can never win whatever you do.”
- “The graphics are too bad; European War 4 is much better.”
gameplay
84 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
52%
43%
5%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many praising its mechanics, graphics, and historical content, while others criticize its difficulty and confusing mechanics. Players appreciate the depth and strategic elements introduced in the new update, but some find the AI overly challenging and the gameplay frustratingly imbalanced. Overall, while the game offers engaging features and improvements over its predecessors, it struggles with clarity and accessibility for new players.
- “The features are impressive as well, and I particularly enjoy the new additions; they add so much depth and excitement to the gameplay.”
- “I love the mechanics of the game; the textures are amazing, the detail is beyond stunning, and the campaign is great.”
- “Great gameplay and challenging decisions playing for the first time.”
- “There's a bunch of mechanics that are not sufficiently clear.”
- “The dice roll mechanic always fails to deal decent damage and enemy units seem to have almost infinite health.”
- “Gameplay is repetitive and quite boring.”
story
40 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
85%
8%
The story aspect of the game is generally well-received for its historical context and engaging characters, but players express frustration with the difficulty of missions and the lack of clear objectives. Many find the turn limits and overwhelming enemy forces to be significant barriers, making it challenging to progress through the campaign. While the narrative is appreciated, the gameplay mechanics often overshadow the story, leading to a sense of imbalance and confusion in mission goals.
- “Graphic and story are so good, but it is too difficult to play without purchases.”
- “Really enjoy the game, love the historic characters and missions and getting a general and upgrading him to be the best is the cherry on top.”
- “The campaign missions can take some time, but the game is pretty fun.”
- “Please, give us proper instructions on what is the actual goal of the campaign, not fancy story.”
- “Wots the story with the weak allies and strong enemies regardless of who the enemy or ally is? Sort this nonsense out!”
- “Conquest is insanely hard and the campaign gets impossible too after a few missions.”
monetization
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
15%
69%
The monetization strategy of the game has drawn mixed reviews, with many players labeling it a "cash grab" due to the heavy reliance on microtransactions and pay-to-win mechanics. While some appreciate the lack of forced ads and optional rewards, others express frustration over unactivated purchases and the feeling that gameplay is hindered by the need to spend money. Overall, the game's potential is overshadowed by its aggressive monetization approach, leading to disappointment among players who feel it detracts from the overall experience.
- “No ads, no forced in-app purchases.”
- “Fantastic one of the true strategy games for phones that isn't a Clash of Clans clone. Not buggy, not pay-to-win, no ads; it's what phone games should be.”
- “I do like the concept though, but the microtransactions are way too forced at this point.”
- “It's insulting because you have an excellent engine to make genuinely fun, pay once and done games, but you use it for cash grabs.”
- “I honestly preferred 4 more than 6; 5 was a weird take, but even though the graphics are great here, the pay-to-win is way higher. Unlike 4, where you could at least grind, this is just a cash grab where the game is great, but it feels like everyone is getting more buffed but you and your allies, especially in conquest mode.”
- “This game is rigged. No matter how powerful your units are, the enemy always spams them, and they are always more powerful. One of their militia troops had more health and damage than my elite cavalry. This is just a cash grab; it's a shame really, it would be a great game if not for greedy developers.”
grinding
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews indicate that grinding is a significant aspect of gameplay, particularly in the Conquest mode, where players often feel compelled to invest considerable time or money to progress effectively. While some players find the grind necessary for enjoyment and strategy, others express frustration over the repetitive nature and perceived lack of reward for their efforts. Overall, the consensus suggests that while grinding can enhance the experience for dedicated players, it may deter those seeking a more streamlined or casual gameplay experience.
- “Conquest is almost impossible to win without grinding for ages or paying for generals.”
- “The game is fun... after you buy all the 'training' upgrades and grind for generals.”
- “Grinding repeatedly and getting only 50 medals does not feel rewarding.”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
83%
The stability of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its design and gameplay while others report significant issues such as lag, bugs, and freezing, particularly during multiplayer sessions. Many users express hope for future updates to address these stability concerns, as the game is otherwise well-received. Overall, while some players enjoy a smooth experience, others find it largely unplayable due to technical problems.
- “Fantastic! One of the true strategy games for phones that isn't a Clash of Clans clone. It's not buggy, not pay-to-win, and has no ads. It's what phone games should be.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes or glitches, providing a stable experience that keeps me engaged.”
- “I appreciate how stable the game is; I can play for hours without any interruptions or performance issues.”
- “Laggy, buggy game; couldn't get past the first tutorial mission without it black screening on me and having to restart.”
- “The game is so laggy and buggy it is unplayable most of the time. I actually had 5 'not responding' notifications pop up on my phone.”
- “Love the game, but it's having glitches; it won't let me play now. Please fix the error.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The game is praised for its strong replayability, with players appreciating its thoughtful design and development. However, there are calls for more playable countries and improvements to the conquest mechanics to enhance the overall experience. Adjustments to AI difficulty are also suggested to make the game more accessible.
- “Fantastic game, really well thought out and developed, with great replayability.”
- “I hope they will improve the conquest and make it more playable and realistic.”
- “I'd also like more playable countries.”
- “I hope they will improve the conquest and make it more engaging and realistic.”
- “You should lower the AI buff to make it way more playable.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Users express frustration with the optimization of the conquest mode, citing an imbalance in enemy unit performance that makes completion challenging, even with top-tier generals. Additionally, there are complaints about issues with reward videos not appearing, which detracts from the overall experience, despite some players appreciating the game's balance and optimization in general.
- “I like the game because it's balanced and well optimized.”
- “The conquest mode is almost impossible to complete without a general. Even though I bought almost all the best generals, I still struggle. EasyTech should decrease the difficulty of the conquest mode since the performance of the enemy units is always better than your units, even though they are the exact same units.”
- “Why isn't the reward video coming up when I click to skip the challenge and take the five rewards? This new update has reduced the performance of the game.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
The atmosphere in the game has been criticized for lacking depth, with users noting that the music and sound design fail to create an immersive experience. Overall, many feel that the atmospheric elements are significantly underwhelming.
- “The atmosphere has been incredibly immersive and captivating.”
- “The game's environment creates a hauntingly beautiful atmosphere that draws you in.”
- “Every detail contributes to an atmosphere that feels alive and engaging.”
- “The atmosphere feels completely lacking, making the game feel empty.”
- “I was hoping for a rich atmosphere, but it ended up feeling flat and uninspired.”
- “The game's atmosphere is so dull that it fails to immerse you in the experience.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music and sound design in the game are generally considered lacking in atmosphere, failing to enhance the overall experience.
- “The music and sounds aren't very atmospheric.”
- “The in-game music is lacking.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Reviews on the humor aspect are mixed; some users find it hilarious, while others feel it falls flat and lacks win conditions. Overall, the humor may appeal to some but disappoints others.
- “Not funny, also not winnable.”