European War 6: 1804 -Napoleon

European War 6: 1804 - Napoleon is a turn-based military strategy game that lets you build your own empire and become a legendary commander. With ingenious mechanics, fantastic visuals, and a focus on empire-building and warfare, it provides an immersive and challenging experience. However, it can be very grinding and may contain disruptive ads. The game allows you to create your own war legends and relive historical battles.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Reviews

74%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,497 reviews

graphics63 positive mentions

monetization17 negative mentions

The graphics and overall design of the game are impressive, providing an engaging visual experience.
The game offers a challenging gameplay experience that requires strategic thinking and planning.
The historical context and variety of campaigns add depth and interest to the gameplay.

The difficulty spikes significantly after the initial chapters, making it frustrating for players to progress.
The AI is often overpowered, leading to unbalanced gameplay where players feel overwhelmed and unable to win.
The allies in conquest mode are often ineffective, leaving players to fend for themselves against stronger enemy forces.

graphics
92 mentions
68 % positive mentions
27 % neutral mentions
4 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have received widespread acclaim, with many users praising their quality, detail, and overall aesthetic appeal. Players appreciate the smooth animations and exceptional map designs, often stating that the graphics are a significant highlight of the game. However, some reviews note that while the graphics are impressive, they feel that gameplay mechanics and difficulty balancing could use improvement.
- “The graphics are the best I have ever seen, the controls are easy to use and it offers amazing maps!”
- “The graphics and new units are amazing, but the last straw occurred when I had an enemy militia unit completely encircled by line infantry, old guard grenadiers, and a mounted general unit.”
- “Graphics are just phenomenal.”
- “Graphics are too bad; European 4 is much better.”
- “Very bad graphics.”
- “It attacks my eyes; the graphics aren't that good. The way the game proceeds, I didn't like that the map is bizarre. Please change it; the screen moves in bizarre ways when you zoom in and out.”
gameplay
80 mentions
51 % positive mentions
44 % neutral mentions
5 % negative mentions
Gameplay reviews are mixed, with many praising the mechanics and graphics while criticizing the difficulty and AI balance. Players appreciate the depth and complexity of the gameplay but often find it frustrating due to confusing mechanics, steep difficulty spikes, and unhelpful allies. Overall, while the game has strong potential and enjoyable elements, many feel it could benefit from better balancing and clearer instructions.
- “This game is amazing in terms of graphics and mechanics.”
- “I love the mechanics of the game, the textures are amazing, the detail is beyond stunning, and the campaign is great.”
- “Great gameplay and challenging decisions playing for the first time.”
- “The dice roll mechanic always fails to deal decent damage and enemy units seem to have almost infinite health.”
- “Gameplay is repetitive and quite boring.”
- “Totally biased gameplay; it makes the game so difficult at one point that either you buy something from the store to proceed or remain stuck.”
story
40 mentions
8 % positive mentions
85 % neutral mentions
8 % negative mentions
The story aspect of the game is generally well-received for its historical context and engaging characters, but players express frustration with the difficulty of campaign missions, often feeling overwhelmed by enemy forces and limited by turn timers. Many users highlight the need for clearer objectives and better balance in mission design, as well as the desire for more opportunities to earn and upgrade generals without excessive reliance on in-game purchases. Overall, while the narrative elements are appreciated, the gameplay challenges detract from the overall experience.
- “Graphic and story are so good, but it is too difficult to play without purchases.”
- “Really enjoy the game, love the historic characters and missions and getting a general and upgrading him to be the best is the cherry on top.”
- “The campaign missions can take some time, but the game is pretty fun.”
- “The last mission of the Prussians is nearly impossible to beat.”
- “I strongly dislike having a specific time limit on missions.”
- “Good concept, but I'm stuck on an unbeatable mission.”
monetization
25 mentions
16 % positive mentions
16 % neutral mentions
68 % negative mentions
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the lack of forced ads and in-app purchases, while others criticize the prevalence of microtransactions and the feeling of being pressured to spend money to remain competitive. Many users express frustration over technical issues with ad rewards and the perception that the game has shifted towards a cash grab model, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, while some enjoy the gameplay without heavy monetization, others feel that the game increasingly prioritizes profit over player enjoyment.
- “No ads, no forced in-app purchases.”
- “Fantastic one of the true strategy games for phones that isn't a Clash of Clans clone; not buggy, not pay-to-win, no ads—it's what phone games should be.”
- “Too many in-game purchases, but I like the style.”
- “On at least 2 occasions I have made in-app purchases that have not activated.”
- “I honestly preferred 4 more than 6; 5 was a weird take, but even though the graphics are great here, the pay-to-win is way higher. Unlike 4, where you could at least grind, this feels like a cash grab. The game is great, but it feels like everyone is getting more buffed than you and your allies, especially in conquest mode.”
- “It's insulting because you have an excellent engine to make genuinely fun, pay-once-and-done games, but you use it for cash grabs.”
grinding
17 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
The reviews indicate that grinding is a significant aspect of the game, often necessary to progress, especially in modes like Conquest where players must farm resources and upgrade generals. While some players find the grind rewarding and manageable with strategy, others feel it can be excessively time-consuming and frustrating, particularly when facing challenging early-game difficulties or when competing against AI that appears to have advantages. Overall, while grinding is a common theme, opinions vary on its impact on the overall enjoyment of the game.
- “Conquest is almost impossible to win without grinding for ages or paying for generals.”
- “European War 6 is more fun than its predecessor and also superior in almost every aspect, but I feel that European War 6 is more grindy.”
- “Grinding repeatedly and getting only 50 medals does not feel rewarding.”
stability
5 mentions
60 % positive mentions
-40 % neutral mentions
80 % negative mentions
The stability of the game has received mixed reviews, with many users reporting significant lag, bugs, and freezing issues that hinder gameplay, particularly in multiplayer modes. While some players appreciate the game's design and concept, the frequent crashes and glitches have rendered it unplayable for others, indicating a need for urgent fixes.
- “Fantastic! One of the true strategy games for phones that isn't a Clash of Clans clone. It's not buggy, not pay-to-win, and has no ads. It's what phone games should be.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes or glitches, making for a seamless gaming experience.”
- “I appreciate how stable the game is; I can play for hours without any interruptions or performance issues.”
- “Laggy, buggy game; I couldn't get past the first tutorial mission without it black screening on me and having to restart.”
- “The game is so laggy and buggy that it is unplayable most of the time. I actually had 5 'not responding' notifications pop up on my phone.”
- “Love the game, but it's having glitches that won't let me play now. Please fix the errors.”
replayability
4 mentions
50 % positive mentions
-25 % neutral mentions
75 % negative mentions
Players appreciate the game's strong replayability due to its thoughtful design, though some express a desire for more playable countries and improvements to the conquest mechanics. Additionally, there are suggestions to adjust AI difficulty for a more balanced experience.
- “Fantastic game, really well thought out and developed with great replayability.”
- “I hope they will improve the conquest and make it more playable and realistic.”
- “I'd also like more playable countries.”
- “I hope they will improve the conquest and make it more engaging and realistic.”
- “You should lower the AI buff to make it way more playable.”
optimization
3 mentions
33 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
67 % negative mentions
Users express frustration with the optimization of the conquest mode, citing an imbalance in enemy unit performance that makes it nearly impossible to complete without a general. Additionally, there are complaints about issues with reward video functionality and a perceived decrease in overall game performance following a recent update, despite the game's previously praised balance and optimization.
- “I like the game because it's balanced and well optimized.”
- “The conquest mode is almost impossible to complete without a general. Even though I bought almost all the best generals, I still struggle. EasyTech should decrease the difficulty of the conquest mode since the performance of the enemy units is always better than your units, even though they are the exact same units.”
- “Why isn't the reward video coming up when I click to skip the challenge and take the five rewards? This new update has reduced the performance of the game.”
atmosphere
2 mentions
150 % positive mentions
-200 % neutral mentions
150 % negative mentions
The atmosphere in the game has been criticized for lacking depth, with users noting that the music and sound design fail to create an immersive experience. Overall, many feel that the atmospheric elements are significantly underwhelming.
- “The atmosphere has been incredibly immersive, drawing me into the game's world.”
- “The sound design and music create a hauntingly beautiful atmosphere that enhances the experience.”
- “Every detail contributes to an atmosphere that feels alive and engaging.”
- “The atmosphere feels completely lacking and fails to immerse the player.”
- “There is a noticeable absence of any engaging atmosphere, making the game feel flat.”
- “The overall ambiance is disappointing and does not contribute to the game's experience.”
music
2 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
The music and sound design in the game are generally considered lacking in atmosphere, failing to enhance the overall experience.
- “The music and sounds aren't very atmospheric.”
- “The in-game music is lacking.”
humor
2 mentions
50 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
50 % negative mentions
Reviews on the humor aspect are mixed; some users find the game amusing and entertaining, while others feel it lacks humor and is not enjoyable.
- “Not funny, also not winnable.”