Wizard of Legend 2

About

In Wizard of Legend 2, players embark on a new series of Trials of Legend in the Floating Lands, where they must master the elemental forces of Arcana to become a Wizard of Legend. The sequel features vibrant 3D visuals, fast-paced 2-player online co-op, and even more challenging rogue-lite elements. Return again and again to face ever-changing obstacles and prove your worth in this magical gauntlet.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Local Multi-Player Play with friends in the same physical space using split-screen or multiple screens
2-Players Play with one other player, either online or locally, in a cooperative or competitive game mode
Multi-Player Compete or cooperate with other players online
Co-Op Team up with friends to complete levels or missions together
Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo
Split Screen Play with multiple players on the same screen, often with divided or shared screen real estate

70%

Audience ScoreBased on 688 reviews

gameplay39 positive mentions

stability52 negative mentions

The game retains the core mechanics of the original Wizard of Legend while introducing new features and a fresh 3D art style.
The combat is fast-paced and satisfying, with a variety of spells and relics that encourage experimentation and different builds.
The addition of online and local co-op is a welcome feature, allowing for fun multiplayer experiences.

The game is currently buggy, with issues such as teleporters not working properly and inconsistent hit detection during boss fights.
There is a lack of content compared to the original game, with only a few biomes and a limited number of spells and relics available at launch.
The voice acting and dialogue can be repetitive and annoying, detracting from the overall experience.

gameplay
153 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
70%
5%
The gameplay of "Wizard of Legend 2" has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the fluid combat mechanics and spell interactions, while others criticize the lack of polish, content, and challenge compared to the original game. Although the game introduces new features and a vibrant art style, some players feel it has lost the unique charm and depth of its predecessor, leading to a gameplay experience that can feel bland or overly simplistic. Overall, while the foundation is solid and fun, significant improvements and content updates are needed to enhance the overall experience.
- “The gameplay is fun and feels quite smooth.”
- “Love the bosses, spells, and general gameplay.”
- “Gameplay is smooth as butter; graphics are beyond gorgeous and the pace is perfect for me personally.”
- “This just leaves a sour taste in my mouth given that the game is clearly not ready for 4-player gameplay.”
- “There isn't much gameplay to be had, and the gameplay that is there just isn't very polished quite yet.”
- “The gameplay feels a bit too easy, and the challenge that made the first game so engaging is missing.”
graphics
116 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
66%
3%
The graphics of "Wizard of Legend 2" have transitioned from the original's pixel art to a more vibrant 3D aesthetic, drawing comparisons to the art style of "Hades." While many players appreciate the new visuals and animations, some feel that the overhaul lacks the unique charm of the first game, leading to mixed feelings about the overall graphical experience. Overall, the game is praised for its polished visuals and dynamic environments, though some players express nostalgia for the original's simpler style.
- “The vibrant new aesthetic breathes life into the world of Lanova, making every encounter feel more dynamic and immersive.”
- “The art style is gorgeous, but that's all there is to it right now I feel.”
- “Amazing graphics, the action is all there, devs thanks a lot for the effort, the game looks amazing as it is, can't wait for the future updates.”
- “The graphics feel like a mess, and the main hub is too large.”
- “I can understand bugs, but right now the game lacks a spark that makes it unique - they've changed the art style from a very unique one in WOL 1 to a more generic style.”
- “It's lost pretty much all uniqueness and identity that made the first game as great as it was; they tried to make it a Hades clone which just made it feel like worse Hades and also worse WOL 1 at the same time.”
stability
53 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
98%
The game is widely reported to be extremely buggy and unstable, particularly in multiplayer modes, with issues such as lag, crashes, and unresponsive UI elements. While some players find the gameplay enjoyable and acknowledge the potential for improvement, many express frustration over the numerous glitches that detract from the overall experience. Overall, the game's current state reflects typical early access challenges, with significant room for enhancement before its full release.
- “Despite some minor issues, the game remains fully playable with no freezes or unexpected crashes, allowing for a truly enjoyable experience.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any interruptions, ensuring that players can immerse themselves in the fun without worrying about stability.”
- “I appreciate that the game is stable; there are no glitches or crashes, which makes for a seamless and enjoyable gaming experience.”
- “The game is a very buggy mess... the original game is much better.”
- “Multiplayer is fun but a lot of glitches; sometimes the game crashes when going into another world or the next part of the biome, and there's a lot of lag in terms of delayed hits and movement.”
- “Never seen a game so buggy; this is not early access, this is a literal alpha play test. Don't buy it until release; they are using us as testers for their buggy game.”
music
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
71%
13%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting that it lacks the charm and excitement of the original title's soundtrack. Several users reported significant audio issues, including music volume not responding to settings and a general lack of impactful sound design, which detracts from the overall experience. While some appreciate the sound design's potential, the consensus is that it falls short compared to its predecessor, leading to a less engaging atmosphere.
- “The fast-paced combo-based combat from the first title is totally present in this one, and the music and sound design remains stellar.”
- “The art, the music, and the gameplay were amazing.”
- “Other than that, the Hades-style art upgrade, monster diversity, and the sick soundtrack makes me very hopeful for the future of this game once it gets fully fleshed out and they start adding end game rewards like secret arcana like in the first game.”
- “The audio issues got worse for me when I reached the second biome, where it played the music at full blast despite setting the sound to 0.”
- “Almost non-existent sound feedback; everything feels so muted and drowned by the background music. There's just no audio impact to anything you do in this game.”
- “The soundtrack is lacking, the gameplay doesn't stand out from any other early access top-down roguelike, lacking the snappiness and crisp audio feedback of the original.”
story
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
62%
14%
The story in "Wizard of Legend 2" has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the expanded world-building and character depth compared to its predecessor, while others criticize it for being shallow and filled with tropes. Many feel that the narrative lacks the depth of other games like "Hades," and some players express a preference for the original game's focus on gameplay over story. Overall, while there are attempts to enhance the storytelling, opinions vary on its effectiveness and relevance to the core experience.
- “Wizard of Legend 2 elevates the magic-filled chaos of its predecessor to new heights, bringing a blend of refined combat, strategic spellcraft, and a richer story-driven experience.”
- “In addition to improved mechanics, the story and world-building have also been expanded.”
- “Players will meet a diverse cast of characters, each with their own motivations and backstory, making the world feel more alive than ever before.”
- “Limited number of spells and pretty terrible acting/story that is just a handful of tropes.”
- “I didn't like how there was such a dramatic shift in the demo where it seemed like the game had shifted to a story-based game, but after playing the game it seems like they hedged a lot of, in my opinion, unnecessary dialogue.”
- “I couldn't care for the story.”
optimization
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
50%
30%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players experiencing significant performance issues, particularly on high-end systems and the Steam Deck, while others report stable gameplay with minor stuttering. Many users express hope for future updates to improve optimization and quality of life features, indicating that the current state may hinder the overall enjoyment of the game.
- “With all that said, posting the performance on the Steam Deck needs to be a priority.”
- “I don't have much to complain about, probably just a bit of optimization on Steam Deck.”
- “I want to love it, but the optimization is bad. The game barely holds together and runs my 4080 so hard that my monitors scramble trying to open it.”
- “The performances feel unnatural and do little to enhance the world or characters.”
- “I do think this game can be great and I hope to change this review later, but as it is now I just can't recommend you buy this and risk it just not working. I'll 100% buy this game back if it gets optimized and fixed up a bit though.”
humor
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players finding the dialogue and various mechanics amusing, particularly in multiplayer scenarios where dying can lead to laughter. However, some frustrations arise from gameplay mechanics that can disrupt the fun, such as allies unintentionally hindering combos, which can detract from the overall experience.
- “Funny magic game”
- “Dodge feels fluid and everything from spikes to pitfalls are still hilarious to get stuck on.”
- “Lots to unlock and the dialogue is funny.”
replayability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
Players highlight the game's strong replayability due to a variety of combos, new arcana abilities, and upgraded relics that ensure each run feels unique. Additional challenges and new systems further enhance the experience, encouraging experimentation and making the game enjoyable to revisit. Overall, the replay value is consistently praised, reminiscent of the original game's appeal.
- “Additional challenges that are basically stat checkers that give gems are incredibly nice and help replayability.”
- “The introduction of new arcana abilities and upgraded relics means that no two runs feel the same, encouraging experimentation and replayability.”
- “New systems have been added that change the way the game plays, offering more replayability.”
- “Looking forward to getting quick and easy groups in the future to enhance replay value.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the emotional depth of the game, particularly through its wholesome side characters and engaging voice acting. However, some find the interruptions during gameplay to be distracting, especially if the game is left unattended for too long. Overall, the emotional elements contribute positively to the fun and immersive experience.
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized as a cash grab, with users highlighting the discrepancy between advertised features, such as 4-player multiplayer, and the actual limited offering of only 2-player multiplayer. This has led to dissatisfaction regarding the game's unfinished state and misleading marketing.
- “This is a cash grab, plain and simple.”
- “Me when I release an unfinished game advertising stuff we don't have.”
- “Currently only has two-player multiplayer despite advertising 4-player in the advertisement.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players note that the game involves significant grinding, typical of the roguelike genre, where losses often outweigh wins. While some find the grind repetitive, many appreciate the mindless fun of battling enemies, making it an enjoyable experience despite its grindy nature.
- “This is a grinding game, so be ready to lose a lot more than you win, but that's the quality of a good roguelike game.”
- “While it's a bit grindy and repetitive, it's insanely fun to just shut your mind off and beat the crap out of baddies for a while.”
character development
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
50%
Reviewers note an improvement in character design artwork and express appreciation for the character designs and voice acting, though some feel that these enhancements do not necessarily elevate the game's overall quality compared to its predecessor.
- “I'm really enjoying the character designs and voice acting.”
- “The artwork for character designs has improved significantly.”
- “I will say the artwork for character designs has improved significantly, but I wouldn't credit that to the game being better than the first.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The atmosphere of the game has been criticized for lacking the charm of its predecessor, with comparisons to Skylanders and Wizard 101. Reviewers noted that the limited and repetitive voice lines during combat detract from the overall experience, making it feel more annoying than immersive.
- “The voice lines during combat and after room clears are very limited and not really engaging; they feel more like a nuisance than an enhancement to the atmosphere. They're overdone, not unwelcome.”