Warhammer Age of Sigmar: Soul Arena

About

Soul Arena is a round-based multiplayer strategy game that takes place in Games Workshop's amazing Age of Sigmar universe. Players choose from a diverse and powerful range of captains available and then take turns facing off against each other on the battlefield.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Warhammer Age of Sigmar: Soul Arena screenshot

53%

Audience ScoreBased on 142 reviews

graphics7 positive mentions

stability7 negative mentions

The game is free to play and offers a fun, casual auto battler experience, making it accessible to a wide audience.
Graphics and animations are enjoyable, with a lighthearted art style that some players find refreshing compared to traditional Warhammer aesthetics.
Matchmaking is quick, and the gameplay is straightforward, making it easy for newcomers to jump in and start playing.

The game suffers from significant balance issues, with many players feeling that it is pay-to-win due to locked captains and the shard system that favors experienced players.
There are numerous bugs and glitches that disrupt gameplay, including issues with the shop not functioning properly during matches.
The game lacks depth and variety, with limited unit options and strategies, making it feel repetitive and less engaging compared to other auto battlers.

graphics
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
55%
14%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the lighthearted and humorous art style, while others criticize it for being inconsistent with the grimdark Warhammer aesthetic. Many note that the visuals appear outdated, particularly on larger screens, and some feel that the game's mobile origins contribute to its lackluster graphical quality. Overall, while some enjoy the graphics, others find them disappointing and not fitting for the Warhammer universe.
- “Great graphics and a sweet Warhammer setting.”
- “I play on the highest graphical settings and I think that the visuals are good.”
- “The game is great with good gameplay, details, lore, graphically, strategic and challenging!”
- “UI and unit graphics are also confusing.”
- “Awful cutesy art style that doesn't fit Warhammer at all.”
- “Unfortunately, this game is just a mobile cash grab; the graphics and the UI are terrible, and the game has no depth to it.”
gameplay
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
50%
15%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some praising its fun and strategic elements, while others criticize it for being a derivative autobattler lacking originality and plagued by clunky mechanics. Many players find the grind-to-win aspect frustrating, and the overall experience is marred by bugs and poor pacing. Despite these issues, there is potential for improvement, as the core gameplay is considered enjoyable by some.
- “Very good gameplay.”
- “I was willing to forgive that for a while because we have a lack of AOS games, and to be fair, the actual gameplay is fun.”
- “The game is great with good gameplay, details, lore, graphics, strategic elements, and challenging aspects!”
- “The gameplay is another copy of the autobattler without any originality or twist on it.”
- “This is a pretty terrible mechanic, as it fundamentally makes the game unfair.”
- “Buggy and clunky mess gameplay-wise, predatory bad mobile game monetization-wise.”
stability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is characterized by frequent bugs and clunky gameplay, with issues such as missing indicators and visual clutter during battles. While these bugs can detract from the experience, they are generally not game-breaking, allowing for some enjoyment in the strategic elements. However, the overall impression leans towards a frustrating experience due to the combination of technical issues and aggressive monetization practices.
- “It is pay to win, it is buggy as hell (having double artifacts actually leaves you dealing just basic or null damage to your opponent), you have no indicator for upgrading level 2 units, no indicator for your income, etc. The sound effects and comments are terrible, you can't read the messy board in battle, and you have to pay for content because there is really no way to grind properly.”
- “A buggy mobile mess.”
- “Buggy and clunky mess gameplay-wise, predatory bad mobile game monetization-wise.”
humor
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as inconsistent, with lighthearted art and character voices that clash with the grimdark Warhammer setting, potentially alienating dedicated fans. While some players find the animations and diverse characters amusing, others criticize the humor as forced and the sound effects as poor. Overall, the comedic elements may appeal to casual players looking for a lighthearted experience, but they may not resonate with those expecting a more serious tone.
- “The art style that this game uses is lighthearted and humorous, which clashes with the grimdark setting of Warhammer: Age of Sigmar and it could be a turnoff to die-hard AOS fans.”
- “Thanks Trophy Games for the funny game!”
- “Captains make 'funny' jokes during combat, everyone has a higher pitched voice than they should (even chaos demons) and the battlefield looks like it's taken from My Little Pony.”
grinding
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of the game is described as punishing for new characters, but players find value in the battle pass, which can yield enough gems for multiple characters through daily grinding. While the game is slow and grindy, it remains enjoyable and fun, especially when played with friends, despite some concerns about potential pay-to-win elements. Overall, the grind is seen as a manageable part of the experience rather than a major drawback.
- “The grind is rather punishing for new characters, but the battle pass is good value and if completed can get you 1 character with the gems. I reckon with daily grinding, by the time the battle pass is complete, I will have earned enough gems for two characters.”
- “This is a slow, grindy type of battler.”
- “There are sneaky grindy pay-to-play elements that mobile games have.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
67%
The monetization in the game is generally viewed positively, as it is not pay-to-win and offers a good variety of units. However, some users express concerns about the game's abandonment by its creators, labeling it a "cash grab." Despite this, there are microtransactions that can enhance winning chances, which some players appreciate.
- “The unit variety itself is pretty good, and surprisingly, the game isn't pay-to-win; the monetization is well-implemented.”
- “Thank goodness the microtransactions that increase your chances to win are balanced.”
- “A dead cash grab that has been abandoned by the creators.”
- “Thank god for microtransactions that increase your chances of winning.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is criticized for lacking a substantial campaign or storyline, which detracts from the rich lore of the Warhammer universe. Players express disappointment over the repetitive daily quests that offer minimal rewards, further emphasizing the absence of a compelling narrative.
- “Warhammer has a lot of lore that I absolutely love to dive into, but this game lacks a campaign or storyline, which doesn't quite fit the feel of what Warhammer truly is.”
- “There's no campaign or storyline!”
- “The game has 3 quests you do each day for your dailies; they are always the exact same, with always the exact same very small bonus.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is generally considered average, lacking standout qualities or memorable elements.
- “The music is alright, nothing extra.”