Post Scriptum

About

The Post Scriptum SDK is a collection of modding tools used to create community-driven modifications. The Post Scriptum SDK is a restricted version of the Unreal Engine 4 Editor that our modding community can use to create their own modifications for Post Scriptum. Mods created with our modding SDK can be uploaded to the Steam Workshop and played within Post Scriptum. Post Scriptum is a first-…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

81%

Audience ScoreBased on 9,067 reviews

gameplay412 positive mentions

optimization193 negative mentions

gameplay
1,186 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
60%
6%
The gameplay of "Post Scriptum" is heavily focused on squad-based tactics and teamwork, reminiscent of "Squad" but set in a WWII context. Players appreciate the realistic mechanics, immersive sound design, and the need for effective communication, although many note a steep learning curve and occasional clunky mechanics. While the game offers intense and rewarding experiences, it suffers from optimization issues and a dwindling player base, which can hinder the overall gameplay experience.
- “The main gameplay is based around squad-level communication and cohesive teamwork.”
- “Although the development and content updates may not be on par with the pace and magnitude of an AAA title, the core gameplay mechanics and immersive atmosphere alone leave others in the dust.”
- “If you enjoy intense and immersive gameplay with high attention paid to historical accuracy, then this is the game for you.”
- “The gameplay is incredibly boring and generic, and that's in the end what it's all about.”
- “The mechanics are so much better than Hell Let Loose, but the gameplay is just too slow and tedious.”
- “The gameplay is painfully clunky, and the stamina system is not enjoyable.”
graphics
776 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
42%
48%
10%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the stunning visuals, detailed environments, and realistic effects that enhance immersion. However, some users criticize the graphics for being outdated or poorly optimized, leading to performance issues and visibility problems, especially when compared to competitors like "Hell Let Loose." Overall, while the graphics can be impressive, they may require a powerful PC to run smoothly, and there are ongoing concerns about optimization and graphical glitches.
- “The game's graphics are stunning, with detailed terrain and weather effects that create a realistic and immersive environment.”
- “The graphics are beautiful if your rig can handle it, the game has gotten so much better from when it initially released.”
- “The graphics are incredible, I'll never forget my first match of this game where my squad leader was telling me to refresh the rally and an artillery shell hit him causing his leg to fly off and hit me in the face.”
- “The graphics are frankly rubbish for this day and age.”
- “The graphics look like something from 2008, and everything is set to high.”
- “The graphics, even maxed out, are reminiscent of a bad fan-made mod rather than a fully released game and the gameplay feels tired and sluggish.”
optimization
735 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
61%
26%
The optimization of the game has received significant criticism, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including low frame rates and stuttering, even on high-end systems. While some updates have improved performance, many users still find it unplayable or frustratingly laggy, particularly on larger maps or during intense gameplay. Overall, the game is seen as needing substantial optimization work to enhance the experience for a broader range of hardware configurations.
- “The performance of the game can be an issue for people.”
- “Despite the age of the game, performance isn't well optimized.”
- “The game has come very far in terms of graphics and optimization.”
- “Last engine upgrade 4.27 massively affected performance for most people and the networking side of the game that was once excellent (barely any desync at 300 ping, good hit registration).”
- “Can't even get the game to run, it's an unoptimized, buggy mess.”
- “The game is very poorly optimized, such that even if your system exceeds the recommended specifications you may experience constant stuttering which essentially makes it impossible to play, at least at a level at which you can compete effectively with other players.”
stability
218 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
96%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous reports of frequent crashes, freezes, and performance issues, particularly during multiplayer sessions. Many players describe it as a "buggy mess," highlighting graphical glitches, sound problems, and unoptimized gameplay that detracts from the overall experience. While some users note improvements over time, the consensus is that the game remains unstable and requires significant fixes before it can be fully recommended.
- “This game runs so much better; besides one or two maps, some occasional RAM spikes which occur during tank blasts, it runs great.”
- “Even though bugs do appear, I have only had very few instances where I was really frustrated, and I can usually play bug-free for hours on end.”
- “Runs great now with the optimization tweaks and the new gore is great.”
- “Can't even get the game to run; it's an unoptimized, buggy mess.”
- “The game is a very buggy product where there is no texture showing on vehicles or the ground itself.”
- “This game is an infuriatingly buggy mess.”
atmosphere
94 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
70%
27%
3%
The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its immersive and realistic depiction of World War II, enhanced by stunning graphics and exceptional sound design. Players report feeling a deep sense of tension and authenticity during gameplay, with many describing it as a visceral experience that evokes the chaos and horror of war. Despite some minor bugs and development issues, the overall atmosphere is considered one of the game's standout features, making it a compelling choice for fans of tactical shooters.
- “The atmosphere is incredible; gorgeous graphics, brilliant map design, and some of the best sound effects I've ever heard in a game.”
- “Easily one of the most immersive, atmospheric, rewarding, and enjoyable FPS experiences out there.”
- “The sound design and atmosphere created in Post Scriptum is second to none.”
- “The atmosphere in the game creates a realistic feeling of terror in warfare along with a very good soundscape.”
- “The concept is realistic but because the graphics and interface are outdated and buggy, I question how much more realistic this is than Battlefield or Insurgency where the graphics and atmosphere really do a much better job of immersing me in the experience.”
- “This game is not polished and has some rough edges, but the atmosphere the devs put you in is unexplainable.”
story
79 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
82%
8%
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of a traditional narrative, with many users noting that it features no story or a minimal one, primarily focusing on team-based gameplay and authentic military missions. While some players appreciate the realistic WWII setting and the potential for emergent storytelling through cooperative play, others express disappointment over the absence of a structured storyline or single-player content. Overall, the experience is described more as a series of tactical missions rather than a cohesive narrative.
- “This is not about k/d ratio, it's about playing together, achieving some epic war stories with your mates!”
- “For now, it's the best and most realistic WWII FPS, with a story based on Operation Market Garden.”
- “Post Scriptum is a war story generator.”
- “This is my story: Seriously, look at the emotion this trailer generates with the allied and axis soldier, giving you the idea there's a possible single player story (there is no single player or story at the time this review was written).”
- “At its worst, you'll find yourself walking for minutes only to be killed by something you didn't see while your squad farts around on their own rambo missions, dealing with a mess of communication.”
- “Game should be cancelled and brought onto a new engine or something because this is a never-ending story.”
humor
55 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
98%
5%
The humor in the game is a standout feature, with players frequently sharing hilarious moments and engaging in comedic roleplay, often stemming from unexpected in-game events and interactions. The community is described as friendly and funny, contributing to a lighthearted atmosphere despite the game's serious World War II setting. While some bugs can be frustrating, many players find them amusing, adding to the overall enjoyment and memorable experiences within the game.
- “The communication that is required between teammates leads to wholesome hilarious moments.”
- “During that same match, a guy who was playing his first match got lost and wounded in a field near one of the crates, some of us went full 'Saving Private Ryan' to save him because 'no man left behind' while laughing our asses off because of the obvious suicide mission.”
- “Yes, the game is a bit buggy, but all the bugs I've seen yet are funny ones and shouldn't be ones that you get salty over.”
- “Mostly they yell out bad information and bad ideas, and they often make jokes that just aren't funny.”
- “The humor falls flat, with attempts at jokes that feel forced and unoriginal.”
- “I found the comedic elements to be cringeworthy, lacking any real wit or cleverness.”
music
52 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
56%
6%
The music in the game has received widespread acclaim for its quality and emotional depth, with many players praising the soundtrack as a standout feature that enhances the overall experience. The compositions are noted for their fitting somber tone, reminiscent of iconic war soundtracks like that of "Band of Brothers." While some players express frustration over the accessibility of the soundtrack outside the game, the general consensus is that the music significantly contributes to the game's immersive atmosphere.
- “The game is visually appealing, the audio is excellent, it has fitting music, and an active player base that actually cares about teamwork.”
- “The absolute best part about it is the music!”
- “You can see the development took some time making the music, composing each piece with regards to the setting of the game; most music is slow, calm, and sad, the exact music needed for a good war game.”
- “It's like one of those songs that doesn't sound too bad, but it never goes anywhere, the beat never drops and it just burns out.”
- “The soundtrack in this game by Scott Tobin is on par with the Band of Brothers soundtrack by Michael Kamen & the London Metropolitan Orchestra.”
- “That soundtrack has not been provided as separate music files and can only be played via the game menu.”
grinding
45 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
24%
67%
The reviews highlight a mixed perspective on grinding in the game, with some players appreciating the absence of traditional grinding mechanics, allowing for immediate gameplay without the need to unlock units or weapons. However, many also express frustration with tedious gameplay elements, such as map design and team coordination, which can lead to a slow and frustrating experience. Overall, while some enjoy the lack of grinding, others find the gameplay itself can be grindy and tedious at times.
- “I don't play many FPS games, but this one I would recommend due to the realistic gameplay (despite the wonky physics sometimes). No level system, no pay-to-win features; everything the game has to offer is ready to be used, so no grinding out units or weapons either. You play, die, then move on to the next game—no money, no rewards, no experience, no levels, no grinding, just pure gameplay.”
- “Great overall FPS sim, no training wheels, no grinding, just tactics.”
- “No grinding or microtransactions at all.”
- “Public matches are a meta grindfest and the developers struggle to fix long-lasting issues like spawning, capping objectives, spawn farming, suppression, and the absolute broken crapfest they sell as 'tanking'.”
- “The love for the immersion and other great additions are severely overshadowed by the game's failings, particularly its tediousness.”
- “It's slow, it's tedious, it's tiring, so it's realistic... but, this is a game.”
replayability
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
41%
45%
14%
The game's replayability is a mixed bag among users; while some praise its infinite replay value and engaging gameplay, others feel it lacks long-term appeal and can become repetitive quickly. Many highlight the variety in classes and maps as contributing factors to replayability, but concerns about server availability and content depth persist. Overall, the game shows potential for replayability, especially with future updates, but currently leaves some players wanting more.
- “Genuine replay value as every engagement feels different.”
- “It's got way more replayability and content than most $60 triple-A games, and the devs actually care about their game more than just the money.”
- “Its 30 dollars for a game with infinite replayability.”
- “However, that is not enough for me; I find it lacking in replayability.”
- “Lacking a bit of content and replayability at the moment, but my love for the WW2 theme cancels that out.”
- “Maybe in a few months, the game will be more playable.”
monetization
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
26%
58%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some users expressing concern over potential future microtransactions following Tencent's acquisition, while others appreciate the absence of microtransactions and premium accounts that could create an unfair advantage. Many players emphasize the need for better advertising and community engagement to boost player counts, suggesting that the game deserves more attention despite its current challenges. Overall, the sentiment leans towards a desire for genuine support and updates from the developers rather than a focus on cash-grabbing tactics.
- “Though the game does have a bit of a learning curve, there are no microtransactions or premium accounts to give players an unfair edge.”
- “That being said, I'm happy that realistic games built for a loyal community are thriving to combat the rising trend of microtransactions and games-as-a-service.”
- “As sad as it is to have to say it; there are no microtransactions, buy the game and you have it and all new content included.”
- “Bought by Tencent, and now microtransactions are planned.”
- “Dev team abandoned the game and Offworld has plans for future monetization just like Hell Let Loose; stay away.”
- “Given that this company keeps making new games on the same engine in different time periods, I'm guessing they are just cash grabbing on an engine and can't be bothered to support their product.”
emotional
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game emotionally impactful, with its wholesome community and immersive graphics enhancing the experience. Moments of intense gameplay, such as healing teammates only to witness their sudden demise, evoke strong feelings, while engaging in team strategies fosters a sense of camaraderie. Overall, the game elicits a range of emotions, from joy to heartbreak, making it a memorable experience for many.
- “It's so emotionally provocative with the graphics and overall design, very simple but so nice!”
- “I got PTSD from this game; 10/10 would cry again.”
- “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”