Skip to main content

Unity of Command 2

Wargames don't see a lot of innovation, but Unity of Command 2 builds new things out of familiar parts.
Unity of Command 2 Game Cover
82%Game Brain Score
Most mentioned positive aspects:gameplay, story
Most mentioned negative aspects:grinding, optimization
80% User Score Based on 1,242 reviews
Critic Score 91%Based on 2 reviews

Platforms

LinuxPCMac OSSteam DeckWindows
Unity of Command 2 Game Cover

About Unity of Command 2

Unity of Command 2 is a single player and multiplayer tactical turn-based strategy game with warfare and historical themes. It was developed by 2x2 Games and was released on November 11, 2019. It received very positive reviews from critics and mostly positive reviews from players.

Unity of Command II is the sequel to one of the most critically acclaimed strategy games of all time; a game critics called 'the perfect gateway' into computer war games.

Skip Games Like Unity of Command 2

Games Like Unity of Command 2

Looking for games like Unity of Command 2? Here are top tactical turn-based strategy recommendations with a warfare and historical focus, selected from player-similarity data — start with Unity of Command, Order of Battle: World War II or Panzer Corps.

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

80%Audience ScoreBased on 1,242 reviews
gameplay60 positive mentions
grinding14 negative mentions

  • Engaging turn-based World War II strategy game with a strong focus on supply lines and logistics.
  • Clean and intuitive UI with clear visuals and well-designed maps.
  • Multiple difficulty settings and campaign paths that provide replayability and challenge for players of various skill levels.
  • Lack of a proper in-game save system, leading to frustration during repeated attempts.
  • Steep learning curve with tutorials and tooltips that are sometimes insufficient, requiring external resources to understand all mechanics.
  • Turn limits on missions can feel restrictive and encourage puzzle-like gameplay rather than open strategy, which may frustrate some players.
  • gameplay

    281 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    21% positive mentions, 77% neutral mentions, 2% negative mentions

    The gameplay in Unity of Command II is praised for its deep, engaging turn-based strategy that emphasizes supply lines, logistics, and HQ mechanics, offering a satisfying mix of historical authenticity and tactical challenge. However, many players find the mechanics initially complex, with tutorials and in-game explanations often insufficient, requiring additional research to fully grasp, which can hinder accessibility for casual players. Once mastered, the well-integrated systems and scenario design provide a rewarding experience that balances strategic depth with streamlined, clean mechanics.

    • “Unity of Command II is a deep, engaging, and brilliantly executed turn-based strategy game that builds on the strengths of its predecessor while introducing a host of new mechanics and systems that elevate the entire experience.”
    • “The core gameplay loop revolves around commanding corps and divisions across a series of historical and hypothetical scenarios, managing not only combat but also logistics, supply lines, reinforcements, and fog of war.”
    • “The game has quite a few systems that it uses such as supply, troop quality, unit attachments, weather, etc., but they all operate very well together and it takes you only a few scenarios before you not only understand them but work them into your gameplay.”
    • “The game has a strong concept and is well implemented overall, but some mechanics, especially the unit logistics system and limited map interaction, are overly complex and can feel prohibitive for regular players.”
    • “It's also a very difficult game that requires a lot of attention to detail, even once you figure out the mechanics, of the sort that to many will feel more like work than play.”
    • “While they've managed to retain the feel of the first game, they've added a few more layers of depth around the core gameplay. On top of this they have taken latent supply and turned it into a vital mechanic - the player will have to manually create and move their supply dumps intelligently so as to ensure that the most important areas on the map are well-supplied and an attack doesn't stall.”
  • story

    172 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    9% positive mentions, 88% neutral mentions, 3% negative mentions

    The game's story is presented through structured campaigns with clear objectives, but it lacks dynamic narrative and in-game cutscenes, relying mostly on text. Missions feel more like tightly timed puzzles with limited strategic freedom, where success depends on precise planning and minimizing losses, as unit conditions carry over between missions. While some find this challenging and immersive, many criticize the rigid design, opaque mechanics, punishing restart requirements, and lack of narrative depth or player choice in how the story unfolds.

    • “Each mission in the campaign has clear objectives and bonus objectives, such as HQ command operation point bonus and prestige point bonus to buy steps or specialists for units.”
    • “Units gain experience as they progress from mission to mission, unlocking new abilities such as bridge building and river crossings, adding depth to the campaign progression.”
    • “Most missions are thought-provoking and challenging, offering satisfying gameplay where completing a mission on normal difficulty remains tough yet rewarding.”
    • “There is no room for improvising, for trying something different, for making mistakes and learning from them without restarting the mission.”
    • “In order to succeed a mission, even including the so-called training missions, you have to play again and again and again in order to work out the one and only game plan for success!”
    • “Perfect example is Norway in Blitzkrieg, both missions have only one path, with no real choice and you have to have all random number rolls go your way or you lose.”
  • graphics

    135 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    47% positive mentions, 50% neutral mentions, 3% negative mentions

    The graphics receive mixed but generally positive feedback, praised for their clean, aesthetically pleasing, and functional style that enhances gameplay and immersion despite a somewhat cartoony or simple look. While some find the visuals a standout feature that elevates the game above typical wargames, others feel the style can detract from readability or appear dated, yet overall the graphics effectively support the strategic depth and historical theme.

    • “The new features in the game include HQs, a more complex supply system with more player control and customization, improved graphics and display, and much more complex and elegantly constructed maps.”
    • “The graphics and aesthetics are very nice for a wargame, and the UI is highly functional and informative.”
    • “Combine this with the most beautiful graphics in a wargame, you have the recipe of the best wargame in the market.”
    • “The UI and graphics are also quite bad.”
    • “Has a ton of different theatres including the Pacific, but poor graphics and UI.”
    • “The new graphics, pretty as they are, just don't have even close to the readability that the old game had.”
  • replayability

    42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    52% positive mentions, 41% neutral mentions, 7% negative mentions

    Replayability is generally praised due to numerous scenarios, branching campaign paths, alternate historical and "what if" routes, and various difficulty levels that keep each playthrough fresh. Additional content like DLCs, unit customization, and performance-based progression further enhance replay value. However, some note limitations such as linear campaigns, turn limits, or a lack of depth that reduce replayability for certain players.

    • “Numerous alternative history scenarios make for great replayability.”
    • “The game features alternate routes through the campaign if you do very well with bonus objectives, allowing you to experience planned WWII operations that were never deployed as well as fully ahistorical scenarios, adding replay value beyond the various difficulty levels.”
    • “This performance-based progression adds a great deal of replayability and keeps players engaged in perfecting their strategy, not just surviving the scenario.”
    • “Frustrating lack of options, hard limitations, zero replayability, and laughable amount of content (not counting paid DLCs) brings it to the level of a mobile game and not a great one.”
    • “As such, there is almost zero replayability or, in my case, any incentive to keep playing past the few hours I've invested in it.”
    • “Okay if you are into that sort of thing, but disappointing if you actually wanted something with some strategy, depth, or replay value.”
  • music

    30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    43% positive mentions, 47% neutral mentions, 10% negative mentions

    The music in the game is generally praised for being atmospheric, high-quality, and fitting the historic setting, with several reviewers noting it as a standout feature compared to genre peers. While some desire more variety or find it occasionally loud or dramatic, the soundtrack by Bruno Brabić is highlighted as exceptional and enhancing the overall experience. However, a few find the music less memorable or merely serviceable, with some players turning it off despite its quality.

    • “I should mention the sound design as well - the soundtrack by Bruno Brabić is one of the best in the genre and leagues ahead of contemporaries like Panzer Corps 2 and Steel Division 2.”
    • “Great music and atmosphere, it really takes you back in time.”
    • “This strategic wargame truly looks, plays and feels amazing in every way, and the musical soundtrack (not forgetting overall sounds) are of top notch quality too (although at times they can be pretty loud especially when using headphones)!”
    • “Overly complex, slow loading, useless sound effects, music that must have been added just to add the no music option.”
    • “The sound and music are generally inferior to the first game.”
    • “The graphics are great and the simulations are cool, but I wish there were more battle/background music.”
  • grinding

    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    7% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 93% negative mentions

    Grinding in the game is widely viewed as tedious and frustrating, marked by repetitive scenario retries and slow progression due to trial-and-error puzzle-like gameplay. Poor UI and cumbersome supply management exacerbate the drudgery, making the experience feel more like a chore than strategic warfare. While some appreciate its immersion and storytelling, the excessive micromanagement and unclear mechanics contribute to a grind-heavy playstyle.

    • “You will coast through some scenarios, then you'll get to one that you'll have to replay (and replay) until you can win it (assuming you can) -- it just gets tedious at that point, as you cannot progress in the campaign until you win.”
    • “This game has nothing to do with real tactics or strategy, each scenario is a puzzle that you must solve through tedious trial and error, and the AI is designed to stop you from reaching the objectives in time, not actually fight a war with a view to preserving their strength or salvage their defensive positions.”
    • “More importantly, the handling of your army is made overly tedious by the UI.”
  • optimization

    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    25% positive mentions, 37% neutral mentions, 38% negative mentions

    Optimization is mixed, with some improvements in CPU turn speed enhancing gameplay flow, but issues remain such as high GPU usage, poorly optimized shadows and shaders, occasional crashes, and save file corruption. These performance inconsistencies affect the overall experience despite the engaging, performance-based campaign structure.

    • “This performance-based progression adds a great deal of replayability and keeps players engaged in perfecting their strategy, not just surviving the scenario.”
    • “Campaign is well paced and there are alternate scenarios depending on your performance (e.g., rush for the Apennines in Italy).”
    • “Uses tons of GPU; shadows and shaders are poorly optimized.”
    • “Then I also had some mediocre performance, a few crashes, but the worst was when my save file corrupted at the very end of the invasion of Italy.”
    • “I think the performance has increased a bit; the CPU takes its turns very fast.”
  • atmosphere

    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    83% positive mentions, 17% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The game's atmosphere is highly praised for its strong, evocative music and sound design that effectively immerse players. While the visuals are clear and functional, some users feel the atmosphere could be enhanced with dynamic weather effects and additional environmental details. Overall, the audio elements stand out as a key strength in creating a compelling ambiance.

    • “Even the music, though simple, is strong and atmospheric.”
    • “I usually turn music off in wargames but the atmospheric soundtrack of uofc is an exception too.”
    • “Great music and atmosphere, it really takes you back in time.”
  • stability

    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    60% positive mentions, 20% neutral mentions, 20% negative mentions

    The game is generally stable and free of major bugs or crashes, providing a smooth and reliable experience. While minor issues like incomplete tutorials and some gameplay inconsistencies exist, overall the game functions well and feels polished beyond typical beta quality.

    • “No glitches or other issues seen in almost 30 hours of play.”
    • “No CTD, no glitches, you are not the beta tester; the game actually works when it is released.”
    • “While it lacks some polish—the manual is still in development and the tutorials leave out important game elements—the game is complete, apparently bug free, and a pleasure to play.”
    • “I also think it is a little buggy because the odds are displayed before you attempt to attack a target, but sometimes you just get destroyed.”
  • emotional

    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    Users express mixed emotions about the game, feeling more attached to their units due to RPG elements and experienced troops, which enhances emotional engagement compared to the original. However, some aspects, like tutorials or certain gameplay moments, are described as less wholesome or impactful on their mood.

    • “Cutting enemy supply lines made me feel like Rommel.”
    • “Experienced units and RPG elements made me feel more attached to how my units are performing; this is a big improvement over the original UOC.”
  • monetization

    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions

    The monetization is criticized for being heavily focused on paid DLC, making it feel like a cash grab, though there is an easy workaround that is poorly advertised. The game offers a decent supply model but remains a straightforward tactical battle simulator.

    • “This is plainly a cash grab as most of the content is DLC.”
    • “Thankfully, there is a simple workaround, which they should do a better job of advertising.”
  • humor

    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    50% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 50% negative mentions

    The humor in the game is generally seen as unfunny or lacking, with some players finding certain tactics, like destroying bridges, more frustrating than amusing. However, the game's lighthearted elements, such as playful explanations and engaging scenarios, add a subtle charm to the experience.

Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy Unity of Command 2

Some of these are affiliate links — if you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Play Times

70h Median play time
130h Average play time
35-400h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 4 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Unity of Command 2 is a tactical turn-based strategy game with warfare and historical themes. Common tags for Unity of Command 2 include turn-based, indie, alternate history, world war ii, trading and others.

Unity of Command 2 is available on PC, Mac OS, Steam Deck, Windows and others.

On average players spend around 130 hours playing Unity of Command 2.

Unity of Command 2 was released on November 11, 2019.

Unity of Command 2 was developed by 2x2 Games.

Unity of Command 2 has received very positive reviews from players and very positive reviews from critics. Most players liked Unity of Command 2 for its gameplay but disliked it for its grinding.

Unity of Command 2 is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Unity of Command, Order of Battle: World War II, Panzer Corps, Strategic Mind: Blitzkrieg, Fantasy General II and others.