Skip to main content

theHunter Classic

The Hunter is a very good game which one can put countless of hours of gameplay into, with small issues to hamper its gameplay.
theHunter Classic Game Cover
59%Game Brain Score
graphics, story
monetization, grinding
55% User Score Based on 18,495 reviews
Critic Score 73%Based on 2 reviews

Platforms

PCWindows
theHunter Classic Game Cover

About

theHunter Classic is a single player and multiplayer shooter game. It was developed by Expansive Worlds and was released on June 3, 2014. It received mostly positive reviews from critics and neutral reviews from players.

theHunter Classic is a realistic online hunting game set in an open world environment with various species to hunt. Players can explore diverse landscapes, use authentic weapons and equipment, and pursue challenging animals with realistic behaviors. Join a community of hunters, undertake missions, and master the art of hunting in this immersive simulation.

Skip User Reviews

55%
Audience ScoreBased on 18,495 reviews
graphics660 positive mentions
monetization76 negative mentions

  • The game features immersive environments and realistic animal models, creating a strong sense of being in the wilderness.
  • Many players appreciate the engaging and rewarding realistic hunting mechanics, along with the game's ability to forge strong emotional connections.
  • The game offers substantial replay value through random generation of animals, large maps, and diverse hunting methods, making it particularly appealing for dedicated hunting enthusiasts.
  • The graphics are often criticized as outdated and blocky, especially when compared to modern hunting games, leading to a desire for a graphical update.
  • The monetization model is heavily criticized for locking essential content behind paywalls, which detracts from the overall experience and enjoyment of the game.
  • Many players report significant performance issues, including poor frame rates and unresponsive controls, indicating a need for better optimization.
  • graphics
    1,213 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players acknowledging that while they are decent for an older title, they often feel dated compared to modern standards. Some users appreciate the immersive environments and realistic animal models, while others criticize the graphics as blocky or poor, especially when compared to newer hunting games like "The Hunter: Call of the Wild." Overall, the visuals are seen as a strong point for some, but many agree that a graphical update would significantly enhance the experience.

    • “The graphics are amazing for being a 2009 game.”
    • “The realistic graphics and immersive gameplay make you feel like you’re in the wilderness.”
    • “The graphics and in-game physics are very good.”
    • “Game sucks, launched on ultra graphic settings, even my grandma's TV has better graphics than this.”
    • “The graphics are awful and you move super slowly.”
    • “The graphics are some of the worst I have seen.”
  • story
    742 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is minimal, primarily revolving around completing missions that require specific tasks related to hunting various animals. Players often find the mission structure to be a grind, as many missions necessitate purchasing weapons or licenses with real money or in-game currency (gm$), which is earned through these missions. While the game offers a plethora of missions and challenges, the lack of a cohesive narrative and the reliance on microtransactions can detract from the overall experience.

    • “For anyone reading this: good games are not about graphics or the depth of story but by how it is able to pull your emotions out and make you feel as if playing the game wasn't a waste of your life. I don't regret any moment spent in this game.”
    • “The grind for weapons and gear is on the higher side but it gives it purpose and makes you go on hunts you normally wouldn't go on. The game also has a strong RPG feel with places to explore, NPC contacts, actively updated missions, etc. So there is a grind, but it feels like progress.”
    • “This is a fantastic game, really fun to play through the mission packs, and the special events are great.”
    • “The storyline is basically null, with missions in-game telling you 'kill this with that' or 'do these things with this animal', and that's good for the sim-feel of the game.”
    • “You can only hunt a couple of animals, do a couple of missions, and use a couple of weapons in what is supposed to be a free game.”
    • “The missions provided only allow you to purchase licenses, ammo, and lures for a huge amount of non-cash currency.”
  • gameplay
    680 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game is characterized by its realistic hunting mechanics and immersive environments, which many players find engaging and rewarding. However, it is often criticized for being slow-paced and requiring significant time investment to progress, with some mechanics feeling clunky or overly complicated. Additionally, the game's monetization model, which limits access to certain features and animals without payment, has led to frustration among players who feel it detracts from the overall experience.

    • “The environments feel alive, tracking animals is satisfying, and the realistic mechanics make every hunt exciting.”
    • “Its stunning graphics, realistic gameplay, and strong community make it a standout choice for those looking for a true-to-life hunting experience.”
    • “The gameplay is fun while remaining somewhat realistic, but it does have a learning curve.”
    • “The gameplay mechanics are nothing short of infuriating.”
    • “The game is really bad, the mechanics suck and the graphics are shit.”
    • “Gameplay is very slow, I was bored after ten minutes of gameplay.”
  • monetization
    274 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization model of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it as a cash grab due to the overwhelming reliance on microtransactions for essential content and gameplay progression. While the game is free-to-play, a substantial amount of content is locked behind paywalls, leading to frustration among users who feel that enjoyment is heavily gated by financial investment. Overall, the aggressive monetization strategy overshadows the game's potential, making it difficult for players to fully engage without spending considerable amounts of money.

    • “Yes, it's free-to-play, and yes — it comes with a monetization system.”
    • “The game itself is free to play and you can earn enough to buy without spending real money, although I actually enjoy the in-app purchases.”
    • “Microtransactions are abundant, and the game takes the fun out of it being a video game by making you have to pay for rounds, rifles, pistols, holsters, hunting licenses, and all sorts of other manner of hunting equipment.”
    • “The monetization system is also disappointing: a lot of content is locked behind paid licenses, and without investments, the game becomes boring.”
    • “For a game with this much potential, it’s disappointing that its monetization model overshadows its strengths.”
    • “This game is filled with microtransactions, so stay the f*** away from it!”
  • grinding
    162 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game is a significant point of contention among players, with many describing it as extremely grindy and time-consuming, particularly for free-to-play users. While some find the grinding rewarding and enjoyable, allowing for a sense of progression, others view it as tedious and frustrating, often leading to recommendations for spending real money to expedite the process. Overall, the game appeals to those who enjoy grinding, but it may deter casual players due to its demanding nature.

    • “But completing the missions feels like progressing, and it's not tedious.”
    • “Relaxing, slow-paced, and not too grindy.”
    • “No progression, no grinding.”
    • “The game is extremely grindy and you will have to choose between this and other games.”
    • “The amount of grinding you have to do just to get a new gun or whatever is unreal.”
    • “Game graphics are very outdated and old; you can only earn money by doing missions and 90% of mission trees require you to purchase some expensive gun to complete it... you have to grind non-stop and drop your soul to buy a new gun.”
  • stability
    135 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The stability of the game has been widely criticized, with numerous players reporting frequent freezes, bugs, and glitches that significantly hinder gameplay. Many users expressed frustration over unresponsive controls, issues with multiplayer functionality, and the overall lack of polish, leading to a generally negative perception of the game's stability. While a few players noted minimal issues, the overwhelming sentiment is that the game is plagued by technical problems that detract from the experience.

    • “Very fun, not too buggy (I don't think I've actually even encountered a bug yet!), and very addicting!”
    • “With over 500 hours in the game, I have never had an issue with it, no glitches or bugs.”
    • “Runs great on most computers and looks good.”
    • “The game is pretty buggy... the objectives aren't clear and in the beginning you could kill an animal but are not given any equipment so you have to leave your kill there.”
    • “Single player doesn't open; the hunter support sends the most elaborate troubleshooting only a NASA tech would understand... everything worked fine a week ago and they suggest I need to check my PC.”
    • “Unfortunately, especially in recent years, the game has become insanely buggy.”
  • humor
    75 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is predominantly appreciated when playing with friends, leading to numerous hilarious moments and shared laughter, despite some technical flaws and gameplay frustrations. Players often recount funny incidents, such as unexpected animal encounters and amusing glitches, which enhance the overall experience. However, some reviews suggest that the humor may not resonate with everyone, particularly those who find the game tedious or lacking in action.

    • “Grab your gear, channel your inner nature enthusiast, and prepare for some hilarious fails as you embark on this hunting adventure!”
    • “The hunting is very fun and realistic, the multiplayer is great and it's absolutely hilarious to play with a good group of friends.”
    • “This game has a ton of funny glitches and that's what makes this game and other more glitchy games fun.”
    • “This game is not funny.”
  • optimization
    58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game is highly variable among users, with some praising its ability to run smoothly on low-end hardware, while others report severe performance issues, even on high-end systems. Many players express frustration over poor frame rates, unresponsive controls, and a lack of clarity in settings, indicating that significant optimization improvements are needed. Overall, while some find it well-optimized, a substantial number of reviews highlight serious performance concerns that detract from the gaming experience.

    • “It's well-optimized and forgiving, with very few performance issues even on older hardware.”
    • “For how old the game is, this is impressive how much the game has in it and how graphic it can get, not like modern games that are very CPU intensive, but this game is pretty well optimized for low-end PCs and medium ones.”
    • “The game is very well optimized for low-end computers (such as mine).”
    • “Some serious optimization needs to be added to the game in terms of clarity and performance; I know it's not a me-issue.”
    • “The game has no optimization at all. I'm using a laptop with an RTX 2080 that can handle Ark and tons of other games, but it only gets about 36 FPS at best on this piece of junk.”
    • “With poor optimization, almost all content is locked, multiplayer restrictions are in place, and there are some serious but not game-breaking gameplay flaws throughout. This title has absolutely no right to ask for the amount of money you'd need to spend to experience it.”
  • atmosphere
    53 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its immersive and calming qualities, effectively capturing the essence of being in a natural wilderness. Despite some dated graphics, players appreciate the attention to detail in the environment, realistic sound design, and the overall aesthetic that enhances the hunting experience. Many reviewers highlight the game's ability to provide a relaxing escape, making it enjoyable to explore and lose oneself in the beautifully crafted landscapes.

    • “This game is so atmospheric, it really feels like I am actually walking around in the wilderness.”
    • “The game manages to create an atmosphere where you are immersed.”
    • “The visuals, sounds, and atmosphere are great; it's a game that's relaxing to play, and it's cool to simply explore the areas.”
    • “The relaxed and realistic atmosphere is likely one of the biggest sellers for the game.”
    • “Waiting... (might sound boring, but the atmosphere was great)”
    • “The island atmosphere and landscape are well done and the animal models look good.”
  • emotional
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express a wide range of emotions while engaging with the game, from wholesome experiences and nostalgic memories to deep sadness and frustration. Many recount moments that triggered tears, whether from personal reflections or the emotional weight of in-game events, highlighting the game's ability to forge strong emotional connections. However, some players also feel manipulated by monetization strategies that detract from the overall emotional experience.

    • “I cried for several hours.”
    • “I was about 10 years old when my mother told him, 'if you ever want to see your grandchildren graduate, you have to stop immediately.' Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly is at stake.”
    • “I cried when I saw a roe deer.”
  • music
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the beautiful soundtrack that enhances the ambiance and provides a relaxing experience, while others criticize the repetitive and bland loading screen music, which can become annoying during long waits. Additionally, there are complaints about the lack of mutability for the background music, leading to frustration for some users. Overall, while the soundtrack has its moments, it seems to fall short for many players.

    • “You will plunge into a world with beautiful graphics and a wonderful soundtrack.”
    • “The attention to detail is not only visible but audible, with a soundtrack that complements the ambiance of the wilderness.”
    • “Peaceful and relaxing music, realistic graphics and gameplay make that game truly interesting.”
    • “I can't even get into the game; it doesn't go past the music on the intro.”
    • “When the game is loading, there is music in the background that cannot be muted.”
    • “If you are loading for a long time, this music will be very annoying and your ears will hurt.”
  • replayability
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The replayability of the game is generally viewed positively, with players appreciating the random generation of animals, large maps, and diverse hunting methods that contribute to an engaging experience. While some criticize the initial cost and limited free version, many find the game offers substantial replay value through competitions, missions, and achievements, making it particularly appealing for dedicated hunting enthusiasts. Overall, the game is considered addictive and worth the investment for those who enjoy hunting simulations.

    • “All of these things, combined with the variety above, give this game a great amount of addictive replayability.”
    • “Adding to the replayability in thehunter are competitions, missions, achievements, & skills.”
    • “Thehunter is an addictive blend of hunting simulation & gaming, offering high replayability through randomly generated animals, enormous maps, variety in hunting methods & species.”
    • “The free part of the game is really just a demo; you get only one weapon and unlimited tags for only two species, which gives you just enough replayability to be called a demo. However, the actual game itself is rather expensive to get into.”
    • “The monthly membership fee is cheaper than most other subscription games, and once you've bought a new rifle, call, etc., it only gets better and increases the replay value.”
    • “When you start a new game in thehunter, the animals are randomly generated on the map, which adds to the replayability.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy theHunter Classic

14h Median play time
78h Average play time
3-71h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 105 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like theHunter Classic

Games Like theHunter Classic

TheHunter: Call of the Wild Image
Hunting Simulator 2 Image
Way of the Hunter Image
Russian Fishing 4 Image
Warface: Clutch Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

theHunter Classic is a shooter game.

theHunter Classic is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 78 hours playing theHunter Classic.

theHunter Classic was released on June 3, 2014.

theHunter Classic was developed by Expansive Worlds.

theHunter Classic has received mostly positive reviews from players and mostly positive reviews from critics. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

theHunter Classic is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include TheHunter: Call of the Wild, Hunting Simulator 2, Way of the Hunter, Russian Fishing 4, Warface: Clutch and others.