The Wild Eight
- October 3, 2019
- Eight Points
- 10h median play time
In "The Wild Eight," eight plane crash survivors must work together to stay alive in a harsh Alaskan wilderness, fraught with danger and hidden secrets. Gather resources, craft tools, and evade deadly creatures while uncovering the mystery behind the crash. Play solo or with up to seven other players for a challenging and immersive experience.
Reviews
- The game is fun to play with friends, offering a cooperative survival experience.
- The graphics and atmosphere are appealing, creating an immersive environment.
- The crafting and leveling systems provide a satisfying sense of progression.
- The game is riddled with bugs and glitches that can disrupt gameplay.
- The difficulty level is unbalanced, with hunger and cold meters depleting too quickly.
- Players lose all progress upon death, which can be frustrating and discouraging.
- story424 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 70 % neutral mentions
- 4 % negative mentions
The game's story is described as intriguing and immersive, with a mix of main quests and side missions that add depth to the survival experience. However, many players express frustration with bugs and glitches that disrupt quest progression, leading to a sense of incompleteness in the narrative. While some appreciate the creative storytelling and character backgrounds, others find the main storyline short and lacking in depth, with many side quests feeling repetitive or unfulfilling. Overall, the potential for a rich narrative is evident, but the execution suffers from technical issues and a need for more content.
“The story is immersive in my opinion.”
“The plot is intriguing and keeps the player in suspense as they must make decisions that affect the outcome of the game.”
“Incredibly exciting story, which kept me hooked to the game and motivated me to explore almost all of the map just to unlock all the story fragments.”
“The story is okay, but it feels incomplete; after the bridge, the map is a copy-paste of forest, and there is almost nothing to explore.”
“The only merits this game has is the exploration because the story is really, really bad.”
“I really enjoyed the first part of this game, but I was disappointed with the second part; it felt very short, very rushed, and the story didn't make sense.”
- gameplay211 mentions
- 44 % positive mentions
- 51 % neutral mentions
- 5 % negative mentions
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it addictive and engaging, particularly in multiplayer settings, while others criticize it for being repetitive and plagued by bugs. Many appreciate the survival mechanics and crafting elements, but note that the game can feel unfinished and lacks depth in certain areas, leading to frustration with its mechanics and pacing. Overall, while the game shows potential with its interesting graphics and atmosphere, it requires further refinement to enhance the overall experience.
“Smooth & rewarding gameplay.”
“The gameplay is robust and engaging, with an emphasis on survival mechanics such as hunting, gathering resources, and building shelters.”
“Great gameplay and exploration.”
“I'm already bored of this gameplay loop with how finicky and unrewarding it is.”
“There are a lot of bugs that make it a little hard to play or progress past 4 hours of gameplay.”
“This is another one of those games that seems nice on the surface but is utterly unfinished and lacks any sort of proper depth, sense of progression, or balancing of mechanics.”
- graphics171 mentions
- 58 % positive mentions
- 38 % neutral mentions
- 4 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game are generally well-received, with many players appreciating the pleasing low-poly art style and atmospheric design that enhances the survival experience. While some reviews note that the graphics are simple or minimalistic, they are often described as beautiful and engaging, contributing positively to the overall gameplay. However, a few critiques mention issues with animations and camera angles, suggesting that while the visuals are appealing, there is room for improvement in execution.
“I really liked it, cool experience, graphics and the atmosphere of winter!”
“The graphics impress with a good level of detail even though they are a low-poly project.”
“A very atmospheric game with nice graphics.”
“This is a great game-play but not great graphics.”
“It's really crap graphics, a very annoying camera angle where you stuck at birds-eye view, the inventory is too small, and crafting system is silly.”
“The game's polygon art style makes the players look especially horrible, and all the gear that isn't fur looks absolutely ridiculous.”
- stability82 mentions
- 5 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 95 % negative mentions
The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous players reporting a plethora of bugs and glitches that significantly detract from the overall experience. Issues include uncompleted missions, game-breaking bugs, and problems with multiplayer functionality, leading many to describe it as unfinished and overly buggy. While some players have noted improvements over time, the consensus remains that the game is still plagued by instability, making it difficult to recommend without reservations.
“It runs great, is fun to play, and keeps me entertained.”
“Since they fixed the multiplayer issues, this game runs great and I now have no issues hosting or connecting to hosts.”
“Not very buggy.”
“The game is very very buggy and unfinished in so many parts; it's a shame that it isn't in alpha status nor flagged as early access, it's definitely everything else but finished.”
“Seems like a good game/story, yet game-breaking bugs that involve losing all items, buggy AI, and crashes make it unplayable.”
“It's a shame because the game has so much potential, yet the whole experience is ruined because of the amount of bugs and glitches.”
- atmosphere72 mentions
- 72 % positive mentions
- 24 % neutral mentions
- 4 % negative mentions
The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its immersive and detailed environments, enhanced by high-quality graphics and a captivating soundtrack. Players appreciate the unique blend of warmth and coldness in the winter setting, which creates a compelling survival experience. Overall, the atmosphere is described as engaging, with elements like weather effects and a sense of mystery that draw players into the game world.
“The environment is well detailed and immersive, with a strong sense of atmosphere that draws the player into the world.”
“Very impressed me with this project, such a warm and pleasant atmosphere with the cold world where you can come across wild animals while looking for other survivors and trying not to freeze yourself.”
“The game has a pleasant winter atmosphere and excellent simple crafting.”
“The atmosphere of hopelessness in winter Siberia is fascinating.”
“- harsh atmosphere and cruel conditions.”
“Scotty feels like any mechanized dropbox in older games and adds absolutely nothing to the atmosphere that the game seems to try and set.”
- music60 mentions
- 52 % positive mentions
- 43 % neutral mentions
- 5 % negative mentions
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with many players praising its atmospheric qualities and ability to enhance the overall experience, describing it as beautiful, relaxing, and fitting for the game's themes. However, some users criticize the limited variety of tracks, noting that the repetitive nature of the music can lead to boredom. Overall, while the soundtrack contributes positively to the game's ambiance, its lack of diversity may detract from long-term enjoyment for some players.
“A very interesting survival game with a beautiful level design and a great soundtrack.”
“The music and scenery are gorgeous.”
“Brilliant mechanics, great atmosphere, and the soundtrack works so well with the game.”
“There's a bug from 2017 (making menu music not affected by settings) online I found a post from a player about that bug; a (seemingly) mod responded saying they're aware and will fix it soon.”
“What little music there is (pretty much 2 songs), is just slow piano music that gets very boring very fast!”
“I muted the music after the first day of playing, and my ears have thanked me ever since.”
- grinding44 mentions
- 5 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 95 % negative mentions
Reviews on the grinding aspect of the game are mixed, with some players finding it tedious and repetitive, particularly in resource gathering and leveling up, while others appreciate the co-op experience and immersive atmosphere that can make the grinding feel less burdensome. Many players express frustration with the loss of progress upon death, which exacerbates the grind, while a few note that the game is not excessively grindy compared to other survival titles. Overall, the grinding can be enjoyable for those with ample time, but it may deter players seeking a more streamlined experience.
“It is not very grindy for a survival game.”
“It's totally rad, not too grindy also.”
“There is a lot of grinding in this game; it's alright if you have plenty of time for gaming.”
“Compared to other survival games, it's extremely boring and tedious.”
“The current gameplay has far too much grinding and there's some big flaws in combat.”
- optimization21 mentions
- 48 % positive mentions
- 29 % neutral mentions
- 24 % negative mentions
The game's optimization is a mixed bag, with some players reporting smooth performance and good graphics, particularly on weaker computers, while others experience significant lags, stuttering, and frame rate drops in certain areas. Many users express a need for further optimization updates to address these issues, especially during more demanding gameplay scenarios. Overall, while some find the game well-optimized, others highlight serious performance concerns that detract from the experience.
“Excellent gameplay and optimization.”
“Optimization is good, I have a weak computer and everything runs without lags or freezes.”
“Well optimized with pleasant graphics.”
“In addition, the game's performance can be uneven, with occasional lags and stuttering.”
“Quality of the game degraded over the course of the story - less voice acting, worse performance, just falling flat on its face.”
“Massive framerate dips for no reason in certain parts of the map, and graphic options are super basic for a PC game - while also not affecting performance.”
- humor16 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players enjoying funny animal antics and amusing in-game descriptions, particularly when playing with friends. However, some find the humor can become repetitive over time, and the experience may not be as enjoyable when playing solo. Overall, the comedic elements contribute positively to the multiplayer experience, making it a fun choice for group play.
“Funny animals do the funny dance!”
“Their description clearly says that you should not eat them under any circumstances, after you cook them the description tries in humor and says something like 'do you really think that if you cooked them you can eat them now?'”
“The credits... hilarious.”
- replayability9 mentions
- 33 % positive mentions
- 33 % neutral mentions
- 33 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players find it enjoyable with procedurally generated elements that enhance replay value, others feel it lacks significant replayability and becomes repetitive after completion. A few users appreciate the intriguing gameplay that offers a decent amount of replayability, but there are also strong sentiments about the game being abandoned quickly due to limited replay options.
“Other than that, it is pretty fun and enjoyable with a decent amount of replayability.”
“I enjoy the game, and it has replay value.”
“The game has procedurally generated elements, which adds replayability.”
“Abandoned immediately with no replay value after you finish.”
“There is zero replay value.”
“The game has the same quests, but because of the random generation, it makes replayability available.”
- emotional5 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Players report a strong emotional investment in the game, often feeling deeply touched by its immersive atmosphere and music. The experience can evoke intense feelings, with some users noting moments that brought them to tears, highlighting the game's ability to create a profound emotional connection. However, the game's mechanics, such as auto-death from minor mistakes, can also induce anxiety and worry.
“Would recommend, but don't be surprised if you find yourself getting very emotionally invested!”
“Really like the music and the atmosphere, immersive and touching.”
“I cried.”
- monetization2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of Hypetrain Digital has drawn criticism for appearing to prioritize profit over game development, as users feel the transition from early access to full release was superficial, with little to no follow-up on promised content. Many players perceive the situation as a cash grab, given the lack of updates and the immediate shift in focus to new projects.
“Hypetrain Digital completely abandoned the game after its 'release' from early access, with the final early access version and 1.0 being almost completely identical, and immediately started advertising their next project.”
“Not finished - I get that it is in early access, but how long can a game be in early access before it is considered just a cash grab with no follow-up on all their promises of a completed game.”
- character development1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -500 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Reviewers express a desire for deeper character development that goes beyond basic customization, emphasizing the importance of unique traits, skills, and personalities that make characters feel more alive and relatable. They advocate for a system that prioritizes meaningful choices over traditional XP grinding, suggesting that character progression should reflect individual player decisions rather than a uniform skill acquisition process.
“The character customization options are definitely impressive. I expect to see characters I am playing with unique traits, skills, and personalities, rather than simple pawns. Even strategy games have much more 'realistic' and 'alive' characters, even though you don't play them directly. Character development should focus on choice, not just grinding XP and purchasing skills that everyone else will master too.”
“The depth of character development in this game is remarkable. Each character feels unique, with their own backstories and motivations that influence gameplay. It's refreshing to see a game prioritize meaningful choices over generic skill trees.”
“I love how the character development system allows for personal growth and transformation. The choices I make truly impact my character's journey, making me feel invested in their story and evolution throughout the game.”
“The character customization options are definitely lacking. I expect to see characters with unique traits, skills, and personalities, not just simple pawns. Even strategy games have much more 'realistic' and 'alive' characters, despite not being directly controlled. Character development should focus on meaningful choices, not just grinding XP to purchase skills that everyone else can master too.”
“The lack of depth in character development is disappointing. I want to feel a connection to the characters I play, but they often feel one-dimensional and generic. It would be great to see more individuality and growth in their personalities.”
“Character development feels shallow and uninspired. Instead of meaningful progression, it often boils down to repetitive tasks that don't enhance the experience or make the characters feel more alive.”