Skip to main content

THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake

We like…
THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake Game Cover
47%Game Brain Score
graphics, music
optimization, stability
46% User Score Based on 263 reviews
Critic Score 50%Based on 1 reviews

Platforms

Nintendo SwitchXbox Series X|SPCPlaystation 5Playstation 4Xbox OneXboxSteam DeckWindowsPlayStation
THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake Game Cover

About

THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake is a single player and multiplayer survival shooter game with horror and violence themes. It was developed by MegaPixel Studio S. A. and was released on August 7, 2025. It received neutral reviews from both critics and players.

The Infect Edition comes with a slipcase and 3 art cards. The House of the Dead 2: Remake is a remake of the second entry in the well-known and popular rail-shooter series. Take on the lone role of a secret agent as James or Gary, or team up in co-op mode to neutralize the dangerous undead monsters standing in your way.

Skip User Reviews

46%
Audience ScoreBased on 263 reviews
graphics15 positive mentions
optimization7 negative mentions

  • Faithful recreation of original gameplay with updated visuals and audio, preserving core mechanics and branching paths.
  • Includes original soundtrack option and additional modes like Boss Mode and Training Mode, enhancing replayability.
  • Nostalgic and fun for longtime fans, offering a fast-paced, classic arcade rail shooter experience.
  • Poor voice acting that loses the original's charm, often perceived as forced, awkward or AI-generated, detracting from the experience.
  • Dark and inconsistent lighting combined with missing textures and graphical glitches that impair visibility and immersion.
  • Performance issues including frame drops, long loading times, bugs, broken hitboxes, awkward animations, and lack of official lightgun support.
  • graphics
    65 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics in the remake receive mixed reviews, with some praising the updated visuals, lighting effects, and modernized presentation that retain the original's dark atmosphere, while others criticize graphical errors, inconsistent art style, and a loss of the original's gritty aesthetic. Many feel the new graphics look generic or outdated, with issues like excessive darkness, glitches, and missing textures detracting from the experience, leading some to prefer the original visuals over this modernized but imperfect update.

    • “This remake sets out to preserve that core structure while rebuilding the presentation with updated visuals, remastered audio, and contemporary control schemes suitable for today’s hardware.”
    • “It faithfully reconstructs the structure, pacing, and branching design that made the original memorable while layering contemporary visuals and refined audio over its framework.”
    • “What struck me most were the visuals: the modern graphics perfectly capture the dark atmosphere of the original with beautiful lighting effects, shadows, and updated environments that feel both familiar and fresh.”
    • “The graphics are just downright ugly and parts of the game are unnecessarily dark to the point where it's hard to see.”
    • “Graphically it can use some improvements; the lighting is too dark and unlit in most levels and many parts of the environment look unfinished or placeholder.”
    • “The complete absence of ambient occlusion gives the game a high-end PS3/Xbox aesthetic, which isn't a compliment.”
  • music
    50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the remake receives mixed feedback, with many praising the option to switch between remastered and classic soundtracks, which helps balance nostalgia and modernization. However, the remade soundtrack is often described as mediocre or low quality, with some finding it overbearing or less charming than the original. Despite technical issues and voice acting criticism, the inclusion of the original music remains one of the best-received features.

    • “Players can choose between rearranged music and the classic soundtrack, which helps bridge nostalgia with modernization.”
    • “The remake’s soundtrack is still a solid revamp, staying true to the originals while adding a bit of polish.”
    • “The best thing about this remaster is the music; you can even switch between the remake music and the classic music.”
    • “I paid $2 for this and I still wouldn't recommend this slop of a remake; music and voice acting are actually so bad – not like original cringe bad that had charm, just bad. Plus the original music was so much better.”
    • “The music is exported in extraordinarily low quality, and they didn't even bother remaking the entire soundtrack, so the game just substitutes the original soundtrack at certain points.”
    • “The voice acting is terrible compared to the original and the music I cannot even hear.”
  • gameplay
    32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay remains largely faithful to the original, preserving classic on-rails shooter mechanics like limited ammo and manual reloading, which some fans appreciate for nostalgia and authenticity. However, many critiques highlight that it feels rough, unpolished, and in some cases inferior to previous versions, with issues like poor pacing, uneven challenge, bugs, and lack of meaningful improvements or quality-of-life enhancements. While some find it fun and faithful, others feel that the gameplay suffers from dated design and technical problems that hinder overall enjoyment.

    • “The gameplay, movement, and staging of events is very close to the original, which makes it ideal for people who want the original game with HD enhancements.”
    • “At the same time, it carefully preserves core mechanics such as limited ammunition clips and manual reloading, ensuring that tension remains intact.”
    • “The gameplay was faithfully remade.”
    • “Doesn't improve over the original game's gameplay and is worse in some respects.”
    • “The gameplay feels rough and unfinished, and in general, it is not very enjoyable right now.”
    • “-Gameplay is ten times wonkier and flaccid than the previous remake, which was already on the lower end of House of the Dead games.”
  • humor
    19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the remake largely falls flat compared to the original, which was unintentionally funny due to its bad voice acting and quirky animations. While the new voice work, especially Goldman's unexpected southern accent, offers some amusing moments, most aspects like clunky animations, poor enemy designs, and lackluster effects come off as unpolished rather than humorous. Overall, the remake lacks the original's goofy charm, making its attempts at humor feel forced or accidentally funny in a disappointing way.

    • “Hotd2 was always known for its hilariously bad voice acting.”
    • “The voice acting in the original is terrible but also funny.”
    • “The original had personality, even if it was unintentionally funny.”
  • optimization
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Optimization for the game is inconsistent, with many users reporting performance issues such as stuttering, poor lighting, long loading times, and texture problems, especially on certain hardware setups. However, some players with stronger rigs experience smooth gameplay without lag or crashes. Overall, the game suffers from noticeable optimization problems that impact the experience, though there is hope that future updates will address these concerns.

    • “A single full run can be completed in a few hours, with replayability driven by branching routes, scoring optimization, and cooperative play rather than sheer length.”
    • “I haven't had any crashes or any lag/optimization issues.”
    • “Hopefully the performance issues other people are having get fixed soon, because I had a great experience and I want more House of the Dead on Steam.”
    • “Loading times are very bad, lighting is even worse, and there are moments where you literally have to wait for zombies to spawn, making optimization and performance really poor.”
    • “I used to play House of the Dead 2 a lot in arcades and was really excited to play this, but the game is just sad. Not only is the engine bad for this type of game, but the game is poorly optimized.”
    • “During gameplay, I experienced a lot of stuttering, and textures look horrible in some levels, especially the last one. Some rooms are so dark it's impossible to see. Combining all these issues in a fast-paced light gun game leads to a bad experience.”
  • stability
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is highly inconsistent, with many users reporting frequent crashes, graphical glitches, missing textures, and buggy cutscenes, making it largely unplayable for some. However, a few players experienced no major issues, noting that all expected game modes are present. Overall, the remake appears plagued by technical problems that detract significantly from the experience.

    • “I've had no glitches, no crashes, no issues.”
    • “Rooms not loading, graphical glitches, broken on launch, placeholder hostages.”
    • “Game stutters like a faulty disc and then freezes my PC.”
    • “Missing textures (especially in chapter 2), buggy cut scenes (characters freezing in certain places to disappearing), to even the main menu not working as it's supposed to.”
  • atmosphere
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere combines improved lighting, particle effects, and detailed models to create a grounded, dark tone that feels both familiar and fresh. However, some users feel the original had a stronger, more distinctive atmosphere, with complaints about certain visual choices like overly murky fog diminishing clarity and immersion. Overall, the mix of creepy and cheesy elements remains enjoyable, though the newer version's darker visuals sometimes hinder visibility and atmosphere.

    • “Lighting effects, particle work, and higher-resolution character models give the infected city a more grounded and atmospheric tone.”
    • “What struck me most were the visuals: the modern graphics perfectly capture the dark atmosphere of the original with beautiful lighting effects, shadows, and updated environments that feel both familiar and fresh.”
    • “There are many changes for the better such as night levels which make the atmosphere much better, and the bosses got changes such as Hierophant with his glowing staff looking great in the dark, and Zeal (Judgement) with his glowing eyes looking crazy when he flies around.”
    • “It doesn't fit the game and the atmosphere is lost.”
    • “It's honestly hard to tell whenever the sun is around, because someone had the genius idea of dipping every daytime level into this brown mudlike diarrhea fog that completely kills the atmosphere of the entire experience.”
    • “This game is very dark, not in a deep way but its need to make it brighter, I know it's for atmosphere to be scary but in some stages you really can't see what you're shooting at, it just comes off annoying.”
  • story
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story largely remains faithful to the original, with minor changes such as an NPC's fate and some altered voice acting, including an unexpected Texan accent for Goldman. While there is no alternate storyline or mob placements, the inclusion of an "original" mode allows experimentation with weapons and items to enhance replayability. Overall, the story is well-regarded but some presentation choices received mixed reactions.

    • “One neat feature is the "original" mode, where you can experiment with different weapons and items to enhance the story, and collect new things for your future playthroughs.”
    • “The story is basically the same as the original version, but one of the NPCs that you can save changes from the original.”
    • “Story 10/10”
    • “No alternate story with different mob placements.”
    • “Game is still okay and does still follow the story and everything but just not in a way I would want it.”
    • “Story is the same but the voice acting is not that charming, they made Goldman have a Texan accent?”
  • replayability
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers strong replayability through its branching routes, adjustable difficulty settings, and additional modes like boss and training modes, which extend play beyond the main campaign. Though some modes from previous remakes like horde mode are missing, the added content and cooperative play further enhance its replay value. Overall, the combination of varied challenges and extra features keeps the experience fresh and engaging.

    • “This branching design is one of the remake’s strongest features, preserving the replayability that defined the arcade experience.”
    • “Difficulty settings allow players to adjust the challenge level, and additional modes such as boss mode and training mode add replay value beyond the standard campaign.”
    • “I do appreciate that they brought back original, training and boss modes from the console/PC version of the original House of the Dead 2, but I'm not sure why they did not bring back the horde mode from the 1 remake, which would have honestly added more replayability.”
    • “A single full run can be completed in a few hours, with replayability driven by branching routes, scoring optimization, and cooperative play rather than sheer length.”
    • “It adds a bit more replay value and mixes up the game a bit.”
  • monetization
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization is heavily criticized as a low-effort cash grab lacking value compared to the original, with no battle passes or microtransactions, leading to disappointment among fans who expected a faithful remaster rather than a profit-driven release.

    • “No battlepasses, no microtransactions, no nonsense, just straight fun.”
    • “Because with the original voice acting, the ability to physically aim, and in some ways the original graphics looking better than this slop, it all makes this 'remaster' look like a 'down-master'—just a piss poor cash grab at the end of the day.”
    • “Stand with me, my hod brothers, do not fall for this low effort cash grab on what we used to love.”
    • “This is a cash grab that makes HotD2 look like ♥♥♥♥, but HotD2 OG was one of the best light gun games.”
  • grinding
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in the game feels tedious and unengaging, particularly during fights like the one with the magician, which lacks satisfying feedback and makes the process feel dull.

Skip Critic Reviews

50%Critics’ scoreBased on 1 critic reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake

2h Median play time
2h Average play time
2-2h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake is a survival shooter game with horror and violence themes.

THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake is available on Nintendo Switch, Xbox Series X|S, PC, PlayStation 5 and others.

On average players spend around 2 hours playing THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake.

THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake was released on August 7, 2025.

THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake was developed by MegaPixel Studio S. A..

THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake has received neutral reviews from both players and critics. Most players liked THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake for its graphics but disliked it for its optimization.

THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2: Remake is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD: Remake, Dementium II HD, Turok 3: Shadow of Oblivion Remastered, Resident Evil Revelations 2, Serious Sam 4 and others.