Skip to main content

SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now

SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now Game Cover
48%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
stability, music
48% User Score Based on 2,735 reviews

Platforms

PCWindows
SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now Game Cover

About

SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now is a single player and multiplayer simulation game. It was developed by TB Games and was released on December 3, 2019. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Survival: Postapocalypse Now" is a first-person survival game set in a post-apocalyptic world. Scavenge for resources, build shelter, and craft tools to survive against the dangers of the wasteland and hostile enemies. Experience dynamic weather and day-night cycles, and make decisions that will impact your character's survival and the overall story.

Skip User Reviews

48%
Audience ScoreBased on 2,735 reviews
graphics58 positive mentions
stability81 negative mentions

  • The game has a cool and immersive survival gameplay experience.
  • It runs well on lower-end PCs, making it accessible to a wider audience.
  • The looting system is engaging, requiring players to search through various items.
  • The game has been abandoned by developers, leading to a lack of updates and support.
  • There are numerous bugs and glitches, including issues with spawning and inventory management.
  • The player base is very low, often resulting in empty servers and a lack of meaningful interactions.
  • graphics
    195 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players noting that they are subpar and reminiscent of older titles, often comparing them to games from the early 2000s. While some appreciate the decent performance on low-end machines and find the visuals acceptable for a budget game, others express disappointment and call for significant improvements. Overall, the consensus suggests that while the graphics are not the game's strong suit, they do not entirely detract from the gameplay experience.

    • “The graphics are fantastic, can't complain.”
    • “Good graphics makes the game run smooth even on not top hardware, this game is an achievement for a small team that has succeeded to make it.”
    • “The graphics look amazing, and it runs so smoothly.”
    • “Another looter shooter without any idea behind it but with ugly graphics, cheaters, tons of bugs and pay-to-win DLCs.”
    • “The graphics are just depressing to look at and the game is basically dead now anyway, the only people that still play are either spawnkillers, Russians, hackers, or a beautiful combination of all three.”
    • “The graphics look like they are from the year 2000.”
  • gameplay
    112 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its immersive survival mechanics and enjoyable looting system, while others criticize it for being outdated, buggy, and lacking clear instructions. Many users noted that the game draws heavily from better titles like Escape from Tarkov, leading to comparisons that highlight its shortcomings in production value and mechanics. Overall, while some find the gameplay fun and engaging, others feel it suffers from significant issues that detract from the experience.

    • “Cool and immersive survival gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay is fun with multiple people and if you have gear, although most of the time you end up opening up an excessive amount of cupboards and closets only to find 1 item such as a can opener... I feel like this is good for the price but needs a lot of work on it.”
    • “Gameplay itself is very good especially considering the fact that it is in alpha.”
    • “Now it's a very outdated game with many broken mechanics, bugs, and glitches. Potato Tarkov for potato PC.”
    • “The game lacks any kind of description of its mechanics.”
    • “Unfortunately, these moments are too far and few in between, and some of the mechanics are so game-breaking that I cannot recommend this game until they are addressed.”
  • stability
    87 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly hinder gameplay. Many users express frustration over the lack of developer support and ongoing issues, leading to a perception that the game is poorly optimized and unfinished. While some players note occasional improvements, the overall consensus is that the game remains highly unstable and often unplayable.

    • “It runs great, the devs are always updating it, the community is fun, and the behavior you encounter is hilarious.”
    • “Love the game, it's so fun and it runs great on a low-spec laptop.”
    • “This game runs great on many computers, so you shouldn't have any problem even with an older PC.”
    • “Now it's a very outdated game with many broken mechanics, bugs, and glitches.”
    • “The game has enough technical problems - freezes, crashes, connection problems, and more.”
    • “I would have recommended it as it was good and fun to play, but now it is just really bad, not fun, and just buggy as hell.”
  • optimization
    39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its ability to run smoothly on lower-end systems, while others report significant performance issues, including low frame rates and bugs. Many users noted that despite its potential, the game requires further optimization and updates to address these performance concerns. Overall, while some players enjoy a stable experience, others struggle with choppy gameplay and server issues.

    • “This game is awesome for someone like me, I do not have a high-end system and am running this on a 4GB RAM i5 dual-core 2.4 GHz, and this game is smooth, no issues with performance at all.”
    • “I should also mention it runs very smooth on older PCs, so the strongest thing this game has over similar types is price and performance.”
    • “Even though it's in alpha, the optimization is really admirable.”
    • “This game is very poorly optimized; updates to the game do not happen since the last update was 1 year ago. It does have potential, a starting point to a decent game, but I recommend playing early access: Next Day: Survival. The devs are great and they often update their content.”
    • “Poorly optimized, bad servers, nearly non-existent supplies, and buggy.”
    • “Could not get this game to run; my computer surpasses the requirements listed but I got an average of 7 fps. The game seems to have potential from videos I've seen, but it's poorly optimized.”
  • story
    25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is generally viewed as lacking depth and coherence, with many players describing it as minimal or non-existent. While some appreciate the concept and potential for narrative, the overall execution is criticized, leading to a perception that the story does not significantly enhance the gameplay experience. Many reviews suggest that the game would benefit from a more developed story mode to improve player engagement.

    • “Fun game with a nice concept of safe zone and PvP looting... it's like Infestation: Survivor Stories but a bit smaller!”
    • “There is a story in this game that adds depth to the experience.”
    • “My story in the game went like this: find a shotgun -> no ammo -> get killed -> get rekt again -> kill someone with a hammer after chasing them for 5 minutes.”
    • “Trash graphics, trash controls, trash story, trash looting, etc... oh yeah, and trash devs.”
    • “No, only suffering awaits... when you're in the sewer there are 0 lights and 0 direction (so quickly it becomes the story of a Russian man who goes crazy in a sewer).”
    • “Rinse and repeat: boy, wouldn't you like to read a story where the main character dies and respawns over and over again?”
  • humor
    22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is a standout feature, with players consistently noting the hilarious interactions and situations that arise, especially when playing with friends. Many reviews highlight the comedic elements of gameplay, such as funny character behaviors and amusing encounters with other players, particularly the Russian characters. Overall, the game is described as entertaining and funny, making it a great choice for those looking to enjoy a lighthearted multiplayer experience.

    • “This is so fun we were laughing for a couple of hours straight.”
    • “It runs great, the devs are always updating it, the community is fun, and the behavior you encounter is hilarious.”
    • “If you approach this game with an open mind and a sense of humor, you will not be disappointed!”
  • atmosphere
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its immersive and beautifully crafted environments, featuring cold weather, crumbled buildings, and a dark, tense ambiance that enhances the survival experience. While some players note technical issues, the overall atmospheric elements, including sound quality and unique snowy settings, contribute significantly to the enjoyment and sense of adventure in the game.

    • “The atmosphere in this game is beautiful, even with these kinds of graphics.”
    • “The crumbled buildings and abandoned structures are great for creating that lonely atmosphere that I love in a survival game.”
    • “Yet, I have to say the snowy setting, not found in many other games, gives such a great atmosphere.”
    • “This game actually has an okay atmosphere, but it's extremely unplayable.”
    • “It feels good at first; you start off in a jail cell. The atmosphere is very dark, along with the lighting in the game.”
    • “-dark, 'the road' like atmosphere”
  • music
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it either out-of-place or unnecessary, often describing it as generic or reminiscent of stock audio. Some appreciate the occasional fitting tracks, while others express frustration over the lack of volume adjustment options, which can hinder gameplay, especially in competitive scenarios. Overall, the soundtrack seems to detract from the experience rather than enhance it.

    • “Fitting music”
    • “This game also has elevator music in lifts; how good is that?”
    • “Decent voice/music, player-base is alright and the overall quality is 50/50 depending on your liking.”
    • “The audio is passable, with the soundtrack being mostly stock stuff except for the odd time it becomes super ominous when nothing's happening.”
    • “The graphics are kind of decent, and the controls aren't complicated, but the music and sound effects are too out-of-place.”
    • “I thought this is an amazing game and if it continues to develop, it could become one of the best survival games, but it could still improve by having the option to remove the music, especially when taking damage, as it's difficult to hear the footsteps of other players.”
  • monetization
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many users labeling it a "cash grab" due to the presence of microtransactions and a perceived lack of ongoing development. Players express disappointment over the game's failure to meet expectations set by advertisements, suggesting that it might be better suited as a free-to-play title with monetization through microtransactions. Overall, there is a consensus that the game has potential but is hindered by its current monetization strategy and unresolved issues.

    • “I believe that this game could only be acceptable if it was free. However, I feel that this game is likely going to become free in the near future and will be monetized via microtransactions, which I honestly think would be a better move.”
    • “Microtransactions seem to be in the pipeline as they appear in stores and the main menu.”
    • “Cash grab.”
    • “I feel this is just another one of those cash grab games. I bought it when it first came out, tried it again today after not playing it for so long, and nothing has changed. I think they stopped developing the game.”
    • “I thought this was a good game, but now it seems like a cash grab with asset flips every few months to make it seem like it's still being worked on.”
  • grinding
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express frustration with the grinding aspect of the game, noting that it often involves tedious and time-consuming looting, particularly in early areas where players farm resources by switching servers. Additionally, the prevalence of teaming in deathmatch modes makes solo play challenging, as players frequently find themselves outnumbered and overwhelmed by coordinated groups.

    • “As much as I love this game, I notice that there are people grouping up in deathmatch and not in groups. They are basically farming areas and teaming up together, making solo runs hard to do because there simply is no way of playing when outnumbered.”
    • “Lots of tedious and time-consuming looting, typically only to then get blindsided by a stacked freak, or a group of them.”
    • “The first half of the game is farming food and weapons in the first two villages... farm them, switch servers to reset the villages and the loot, farm again.”
  • replayability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the game offers significant replayability, often exceeding that of more expensive AAA titles, making it a worthwhile investment at its low price point. However, some users note that improvements are needed to enhance the overall play experience.

    • “Tons of replay value and worth the £4.00!”
    • “The game needs several improvements to make it more replayable.”
    • “This game cost me £3.99 and has proven itself to be more replayable than some AAA titles.”
  • emotional
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game evokes strong emotions, with players finding it both touching and impactful. However, some elements, such as the mechanics of movement, may detract from the overall emotional immersion.

    • “Amazing! This game is touching but strong.”
    • “The emotional depth of the story really resonated with me.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now

8h Median play time
17h Average play time
3-27h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 19 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now

Games Like SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now

Miscreated Image
Nether Image
Next Day: Survival Image
SCUM Image
Hurtworld Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now is a simulation game.

SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 17 hours playing SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now.

SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now was released on December 3, 2019.

SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now was developed by TB Games.

SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its stability.

SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Miscreated, Nether, Next Day: Survival, SCUM, Hurtworld and others.