Supreme League of Patriots

About

Supreme League of Patriots is a single player action game. It was developed by No Bull Intentions and was released on January 29, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

Don your cape and mask and join the Supreme League of Patriots in this hilarious and irreverent superhero comedy adventure! Poking fun at pop culture, politics, reality TV and more, join Kyle Keever in his politically incorrect quest to win a spot on the newest hit reality TV show, America's Got Superpowers. But when a freak accident turns Kyle's alter-ego, the Purple Patriot, into his main ego a…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

59%

Audience ScoreBased on 83 reviews

humor55 positive mentions

grinding3 negative mentions

The game features clever writing and humorous dialogue that can be quite entertaining, especially for fans of British humor.
The voice acting is well done, adding to the overall charm of the characters and their interactions.
The colorful graphics and cartoonish art style create a visually appealing environment that complements the comedic tone.

The pacing is slow, with excessive dialogue that can become tedious and disrupt the flow of gameplay.
The puzzles are often straightforward and lack depth, making the gameplay feel simplistic and unchallenging.
The inventory system is clunky and unintuitive, leading to frustration when trying to interact with objects or combine items.

humor
59 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
93%
7%
The humor in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players appreciating its witty dialogue and satirical elements, while others find it cringe-worthy and unfunny. Many comments highlight a struggle between clever writing and heavy-handed attempts at humor, leading to a perception of the comedy as either enjoyable or painfully juvenile. Overall, the game's comedic success seems to depend on individual taste, with some enjoying the quirky humor and others feeling it falls flat.
- “It made me laugh multiple times, and who doesn't need a laugh now and then?”
- “Fun point and click with a pretty good sense of humor.”
- “A hilarious point and click adventure.”
- “The comedy elements are not funny enough.”
- “While the graphics are nice and the soundtrack is awesome, this point & click adventure game fails at everything else: it's supposed to be a comedy but it's vastly unfunny thanks to the bland writing and the bad comedic timing.”
- “The salt and pepper of this game is given by the dialogs, which are supposed to be funny, but in fact they are mostly satiric and witty, and at times bland and annoying.”
story
41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
61%
7%
The game's story has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it thin, linear, and lacking depth, often criticizing the characters as unlikable and the plot as predictable. While some appreciate the comedic elements and the unique premise, others feel that the focus on humor detracts from a more engaging narrative experience. Overall, the story is seen as average, with a blend of enjoyable moments and significant shortcomings.
- “Let's start with the story: it's mostly enjoyable.”
- “The game has huge comical elements with the focus more on the story and plot rather than the gameplay.”
- “A helpful task list makes sure you always know what you’re supposed to be doing to advance the plot, and the cheerful graphics and music make for a nice, uplifting (albeit sarcastic) storyline.”
- “In addition, the plot is thin and the characters are annoying.”
- “Dumb main character and lack of credibility in the plot made this hard to get into.”
- “There really aren't any puzzles that you will have much trouble with or a deep story to get into.”
graphics
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
52%
12%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the beautiful artwork, colorful visuals, and impressive clothing textures. However, some players criticize the character graphics and animations as mediocre or awkward, suggesting that improvements are needed. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered polished and fitting for the game's theme, there are calls for enhancements, particularly in character design.
- “It's a highly polished game, with nice graphics, good voice acting and no obvious bugs.”
- “A helpful task list makes sure you always know what you’re supposed to be doing to advance the plot, and the cheerful graphics and music make for a nice, uplifting (albeit sarcastic) storyline.”
- “The game is rather fun to play, but I'd like the creators to change some things, for example, improve character graphics, make shorter dialogs, and increase the main character's IQ.”
- “On top of the mediocre graphics, the animation is not really much better either; some of it either just looks awkward or just plain awful.”
- “Graphically, Supreme League of Patriots looks colorful and childlike, with most of the characters looking more like they have been pulled out of a Nickelodeon.”
gameplay
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
66%
17%
The gameplay is characterized by standard point-and-click mechanics that are functional but lack innovation, leading to a somewhat tiresome experience. Players often find themselves spending more time on dialogue and cutscenes than actual gameplay, with puzzles that are generally easy and predictable. While the game features unique characters and some engaging moments, it suffers from mechanical issues such as frequent loading screens and a lack of intuitive item usage, ultimately making it feel more like a vehicle for humor than a compelling adventure.
- “The core mechanics are point-and-click.”
- “All the characters feel unique and all mechanics work well.”
- “Each issue comprises about 3-4 hours of gameplay depending on how you solve the puzzles in the game.”
- “The actual gameplay wasn't enjoyable either.”
- “The gameplay is almost too easy and you actually spend more time just listening to dialog and watching cutscenes than actually playing the game itself.”
- “From the mechanical and execution point of view, loading screens pop up every time you walk into a different room, not just separate locations, also there is no way to make the PC warp to an exit, something that is expected of adventure games, having it been the case for decades.”
music
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
71%
11%
18%
The music in the game is widely praised, with many reviewers highlighting its superb quality, dynamic nature, and the unique themes assigned to each character. While the soundtrack complements the visuals effectively, some players find the overall experience marred by bland writing and gameplay dynamics. Overall, the music stands out as a strong point, enhancing the game's atmosphere despite other shortcomings.
- “Music, art design, and voice acting are all top notch.”
- “I like how the music is dynamic and changes with every character you’re talking with.”
- “The artwork is well done, a marvelous soundtrack and a fun story.”
- “Music was okay.”
- “Whenever a character speaks (which is very often), the music volume goes down, the screen goes dimmer, the character appears in the foreground, and the dialog happens.”
- “Sounds, music, voice acting.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious, with interruptions in dialogue flow that disrupt engagement and make interactions feel laborious. While the underlying game model is solid, the repetitive nature of grinding detracts from the overall experience.
- “The game model is solid, but it can be tedious.”
- “A short pause between each line disrupts the conversational flow and makes every interaction tedious.”
- “Tedious.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
Overall, the game's optimization is mixed; while it runs smoothly and features visually appealing cartoonish 3D environments, users have reported initial setup issues and a persistent requirement to play in windowed mode. Performance is generally acceptable, but some optimization concerns remain.
- “Despite a few optimization issues at setup and the game's insistence to be played in windowed mode whenever it starts, overall it runs smoothly and has bright cartoonish 3D environments that are pleasing to the eye and set the mood for the comedic tone of the story.”
- “Despite a few optimization issues at setup and the game’s insistence on being played in windowed mode whenever it starts, overall it runs smoothly and has bright cartoonish 3D environments that are pleasing to the eye and set the mood for the comedic tone of the story.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is generally perceived as lacking replayability, with users indicating that there is little incentive to play it multiple times.
- “Doesn't have replay value.”
- “The game lacks incentives to play through again.”
- “Once you finish it, there's little reason to return.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers note that the voice acting effectively complements the character designs and personalities, enhancing the overall character development in the game.
- “The voices are a great match for the character designs and personalities.”
- “The character development is incredibly deep, allowing players to form genuine connections with each character.”
- “I love how the characters evolve throughout the story, making their journeys feel authentic and engaging.”