Strategy & Tactics－USSR vs USA

About

"Strategy & Tactics: USSR vs USA" is a turn-based strategy game that simulates Cold War conflicts between the two superpowers. Players can choose to command either the USSR or USA military, managing resources, technology, and troops in various scenarios. The game offers a blend of strategic planning and tactical decision-making, as players strive to achieve victory through military might or diplomatic influence. This is a clash of two frenemies!

Genres & Tags

Strategy

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Strategy & Tactics－USSR vs USA screenshot

63%

Audience ScoreBased on 348 reviews

humor2 positive mentions

monetization3 negative mentions

The game offers a challenging and engaging strategy experience, reminiscent of the Civilization series.
Players appreciate the variety of countries to choose from and the strategic depth of the gameplay.
The demo version is well-received, providing a taste of the game without ads, and many players express a desire to purchase the full version.

The game is plagued by frequent crashes and technical issues, making it unplayable for many users.
There is a significant paywall, with many levels and features locked behind a paywall, frustrating players who want to enjoy the game for free.
The difficulty spikes in missions can be overwhelming, with some players finding certain scenarios nearly impossible to complete.

story
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
79%
11%
The game's story is centered around a limited campaign with only a few missions, leading to frustration among players due to difficulty spikes and frequent crashes after completing initial missions. Many users express a desire for more content and playable countries, as well as improvements to mission accessibility and balance. Overall, while the concept is appreciated, the execution leaves much to be desired, particularly in terms of mission variety and stability.
- “This game is great for strategy game lovers; please add more missions, I can't wait to play it again.”
- “However, I will say as you progress, the missions become near impossible for the casual player.”
- “Mam, I loved the whole continent war, but since you added missions like a small scale battle, I hate it; it got boring.”
- “There is only one campaign and one sandbox mission.”
- “However, I will say as you progress, the missions become nearly impossible for the casual player.”
- “I love the game and I would give it five stars, but I don't like that the plot is mostly fictional and never happened.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The graphics of the game have received negative feedback, with users citing poor quality and issues with downloading HD graphics and additional content. Many feel that the game prioritizes aesthetics over clarity and usability, leading to a disappointing visual experience.
- “The graphics of the game are stunning and truly immersive.”
- “The visual design is breathtaking, making every scene a work of art.”
- “The attention to detail in the graphics enhances the overall gaming experience.”
- “Graphics sucks.”
- “Also wouldn't let me download HD graphics or extra missions; something about index file not found?”
- “Seems to sacrifice clarity and ease of use for aesthetics.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The monetization model has been criticized as a cash grab, with users feeling that the game is essentially a demo filled with ads, offering limited access to levels unless players pay for the full version. While the demo itself is enjoyable and ad-free, the overall experience is marred by aggressive monetization tactics.
- “The demo is nice to play, with no ads at all, allowing me to experience parts of the game and everything.”
- “It's not a free game if all the levels aren't included; it's a demo full of ads.”
- “Downloaded was not even a game, just ads for buying the full version.”
- “Pay to play cash grab.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the replayability of the game due to its expansive maps and the freedom to explore different strategies at their own pace. However, there are concerns about compatibility with certain devices, such as Samsung phones, which may affect overall accessibility and enjoyment.
- “Make this game more playable on Samsung phones.”
- “To me, being able to take my time and conquer the large maps like 'Decline of the West' at my own pace and with varying strategies is what holds the most replay value in your games.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find humor in the game's unexpected glitches, such as a pop-up titled "creating diversion" appearing just before a crash, highlighting the irony of the situation. This blend of unintentional comedy adds a lighthearted touch to the gaming experience.
- “It's funny how I got a pop-up called 'Creating Diversion' before my game crashed. I've never played it because of that.”
- “This is funny.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players enjoy the game but report frequent screen freezes, indicating a need for stability improvements.
- “The game is fun, but my screen freezes constantly. I wish it would be fixed.”
- “I keep experiencing crashes that ruin my gameplay experience.”
- “The frequent lag and instability make it hard to enjoy the game.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The gameplay is consistently enjoyable, offering hours of tense and challenging experiences that keep players engaged.
- “Always fun and tense, with hours of challenging gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is incredibly engaging and keeps you on your toes.”
- “Each level offers unique challenges that make the gameplay feel fresh and exciting.”