Steel And Flesh Old

About

Steel And Flesh Old is a single player casual strategy game. It received positive reviews from players.

Steel And Flesh Old - a Mixture of medieval 3D action and strategy.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

81%

Audience ScoreBased on 713 reviews

graphics22 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

Engaging and fun gameplay with good replay value, especially for fans of medieval strategy and army command games.
Runs smoothly on low-end devices and offers a nostalgic experience reminiscent of popular PC games like Mount and Blade.
Good graphics relative to game size and platform, with immersive 3D elements and detailed armor and weapon designs.

Controls are often described as difficult, unresponsive, or glitchy, especially during battles and horse riding.
Lack of tutorial or clear instructions makes it hard for new players to learn game mechanics and army management.
Multiple bugs and glitches affecting gameplay, such as soldiers not attacking properly, crashes, and issues with fighting spirit mechanics.

graphics
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
59%
25%
16%
The game's graphics receive mixed feedback, with many praising their adequacy given the game's size and platform, while others find them outdated, low-quality, or laggy. Despite some criticism, several players appreciate the 3D style and realistic elements, noting that gameplay often outweighs graphical shortcomings. Suggestions for improvement include better battle animations, more detailed environments, and overall graphic updates.
- “The 3D style graphics are perfect and complement the gameplay well. Improvements could include adding more structures like jungles, ruined temples, and treasure locations, as well as animations such as a 5-second boat ride.”
- “The battle scenery is nice and more realistic than in the second version. The graphics are better and immersive, though adding features like blood and improved battle setup would enhance the experience.”
- “The graphics are good considering the game's size and Android platform, delivering impressive visuals for low-end devices without compromising smooth gameplay.”
- “Although the graphics are bad and I have to ask, what's the difference between the 3 steel and flesh? They all look the same. Other than that, keep up the good work.”
- “Bad graphics and I can't get more squad members. I tried upgrading but couldn't find how to do that.”
- “It's very good but the graphics are very bad.”
gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
20%
30%
The gameplay is generally praised for being immersive, detailed, and enjoyable, with smooth mechanics and ample content, though some users note glitches, lag, and room for optimization. Suggestions for improvement include adding more exploration features, better fighting mechanics, and enhanced animations. However, a few users criticize the controls and gameplay experience as frustrating.
- “Not the best graphics but who needs graphics when you have awesome gameplay!”
- “This game is the best because of the 3D style graphics and the gameplay. It would be better if more structures like free-to-explore locations such as jungles and buildings like ruined temples were added along with treasures and animations, like a 5-second boat ride.”
- “Beautiful gameplay with lots of space options and many other features.”
- “I have noticed some glitches and problems during gameplay which need attention.”
- “Please add hoplite equipment and fix the fighting mechanics; it's a bit glitchy but detailed and has much potential.”
- “Horrible controls and gameplay.”
story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
Users appreciate the game's concept and gameplay but consistently note the lack of a cohesive storyline. Many suggest adding a story mode with missions, quests, and more detailed world-building to enhance immersion. Including narrative elements like village management, special characters, and thematic content would greatly improve the experience.
- “Improve graphics and it would be nice if a storyline would be added with missions helping villagers and trade, name village.”
- “It's a great game; all it needs personally is a story mode.”
- “The gameplay is great but the graphics are wonky, also very laggy, no story and no gothic styled armor, as long as the gameplay is cool I'll give it 5 stars.”
- “Please add more content like Spartans, barbarian tribes, and a story also.”
- “I like the idea of the game and the options but there is a bit of lag and a lot of ads. Maybe add quests and special people you can hire, have more choices of workshops you can buy, and build your own villages and castles. When you defeat a village or castle, you can either destroy it for resources or capture it and have a menu to make new laws and change the building style. Please put in more detail.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The music in the game, including tracks like the "Empire Song," enhances the immersive medieval atmosphere and complements the strategic battles and clan wars. Users appreciate how the soundtrack adds to the game's historical and competitive feel.
- “The empire song sets an epic tone, enhancing the immersive experience of the gameplay.”
- “The soundtrack complements the historical setting perfectly, especially with the inclusion of period-appropriate instruments and themes.”
- “The battles, strategy, teams, graphics, and even the music.”
- “Plz add muskets you all know medieval years 1301 that there's muskets those times example of empire song and Poland England and add Shogun empire.”
- “My squad is 476 and I'm the king. I captured all the Germany castles and villages. Now I'm going to attack Poland next with the empire song, and I will declare war on all clans!”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is generally enjoyable but experiences several glitches and stability issues during gameplay. While not pervasive, these problems are noticeable and impact the overall experience.
- “But I have noticed some glitches and problems during gameplay which I'm required to bring to your attention.”
- “I like this game but there are so many glitches.”
- “Although there are a few glitches, it's relatively a good game.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users consistently highlight the game's strong replayability, noting that it offers continuous fun and lasting value.
- “Overall fun and replayability is continuous”
- “Great replay value”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users appreciate the game’s monetization as easier and more enjoyable than others, but find the excessive frequency of ads—especially triggered by actions like tapping castles—detracts from the experience and lowers their rating.
- “Every time you tap a castle you get an ad. It's way too much, I can't stand the ads. Why do you make such trash?”
- “It is a lot easier than the others and has something they don't. The others are on a good path but there is something that the original has that they don't. I like this one because it's fun but please don't have so many ads. It's definitely a five star but so many ads means that this gets 4 stars.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is appreciated for adding a fun and entertaining element to the gameplay, enhancing the overall enjoyable experience.
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game demonstrates strong optimization that enhances gameplay, earning a high rating of 9.9/10, though there is still some room for improvement in future updates.