Space Engineers Game Cover
Starting at $25Buy now

Space Engineers is a sandbox game set in space, where players build, design, and maintain various types of space vessels and stations. It features both creative and survival modes, allowing players to either freely build and explore or survive in a hostile environment. The game also includes physics-based engineering and destruction, adding a layer of realism and challenge to space engineering.

  • PC
  • Play​station 4
  • Play​station 5
  • Windows
  • Xbox One
  • Xbox Series X|S
  • Cloud
  • NVIDIA GeForce NOW
  • Play​Station
  • Xbox
  • x_box_cloud_gaming

Reviews

90%
Audience ScoreBased on 61,271 reviews
gameplay918 positive mentions
optimization414 negative mentions
  • gameplay3,229 mentions

    The gameplay of Space Engineers is characterized by its intricate building mechanics and realistic physics, allowing players to create complex structures and vehicles in a sandbox environment. While the game offers a rich array of creative possibilities, many players note a steep learning curve and a lack of clear objectives, which can lead to repetitive gameplay. Despite its potential, the game is often criticized for bugs, performance issues, and a perceived lack of meaningful content beyond construction, making it more appealing to those who enjoy engineering and creativity rather than traditional gameplay experiences.

    • “The game's building mechanics are a true highlight, offering an extensive array of blocks and tools for players to utilize.”
    • “The seamless transition between solo and multiplayer modes ensures a dynamic and engaging gameplay experience, fostering a sense of community among players exploring the cosmos together.”
    • “Whether you're a meticulous designer or simply enjoy building and tinkering, this game offers a rich and rewarding gameplay experience.”
    • “Don't know how half the mechanics work, full of ideas that never get finished.”
    • “Every single mechanic is as complicated as humanly possible and not for a single moment did one solid second of the game feel intuitive.”
    • “The gameplay loop of gathering resources, building ships or stations, and exploring can be engaging for a while, but it can also get repetitive after a bit.”
  • graphics2,279 mentions

    The graphics in Space Engineers receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the stunning visuals and attention to detail, particularly in the depiction of space and planetary environments. However, there are significant concerns regarding optimization, as many users report performance issues, especially on lower-end systems, leading to lag and crashes even at reduced settings. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered impressive for a sandbox game, they demand a powerful graphics card to run smoothly, which can limit accessibility for some players.

    • “The graphics and visual effects in Space Engineers are stunning, capturing the beauty and vastness of outer space.”
    • “The expanse of the universe along with the breathtaking graphics makes gameplay a thrill every time you log in.”
    • “With its stunning graphics, realistic physics engine, and deep gameplay mechanics, this game has become one of my all-time favorites.”
    • “The graphics are terrible, feels in general clunky.”
    • “The graphics were decent but even my computer with high end hardware struggled to run it because it doesn't feel optimized at all.”
    • “The graphics are subpar, and that's putting it nicely.”
  • optimization1,913 mentions

    The optimization of "Space Engineers" has been a significant point of contention among players, with many expressing frustration over its performance issues. While some users report improvements in recent updates, the game is still criticized for being poorly optimized, particularly in multiplayer scenarios and when handling large builds, leading to frequent lag and crashes. Overall, while the game offers a rich sandbox experience, its performance limitations hinder enjoyment, especially for those with mid-range or lower-end systems.

    • “The progression may be self-instigated, but man it is satisfying to have everything come together to make your very own, personalized, well-oiled, optimized, intergalactic enterprise.”
    • “Even on a mid-range PC, the game runs smoothly.”
    • “It's come a long way as far as optimization is concerned and they still update it and add stuff via paid DLCs that aren't necessary but do have some benefits.”
    • “But the reason that I can't recommend the game is that such a good game is plagued by never-ending crashes and just the game is incredibly poorly optimized.”
    • “There is still so little optimization for the kind of gameplay that was envisioned for this game, that modded singleplayer is really the only way to get good performance and large ship battles together.”
    • “The optimization is notably poor, resulting in performance issues and making it one of the worst-optimized games.”
  • stability1,559 mentions

    The stability of the game has been a significant point of contention among users, with many describing it as "buggy" and "glitchy." Players report frequent crashes, freezes, and various gameplay issues, particularly in multiplayer mode, which can lead to frustrating experiences. While some acknowledge that the game has improved over time and can be enjoyable despite its flaws, the consensus is that it remains in a state of instability, often requiring patience and troubleshooting to navigate its complexities.

    • “Regular updates keep this game working and mostly bug free.”
    • “This game is a bug free masterpiece that deserves any award that is humanly possible.”
    • “The game dynamics and building mechanics are pretty good already and apart from the odd lag spike in multiplayer, the game runs surprisingly smooth and very bug free.”
    • “The game is buggy, the devs are doing odd things with the game, the building system is objectively hard to get used to - but the game is extremely fun.”
    • “Breaks my heart to say this but they've ruined one of my favorite games :( the last major update completely screwed over its optimization the game is nearly unplayable with horrible lag spikes and freezes and crashes at random.”
    • “This game is buggy as hell. You spend hours on something to discover that the thing you wanted to build doesn't work anything close to what you expect it to because hey, buggy physics.”
  • story1,220 mentions

    The story aspect of "Space Engineers" is largely criticized for its lack of depth and direction, with many players noting that the game is primarily a sandbox experience focused on building and creativity rather than a narrative-driven adventure. While there are a few scripted missions and scenarios that serve as tutorials, they are often seen as insufficient and lacking engagement, leaving players to create their own stories or objectives. Overall, those seeking a rich storyline or structured gameplay may find the game lacking, while others appreciate the freedom to craft their own experiences.

    • “The starting scenarios/tutorial missions are a great introduction to the game and give a good feel for what is possible, and there is a lot that is possible.”
    • “The scenarios in general were all good story-driven fun.”
    • “The new campaign (story) mode they added is actually pretty good.”
    • “There's no story or progression like Subnautica or Raft.”
    • “If you need a story-driven game, this isn't for you as the game encourages you to make your own, but if you like games like Minecraft, then this might be the one for you!”
    • “The story mode is pretty lame and just not entertaining.”
  • grinding641 mentions

    The grinding aspect of the game is frequently described as tedious and time-consuming, particularly in survival mode, where players often find themselves spending hours gathering resources and managing limited inventory space. While some players appreciate the grind as part of the challenge and enjoy the satisfaction of building and crafting, many express frustration with the slow progression and repetitive tasks, suggesting that the experience can be significantly improved with mods or by playing with friends. Overall, the game appeals to those who enjoy grinding and resource management, but it may deter players looking for a more streamlined or action-oriented experience.

    • “The resource gathering isn't too grindy considering you use them to make gathering easier, through device/ship creation, which is what makes this game fun.”
    • “A fantastic sandbox game where survival is challenging but not too grindy.”
    • “Can get a bit grindy.”
    • “The game is nothing but grinding and some community servers multiply loot from mining rock because the game unnecessarily takes hours otherwise.”
    • “Survival mode is extremely grindy — this can be 'fixed' by using the 10x mods that give you more stuff.”
    • “The survival is really hard and kind of grindy.”
  • atmosphere378 mentions

    The atmosphere in "Space Engineers" is often praised for its immersive qualities, combining realistic physics with a sandbox environment that encourages creativity in shipbuilding and exploration. Players appreciate the challenge of designing vehicles capable of navigating both atmospheric and space conditions, although some express frustration with the game's physics and the limitations of atmospheric thrusters. Overall, the game successfully creates a captivating atmosphere that enhances the experience of building and surviving in a vast, open universe.

    • “The game's realistic physics engine means that your creations need to be well-designed and balanced to function properly in a planet's atmosphere or zero gravity environments.”
    • “I love this game; it's epic, and you can survive with friends and keep building up your tech until you eventually have a gigantic base all connected with conveyors and everything is automated.”
    • “The atmosphere in this game is excellent, and I think it captures the feeling of being in space extremely well.”
    • “The planets without any mods at all are completely empty, not even NPCs go into the atmosphere; the only planets that NPCs can get close to are the ones without gravity.”
    • “The game started out great, the physics and block damage were the best for its time, but after a while you can see a jump in negative reviews, that's when the planets update came out, which allowed us to have huge, really huge planets to drive around on, with natural gravity and atmosphere.”
    • “Unfortunately that also means there is no visible entry of a planet's atmosphere, but the smooth, transitionless movement, while watching the planet's surface closing in, is the more important feature.”
  • humor322 mentions

    The humor in this game is a standout feature, often stemming from its quirky physics and unexpected glitches, which lead to hilarious moments during gameplay. Players frequently share laughter over the chaotic outcomes of their builds, such as ships crashing or exploding in comical ways, especially when playing with friends. While some bugs can be frustrating, they often add to the charm and entertainment value, making the game a source of both amusement and creativity.

    • “The most fun I had was watching other factions lose ships in hilarious ways.”
    • “It's a really funny sandbox game.”
    • “I love creating cool spaceships or funny mechanisms in this wonderful game where the only limit is your imagination.”
    • “There is a saying that the user experience is like a joke and it is not funny when you have to explain it.”
    • “There are so many bugs and issues it's not funny.”
    • “It used to be fun to laugh at the bugs but this game has become a bad joke and it's just not funny anymore.”
  • music253 mentions

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising its atmospheric and immersive qualities that enhance the space exploration experience, while others find it repetitive and unbalanced compared to sound effects. Many users suggest that the soundtrack can become tiresome over time, leading them to mute it or play their own music instead. Overall, while the music contributes to the game's ambiance, its limited variety and occasional jarring elements detract from the overall enjoyment for some players.

    • “The music is amazing and I can't wait to see what comes to this game in the future!”
    • “The graphics are great, the music adds atmosphere to it.”
    • “The soundtrack is fitting and sets the atmosphere nicely.”
    • “The music is awful and totally unbalanced with the voices, meaning you have to practically turn the music off to even hear what they're saying.”
    • “The audio design is also unimpressive, with generic sound effects and uninspired music that quickly become repetitive and grating.”
    • “The music gets very old after a while, but if you turn it off the game gets more boring!”
  • replayability183 mentions

    Space Engineers is widely praised for its exceptional replayability, often compared to Minecraft but set in a space environment. Players appreciate the game's deep building mechanics, extensive mod support, and the freedom to create and explore, leading to countless hours of gameplay. While some users note that replayability can diminish once the game mechanics are mastered, the overall consensus is that the game's potential for creativity and the active modding community provide nearly infinite replay value.

    • “Space Engineers offers exceptional replay value, akin to Minecraft but set in space with the ability to build ships, space stations, and bases.”
    • “With the workshop full of mods and all the DLCs (not required but nice), this old game has a very long replayability factor— I mean, why else would I have put in more than 7000 hours into this game?”
    • “The game has great replay value, especially when played with friends.”
    • “I might play it off and on when I am bored, but this game is missing some key ingredients for it to be a vastly replayable game.”
    • “It does not have any replay value once you figure out the game mechanics as there are no threats outside of multiplayer.”
    • “Overall the game does need more work in the area of missions, NPCs, and overall replayability.”
  • monetization156 mentions

    The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it as a "cash grab" due to the prevalence of microtransactions and paid DLCs that often feel like content that should have been included in the base game. While some players appreciate the cosmetic nature of the DLCs and the absence of pay-to-win mechanics, the overwhelming presence of advertisements and the feeling of being constantly prompted to purchase additional content have soured the experience for many. Overall, the monetization practices are seen as exploitative, detracting from the game's potential and leaving players frustrated with the lack of substantial updates and core improvements.

    • “The Steam Workshop integration is seamless, the blueprint system (for saving designs) works extremely well, and the DLC policy of the devs sets the gold standard of ethical monetization.”
    • “Good guy devs, no shady hidden microtransactions; most DLCs are only cosmetic, so get it after you figure out if you enjoy the core gameplay.”
    • “DLCs are reasonably priced too, compared to most in-game purchases and DLCs nowadays.”
    • “Every new update is just a shameless cash grab of DLC being shoved down your throat.”
    • “The microtransactions are expensive and pointless.”
    • “This game feels like the devs abandoned it and then released some DLC for a quick cash grab; it had a lot of potential that was never realized.”
  • emotional59 mentions

    The emotional aspect of "Space Engineers" elicits a wide range of feelings, from joy and pride in creative achievements to frustration and heartbreak over technical issues and game mechanics. Players often experience a rollercoaster of emotions, celebrating their successes while mourning losses, such as the destruction of hard-built creations or the impact of bugs. The community's support and the potential for future improvements add a layer of hope, making the emotional investment in the game both rewarding and challenging.

    • “Crashing your ship in survival is heartbreaking.”
    • “Unfortunately, my ship took a hell of a lot of damage in a battle with another friend, and I cried myself to sleep because I had nowhere near the required amount of steel to repair even the tiniest part of my beloved ship.”
    • “It is also an emotional rollercoaster as you accidentally crash into an asteroid going mach 3 with your brand new fighter as you change between laughing and crying.”
  • character development2 mentions

    Reviews indicate that while the game's physics engine is a standout feature, the lack of a compelling narrative and cohesive gameplay undermines character development. The character design received a score of 7.2/10, suggesting that while the characters are visually appealing, their development lacks depth and integration within the overall game experience.

    • “If you make a game and your one thing is your physics engine, there's no narrative, core gameplay loop, or character development. At least make sure that one thing works properly.”
    • “The character development feels shallow and uninspired, leaving players disconnected from the story and the characters.”
    • “I was hoping for a rich character arc, but instead, I got flat personalities and predictable outcomes.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Space Engineers

Play time

155hMedian play time
428hAverage play time
24-600hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 452 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games

Game News