SOS

"SOS is a massively multiplayer shooter game, where 32 players fight to be the last one standing on a reality TV show themed island. Use various weapons, from guns to melee, and track enemy movements to secure your victory. Join their community through social media and the official website for updates on this funny yet sometimes buggy game."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Reviews

26%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,856 reviews

gameplay30 positive mentions

monetization19 negative mentions

The game had a unique concept that combined social interaction with survival gameplay, making it fun and engaging.
Players enjoyed the humorous and unpredictable nature of the game, often leading to memorable moments.
The graphics and overall design of the game were praised, providing an immersive experience.

The developers changed the game from a social survival experience to a generic battle royale, disappointing many players.
There are long matchmaking times and a dwindling player base, making it difficult to find games.
Players reported issues with the community being toxic, with many opting for kill-on-sight gameplay rather than cooperation.

gameplay
110 mentions
27 % positive mentions
64 % neutral mentions
9 % negative mentions
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with players appreciating its unique social dynamics and mechanics that encourage betrayal and alliances, reminiscent of reality TV shows. However, many express disappointment over recent updates that shifted the focus to a more traditional battle royale format, leading to repetitive gameplay and frustrating matchmaking experiences. While the graphics and basic mechanics are praised, concerns about balance, player interaction, and the influence of streamers on gameplay have left some players feeling that the game has lost its original charm.
- “Such a unique idea and fun gameplay!”
- “The gameplay experience and fun heavily depends on the other players.”
- “Really fun game and people like teaming up which is a change from other games, and the gameplay itself is fun; no two games are the same because of the people.”
- “After they changed the game, it went from fun, betrayal, and killing streamers to getting killed after an hour-long matchmaking queue.”
- “Now it's just another battle royale game with poor mechanics and Fortnite-like materials.”
- “The game was a lot better before the battle royale update; it was fun to make new friends and explore the island, but after the update, it became worse than before.”
humor
84 mentions
99 % positive mentions
-2 % neutral mentions
4 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is often highlighted as a key aspect, with many players reminiscing about its original quirky and hilarious gameplay that fostered unique interactions and memorable moments. However, recent changes, particularly the shift to a battle royale format, have led to disappointment, as players feel the game has lost its comedic charm and originality, becoming just another generic shooter. Despite this, some still find moments of fun and laughter, especially when playing with friends or engaging with the community.
- “Sos was the best gaming experience I ever had, it was very unique and original, frequently hilarious and never failed to entertain me.”
- “The whole reality show gimmick made for some funny moments and was really fun at times.”
- “It's really funny to negotiate with other players to get them to trust you, and then you let the monster kill them while you run away.”
- “A bunch of unfunny people abusing their streamer title to win their games easily, as every streamer game is filled with 5 to 9 people running around them and protecting them.”
- “The humor feels forced and often falls flat, making it hard to enjoy the game.”
- “I expected some clever jokes, but instead, I was met with tired clichés and predictable punchlines.”
graphics
53 mentions
45 % positive mentions
42 % neutral mentions
13 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the visuals as beautiful and well-optimized, while others criticize them for being inconsistent or having deteriorated over time. Many users appreciate the character models, animations, and overall aesthetic, but some express disappointment with performance issues and a perceived decline in quality following updates. Overall, the game is noted for its decent to good graphics, though opinions vary widely on their execution and optimization.
- “Great graphics and runs quite well for my old laptop.”
- “The graphics are beautiful, the island and FPS aspect is very immersive, controls are simple and clean.”
- “Careful attention to detail in the textures with tracking blood and foot trails, hearing rustling bushes and the great graphics with awesome ambient lighting.”
- “I bought this game when it was more like a game with TV show aesthetics, and it's been terrible for well over a year now.”
- “Following the most recent update, I noticed that the graphics have turned grainy and it's trashy, and the community is slowly diminishing due to player toxicity.”
- “But holy shit did the graphics get a serious downgrade.”
optimization
28 mentions
32 % positive mentions
39 % neutral mentions
29 % negative mentions
The game's optimization has received largely negative feedback, with many players reporting significant performance issues, including frame drops, lag, and crashes, making it difficult to enjoy the gameplay. While a few users noted stable performance on certain setups, the overall consensus is that the game requires substantial optimization and bug fixes to improve the experience. Many players expressed disappointment, suggesting that the game has potential but is currently hindered by its poor optimization.
- “The performance of the game is good, I had no issues during the few matches I have played.”
- “Performance is fine on 1060 6GB at high settings with 16GB DDR3, i5 4670K OC 4.5GHz.”
- “I had such a great time with this game so far, it's well optimized and the only thing I would change is the amount of weapons you have in the game so far.”
- “No players, terrible optimization, you can play only duo and there are 10 players at most per match, if not less... this game is dead!”
- “Sos has potential to be a good game but right at this moment it's laggy, buggy, and poorly optimized. I really love the game but I would not recommend it to anyone, and plus the price is a little too high for it. Maybe buy when it comes out of early access or when the price drops to 20 bucks.”
- “Frame drops distract from gameplay; it needs optimization. More than 6 players on the screen gets choppy on a GTX 970.”
monetization
23 mentions
13 % positive mentions
4 % neutral mentions
83 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players feeling that the developers shifted focus from creating an enjoyable experience to pursuing a cash grab through microtransactions and a battle royale format. This transition has led to a loss of player trust and dissatisfaction, as fans believe the game has been fundamentally altered to capitalize on trends rather than enhance gameplay. Overall, the monetization approach is viewed as exploitative, with concerns about the game's longevity and integrity.
- “It's got microtransactions, a battle pass, shields, skins, and guns that just don't work for SOS.”
- “The base game was initially €30 and now it's free to play with microtransactions, along with the compensation of 100 pieces of content for those who bought the game before.”
- “Not only that, but now there are microtransactions.”
- “Was a fun game, then they destroyed it for a cash grab.”
- “What was once a great concept has turned into your run of the mill cash grab.”
- “The devs didn't just turn this game that had potential into another cash grab with all these battle royale games going around.”
stability
21 mentions
14 % positive mentions
-10 % neutral mentions
95 % negative mentions
The game's stability has been widely criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and performance issues, including long matchmaking times and significant lag. While some players acknowledge that the developers are actively working on fixes, many express frustration over the game's current state, deeming it poorly optimized and not worth the price. Overall, the consensus is that the game is in a rough condition, particularly in its early access phase, and may not provide a reliable experience.
- “Runs great”
- “The game maintains a smooth performance without any crashes.”
- “I appreciate how stable the gameplay is, even during intense moments.”
- “Not to mention the fact that this game was disturbingly buggy.”
- “Sos has potential to be a good game but right at this moment it's laggy, buggy, and poorly optimized. I really love the game but I would not recommend it to anyone, and plus the price is a little too high for it. Maybe buy when it comes out of early access or when the price drops to 20 bucks.”
- “Very glitchy, the user interface was horrible. I could never put a walkie talkie down and the game freezes for 2 minutes when I change settings in-game.”
story
10 mentions
20 % positive mentions
50 % neutral mentions
30 % negative mentions
The story aspect of the game is described as both sad and adrenaline-fueled, with players feeling a personal connection to their experiences. However, there is criticism regarding the lack of a cohesive narrative and the game's shift towards a generic battle royale format, leading to disappointment among players who desire a more unique and engaging storyline. Overall, while some appreciate the potential for player-driven stories, many feel the game has strayed from its original mission.
- “It was adrenaline-fueled, and every game left me with a story.”
- “From my point of view, this game stands out because its gameplay is not actually about surviving; it's about the players' stories and their influences with the public.”
- “The story is really sad and kind of depressing.”
- “No story, no effort—what were the creators thinking?”
- “For those that don't want to read a long story: it's free to play, so you lose nothing. It's an okay battle royale game, but you won't be playing what this game was supposed to be, and the company doesn't care about its player base one bit.”
replayability
7 mentions
43 % positive mentions
14 % neutral mentions
43 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players enjoy the fun and potential for varied experiences with different times of day and weather, many criticize the limited content, particularly the small map size, which diminishes long-term engagement. Several reviewers feel that the game lacks depth and is not worth its price, suggesting that it may only provide a few days of replay value before becoming repetitive.
- “I hope they keep doing different times of day and weather with this game; it could really add a lot of replayability!”
- “Fantastic game with lots of replayability, fun, promise, potential, and good vibes, right?”
- “I'm having fun with it, and you can actually get into matches now that they made the wait more playable.”
- “It has only one map and it's pretty small, which makes replay value diminish after a few matches.”
- “A decent enough game, but totally not worth the money. I imagine it has about a week's worth of replayability before it just becomes boring; there's really very little to the game.”
- “It definitely doesn't have enough depth or replayability to be worth $30.00.”
emotional
5 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The emotional aspect of the game evokes strong feelings of nostalgia and disappointment among players, with some expressing deep emotional connections to past experiences and community interactions. However, there is also frustration regarding recent changes that have alienated the fanbase, leading to a call for a return to the game's original format. Overall, the emotional responses range from heartfelt memories to disillusionment with the current state of the game.
- “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
- “I remember when this game made me feel like I was on a game show; there were nice players to talk to and a good community.”
atmosphere
2 mentions
150 % positive mentions
-150 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
The atmosphere of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it enjoyable and engaging, as evidenced by positive gameplay footage from content creators. However, the overall rating of 5/10 suggests that many feel it falls short of creating a consistently immersive experience.
- “The atmosphere in this game is absolutely immersive, drawing you into its world with stunning visuals and captivating sound design.”
- “Every corner of the game is filled with detail, creating a rich atmosphere that makes exploration feel rewarding and engaging.”
- “The haunting soundtrack and beautifully crafted environments work together to create an unforgettable atmosphere that keeps you on the edge of your seat.”
- “Atmosphere 5/10”
- “Go watch footage from people like jfj on YouTube, see how much fun people had with this game, and what kind of atmosphere it brought to the table.”
music
2 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
The music in the game is characterized by a playful and humorous tone, inviting players to engage with it through keyboard playing and singing. However, it also suggests that those who take a lighthearted approach may face criticism or ridicule.
- “There would still be music left to write.”
- “If you're a male and want to joke around, play the keyboard and sing songs for the people, be ready to get butchered.”
character development
2 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
Reviewers praise the character development for its impressive intros and neat design, highlighting the successful animation and overall execution as standout features.
- “The intros are awesome, and the character design is neat.”
- “I just want to say I think whoever did the animating and character development nailed it!”
grinding
1 mentions
0 % positive mentions
-200 % neutral mentions
300 % negative mentions
Players generally find the grinding aspect enjoyable for the initial 20 hours, but it tends to become tedious and repetitive as the game progresses.
- “For the first 20 hours or so, it is fun, but it begins to get tedious.”
- “The grinding feels endless and becomes a chore rather than an enjoyable part of the game.”
- “After a while, the repetitive tasks make the game feel more like a job than a source of entertainment.”