SOS

About

SOS is a multiplayer survival shooter game. It was developed by Outpost Games, Inc. and was released on January 23, 2018. It received negative reviews from players.

SOS is an interactive game show where 16 entertaining performers are dropped onto La Cuna Island with one simple goal – get off La Cuna Island. Players must find a relic, signal for extraction, and grab a spot on the rescue chopper while out-thinking opponents and fending off monster hordes. Survivors will be rewarded with fame and fortune, not to mention their lives.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+18

Skip User Reviews

26%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,124 reviews

gameplay36 positive mentions

monetization28 negative mentions

The game was unique and fun in its original state, focusing on social interaction and teamwork.
Players enjoyed the comedic elements and the reality show aspect of the game.
The graphics and concept were praised, with many players finding it entertaining.

The game was changed to a battle royale format, losing its original charm and gameplay mechanics.
Many players experienced long matchmaking times and a dwindling player base.
The developers were criticized for not listening to the community and prioritizing streamers over regular players.

gameplay
138 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
64%
10%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players initially enjoying its unique blend of social interaction and survival mechanics, particularly the elements of betrayal and teamwork. However, subsequent updates have shifted the focus towards a more traditional battle royale format, leading to complaints about repetitive gameplay, long matchmaking times, and a decline in the social aspects that made it appealing. While some players appreciate the innovative mechanics and the potential for fun interactions, others feel that the game has become a generic experience plagued by toxic behavior and a lack of content.
- “Such a unique idea and fun gameplay!”
- “The gameplay was true to the theme of drama television.”
- “Really fun game and people like teaming up which is a change from other games, and the gameplay itself is fun; no two games are the same because of the people.”
- “At some point down the line, they made a content update which changed the mechanics of the game entirely.”
- “The game was a lot better before the battle royale update. It was fun to make new friends and explore the island with them, but after the update, this game became worse than before. The developers killed their own game by doing this. Now if I go to find a match, it takes forever to find one, like waiting 15 minutes, and then the gameplay is just not enjoyable.”
- “The gameplay will get repetitive very quickly, but the social experiences are unique and worth the $30.”
humor
119 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
98%
2%
The humor in the game is often highlighted as a standout feature, with players enjoying the quirky, comedic interactions and the game's unique premise reminiscent of a game show. However, many reviews express disappointment over recent changes that shifted the game towards a more conventional battle royale format, which detracted from its original charm and humor. Despite these criticisms, players still find moments of hilarity, especially when engaging with the community and experiencing the unpredictable nature of gameplay.
- “It was so funny because it was a freaking game show; you were contestants in a game show, I mean come on, that was amazing.”
- “This game is hilarious and honestly, I have enjoyed almost every match I've played so far.”
- “The game runs well, it's pretty fun, simple to play, and honestly could be the most hilarious game ever.”
- “A bunch of unfunny people abusing their streamer title to win their games easily, since every streamer game is filled with 5 to 9 people running around them and protecting them.”
- “A bunch of unfunny people abusing their streamer title to win their games easily, since every streamer game is filled with 5 to 9 people running around them and protecting them.”
graphics
45 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
51%
18%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising their beauty and immersive quality, while others criticize them for being grainy or subpar, especially after recent updates. Many users note that the game is graphics-intensive, requiring high-end hardware for optimal performance. Overall, while some find the visuals stunning and enjoyable, others feel they fall short of expectations, particularly in comparison to similar titles.
- “I fell in love with the graphics, the community, and the simple but brilliant concept of the game.”
- “The graphics are beautiful, the island and FPS aspect is very immersive, controls are simple and clean.”
- “Graphically, definitely a 2018 title; looks pretty and runs smooth.”
- “Following the most recent update, I noticed that the graphics have turned grainy and it's trashy, and the community is slowly diminishing due to player toxicity and again, the battle royale issues.”
- “But holy shit did the graphics get a serious downgrade.”
- “Just like a higher requirement PUBG with shittier graphics and gameplay, fewer players, fewer weapons, fewer items, fewer cosmetics, and more want for your money.”
monetization
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
3%
9%
88%
The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players feeling that the developers shifted focus to a cash grab model by adopting a battle royale format and introducing microtransactions. Initially a paid game, it has now transitioned to a free-to-play model, but players express dissatisfaction with the lack of meaningful content and the perception that the game has become a vehicle for profit rather than a quality experience. Overall, the sentiment is that the game's monetization approach has alienated its original fanbase and diminished its long-term viability.
- “The base game was initially 30€ and now it's free to play with microtransactions, offering compensation of 100 pieces of content for those who purchased the game before.”
- “Was a fun game, then they destroyed it for a cash grab.”
- “Now it's just a battle royale cash grab.”
- “Bought what was a good game, then the developer wanted to join the battle royale cash grab train and completely changed the game I originally purchased.”
stability
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
92%
The game's stability is frequently criticized, with users reporting significant glitches, lag, and freezing issues that detract from the overall experience. While some minor glitches are noted as manageable, many players describe the game as poorly optimized and recommend waiting for improvements before purchasing. Despite its potential, the current state is seen as unfinished and frustrating, leading to a lack of recommendations from users.
- “Runs great”
- “Runs great”
- “Then on the 2/5/18 they decided that they were going to change the base game into an unfinished, laggy, buggy, and broken battle royale.”
- “Sos has potential to be a good game but right at this moment it's laggy, buggy, and poorly optimized. I really love the game but I would not recommend it to anyone, and plus the price is a little too high for it. Maybe buy when it comes out of early access or when the price drops to 20 bucks.”
- “Every time I find a match and it shows the audience count, it freezes and stops working completely. Please fix this... overall fun game if it worked.”
optimization
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The game is criticized for its poor optimization, with players experiencing significant lag, stuttering, and performance issues, especially when more than six players are on screen. Despite having a solid foundation and good graphics, many reviewers suggest that it requires urgent bug fixes and optimization to enhance the overall experience. Overall, while the game shows potential, its current state is deemed unplayable for many, leading to recommendations to wait for improvements before purchasing.
- “The map is not too big, there are not way too many players, it should be running just fine, and it was, on alpha. Now on early access, performance is going up and down depending on the patches.”
- “All that this game needs now is bug fixes and optimization plus whatever the devs have in mind for content.”
- “+ good graphics, and gameplay has no stuttering.”
- “Horribly optimized.”
- “Sos has potential to be a good game but right at this moment it's laggy, buggy, and poorly optimized. I really love the game but I would not recommend it to anyone, and plus the price is a little too high for it. Maybe buy when it comes out of early access or when the price drops to 20 bucks.”
- “Frame drops distract from gameplay, needs optimization; more than 6 players on the screen gets choppy on a GTX 970.”
story
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
61%
17%
The game's story aspect is described as lacking depth and effort, with players feeling that it prioritizes adrenaline-fueled gameplay over a meaningful narrative. While some appreciate the unique player-driven stories that emerge during gameplay, there is a strong desire for the developers to focus on creating a more engaging and original storyline rather than conforming to the battle royale trend. Overall, players express disappointment in the current direction and hope for future content that enhances the storytelling experience.
- “It was adrenaline fueled, and every game left me with a story.”
- “From my point of view, this game looked like any other survival game, but this one stands out because its gameplay is not actually about surviving; it's about the players' stories and their influence on the public.”
- “If this game continues like this, I would expect more content and choices added toward the players' stories, like a new big brother resort map and other social events where players try to obtain public votes to get out of the island without a relic or something similar. This could make things more interesting; who knows?”
- “For those that don't want to read a long story: it's free to play so you lose nothing, it's an okay battle royale game, but you won't be playing what this game was supposed to be and the company doesn't care about its player base one bit.”
- “No story, no effort--what were you creators thinking?”
- “From my point of view, this game looks like any other survival game, but this one stands out because its gameplay is not actually about surviving; it's about the players' stories and their influence on the public.”
emotional
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a strong emotional connection to the game's original format, reminiscing about the sense of community and enjoyment it provided. However, there is significant frustration with recent changes that diverge from what the fanbase desires, leading some to reject the game until it returns to its former state. The sentiment highlights a longing for the game's past charm and a disappointment with its current direction.
- “I remember when this game made me feel like I was on a gameshow, there were nice players to talk to and a good community.”
replayability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The game's replayability is significantly hindered by its single, small map, leading to a quick decline in interest after a few matches. Many reviewers feel that the lack of depth and content does not justify the $30 price tag, suggesting it offers more value akin to a $15-$20 title, with replay potential lasting only a couple of days for most players.
- “It definitely doesn't have enough depth or replayability to be worth $30.00.”
- “It has only one map and it's pretty small, which makes the replay value diminish after a few matches.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game is characterized by a playful and humorous tone, particularly when performed by male characters who engage in lighthearted singing and keyboard playing. However, this approach may not resonate with everyone, as some players feel it can be overly simplistic or poorly executed.
- “There would still be music left to write.”
- “If you're a male and want to joke around, play the keyboard and sing songs for the people, be ready to get butchered.”
character development
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers praise the character development for its impressive intros and neat character design, highlighting the skillful animation that enhances the overall experience.
- “I just want to say I think whoever did the animating and character development nailed it!”
- “The intros are awesome and the character design is neat.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the grinding aspect enjoyable for the initial 20 hours, but it tends to become tedious as the game progresses.
- “For the first 20 hours or so, it is fun, but it begins to get tedious.”