Sol Survivor

About

Sol Survivor is a single player and multiplayer survival strategy game with horror and science fiction themes. It was developed by Cadenza Interactive and was released on March 15, 2010. It received very positive reviews from players.

Jump in to intense turret defense action with Sol Survivor! Build turrets to defend your colony and the innocent colonists within. Smash enemies with volleys of actively-controlled orbital support. Play with friends in co-operative and competitive multiplayer matches or test your mettle against our new Survival mode. Orbital Support - Get up close and personal with the enemy by calling down orbit…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

94%

Audience ScoreBased on 357 reviews

story8 positive mentions

grinding3 negative mentions

Sol Survivor offers a diverse range of towers and support abilities, allowing for various strategies and playstyles, making it highly replayable.
The game features enjoyable multiplayer modes, including co-op and competitive play, which enhance the overall experience and provide hours of fun with friends.
Despite its age, the game maintains a solid balance and engaging gameplay, with a captivating soundtrack that complements the tower defense mechanics.

The game suffers from slow pacing, with long waits between waves and no option to speed up gameplay, which can lead to tedious moments.
Some players find the graphics dated and the overall presentation lacking polish compared to more modern tower defense games.
The campaign can feel repetitive, and certain challenges may be frustratingly difficult, leading to a lack of motivation to continue playing.

story
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
75%
7%
The story in this tower defense game is described as having higher stakes than typical entries in the genre, yet it remains somewhat odd and simplistic, often lacking depth and clarity. While some players appreciate the text-based narrative and find it rewarding, others criticize it for being minimal and not a primary draw for the game. Overall, the story serves as a backdrop to the gameplay rather than a compelling element, with many players noting that the focus should be on strategy and tower mechanics rather than narrative.
- “As opposed to many tower defense games, this game has a really nice, relevant classical story which is being told in text form.”
- “The story is really nice and is one reason why playing this game feels so rewarding and worthwhile.”
- “It looks gorgeous, has an amazing soundtrack, and it definitely has a story to tell.”
- “The story is somewhat nonexistent, but it's a moot point when you're watching your towers launch volley after volley of defensive flak to a kickin' soundtrack.”
- “Campaign has a simple text-based couple of missions, but honestly, if you are buying a tower defense game for the story, you are doing something wrong.”
- “The music is fantastic, but tower sound effects feel flat and the story is also very basic.”
graphics
39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
49%
18%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many users noting that they appear dated and lack high resolution, especially when compared to modern titles. However, some players appreciate the unique visual style and the engaging gameplay that compensates for the simplicity of the graphics. Overall, while the visuals may not meet the standards of contemporary games, they are considered adequate for the genre and contribute to a satisfying gaming experience.
- “The attention to detail in Sol Survivor's visuals is truly commendable.”
- “The graphics are also very nice considering when it came out, and it supports 4K resolution even.”
- “Cadenza Interactive does an excellent job in delivering a graphical style that is both elegant and visually appealing.”
- “The graphics are a bit dated.”
- “If HD graphics is a standard you don't want to miss, this game is not for you.”
- “A shoddy tower defense with sad, horrible art; it does get challenging, but with the visuals, it feels forced and irritates the player.”
gameplay
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
64%
9%
The gameplay of the game is generally praised for its balance, engaging mechanics, and strategic depth, making it appealing to both newcomers and veterans of the genre. While some players appreciate the gradual introduction of new elements and the multiplayer features, others criticize aspects like repetitive gameplay and visibility issues. Overall, it offers a solid tower defense experience, though some recommend alternatives for a more refined gameplay experience.
- “With its engaging gameplay mechanics, stunning visuals, and strategic depth, the game stands out as a must-play for both newcomers and seasoned strategy enthusiasts.”
- “The gradual introduction of new tower types and abilities keeps the gameplay fresh and encourages experimentation, ensuring that every level presents a new challenge to overcome.”
- “The gameplay is excellent, the soundtrack is amazing, the multiplayer adds more than plenty of replay value, and the game is a quite solid production with lots of potential for enhancement later on.”
- “If you want a pure tower defense game, Defense Grid: The Awakening and its sequel are a better bet in terms of gameplay, mechanics, map design, and general enjoyment - and that's why it's hard to recommend this.”
- “However, same exact gameplay and mostly the same kinds of towers.”
- “The sound is particularly lackluster and the gameplay, like any typical tower defense game, is basically a matter of plopping down turrets as soon as you have enough funds to get them.”
music
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
56%
35%
9%
The music in the game receives high praise for its exceptional quality and fitting ambiance, enhancing the overall experience with its electronic space sounds and melodies reminiscent of late 80s synth pop. While some reviews note shortcomings in other areas, the soundtrack is consistently highlighted as a standout feature that adds depth and immersion to the gameplay. Overall, players find the music to be a significant strength, contributing to the game's replay value and enjoyment.
- “Probably the best tower defense game I've played and the soundtrack is amazing.”
- “Another highlight is the incredibly beautifully composed soundtrack, which consists mostly of electronic space sounds and melodies that remind me of late 80s synth pop.”
- “Kudos to the composer, because the soundtrack is amazing and fitting in every way.”
- “It also doesn't help that the soundtrack really sucks.”
- “There weren't any other characters you interact with, no cool-looking enemy force, no cause to get behind, no great music, no cool art style, no humor (other than that officer), and it just felt really bland due to these things.”
- “I can't think of another tower defense game with music that I even noticed.”
replayability
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
30%
30%
Overall, the game offers significant replayability through its engaging multiplayer co-op features, a robust map editor, and various difficulty levels and challenges. While some players note a lack of story payoff and dated visuals, the addictive gameplay and depth contribute to its lasting appeal. The combination of solo and multiplayer modes ensures that players can enjoy the game repeatedly without losing interest.
- “The map editor adds a lot of replayability.”
- “The multiplayer co-op function is incredibly fun as it adds a lot of replay value to the maps and missions, although it is still highly addictive going it alone.”
- “It is very forgiving of small mistakes, has an excellent soundtrack, and has a ton of replay value with the many difficulty levels and extra challenges and multiplayer modes.”
- “Ss is a bit dated looking these days and there's no story payoff; it has no speed-up options, which really hurts it for replayability and experimentation.”
- “The gameplay is excellent, the soundtrack is amazing, the multiplayer adds plenty of replay value, and the game is a solid production with lots of potential for enhancement later on.”
- “Top-notch indie tower defense game with a lot of replayability and depth.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be somewhat tedious and repetitive, especially when fatigue sets in. However, many feel that the focus is more on strategy rather than excessive grinding, making it manageable overall.
- “Slow, tedious, repetitive.”
- “It can be a bit tedious at times, especially when you're tired and should be getting some sleep.”
- “The highest difficulty revolves around strategy to win and not grinding.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The optimization of the game is highly praised, with users noting that it delivers superb performance reminiscent of polished flash games, ensuring a smooth experience across various systems.
- “Like the good old times when Flash games were a thing, but more polished and with amazing performance no matter what.”
- “Performance: superb.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users report significant stability issues, citing buggy navigation, frequent crashes, and poor frame rates that hinder gameplay and overall enjoyment.
- “The navigation mechanisms and movement are buggy, with crashes and horrible frame rates preventing me from playing this agonizing mess further.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is largely absent, with only a minor comedic element provided by an officer, leading to an overall bland experience devoid of engaging characters or entertaining interactions.
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere is highly praised for its exceptional music and immersive qualities, enhanced by extensive support options that allow for a richer gameplay experience beyond just building and upgrading towers.
- “The music and atmosphere are particularly good, and the extensive support options mean you do a lot more than just building and upgrading towers.”