Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game

About

Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game is a single player casual puzzle game. It received negative reviews from players.

Find a match and put the slice in a circle! Try an addictive puzzle action game!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

37%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,220 reviews

gameplay17 positive mentions

monetization1k negative mentions

Fun and addictive game with a simple, relaxing concept.
Good way to pass time, entertaining and occupies hands with minimal thinking.
Nice visuals and various playing modes including daily challenges and world tour.

Excessive and intrusive ads, including unskippable ads during and between rounds, disrupt gameplay.
Poor randomization algorithm causes repeated identical pieces making levels unwinnable and frustrating.
Game feels rigged to force losses and ad viewing; lack of real strategy reduces enjoyment.

monetization
1,041 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
98%
The game’s monetization heavily relies on excessive and intrusive ads, with users reporting ads before, during, and after each level, often unskippable and very long, severely disrupting gameplay. Many feel the game is designed to make players lose by giving repetitive pieces, forcing ad views to continue, which detracts from enjoyment and feels like a cash grab. While an ad-free purchase option exists, it is often seen as overpriced and still does not remove all ads, leading to widespread frustration and poor overall reception of the monetization model.
- “This game is so good that I ended up paying the $5 to have no ads.”
- “Great game to pass the time, definitely buy the no ads offer, but it needs more content.”
- “Not super challenging, but still requires some strategy, no time limits, and if you pay for no ads, plenty of chances to finish a level.”
- “The game forces you to lose by giving you the same pieces over and over, and the only way around it is to watch ads or pay for the full version.”
- “You spend more time watching 30 second ads than actually playing.”
- “It's nearly impossible to complete levels without watching ads to continue, as the game purposefully fails you with repeated pieces.”
gameplay
84 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
65%
15%
The gameplay is generally seen as simple and potentially entertaining but is marred by frustrating mechanics, particularly the repetitive and non-random piece distribution that often forces unwinnable situations. Excessive and intrusive ads, sometimes appearing mid-level and disrupting flow, significantly detract from the experience, making gameplay time far shorter than ad time. Overall, the game feels like a cash grab prioritizing ad revenue over skill-based, enjoyable gameplay.
- “The gameplay itself can be really entertaining, but there are times where you might get the same piece multiple times and after a bit you can't fill the circle to win, but otherwise the game is fun.”
- “Other than that I really like your concept, visuals and overall relaxing gameplay.”
- “I like the gameplay experience and the concept!”
- “The game was 75% ads, 25% gameplay.”
- “The game's mechanics are inherently broken.”
- “Terrible gameplay, six pizzas to fill with 6 slices each, if you can't play the current piece you lose, that all sounds fine until you realise the game repeatedly gives you the same piece while not giving any of another making it impossible more often than not.”
graphics
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
65%
22%
13%
Users generally praise the graphics for being bright, cute, and visually relaxing, with a simple yet appealing aesthetic that enhances gameplay. Some note minor issues with specific design elements and express that while the visuals are well done, the overall game experience can be repetitive or frustrating. Overall, the graphics are considered a strong positive aspect of the game.
- “The graphics look bright and slick.”
- “The graphics are nice, the controls are easy to use, and the dark background is easy on the eyes.”
- “Everything is lovely, the aesthetics are beautiful and it's easy to play.”
- “So I've sought out another clone of this that, to be honest, has better graphic design.”
- “Suggestion: graphics department might want to revisit the look of the 'strawberry' pieces.”
- “On top of that, the levels don't change other than the graphics and number of pieces you have to put down; gameplay is too repetitive.”
stability
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from frequent freezes, crashes, and glitches that disrupt gameplay, often requiring restarts and causing lost progress. These stability issues, compounded by aggressive ads, significantly detract from the overall experience despite some initial enjoyment.
- “The game often freezes or crashes, causing me to have to restart the level.”
- “This app is terrible... I downloaded it for my ADHD, for which it's great, but the app freezes almost every time you start a new set and halfway through you lose progress. Plus, in the four days I've had it downloaded, it's given me one daily challenge and refuses to reset and count as a new day.”
- “It was really fun at first, even though it's all luck and no strategy, but once you get to a certain level the game freezes and you can't click on any of the 'redo' buttons.”
music
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The game lacks its own music and offers only minimal sound effects, leading to a silent experience until frequent unskippable ads interrupt and pause any user’s own music, which frustrates players and detracts from the overall enjoyment.
- “I play music whenever I play games like these, but the ads ruin my experience. Besides that, this is a good quality game.”
- “Also, there's no music to listen to, so you sit there in silence until an ad pops up.”
- “Also, the description says there is music, but there isn't, only the breaking sound.”
- “Every time an annoying ad pops up, my music is paused and then I have to go back to my app to play the music again.”
- “Little did I know that there were 30-second unskippable ads between every level and failure that pause your music and try to redirect you.”
- “Also, there's no music to listen to so you sit there in silence until an ad pops up.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is light and somewhat amusing, though users feel there's potential for it to be more entertaining and less stressful. Some frustrating moments, such as forced ad views even after declining, detract from the comedic experience.
- “It's kinda funny.”
- “You have too many ideas for making the game more funny and less stressful.”
- “Funny thing, when you lose and press 'no thanks' for watching an ad to continue, you still have to watch an ad.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express frustration with the game's interface, noting that design issues like lack of resolution scaling cause uncomfortable screen placement and accidental ad activations, which detract from the emotional enjoyment.
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding in the game feels repetitive and lacks sufficient randomness, leading to tedious and frustrating gameplay that some users perceive as a ploy for ad revenue farming.
- “While I like the premise, the sequences of pieces aren't random enough and it makes the gameplay tedious and frustrating.”
- “Game feels like a front for farming ad revenue frankly.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is optimized for smooth performance and low battery usage, providing a fun experience. However, heavy ad presence and unpredictable randomness detract from overall playability, suggesting a prioritization of ad revenue over user experience.
- “It is fun and seems to be optimized for smooth play and minimal battery drainage, but they really need to lessen (not remove, I know developers need to eat!) the number of ads and tweak the randomness to a playable level.”
- “A great game concept, but seems to be optimized for ad revenue.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the game's replayability to be very low, feeling that it offers little incentive to play again. Additionally, the $5 price to remove ads is viewed as unjustified given the limited content and replay value.
- “However, the replayability is almost nil.”
- “And the $5 to get rid of the ads is ridiculous because this game lacks replayability.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story is engaging and puzzle-like, encouraging players to keep playing for extended periods. However, some players have encountered issues that affect their progress in collecting items, which may impact the overall experience.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game

Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game
See offer on Play Store

Skip Games Like Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game

57%10kreviews

Woodoku - Wood Block Puzzle

Puzzle

65%1.3mreviews

Pull the Pin

2020

Casual Puzzle

43%820reviews

Color Hole 3D

Action

51%10kreviews

Water Sort: Color Puzzle Game

Casual Puzzle

60%407.4kreviews

Tangle Master 3D

2020

Casual Quiz

More games like Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game is a casual puzzle game.

Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game was developed by CASUAL AZUR GAMES.

Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game has received negative reviews from players. Most players liked Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game for its gameplay but disliked it for its monetization.

Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game is a single player game.

Similar games include Woodoku - Wood Block Puzzle, Pull the Pin, Color Hole 3D, Water Sort: Color Puzzle Game, Tangle Master 3D and others.

Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game

Platforms

About

Buy Slices: Shapes Puzzle Game