Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS

About

Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS is a single player casual strategy game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

The most Epic mobile strategy game(RTS) in real time

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

80%

Audience ScoreBased on 557 reviews

graphics7 positive mentions

monetization9 negative mentions

The game offers a fun and addictive RTS experience, reminiscent of classic PC games like Age of Empires.
Players appreciate the potential for future updates, including new factions, maps, and gameplay features.
The game is praised for its engaging mechanics and the nostalgic feel it provides for fans of strategy games.

The game suffers from numerous bugs, including issues with online play, synchronization problems, and frequent crashes.
Many players find the controls clunky and difficult to manage, particularly when selecting and commanding units.
There are complaints about excessive ads and a lack of balance in gameplay, making it frustrating for players to progress without spending money.

graphics
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
37%
19%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed feedback from users. While some appreciate the aesthetic and find it reminiscent of classic titles, many others criticize the graphics as low-quality and in need of significant improvement. Suggestions for enhancements include better animations, higher resolution options, and more detailed environments to elevate the overall visual experience.
- “Ai is superb, game graphics and gameplay is fun and should be considered a good baseline for additional functionality and future expansion such as campaigns and storylines.”
- “Good game and I really liked the graphics which gave the feel of Empire Earth and the Settlers franchise.”
- “Five stars, the best graphics.”
- “Gameplay is okay at best... but the worst bit is that they've taken graphics from Lord of the Rings (Stone Kingdom uses Gondorian tree symbol, and the enemy are very clearly orcs too) so I don't know how long this would last if Warner got a hold of this.”
- “However, you need to polish the game effort and realistic graphics.”
- “Poor graphics, too elementary.”
monetization
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
8%
75%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed feedback, with many users expressing frustration over the frequency of ads, particularly during critical gameplay moments. Some players reported issues with in-game purchases, such as receiving fewer gems than promised and experiencing increased ads after spending money. While a few users appreciate the option for quick ads with rewards, the overall sentiment leans towards a need for better balance and reduced ad interruptions to enhance the gaming experience.
- “At least that one didn't have ads on every corner.”
- “If you can add in-game purchases, I would be very happy. I want to support you so bad!”
- “The problems are that ads appear every time you switch to the world map, which is a lot. I was okay with that, but when I went to buy gems, it said the ads would go away if I purchased them. I bought 400 gems, but the game only gave me 200, and the ads got worse after I bought it. Now an ad pops up, and boom, I'm under attack. I couldn't reinforce my other city right after the ads; I get attacked before I could see them marching to my city.”
- “Ads appear way too frequently, and the gameplay is super challenging and a little sluggish. But generic problems aside, it's fantastic!”
- “Lot of advertising.”
gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
23%
33%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it enjoyable yet simplistic, while others criticize its mechanics and frequent ads. Key issues include a lack of depth in gameplay features, such as zooming out for better battlefield views and a more robust economy system. Additionally, the graphics have drawn comparisons to existing franchises, raising concerns about originality, and some players have experienced technical difficulties that hinder their overall experience.
- “Good game and I really liked the graphics which gave the feel of Empire Earth and the Settlers franchise, but the mechanics surely need a lot of work like zooming out for a wide view of the battlefield, viewing enemy building's HP, and some new maps, especially a good economy system.”
- “Mechanics are great, but graphics and animations do need work. I will keep playing this one.”
- “Ads appear way too frequently, and the gameplay is super challenging and a little sluggish, but generic problems aside, it's fantastic!”
- “Gameplay is okay at best, but the worst bit is that they've taken graphics from Lord of the Rings (Stone Kingdom uses Gondorian tree symbol, and the enemies are very clearly orcs too), so I don't know how long this would last if Warner got a hold of this.”
- “Good game and I really liked the graphics which gave the feel of Empire Earth and the Settlers franchise, but the mechanics surely need a lot of work, like zooming out for a wide view of the battlefield, viewing enemy building's HP, and some new maps, especially a good economy system.”
- “Singleplayer = 30 seconds gameplay / 30 seconds ad time.”
story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The reviews indicate that while the game features enjoyable graphics and gameplay, it lacks a compelling story or campaign mode, which has led to a lower rating. Players express a desire for additional content, including missions, unit formations, and a narrative to enhance the overall experience. The absence of a storyline is a significant drawback for many users.
- “Ai is superb, game graphics and gameplay is fun and should be considered a good baseline for additional functionality and future expansion such as campaigns and storylines.”
- “Please add formation for units and more units like trolls for orcs, as well as walls, more maps, sea maps, more offline mode, more rewards, and finally campaign mode or story mode for each faction.”
- “But 4 stars for now because this game has no missions or campaign mode and also lacks upgrades for heroes and buildings to improve their abilities, strength, and weaknesses.”
- “But 4 stars for now because this game has no missions or campaign mode, and also no upgrades for the heroes and buildings to improve their abilities, strengths, and weaknesses.”
- “No storyline.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
80%
The game's stability is a significant concern, with multiple users reporting frequent glitches and freezing issues, particularly when starting online or solo modes. While some players have enjoyed the gameplay without encountering problems, the overall experience is marred by persistent bugs that hinder functionality, especially during unit training.
- “I've had fun playing it; it's very easy to play and also a very interesting game. During the time I played, I encountered no glitches.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes or bugs, making for a seamless experience.”
- “I appreciate the stability of the game; it allows me to focus on enjoying the gameplay without interruptions.”
- “The game is broken; it glitches.”
- “When I click on online or solo and choose my faction, it loads for 2 seconds and then freezes.”
- “I love this game, but the problem is that when you try to train a unit, it glitches. Can you try to fix that?”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
Players appreciate the diverse and engaging music that enhances the battle scenes, with many expressing that the in-game soundtrack is a key factor in their enjoyment and continued play of the game.
- “I enjoy the battle scenes and the great variety of music that goes with them.”
- “I love the music; the game is really good!”
- “If anything, it's the in-game music that's stopping me from deleting it.”
- “The soundtrack is repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to enjoy the game.”
- “The music feels out of place and doesn't match the game's atmosphere.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The optimization of the game has received mixed feedback, with users reporting persistent bugs that hinder gameplay, such as issues with building placement and overall performance. Many players are calling for improvements to enhance the smoothness of the experience.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS

Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS
See offer on Play Store

Skip Games Like Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS

86%4.4kreviews

Cartoon Craft

Casual Strategy

95%3.8kreviews

Rusted Warfare - RTS Strategy

Casual Strategy

72%1.3kreviews

War of Empire Conquest：3v3

Casual Strategy

75%1.4kreviews

RedSun

Casual Strategy

84%10kreviews

The Battle of Polytopia

2020

Casual Turn-based Strategy

More games like Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS is a casual strategy game.

Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS is available on Phone and Tablet.

Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS was developed by Forge Of Games.

Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS is a single player game.

Similar games include Cartoon Craft, Rusted Warfare - RTS Strategy, War of Empire Conquest：3v3, RedSun, The Battle of Polytopia and others.

Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS

Platforms

About

Buy Shadows of Empires: PvP RTS