Rise Of The Overlords

About

Rise Of The Overlords is a multiplayer strategy game. It was developed by Firescale Studios and was released on March 22, 2024. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Rise of the Overlords is an online multiplayer game that combines collectible card games (CCG) with board strategy games. Build your deck, command your army, and challenge other players in epic combats on stunning dynamic battlefields. Rise of the Overlords is completely free and learning how to play will only take you 5 minutes! Choose an Overlord with unique abilities to represent you on th…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

70%

Audience ScoreBased on 10 reviews

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game features beautiful artwork and great animation, enhancing the visual experience.
The grid-based strategy layout offers a unique gameplay mechanic that encourages tactical thinking.
There is potential for interesting gameplay mechanics and a solid basis for future development.

The game lacks meaningful single player content and has a very low active player population, making it unplayable as intended.
Graphics and overall design feel outdated and are more suited for mobile devices rather than PC gaming.
The game has been abandoned by the developers, leading to concerns about its long-term viability and lack of updates.

gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
37%
38%
The gameplay is described as smooth with decent combat mechanics, but it lacks depth and variety, feeling like a cash grab compared to established titles like MTG Arena. Players note that while the tactical elements exist, there is little to achieve, leading to a lack of engagement. The tutorial is brief, and the game struggles to stand out in the crowded card game genre.
- “Gameplay seems pretty smooth.”
- “So I won't play it again for now, but can't give it a thumbs down as the combat gameplay played pretty good.”
- “So this is basically an incredibly obvious cash grab ripoff of MTG: Arena with a minor bit of tactical gameplay that doesn't add anything more than choosing which creatures to block with when you're playing Magic.”
- “As of late May 24, there is very little gameplay available.”
- “The combat mechanics are pretty decent, but there is nothing to achieve in the game, yet.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The graphics have received mixed reviews, with some users finding them lackluster due to the game's mobile origins, while others appreciate the beautiful artwork despite its cartoonish and occasionally jarring style. Overall, the visuals may not meet the expectations of gamers accustomed to high-end PC graphics.
- “Beautiful artwork”
- “Jarring graphics that do distinguish well while being cartoonish.”
- “The graphics are lackluster because this was designed for mobile phones, not gaming PCs.”
- “Graphics are oddly off-putting.”
- “Jarring graphics that do not distinguish well while being cartoonish.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized as a blatant cash grab, likening it to a poorly executed clone of popular mobile games like MTG Arena and Hearthstone. Users express concern over the lack of quality assurance and advertising, leading to a quick decline in player engagement and support.
- “This was basically being lined up to be a mobile app cash grab scam, but the mobile devs behind this decided to inflict this on Steam first because there's no pesky QA departments to stop them.”
- “So this is basically an incredibly obvious cash grab ripoff of MTG: Arena (popular on your mobile phones next to Hearthstone) with a minor bit of tactical gameplay that doesn't add anything more than choosing which creatures to block with when you're playing Magic.”
- “They came out from nowhere, with a strong will and maybe some early supporters at first, but the lack of advertising turned most of these into deserts in no time, which devs then usually gave up on.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's story is perceived as lacking depth, with the developer relying on player interactions to compensate for the absence of traditional storytelling and level design elements.
- “The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design, etc. to the game.”