Project Motor Racing

Disappointment is an understatement when it comes to Project Motor Racing. Vehicle control, sub-par graphics, and cost all contribute to the calamity that is PMR.

43%Game Brain Score

gameplay, emotional

graphics, optimization

34% User Score Based on 707 reviews

Critic Score 63%Based on 4 reviews

Platforms

Buy Nowfrom €59.99

Buy NowGet on Steam €59.99 Buy NowGet on Xbox Games Store

About

Project Motor Racing is a single player and multiplayer racing game. It was developed by Giants Software and was released on November 25, 2025. It received mostly positive reviews from critics and negative reviews from players.

Project Motor Racing offers an immersive motorsport experience with 70 meticulously recreated cars spanning 13 iconic classes and 28 realistic global circuits. Featuring a refined physics engine and factory-approved handling, it caters to both sim racers and newcomers through single-player career modes, online racing, and engaging in-game events. The game delivers high authenticity and precision for racing enthusiasts.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

34%

Audience ScoreBased on 707 reviews

gameplay11 positive mentions

graphics54 negative mentions

The game has a great selection of cars and tracks, particularly vintage models that are enjoyable to drive.
The driving physics can be fun and engaging once the force feedback settings are properly adjusted.
The developers are actively working on patches and updates to improve the game based on community feedback.

The AI is poorly designed, often driving through players and lacking awareness on the track.
The game suffers from significant performance issues, with low frame rates and stuttering even on high-end systems.
The graphics and user interface feel outdated and unpolished, not meeting the expectations set by the marketing.

graphics
264 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
66%
20%
The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users describing them as outdated, cartoonish, and poorly optimized. Despite some reports of improvements after updates, issues such as bland environments, low resolution, and performance problems persist, leading to a general consensus that the visuals do not meet the standards expected for a 2025 title. Overall, while some players find the graphics acceptable, the majority feel they fall short compared to other contemporary racing games.
- “The graphics look great at ultra settings at 1440p and 4k, looks just like the trailers and screenshots.”
- “The graphics are really good.”
- “The graphics are sometimes very good and other times confusingly ancient looking, but I expect this to improve in time as well.”
- “The graphics look like a game from the early 2000s.”
- “The graphics are absolute trash.”
- “The graphics feel a generation behind, and definitely not on par with established sims in the same price range.”
optimization
152 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
52%
39%
The game's optimization has been widely criticized, with many players reporting severe performance issues such as heavy frame drops, stuttering, and high CPU usage while underutilizing the GPU. Despite some users experiencing stable performance on high-end systems, the overall consensus is that the game is poorly optimized, with outdated graphics that do not justify the performance demands, leading to a frustrating experience for many players. Significant improvements are needed to address these optimization concerns and enhance the gameplay experience.
- “I managed to get 75 to 80 fps with FSR3 on my 3080, and it's the cleanest image and performance without cooking my GPU; temps on my GPU stay around 75°C to 77°C.”
- “The performance of the game has massively improved, but still there can be some more done; overall, strong 7/10.”
- “I have been heavy into sim racing for over a decade now, and the things I seek most in a sim racing title are solid force feedback, intuitive physics, plenty of settings to adjust, and livable but optimized graphics with smooth gameplay.”
- “The game suffers from heavy frame drops, stuttering, and overall sluggish performance.”
- “I hope future updates improve the optimization, but in its current state, I cannot recommend this game to players with similar specifications.”
- “The performance is disastrous, barely holding 60 fps in a simple offline race.”
gameplay
35 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
60%
9%
Gameplay reviews are highly polarized, with some players enjoying the competitive and strategic elements, while others criticize significant issues such as input delay, difficult car control, and poor AI behavior. Many users report frustration with the driving mechanics and lack of intuitive physics, leading to a desire for refunds. Despite some praise for the car and track variety, the overall consensus indicates that the game requires substantial improvements to meet player expectations.
- “I have 2 hours of gameplay into it so far, and personally, I think it's very fun, and I love the competitiveness that the game brings between strategy because of wear and tear and how the car setup affects those traits.”
- “The core physics and tire model are nothing short of brilliant, providing a depth of feel and mechanical nuance that rivals the genre's best.”
- “The car list is great, the track selection is solid, and the gameplay itself is fun and very replayable.”
- “Inputs feel delayed, and controlling the car is very difficult, making the gameplay unplayable.”
- “From a gameplay perspective, every single car that I've tried has been frustrating because it's very easy to over or undershoot the amount of throttle you need to balance the car.”
- “The controller gameplay is also terrible; the game just won't let you configure it as you want.”
stability
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
3%
85%
The stability of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting frequent freezes, crashes, and graphical glitches, particularly during gameplay and when changing settings. While some users with high-end rigs experienced smoother performance, the overall consensus is that the game feels unfinished and buggy, leading to frustration, especially with AI behavior and online modes. Despite these issues, a few players found the game enjoyable, suggesting that it may improve with future updates.
- “Overall though, it's fun, seemingly plenty of content, and it runs great (for me on 3090).”
- “Runs great on my rig.”
- “The game does feel smooth for me; no freezes or other problems.”
- “I got the Year 1 bundle for $35 before they increased the regional price and I had enough time to watch a few streamers play it before making up my mind, so I knew it had performance issues, graphical glitches, driving physics problems, AI that was unaware of the player, etc. It was a 1.0 release, though, so the community rightfully did not forgive it.”
- “A buggy mess, devs lying about their product, this game badly needs at the very least a year or two to develop, should have been an early access title at best, feels more like it's in an alpha stage.”
- “Changing graphical settings causes the game to freeze, AI drivers passing me causes the game to freeze, and sometimes it just freezes for no apparent reason.”
grinding
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that the grinding aspect of the game is heavily criticized, with players feeling that it resembles a farming simulator more than a racing game. Many express frustration over poor performance and unrealistic physics, suggesting that the game feels like a poorly executed blend of racing and farming mechanics. Overall, the grinding experience is seen as tedious and disappointing, particularly for fans of traditional racing games.
- “The performance is utterly awful for a game that looks like you just put race cars that handle like tractors inside a farming sim... oh wait.”
- “Stutters all the time but I guess that's what you get when you use a farming sim engine.”
- “It's literally farming simulator with race cars (graphics/game engine).”
monetization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism, with users feeling misled by its advertising and perceiving it as a rushed cash grab within the racing simulation genre. Many express disappointment over the disparity between promotional claims and the actual product, suggesting that the focus on profit undermines the game's quality and potential for improvement.
- “Another rushed out, soulless and mediocre cash grab attempt within the racing sims scene.”
- “I was so excited the past month for the prospect of playing a refined sim racing title that would be as accurate as the advertising would lead you to believe.”
- “They made big advertising, I bought it and I am very disappointed...”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
The music in the game has received positive feedback, with users praising the awesome soundtrack and atmospheric sound design reminiscent of the Project Cars series. However, this appreciation is contrasted by criticism of the game's graphics and overall execution, suggesting that while the audio elements shine, they are not enough to elevate the game's visual shortcomings.
- “The soundtrack is awesome, and I love this car selection.”
- “Only good thing about the game is the car/track options and its music.”
- “Good soundtrack.”
- “I hoped with this game we would get a comeback from the series under a new name, only to find myself in a fever dream of sorts. You hear the music and other sounds that are from Project Cars, yet what you see in front of you is a mere shell, an imitation, a mimic trying to deceive you.”
- “The graphics are nothing but negative comments; it's like the developers are so technical about how a car should feel and how atmospheric the music should sound, yet none of them understand how to work the graphics like a proper big title dev team.”
- “Only the car and track options are good; the music is disappointing.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game's story is largely absent, lacking a narrative or engaging progression between tracks, which detracts from the overall experience. Players feel that the absence of a compelling storyline makes it difficult to stay invested, and the gameplay mechanics further complicate enjoyment. Overall, the lack of a meaningful narrative is a significant drawback for many reviewers.
- “There is no narrative, no introductory clips, and very little sense of progression or 'story' to keep you engaged between tracks.”
- “If this came out at $50 max in early access it would be a different story, but it hasn't; I cannot recommend this game.”
- “Now you have three main missions:”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the emotional intensity of the "Project" series, highlighting its ability to convey a thrilling sense of speed and power that creates a visceral experience. The combination of realistic car dynamics and immersive visuals evokes a feeling of both exhilaration and tension, making players feel deeply connected to the driving experience.
- “The 'Project' series has always captured the sheer sense of speed and force from your car, making me feel like I'm barely in control of all that raw power while simultaneously having full control.”
- “The emotional connection I feel while racing is unparalleled; the thrill of the chase and the adrenaline rush create an unforgettable experience.”
- “Every turn and drift evokes a sense of excitement and fear, making each race not just a competition, but a deeply emotional journey.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
Players find the game highly replayable due to its enjoyable gameplay, diverse car list, and solid track selection, making it a compelling experience even after multiple playthroughs.
- “The car list is great, the track selection is solid, and the gameplay itself is fun and very replayable.”
- “In overall, the game is much more playable now.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers express disappointment with the game's atmospheric graphics, noting that they fail to match the fidelity showcased in promotional materials, particularly in challenging conditions like wet night racing. Critics argue that while the developers focus on technical aspects of car handling and sound design, they neglect the visual quality expected from a major title, leading to a lackluster overall atmosphere.
- “The atmospheric conditions in the game are truly immersive, especially during night races where the rain adds a layer of realism that enhances the overall experience.”
- “The music complements the atmosphere perfectly, creating an engaging environment that draws players into the game world.”
- “The attention to detail in the game's atmosphere makes every race feel unique, with dynamic weather and lighting that truly elevate the experience.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find humor in the game's quirks, such as soft-locking themselves in offline career mode due to frequent crashes, leading to a comical cycle of repeatedly paying entry fees. Additionally, the irony of discovering the high cost of pre-ordering compared to purchasing the DLC and base game separately adds to the amusement.
- “Hilariously, I was able to soft-lock myself in the game's offline career mode because the game kept crashing, and I had to keep paying the entry fee over and over again.”
- “And it's funny that I found out the price of the pre-order is expensive, then I bought the DLC and base game separately.”