RENNSPORT

About

RENNSPORT is a multiplayer racing game. It was developed by Teyon and was released on November 10, 2025. It received negative reviews from players.

RENNSPORT is a motorsport racing game featuring a variety of car classes like GT3, GT4, and Hypercars on iconic tracks such as Monza and Spa-Francorchamps. It offers both single-player and multiplayer modes, including PvP and league racing, with good game mechanics and visually appealing graphics. However, players may encounter numerous bugs during gameplay.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

39%

Audience ScoreBased on 569 reviews

graphics38 positive mentions

optimization10 negative mentions

The graphics are visually appealing, showcasing detailed car models and environments.
The driving physics can be enjoyable, especially in high-performance cars, providing a rewarding experience when conditions align.
The online racing aspect is engaging, with a focus on competitive play and community interaction.

The handling model is inconsistent, often feeling floaty and disconnected from the road, which undermines immersion.
The monetization strategy is aggressive, with high prices for cars and a battle pass system that feels out of place in a racing sim.
There are significant technical issues, including poor force feedback, bugs, and a lack of AI opponents, making the single-player experience lacking.

graphics
99 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
49%
13%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the detailed car models and environments, while others criticize them as mediocre or below standard for a 2025 sim racing title. Many users report performance issues, including frame rate drops and visual glitches, which detract from the overall experience. Overall, while there are moments of impressive visuals, the game's graphical performance and optimization appear to be inconsistent and in need of refinement.
- “The graphics are top notch, with beautifully detailed cars and tracks that make every race feel immersive.”
- “The visuals are a feast for the eyes, with stunningly realistic car models and meticulously crafted environments that bring each race to life.”
- “On the bright side, the graphics are great — no complaints there.”
- “The graphics are below average for a 2025 sim racing game and is probably this game's strong point.”
- “Graphics are basic, environments are bland, and there are much better car games on the market.”
- “The graphics also just feel like a step down from what the advertisements showed.”
optimization
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
50%
28%
The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with many users reporting poor performance, unstable frame rates, and various bugs that detract from the overall experience. While some players noted improvements in performance and graphics, particularly with certain settings, the consensus is that the game feels unpolished and requires substantial optimization to reach its potential. Overall, the game is perceived as a work in progress rather than a fully optimized product.
- “When conditions align, the handling can feel rewarding and demanding, particularly in high-performance GT cars where smooth inputs and consistency are essential.”
- “The performance and stability of the FPS and non-existent screen stutters is so good to see considering what it was like a few months ago.”
- “Performance is great, functionality with replays and camera adjustments are just awesome, physics is good but I would like some ability to lower grip and possibly oversteer if I choose.”
- “Performance and stability issues, including bugs and UI quirks, have also been a point of criticism, contributing to the perception that the game feels closer to an evolving platform than a fully polished final product.”
- “The game is not optimized.”
- “Technical – poor optimization, unstable FPS, clunky menus, and buggy multiplayer lobbies.”
monetization
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
73%
21%
The monetization model of the game has been widely criticized for being excessively aggressive and reminiscent of mobile games, featuring overpriced microtransactions for cars, battle passes, and a predatory currency system. Many reviewers feel that the game is not worth its price given its unfinished state and that the monetization detracts significantly from the overall experience, making it hard to recommend. Overall, the heavy reliance on microtransactions has led to perceptions of the game as a cash grab rather than a polished product.
- “The monetization of this game is probably the biggest concern, and I'm not sure your current strategy will do you any favors in the long run.”
- “While I understand the need for monetization, the current system feels restrictive and detracts from the overall enjoyment.”
- “The monetization is pathetic.”
- “Monetization – overpriced cars, predatory currency system that forces you to overspend, and battle passes in a game that feels unfinished.”
- “The heavy reliance on microtransactions means you're often stuck driving cars you wouldn't choose if you had other options.”
gameplay
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
60%
11%
The gameplay experience is highly polarized, with many users criticizing the driving mechanics, AI behavior, and performance issues, such as significant FPS drops and bugs that hinder gameplay. While some appreciate the graphics and customization options, others find the monetization strategies and locked content frustrating. Overall, the game struggles to deliver a seamless and engaging racing experience, failing to meet the expectations set by its visuals and potential.
- “The sense of speed, graphics, and endless gameplay customization are very appealing.”
- “The driving mechanics are solid, and the variety of cars available showcases the game's potential to become a standout in the racing genre.”
- “The gameplay mechanics are finely tuned, striking a perfect balance between accessibility for newcomers and depth for seasoned racers.”
- “Horrible graphics, limited gameplay, and I have a 3060 Ti.”
- “The driving mechanics are an utter disgrace.”
- “Gameplay trash, graphics trash, performance trash... literally everything in this game is trash.”
stability
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
92%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and poor optimization leading to a frustrating experience. Users have noted issues such as freezing, inconsistent force feedback, and audio problems, indicating that the game feels unfinished and requires significant improvements. Overall, the stability is deemed unsatisfactory, detracting from the potential enjoyment of the game.
- “The graphics are great, especially the foliage, and it runs smoothly on my hardware.”
- “The game maintains a steady frame rate, which enhances the overall experience.”
- “I haven't encountered any crashes or bugs, making for a very stable gameplay experience.”
- “This game is not feeling finished. It looks good, but is full of bugs and sometimes freezes completely. It's a pity...”
- “Technical – poor optimization, unstable FPS, clunky menus, and buggy multiplayer lobbies.”
- “Bugs/glitches: there are some serious alpha-grade issues. Audio not working at all at times, weird force feedback issues that are inconsistent with my Simucube 2 Pro, and button/wheel bindings that have to be rebound because the initial setup somehow translated to completely different and wrong buttons.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The humor in the game is described as unexpectedly amusing, with a focus on absurdities like unrealistic car physics and playful commentary on the game's quirks. Users appreciate the lightheartedness and clever naming, which adds to the overall comedic experience.
- “Hilariously unrealistic.”
- “This is quite funny because it's my first time reviewing a game, and I did not think it would be this game.”
- “The car's weight transfer is okay until mid-corner, then some kind of magic happens where all of a sudden the weight from the front of the car just walks out and starts laughing at you while saying, 'Good luck with that, buddy!'”
- “The humor in this game feels forced and often falls flat, making it more cringeworthy than funny.”
- “I expected some clever jokes, but instead, I got a series of tired clichés that just didn't land.”
- “The attempts at humor are so over-the-top that they detract from the overall experience rather than enhance it.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The reviews indicate that the game lacks a compelling story, with some users criticizing the inclusion of animated elements that detract from immersion in a sim-racing experience. Additionally, there are calls for more offline content, such as a single-player AI race or a career mode, to enhance gameplay and provide a richer experience.
- “The story elements in the game are engaging and add depth to the overall experience.”
- “The narrative is well-crafted, providing a compelling backdrop that enhances the gameplay.”
- “I appreciate the immersive storytelling that keeps me invested in the characters and their journeys.”
- “Some of them are also animated, which completely destroys the point of a sim-racer (hint: it's the immersion). Who would enter a race in a hypnosis mission?”
- “---{ story }---”
- “☑ no story”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The atmosphere in Rennsport is enhanced by Unreal Engine 5's impressive lighting and rendering, creating a detailed and immersive track environment. While some users note minor atmospheric elements, the overall experience is elevated by realistic driving physics and graphics, making players feel like genuine race car drivers. However, some find the racing experience itself lacking enjoyment despite the strong atmospheric elements.
- “Visually, Rennsport benefits from Unreal Engine 5’s lighting and rendering capabilities, especially in terms of track atmosphere and environmental detail.”
- “The combination of realistic driving physics, detailed graphics, and an amazing atmosphere immediately makes me feel like a real race car driver.”
- “Maybe some little atmosphere bits here and there, but in this current state, I do not find the racing overall enjoyable.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express that the grinding aspect of the game is excessively time-consuming, often requiring a significant investment of effort akin to having a second life to fully engage with it.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
- “I spent hours grinding, and it still feels like I'm nowhere.”