Pangea Survival

About

Pangea Survival is a multiplayer survival role playing game. It was developed by Pangea Survival Development Team and was released on August 21, 2020. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Pangea Survival is a massively multiplayer role-playing game set in a dynamic open-world with diverse biomes. Players can choose to be a dinosaur, competing for resources and territory, or a human mercenary, hunting dinosaurs for rewards and equipment. The game features 30+ species of dinosaurs, crocodiles, monitor lizards, and fish across artificial islands with hidden human bases."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

51%

Audience ScoreBased on 61 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

stability6 negative mentions

The game has a lot of potential with beautifully designed creatures and engaging core mechanics.
The single-player experience is enjoyable, with AI creatures that exhibit basic behaviors, making the game feel alive.
The developers are dedicated and responsive to feedback, showing promise for future updates and improvements.

The game is extremely buggy and poorly optimized, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences.
Many players feel the game is empty and lacks meaningful content, making it feel abandoned.
The graphics and sound design are subpar, with many assets feeling like placeholders rather than polished elements.

graphics
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
53%
20%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the models and lighting while others criticize the overall optimization and fluidity. Many users feel that the graphics are unpolished and not worth the price, likening them to a mobile game despite some advanced features. Overall, there is hope that future updates will improve the graphical performance and quality.
- “The only advanced things in this game's graphics are the models and the lighting.”
- “For now at least I believe it's not worth it at all; it's like a mobile dinosaur game but for PC and better graphics and models.”
- “---great graphics”
- “However, unlike Isle, the game is poorly optimized, needs to work on its graphics, and lacks the fluidity to support community servers.”
- “For now at least, I believe it's not worth it at all. It's like a mobile dinosaur game but for PC with better graphics and models.”
- “Graphics are mediocre at best.”
gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some praising the core mechanics and beautiful graphics, while others criticize it for being unpolished, boring, and lacking engaging features like online multiplayer or dynamic interactions. Players note that the aggressive AI and limited activities contribute to a frustrating experience, overshadowing the game's potential. Overall, while there are strong elements present, significant improvements are needed for a more enjoyable gameplay experience.
- “The game has some really great core mechanics and features in place, but it does need a bit of polish for said mechanics and graphics. It's great to see the devs focus on getting the core mechanics in place.”
- “Huge map, good dinosaur roster, well-done animations, beautiful 3D models, and the mechanic of going up the food chain by unlocking dinosaurs that directly evolve from the one you just played.”
- “Amazing and great fun, not too bad graphics, and nice gameplay. A good game for sure with amazing potential.”
- “A lot of it is scuffed; the mechanics are questionable.”
- “The gameplay is boring; since there are no online servers, you can only play with your imaginary friend while losing your mind from the bloodthirsty AI.”
- “It hurts me to see all these beautiful models and stuff get ruined by the gameplay... the models are fine, but the rest is terrible.”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is a significant concern, with multiple users reporting it as extremely buggy and poorly optimized, leading to a frustrating experience. Many players feel that these issues detract from the overall enjoyment, making it difficult to recommend the game in its current state.
- “Sadly, it's a dead game. It was fun, but some of the changes made it less enjoyable for me, and the game feels empty and buggy.”
- “I can't recommend this game right now; it's buggy. If you want a good dino game, go play 'The Isle.'”
- “It's extremely buggy and badly optimized.”
optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
20%
60%
The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with users reporting poor graphics performance, bugs, and a lack of fluidity, particularly in community servers. While some hope for future improvements, many feel that the current state does not justify the price paid.
- “I will give this a bit of leeway in hopes that the current graphics are acting as a foundation for future, better-optimized graphics, but again, I paid $20 for this, so I can't be too easy on it.”
- “However, unlike Isle, the game is poorly optimized, needs to work on its graphics, and lacks the fluidity to make community servers.”
- “Very unoptimized graphics.”
- “It's extremely buggy and badly optimized.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players highlight the high replayability of the game due to the extensive variety of playable animals, including many lesser-known species, which encourages exploration and experimentation with different gameplay styles.
- “The variety of animals available to play is astounding; there are more than I can remember or count, including some you may not have even heard of, like Allosaurus jimadseni.”
- “Each playthrough offers a unique experience, thanks to the diverse range of characters and scenarios.”
- “The game encourages multiple runs, as each choice leads to different outcomes and surprises.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
Players indicate that grinding in the game can be quite demanding, often requiring significant time investment or additional lives to progress effectively.
- “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
- “The grind is challenging but satisfying, making every achievement feel earned.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
- “I spent hours grinding, and it still feels like I'm nowhere.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game lacks a narrative component, with users noting that there is no story present.
- “There is no story.”
- “The game lacks any narrative depth.”
- “The storyline is completely absent.”