Next Agers

+4

Skip User Reviews

64%Audience ScoreBased on 175 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

monetization6 negative mentions

The game features beautiful graphics, historical themes, and character designs that many players appreciate.
It combines elements from popular strategy and base-building games, providing a blend that some find fun and engaging.
Some players find the gameplay enjoyable and appreciate the events and overall design, mentioning it as a good time pass.

The game is heavily criticized for being pay-to-win with expensive in-game purchases and limitations for free players.
Many users report technical issues such as freezing, crashes, login problems, and progression blockers (e.g., watchtower loading issues).
The gameplay differs greatly from advertised content, often described as misleading with false advertising, lacking promised features, and repetitive city building.

graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
14%
29%
The graphics are generally praised as wonderful and awesome, contributing positively to the game's appeal; however, at least one user found them disappointing, calling them a joke. Overall, visual elements like buildings, characters, and food graphics receive favorable mentions.
- “Graphics, sound, music, building, character, etc. are wonderful.”
- “Awesome graphics and gameplay.”
- “Nice game, I love the graphics.”
- “Ridiculous game, can't even set up your base; the graphics are a joke.”
- “Food graphic.”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization is criticized as a blatant cash grab relying on social pressure to encourage spending, with misleading ads that do not reflect the actual gameplay. Users feel the game is deceptive, promoting a tower defense style that it does not deliver, resulting in frustration over its true monetization approach.
- “Yet again, just another reskinned cash grab that's multiplayer for no reason other than trying to use social pressure to get you to spend money.”
- “The ads show iterative battles where you upgrade and sweep enemies.”
- “Game is a lie, not like the ads.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from stability issues, including frequent freezing during load times and progression, particularly around the watch tower. Additionally, glitches enable players to bypass protection shields, indicating technical flaws that impact gameplay.
- “Every time I progress further in the game, the next time I load it, it freezes and I can't access it.”
- “Can't get past the watch tower; it always freezes. Other than that, cool game.”
- “There are glitches that allow players to bypass the protection shield.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story received mixed feedback: some users praised it as fantastic and engaging, while others struggled to follow it due to fast-moving text. Overall, the narrative appeals to fans but may be difficult to fully appreciate because of presentation speed.
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features visually appealing character designs that complement its historical themes, though detailed feedback on character development is limited.
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding primarily involves repetitive level grinding, which some players may find tedious or time-consuming.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music is praised alongside other elements like graphics and sound, contributing to an overall wonderful experience.
- “Graphics, sound, music, building, character etc. is wonderful.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay is praised for being enjoyable and engaging, complemented by impressive graphics that enhance the overall experience.