My Colony

About

My Colony is a single player casual management game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Build, expand, and rule a growing space colony. Explore tech, and trade online!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

76%

Audience ScoreBased on 700 reviews

gameplay17 positive mentions

graphics15 negative mentions

The game offers a fun and engaging city-building experience with a lot of depth and strategy.
It is free to play with no intrusive ads, and the premium content is optional and not pay-to-win.
The developer is actively updating the game and listening to community feedback, which enhances the overall experience.

The game suffers from performance issues and lag, especially when managing larger colonies.
There is a lack of a comprehensive tutorial, making it difficult for new players to understand the mechanics.
Recent updates have introduced bugs that can corrupt save files and hinder gameplay.

graphics
53 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
53%
28%
The graphics of the game are generally described as simple, old-school, and at times, lacking in resolution and optimization, leading to performance issues and lag. While some players appreciate the charming art style and find the graphics do not detract from the overall fun, many express a desire for improvements and refinements to enhance the visual experience. Overall, the consensus is that while the graphics are not the game's strong suit, the engaging gameplay compensates for these shortcomings.
- “The art style I haven't seen very many games use, and the way everything works with each other is amazing.”
- “Despite the simple graphics, this game shows how simplicity can be fun.”
- “The graphics are simple and the game is quite fun, but it needs to be optimized better.”
- “Used to have fun with this game, however over the years the graphics have become rather lackluster with the only possible way to fix it being to pay 5 dollars and even then it's not guaranteed as paying the money lets you mod the game but because you can't preview there's no way to know if the community available mods actually make the game look better.”
- “The graphics are rather crude and unappealing.”
- “The game used to be amazing but now it has disgusting graphics that make everything lag and nearly everything cool in the game requires premium, this is a cash grab game before there was no premium and the game was fun and amazing to play...”
gameplay
34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
41%
9%
Overall, the gameplay is described as enjoyable and addictive, with a solid foundation in resource management and colony expansion. However, players have noted performance issues, repetitive mechanics, and a lack of clear goals, which detract from the experience. While many appreciate the absence of intrusive ads and the game's unique mechanics, there are calls for improvements in UI, unit micromanagement, and overall performance, especially on lower-end devices.
- “The gameplay is fun and I love expanding my colonies and working through resource management.”
- “The gameplay is magnificent and there is so much to discover and unlock!”
- “Thoroughly enjoyable gameplay, multi-platform support, and great performance.”
- “Over time, sure it's had a lot of new content added and now I can experience an ad-free fully fledged version of the game, but with performance issues, lack of any real goal, poor UI, repetitive gameplay with very little variation, and some little features like colonist customization gone, it's just not as good as it used to be.”
- “11/10 edit about more gameplay: it's laggy because it's constantly updating each building you built, each rover you made, and each colonist that lives in your colony, and this takes a lot of computing power, which causes lag on almost every device with big colonies.”
- “I enjoy playing, but when it resets every time, it makes gameplay hard.”
optimization
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
65%
14%
Overall, the game's optimization has been a significant concern among users, with many reporting severe performance issues, especially as their colonies expand. Players have noted that the game becomes increasingly laggy and prone to crashes, even on newer devices, and the user interface is often described as unhelpful. While some appreciate the game's content and gameplay, the consensus is that substantial improvements in optimization are necessary for a smoother experience, particularly on lower-spec devices.
- “I might suggest that, rather than expanding the game, focus on optimization, because I noticed you've moved what something is being built with to the lower plains and sits behind the map rather than just not being there, which, if you build a lot of stuff at once, slows the game as lots of layers of random resource textures are rendered.”
- “Getting hard to play, your hardware requirements are getting heavier; you need to consider performance on low-spec gadgets since most Android devices are middle and low specs, and my phone is not that low spec but for me to play is getting harder because it is so lagging.”
- “The graphics are simple and the game is quite fun, but it needs to be optimized better.”
- “Over time, sure it's had a lot of new content added and now I can experience an ad-free fully fledged version of the game, but with performance issues, lack of any real goal, poor UI, repetitive gameplay with very little variation, and some little features like colonist customization gone, it's just not as good as it used to be.”
- “I used to play this on a phone two generations earlier than this one (Note 9) but the performance has gotten steadily worse over the years to the point where, even on the lowest settings, a city of modest size brings the framerate to a crawl.”
- “Getting hard to play, your hardware requirements are getting heavier. You need to consider performance on low-spec gadgets since most Android devices are middle and low specs, and my phone is not that low spec but for me to play is getting harder because it is so laggy.”
monetization
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
4%
83%
The monetization model of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the absence of pay-to-win mechanics and the option to remove ads through a premium purchase. However, many users find the ads intrusive and disruptive, particularly with constant banner ads and issues with ad loading causing app freezes. Overall, while some players commend the game for its relatively unobtrusive ad presence compared to other titles, others express frustration over the frequency and impact of ads on gameplay.
- “I absolutely love this game! It's amazing, one of the best games ever, and definitely near the top on mobile devices. I have it on mobile and PC. It's fun and can be relaxing to play. Definitely get it right—no ads that disrupt gameplay and no in-game purchases. 11/10 if I could rate that high!”
- “No ads or waiting.”
- “A fun game in the vein of SimCity (the 2000 ones) or Civilization, or any base-building classic from before the advent of microtransactions.”
- “I don't recommend this game at all while it's still infested with ads.”
- “Locking things behind premium is fine, but ads on top of that is too much.”
- “The ads are extremely intrusive, constantly taking up 1/8th to 1/6th of the screen, and they don't even work.”
stability
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability has been a significant concern among users, with frequent freezes, glitches, and lag affecting playability, particularly in later stages. Many players report issues with the save feature and menu navigation, leading to frustration and a less enjoyable experience. While some acknowledge the game's potential and appreciate ongoing updates, the overall consensus is that it remains buggy and unstable, especially in its early release phase.
- “There have been two glitches for the past few months that make the game unplayable.”
- “Edit for the latest update: impossible to play, framerate down to 0 almost all the time, citizens losing jobs instead of entering them, all buggy and bad in general.”
- “Sometimes the save feature glitches and corrupts the file, so I routinely save to my hard drive.”
atmosphere
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Players appreciate the game's atmosphere but express frustration with certain mechanics, particularly regarding the management of atmosphere resources. Some users feel overwhelmed by excessive atmosphere production in specific regions, which detracts from their overall enjoyment. There are also requests for deeper gameplay elements, such as clearer information on atmosphere's role and its potential as a survival resource.
- “I love the game but I've been having an issue that's really driving me away; basically, one of the regions on the map is putting out way too much atmosphere to deal with, and I don't have anything producing atmosphere in that region besides maybe a single vehicle factory.”
- “Yet it's spitting out almost 5,000 atmosphere/cycle, which I simply can't keep up with right now.”
- “Would love the oxygen factor to be a survival resource and make non-atmospheric planets more challenging.”
- “I love the game, but I've been having an issue that's really driving me away. Basically, one of the regions on the map is putting out way too much atmosphere to deal with, and I don't have anything producing atmosphere in that region besides maybe a single vehicle factory.”
- “Yet it's spitting out almost 5,000 atmosphere per cycle, which I simply can't keep up with right now.”
- “I even tried deleting it and restoring a backup, but it just keeps making more and more atmosphere.”
music
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game's music is generally praised for being charming and enjoyable, contributing positively to the overall experience. However, some users have noted issues with the music continuing to play even when the app is minimized, and there are mixed feelings about the quality of certain tracks, with one described as annoying. Despite these concerns, the soundtrack remains a highlight for many players.
- “The soundtrack is really snazzy and charming, adding a delightful atmosphere to the game.”
- “I like the music, and the game is fun.”
- “Despite some technical issues, the music keeps playing, and it's such a good game that I'm sticking with it.”
- “If you exit out of the game, the music keeps playing - even during a call - unless you close out of the app completely.”
- “Its soundtrack is really snazzy and charming, but the graphical interface is so low-res that it makes it slightly challenging to see, and it's so insensitive that it's difficult to select units.”
- “The music is a little outdated.”
grinding
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
80%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be a mixed experience; while some appreciate the unique mechanics and lack of invasive monetization, others feel that certain factions impose excessive tedium, particularly when resource gathering is slow and limited. Overall, the game is praised for its engaging gameplay, but the grind can become frustrating at times, especially when significant resources are required for progress.
- “Great game in general! I appreciate the monetization model—no invasive ads, no absurd store, and no grinding. It's refreshing to have pure gameplay without waiting on timers.”
- “I love that this game avoids the typical grinding mechanics found in many others. It allows for a more enjoyable and engaging experience without the frustration of repetitive tasks.”
- “The absence of grinding in this game is a huge plus. It keeps the gameplay focused and fun, allowing players to enjoy the content without feeling like they have to grind for hours.”
- “The mass driver is one of the easiest ways to get money, but it can't sell more than 300 units at a time, which can become very tedious once you need 16k for each payroll.”
- “Some factions seem intentionally more difficult than others. For instance, the independent league forces a player to wait much longer than necessary, only having access to one ore miner for the majority of the 2-day playthrough I had of that faction, only getting around 15 ore per trip. When the building you need to get another ore miner necessitates you to have 1200 ore, that gets a little tedious.”
- “It's really fun; however, sometimes it is a bit tedious to make progress.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The story aspect of the game is noted for its intriguing lore, particularly regarding the Zolarg empires, which players find compelling. However, many users feel that the gameplay would benefit from more structured missions or objectives, as the current sandbox format lacks direction.
- “Adding the lore of my colony to the actual gameplay would be good, especially the Zolarg empires; their backstory is super interesting (even though I usually play as humans).”
- “It's an okay time killer, but I think it would be better if there were missions, objectives, or some sort of structure besides a sandbox builder game.”
- “The story feels disjointed and lacks depth, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “Character development is minimal, and the plot twists are predictable.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is appreciated for its lightheartedness, contributing to enjoyable gameplay experiences that encourage laughter and camaraderie among players. While some technical issues and interface annoyances are noted, the overall comedic tone enhances the game's appeal, especially given its solo development.
- “Great game in general! First of all, I like the monetization model: no invasive ads, no absurd store, no grinding, no waiting on timers, just pure gameplay. It's funny times we live in where that is a game's advantage! =p”
- “And sit around at a table for hours laughing, telling jokes and stuff.”