Mortar Clash 3D: Battle Games

About

"Mortar Clash 3D: Battle Games" is a simulation game where players use mortars to defeat enemies and advance towards victory. The game boasts exciting action, but is marred by annoying ads and bugs that can hinder the overall experience. Despite these issues, players can still enjoy the challenge of strategically firing mortars to eliminate the opposition.

Genres & Tags

Simulation

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Mortar Clash 3D: Battle Games screenshot

86%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,239 reviews

graphics11 positive mentions

monetization215 negative mentions

The game has a fun concept and can be enjoyable for short periods.
Some players appreciate the graphics and find the gameplay simple and easy to learn.
There is potential for improvement, and some users are hopeful for future updates.

The game is plagued by an overwhelming number of ads, often interrupting gameplay.
Many players report frequent crashes and performance issues, making the game unplayable.
The gameplay is repetitive and lacks variety, with many users expressing disappointment over the absence of mortars despite the game's title.

monetization
217 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
99%
The monetization strategy of this game is heavily criticized for its overwhelming number of ads, which often outnumber gameplay time significantly. Players report being bombarded with ads before, during, and after levels, leading to frustration and frequent uninstalls. While some users acknowledge the necessity of ads in free games, the sheer volume and frequency have made the experience unenjoyable, with many feeling that the game is more of an advertisement platform than a playable experience.
- “I paid to get the no ads version.”
- “Fun game, then I purchased the no ads version, and guess what? I still have ads, so thanks for taking the money I paid and still letting me watch ads.”
- “I swear, to date, I have spent more time watching ads than playing the game.”
- “In short, you spend more time looking at ads that can't be skipped than playing.”
- “The amount of ads in this game is ridiculous.”
graphics
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
42%
23%
35%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many users criticizing them as poor, simplistic, or laggy, often describing them as a significant drawback to the overall experience. However, some players appreciate the graphics, noting them as good or cool, suggesting that while there are notable issues, there are also moments of visual appeal. Overall, the consensus leans towards a need for improvement in graphical quality and performance.
- “Basic game principle, even graphics aren't bad.”
- “Great gameplay, cool graphics 10/10.”
- “Fun game, nice graphics.”
- “So disappointing, I've been waiting for the perfect artillery game forever and all that's available is a couple of Soviet-made, half-translated, low-end graphics, battery-draining, all permissions asking mediocrities and this sorry excuse for a good line of code.”
- “Graphics are terrible and gun control is impossible.”
- “Horrible graphics and controls.”
stability
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game is severely criticized, with users reporting frequent freezes, crashes, and unresponsive controls that disrupt gameplay. Many players experience the app freezing every few seconds, causing frustration and leading some to uninstall the game altogether. Overall, the game's performance issues significantly detract from the user experience.
- “But it constantly freezes and crashes.”
- “App seems fun, but it's not able to be played with because it closes or freezes.”
- “All it does is load then it freezes not just the game, but my phone.”
gameplay
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
65%
18%
The gameplay is criticized for being overly simplistic and repetitive, with many users noting that it can be mastered quickly but lacks depth and progression. Additionally, the experience is marred by excessive ads that interrupt gameplay, leading to frustration and dissatisfaction. While some users find the mechanics fun and easy to grasp, the overall consensus leans towards a negative view due to poor controls, graphics, and the overwhelming presence of advertisements.
- “Great gameplay, cool graphics, 10/10.”
- “No problem with gameplay as it's easy to play.”
- “Graphics a little wonky, but fun, involving mechanics alright, simple to play.”
- “Gameplay a 4-year-old can master in 5 minutes and it has no legs as far as progression.”
- “The ads for this game show an entirely different game and gameplay than what you get when you download it.”
- “Too many ads and gameplay is non-existent.”
story
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for its repetitive missions and lack of variety, with players noting that most missions feel the same and often involve shooting from a turret. Additionally, the frequent interruptions from advertisements detract from the overall experience, making it feel more like a cash grab than a well-developed narrative.
- “This game has a lot of potential, but after you reach a certain level, all the missions are the same. What I mean by this is that 9 out of 10 times you are shooting a turret instead of an artillery cannon.”
- “And here I thought the advert was truthful; this game is a straight-up scam. I went through 25 levels and encountered no mortar missions, just firing at jets, warthogs, tanks, and cars.”
- “Because after mission complete, there is lag.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant performance issues, leading to widespread criticism of its poor optimization. Users express frustration over the lack of effort from the development studios, questioning the overall quality and playability of the game.
- “I am left confused as to how four gaming studios managed to make a game with such performance issues.”
- “Bad optimization. Why is the flak used as artillery? If you make a game, put more effort into it. Don't expect people to play it much and give good reviews for a waste of time.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Users express frustration with the game's replayability, suggesting that misleading advertisements diminish their interest in engaging with the game. This skepticism towards the game's authenticity may negatively impact players' willingness to revisit it.
- “The game lacks meaningful choices, making multiple playthroughs feel redundant.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to return.”
- “The limited variety in gameplay mechanics leads to a quickly diminishing interest in replaying.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is consistently described as funny, suggesting that it effectively engages players with its comedic elements.
- “The humor in this game is absolutely hilarious, with clever jokes and witty dialogue that kept me laughing throughout.”
- “I love how the game incorporates humor into its gameplay; the quirky characters and absurd situations are a delight.”
- “The comedic timing in the cutscenes is spot on, making even the most mundane tasks entertaining.”