Mad Machines

About

Free WeekendDecember 19th @ 10 AM PST running 3 full days. About the GameSmash, shoot and explode each other into blocks. Loot blocks for ammo, growth and repair. Create and join games, private or public, or just enter the 24h running Free For All mode. You can play for kills or points, points make you GROW, you loose it all when dying. Best player is King. Best performing King gets a chance t…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

83%

Audience ScoreBased on 138 reviews

gameplay7 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

Fun and addictive gameplay with a unique twist on the sports genre, combining elements of soccer and combat.
The game has a lot of potential and is enjoyable, especially when played with friends.
Free-to-play model allows players to try the game without financial commitment, making it accessible to a wider audience.

Severely low player population makes it difficult to find matches, often resulting in playing against bots.
Gameplay mechanics and controls can feel clunky and require refinement, leading to a frustrating experience for new players.
The game lacks sufficient content and variety in game modes, which can lead to repetitive gameplay.

gameplay
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
38%
19%
Overall, the gameplay is praised for its smooth mechanics and fun experience, with many players appreciating the depth and accessibility it offers. However, some users express concerns about the high skill ceiling and the initial difficulty in mastering the controls, which may deter new players. While comparisons to games like Rocket League are common, the unique mechanics and potential for customization are highlighted as positive aspects.
- “Overall it was a very fun experience; the game feels very smooth and easy to understand the game mechanics.”
- “Awesome game, great mechanics, and it's already so in-depth with training and game modes.”
- “Accessible game but deep gameplay for the skilled.”
- “I would say that the graphics and gameplay itself are okay, but I think the lack of other game modes and how casual it is will eventually kill the game soon.”
- “I feel like the main reason people dislike the game or get put off is due to the high skill ceiling and how hard it is to get used to the controls. The game may have a ball in a giant arena, but it is nothing like 'ahem' Rocket League with how the mechanics work and rotations.”
- “First time playing this type of game, having never played Rocket League, I found the controls a little fiddly, but could only grab like 3 matches in 2 hours of gameplay.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The graphics of the game are generally described as smooth and balanced, neither overly complex nor too simplistic, making it accessible for modern hardware. However, opinions vary significantly, with some users criticizing the graphics as poor, while others appreciate the aesthetic compared to similar AI-inspired games. Overall, the visuals seem to be a mixed bag, with some players enjoying them and others finding them lacking.
- “The game is very smooth; I love the graphics too—they are not too fancy nor too simple!”
- “Io inspired, but 3D, with robots, and with much better graphics.”
- “The controls need a lot of work; the graphics are horrible.”
- “Not too graphically intensive for modern hardware.”
- “Io and such that is just played with higher graphics and better gameplay.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
Reviewers suggest that the game's monetization strategy could benefit from a free-to-play model with cosmetic in-game purchases, which might enhance its appeal. Additionally, the developers are open to community feedback and are actively investing in advertising efforts.
- “If this was a free-to-play game, it might eventually thrive with cosmetic in-game purchases.”
- “The monetization model is fair and doesn't feel intrusive, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend.”
- “I appreciate that the game offers optional purchases that enhance the experience without being necessary to progress.”
- “If this was a free-to-play game, maybe it would start to thrive eventually; cosmetic in-game purchases could work here, I guess.”
- “The monetization model feels overly aggressive and detracts from the overall experience.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls, making it hard to enjoy the game fully without spending extra money.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the humor in the game to be quite enjoyable, appreciating its funny concepts and gameplay. There is a desire for additional game modes to enhance the comedic experience further.
- “Very good gameplay, very good server, I like the idea and it's very funny.”
- “I hope the developers make another kind of game modes to make it more funny.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Users have reported that the tutorial is buggy, indicating issues with stability that may affect the overall gameplay experience.
- “The tutorial is buggy and makes it hard to understand the game mechanics.”
- “I encountered several bugs during the tutorial that disrupted my experience.”
- “The tutorial was filled with glitches, making it frustrating to follow along.”