MA 2 – President Simulator | Game Brain

About

"MA 2 – President Simulator" is a single-player simulation game with good mechanics and impressive graphics, allowing you to become a president and build a prosperous state. While the game offers an engaging experience, it is marred by frequent and annoying ads. Construct and manage your own nation, overcoming challenges to lead it to success.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

73%

Audience ScoreBased on 980 reviews

graphics17 positive mentions

monetization49 negative mentions

The game offers a deep and engaging strategy experience, allowing players to manage a country and navigate complex geopolitical situations.
Graphics and UI improvements enhance the overall gameplay experience, making it visually appealing.
The game encourages critical thinking and strategic planning, providing a realistic simulation of political and economic management.

The relationship mechanics are frustrating, as countries quickly turn hostile for no apparent reason, leading to constant wars and conflicts.
The game often requires watching numerous ads or spending real money to progress, which can detract from the overall enjoyment and accessibility.

monetization
52 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
2%
94%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over the high frequency and length of ads, which are often necessary to progress. While some users appreciate the option to purchase ad removal and speed boosts, others feel that the reliance on ads for earning in-game currency creates a pay-to-win environment, making it difficult for free-to-play users to advance without watching numerous ads. Overall, while the game is enjoyable, the monetization strategy has been criticized for hindering the overall experience.
- “Totally worth buying the no ads and double speed; all the perks like 7k a day is probably a great buy as well.”
- “This rating would be three stars if there were no ads, but you can't stop that unless you buy the premium pack.”
- “Progress is very slow in the game unless you watch extremely many ads or pay.”
- “Everything is great about this game honestly but the reason I'm giving this three stars is due to the pay-to-win system. If people want to start off as a medium or low-level country and don't want to buy anything, they usually have to rely on ads, which are often 30 seconds long. Some items cost too much, making it hard to obtain what they want. This issue could be fixed if in-game prices were lowered or ad times shortened.”
- “This game is great but the problem is the ads. Low income, 30 seconds annoying ads, and now the latest update doesn't allow me to watch ads more than 15 times to get gems. It's just annoying.”
graphics
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
39%
55%
7%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed feedback from users. While many appreciate the improvements and detailed 3D maps, some express disappointment, noting that the graphics do not surpass those of the previous version and suggest further enhancements for realism and detail. Additionally, issues such as lag and poor UI design detract from the overall visual experience for some players.
- “First of all, the graphics are well improved and the 3D map looks great.”
- “The graphics are impressive, and wars and scenarios are fun to play. I just wish there was a world war mode.”
- “Love the graphics and the way it makes you actually feel like a president; I've always been a fan of history and I found the perfect game!”
- “The graphics on the war map need some improvement because it's the same one as Modern Age 1.”
- “I'm disappointed; indeed there's a lot of improvement with graphics and UI design, but the gameplay is still the same from the original game. You will have to waste a lot of cash just to experience the full content of the game. Just play the original version of this game; it's way better. Indeed, the graphics and UI design are awful in that version, but believe me, the gameplay is not too bad.”
- “The graphics need to be improved; it looks ugly and seems annoying. I expected a bit more like the first game but with better graphics and a little bit more realism. I'll stick to the first game until this one is fixed.”
gameplay
29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
59%
10%
Gameplay in the game is generally praised for its strategic depth and engaging mechanics, but many players express disappointment over its unforgiving nature and the need for significant cash investment to access full content. While the graphics and UI have seen improvements, the core gameplay remains largely unchanged from the original, leading some to prefer the earlier version. Players desire more complex strategies, additional features, and a more balanced experience to enhance overall enjoyment.
- “I love the game, it's very well made, has great mechanics and it's addicting.”
- “The game is about governing a country, and there are a lot of playable countries; the mechanics, UI, and features are cool.”
- “Engaging and strategic presidential gameplay.”
- “Gameplay is unforgiving.”
- “I'm disappointed; indeed there's a lot of improvement with graphics and UI design, but the gameplay is still the same from the original game. You will have to waste a lot of cash just to experience the full content of the game. Just play the original version of this game; it's way better. Indeed, the graphics and UI design are awful in that version, but believe me, the gameplay is not too bad.”
- “It's actually painful to play with; it's the same mechanics as the original game.”
story
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
Players express a desire for a more diverse and engaging storyline, with unique missions tailored to each country's strengths and resources. Many reviewers suggest adding new features, characters, and military options to enhance the narrative experience, while also calling for improved tutorials and clearer quest objectives. Overall, while the game is enjoyable, there is a strong demand for updates that would enrich the story and gameplay.
- “P takes too long but I love it and still play it; please update with a new storyline.”
- “Pretty good game; the only thing I wished is that they made a storyline that would make it way better, but other than this, this game is in my top 5.”
- “Quite a fantastic game! Congrats to the team! If coins could be added a bit quicker for easier mission accomplishment and improved rewards on a daily basis.”
- “Pretty good game, only thing is I wished they made a storyline that would make it way better, but other than this, this game is in my top 5.”
- “Everything is good, but the game lacks a proper tutorial which makes it very hard to play; in quests, I don't even understand what it meant.”
- “Can't win as everyone attacks you if you do any of the missions.”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is a significant issue, with frequent crashes, lag, and glitches reported by users. Players experience interruptions during gameplay, including infinite attack loops and unresponsive loading screens, detracting from the overall enjoyment of the game. Despite its fun concept, these stability problems have led to frustration among users.
- “The concept is good, but every 15-30 minutes, the game crashes, and sometimes lags hard and freezes.”
- “Like the concept but it is buggy and unresponsive.”
- “Game also lagging, drop off and even freezes.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is noted for its potential, with players finding irony in the unrealistic portrayal of resource distribution among European and African countries. However, the overall gameplay difficulty and resource management issues detract from the comedic elements, suggesting that simplifying these aspects could enhance the humor.
- “This has a lot of potential; I found it funny that European countries have natural resources like France and Germany, which isn't realistic, while many African countries rich in natural resources don't.”
- “My country is always in a food crisis, but the funny thing is I don't know how much food I need to solve the crisis.”
- “I hope it gets better. The gameplay is very hard, and the amount of resources in the game is unbelievable. If you make it simpler, that will make the game more funny.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
50%
Players express a desire for more customization options in the game's music, indicating that the current soundtrack does not align with their preferences. They suggest that allowing players to choose their own songs and adjust the game's aesthetic elements, like color schemes, would enhance the overall experience.
- “The game features a fantastic soundtrack that really enhances the overall experience.”
- “The music perfectly complements the gameplay, making every moment feel more immersive.”
- “I love how the music sets the mood and keeps me engaged throughout the game.”
- “Could you please change the music to a cheerful one?”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Many users find the grinding aspect of the game excessive, labeling it as overly tedious and indicative of a pay-to-win model, where in-game currency (crystals) feels ineffective even when purchased in bulk.
- “Though a fairly good effort, it is too grindy. It's a serious pay-to-win situation, and the crystals are too useless even if you buy a bulk of them. Hard pass... sorry.”
- “The grinding in this game is excessive and feels more like a chore than fun. It detracts from the overall experience.”
- “I found the grinding to be monotonous and tedious, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game currently suffers from significant lag and requires optimization improvements to enhance overall performance.
- “Very laggy at the moment, needs some improvement with the performance.”