20th c 1 – President Simulator | Game Brain

20th c 1 – President Simulator Game Cover

About

"20th Century Economic Strategy" is a thrilling military strategy game that transports players to various conflict zones throughout the 20th century. Players must balance economic development with military expansion, managing resources, technology, and diplomacy to achieve victory. With a focus on historical accuracy and realistic strategic challenges, this game offers a deep and engaging experience for fans of the genre.

Genres & Tags

Strategy

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

20th c 1 – President Simulator screenshot

78%

Audience ScoreBased on 741 reviews

gameplay6 positive mentions

monetization6 negative mentions

The game offers a complex and engaging gameplay experience that involves economic strategy, diplomacy, and military conquest.
Many players appreciate the realistic options and mechanics, finding the game to be addictive and enjoyable once they get the hang of it.
The game has potential for improvement and players are excited about future updates that could enhance gameplay and add more countries.

The game is overly complicated and the tutorial is not helpful, leading to confusion for new players.
Many players express frustration with the lack of certain countries on the map, particularly the Americas, and the high costs associated with gameplay.
There are frequent issues with ads and in-game purchases, leading some to feel that the game is pay-to-win or requires excessive grinding to progress.

gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
25%
25%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its engaging mechanics and challenging nature, while others criticize the lack of originality and complexity in the mechanics. Many enjoy the smooth and realistic experience, though some find it dull or overly complicated at the start. Overall, the gameplay is seen as enjoyable by those who invest time in learning its systems, but there are calls for more innovation and variety.
- “Great game, ads aren't too bad and most of them are short, so it's great, and all the mechanics add to the gameplay, so personally I love it.”
- “Great game, wonderful RTS mechanics.”
- “Amazing game, no problems for me, smooth gameplay and it's very realistic. I recommend.”
- “Alright, every single one of your 'games' are literally carbon copies of each other, just with different names. Same mechanics, just different looks. You just make these games purely for profit.”
- “I think it was awfully complex at the start and wasn't that clear on the mechanics, but a decent game overall.”
- “Dull and slow game, my type of gameplay!”
monetization
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
75%
The monetization strategy of the game is mixed; while some players appreciate the short ads that provide boosts without requiring payment, others criticize the frequency of ads and in-app purchases, suggesting a pay-to-win model that detracts from enjoyment. Overall, experiences vary widely, with some players finding the ads manageable and others feeling overwhelmed and frustrated by them.
- “Favorite game at the moment! Nothing bad about it, no ads. I would highly recommend this game.”
- “The in-app purchases are clear and straightforward, making it easy to understand what you're getting.”
- “I appreciate that the game offers a fair monetization model without overwhelming ads.”
- “Great game, but the only thing that seems to have changed from the developers' earlier games is the frequency of ads and special offers for gems and in-game money.”
- “15 minutes in, and I know everything about the in-app purchases, but nothing about the game.”
- “Tutorial is useless; you have to start with Swiss, so you have to watch ads to get decent income. If you don't have money or a spare 5 hours a day, it is also a clone of other games you've done. Overall, pay-to-win and incredibly hard to even vaguely enjoy.”
graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
Overall, the graphics of the game are considered decent, with some users appreciating the realistic map and period-accurate clothing. However, there is a consensus that improvements could be made, particularly in enhancing the visual quality and detail to better reflect the game's political and military themes.
- “Quite good overall, economical choices and keeping the balance in finance is challenging and good. Improve graphics, but everything else is okay.”
- “A decent game aesthetic, like period-accurate clothing, would be nice.”
- “The map is similar to real life, and the graphics are good.”
- “Quite good overall, economical choices and keeping the balance in finance is challenging and good. However, improve the graphics; everything else is okay.”
- “A decent game; aesthetics like period-accurate clothing would be nice.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
150%
Users have mixed feelings about the game's optimization; while some report smooth performance on their devices, others express frustration over initial performance issues after purchasing the game.
- “Runs smoothly on my phone”
- “I'm pretty upset; I just spent money on this game, and this is the first performance issue I've encountered.”
- “The optimization is terrible; I can't believe how laggy it is even on high-end hardware.”
- “I expected better performance from a game of this caliber, but the optimization is severely lacking.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is derived from the amusingly frustrating conundrum of resource gathering, where players find themselves in a comedic loop of needing one resource to obtain another.
- “The conundrum of stone taking wood and wood taking stone is both funny and frustrating.”
- “The game's witty dialogue and clever puns had me laughing out loud.”
- “I love how the characters have such quirky personalities that make every interaction entertaining.”