Lop Nor Zombie VR

About

Lop Nor Zombie VR is a single player action adventure game. It was developed by 哈视奇科技 and was released on September 30, 2016. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Lop Nor Zombie VR" is a virtual reality game set in a western lab in Lop Nor where staff have become zombies due to a virus. As Soldier 9527, your mission is to survive by killing all zombies and solving puzzles to search for answers. Remember to maintain distance from zombies and use all available weapons to defeat them before they get too close.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

76%

Audience ScoreBased on 25 reviews

gameplay3 negative mentions

Fun and quick VR zombie game with satisfying gunplay and enjoyable mechanics.
Decent graphics for a VR title, with a good atmosphere reminiscent of classic zombie games.
Great value for the price, providing an entertaining experience despite its short length.

The game is very short, feeling more like a demo than a full experience with limited replay value.
Gameplay issues such as bugs, mixed-up controls, and a frustrating boss fight detract from the overall experience.
Outdated mechanics and a lack of content make it feel cheap and not fully developed.

gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
37%
38%
The gameplay features a mix of FPS shooting and teleport mechanics, offering a unique experience with varied enemies and a story-based survival approach. However, players have noted issues with graphics and controls, leading to frustration, particularly with the challenging final boss. Overall, while the mechanics show promise, the execution leaves much to be desired, with some players feeling it lacks the depth and engagement of longer, more polished games.
- “It combines FPS shooting with a teleport mechanic to travel around a map.”
- “VR gameplay 8/10 (it actually felt like a real video game level...)”
- “I refunded because the graphics and gameplay weren't good, and I felt I couldn't play it for more than 10 minutes.”
- “The boss is frustratingly tough to avoid due to the teleport mechanic; we need to be faster.”
- “The gameplay concept claims to be a story-based survival FPS, which would be a nice departure from wave shooters and defensive games in general.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics in the game receive mixed reviews, with some users praising them as "top-notch" and better than most VR titles, while others find them merely "okay" and not particularly impressive. There are complaints about the overall visual quality not meeting expectations, especially given the investment in VR technology. Overall, the graphics seem to be a point of contention, with some appreciating the detail and others feeling let down.
- “The graphics are top-notch (U4) and heads actually explode with realistic flesh rather than looking fake.”
- “The graphics are okay for the most part, not mind-blowing but definitely better than most VR titles.”
- “VR graphics 7/10 (models I liked, environments were kind of meh).”
- “I refunded because the graphics and the gameplay weren't good, and I felt I couldn't play it for more than 10 minutes.”
- “Individually, I built a PC for VR, then pre-ordered, waited an age, and spent a fortune; collectively, we’ve spent over a billion dollars, been led astray by tales of Half-Life, Dying Light (I almost cried when I realized that I couldn't play that in VR despite all the stuff online!) and other games working on developer versions of headsets, been swindled by BS like Vorpx et al (the biggest waste of money of all time), been kept in the dark about the real reasons we can’t play proper FPS and RPG (is it nausea, graphics limitations, lack of developer investment in high-end VR – who knows?) – isn’t it about time HTC, Oculus, and the developers either let us try proper, walking FPS or tell us what the problem is and the timescale before we waste any more time, money, and energy?!”
- “The graphics are okay for the most part, not mind-blowing but definitely better than most VR titles (sadly).”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Overall, while players report the presence of various glitches and bugs, most agree that none are severe enough to disrupt gameplay significantly, leading to a generally stable experience.
- “There are numerous glitches and bugs, but none I've encountered were game-breaking, so I won't penalize the game too harshly.”
- “The game crashes frequently, making it frustrating to progress.”
- “I experienced several stability issues that disrupted my gameplay experience.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The game is positioned as a story-driven survival first-person shooter, offering a refreshing alternative to traditional wave shooters and defensive gameplay.
- “The gameplay concept claims to be a story-based survival FPS, which would be a refreshing departure from wave shooters and defensive games in general.”
- “The story feels disjointed and lacks coherence, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “Character development is shallow, leaving players with little emotional investment in the narrative.”
- “The plot twists are predictable and fail to deliver any real surprises or depth.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere of the game is reminiscent of Resident Evil 2 and 3, evoking a sense of nostalgia while maintaining a decent overall quality.
- “The atmosphere was just like Resident Evil 2 and 3.”
- “The overall atmosphere is decent.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game offers minimal replayability, as it consists of only a single level that does not encourage repeated play.
- “It's a single level of a game with almost no replay value.”