Loops of Zen

About

Loops of Zen is a single player action game. It was developed by Strength in Numbers Studios, Inc and was released on August 10, 2017. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Loops of Zen is simple to learn, yet difficult to put down. Rotate scattered tiles to reconnect broken paths and complete the loops. Tiles are randomly generated and grow in number and complexity as sets are completed.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 26 reviews

gameplay3 positive mentions

monetization3 negative mentions

The game features simple mechanics that lead to fun and challenging puzzles.
It has a relaxing atmosphere with calming art and music, making it enjoyable for short play sessions.
Levels are randomly generated, providing a good amount of content and a quick ramp-up in difficulty.

The game is considered barebones compared to the original Flash version, with sluggish animations and slow tile turning.
Puzzle sizes are smaller and more repetitive, leading to a less engaging experience.
The game can be resource-intensive, causing performance issues on some computers.

gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
37%
25%
The gameplay is characterized by simple yet engaging mechanics that foster interesting and challenging puzzles, providing a fun experience that gradually increases in difficulty. Players appreciate the elegant design that encourages critical thinking and offers a satisfying mental workout.
- “A great game with simple mechanics and fun, challenging puzzles.”
- “The mechanics are simple, but the interaction between them creates interesting puzzles that are fun to solve.”
- “It has a simple and elegant gameplay that belies its quick ramp-up in difficulty.”
- “The mechanics get your brain a major workout with its challenging puzzles.”
- “It has a simple and elegant gameplay which belies its quick ramp-up in difficulty.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The graphics are described as simple and elegant, yet they are surprisingly resource-intensive, causing performance issues on some systems. While some users appreciate the aesthetic, others find the additional graphical elements unnecessary and prefer to mute the soundtrack for a better experience.
- “The graphics are so simple and elegant.”
- “Worst of all, despite its simple graphics, it is so intensive that my computer sounds like an airplane taking off.”
music
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
50%
17%
The music in the game is described as calming and gentle, complementing the visuals effectively; however, some players feel it is unremarkable and would prefer to mute it in favor of more appealing alternatives. Overall, while the ambient soundtrack enhances the experience, it may not stand out for everyone.
- “The art and music are calming and make the game feel gentle in its presentation.”
- “The ambient music and animated background are also good.”
- “It has nicer although unnecessary graphics and provides a soundtrack which may just as well be muted because I'd rather listen to something more appealing.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
Users express disappointment with the monetization strategy, feeling that the premium version lacks substance compared to the original, which was free of monetization. Many regret their purchase, believing the original experience was superior.
- “This feels like a cash grab. The original game was much better without any monetization, and I regret paying for this premium version.”
- “The monetization in this game is excessive and detracts from the overall experience. It feels like they prioritized profit over player enjoyment.”
- “I was disappointed to see that the game relies heavily on microtransactions. It ruins the immersion and makes it feel like a money-making scheme.”