Skip to main content
Left to Survive Game Cover

About Left to Survive

Left to Survive is a single player and multiplayer casual shooter game. It was developed by MY.GAMES and was released on November 18, 2021. It received neutral reviews from players.

Left to Survive is an action shooter game with the post-apocalyptic world setting with a base building feature. Become a hero, challenge other players, join tournaments, raid bases. Would you be able to survive in a dead world?

Skip Games Like Left to Survive

Games Like Left to Survive

Looking for games like Left to Survive? Here are top casual shooter recommendations, selected from player-similarity data — start with Evolution 2: Shooting games, Left to Survive: Zombie Games or Mech Assemble: Zombie Swarm.

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

57%Audience ScoreBased on 157 reviews
graphics6 positive mentions
grinding9 negative mentions

  • Fun and addictive zombie shooting gameplay with a mix of base building and RPG elements.
  • Good variety in activities, from FPS shooting to events and PvP matches.
  • Smooth graphics and enjoyable for casual play, runs well on various devices including PC and Steam Deck.
  • Heavy pay-to-win mechanics with aggressive monetization and grind walls making progression frustrating without spending money.
  • Mobile game port issues such as lack of player movement during gameplay, frequent crashes, constant large data downloads, and poor optimization on PC.
  • Matchmaking issues in PvP with unfair pairing against higher level or modded players and presence of hackers.
  • story

    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    25% positive mentions, 50% neutral mentions, 25% negative mentions

    The story is generally engaging with enjoyable missions and a decent campaign, but progression is often hindered by pay-to-win mechanics and lengthy upgrade waits. While some find the narrative and missions addictive and fun, others criticize the lack of flexibility and feel forced into spending money to advance. Overall, the story adds to the game's appeal but is marred by monetization issues.

    • “Pretty addictive once you try, story is good, gets harder after some time but overall pretty good.”
    • “It's a good PvP zombie shooter game with a good story and cool mutant infected.”
    • “Go on missions, fight in PvP, level up your hero and fight to survive.”
    • “Made it to the mission for 'base raid' and it won't progress.”
    • “Didn't get any further than mission 4 as I did not feel like waiting for upgrades.”
    • “Your character's story is about as flexible as a Siberian winter.”
  • graphics

    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    55% positive mentions, 18% neutral mentions, 27% negative mentions

    The graphics are generally praised for being good to very nice, with some users noting a mobile-friendly design that can limit visual fidelity. While visuals are considered attractive and fitting for the game style, a few feel they resemble older console generations or are simplified for mobile devices. Overall, the graphics support enjoyable gameplay but may not impress those expecting high-end visuals.

    • “Excellent gameplay, great graphics - keeps you busy.”
    • “In my opinion, a pretty cool third person/rail shooter zombie game with pretty nice visuals. The missions are short but fun; I really like this game :)”
    • “PvP play and graphics are along with realistic effects with guns.”
    • “Feels like playing a really old PS One game in terms of no player movement, but has PS2 graphics.”
    • “The graphics are cut down to cater to the iPhones this garbage was designed for.”
    • “Graphics rated 6/10, indicating below average visual quality.”
  • grinding

    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions

    Grinding in this game is excessive and often feels like a forced chore, with players needing to invest countless hours or make multiple purchases to progress. Recent updates have made grinding more frustrating by removing free reward avenues, pushing a pay-to-win model that many find disappointing and exploitative. Overall, grinding is repetitive, time-consuming, and detracts from the enjoyment for many players.

    • “Grinding to 250 parts to get a single gun out of many is never a good idea.”
    • “This creates a disappointing experience where you are either forced to make multiple purchases or spend an excessive amount of time grinding to achieve the same outcome.”
    • “Latest update removed PvP store and free crates, so now the only way to get books and medkits is by spending real money on gold. The so-called free stuff and free events are misleading; free users can't progress to higher levels without spending, making grinding pointless and the game effectively pay-to-win.”
  • gameplay

    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    25% positive mentions, 37% neutral mentions, 38% negative mentions

    The gameplay receives mixed feedback, with some praising its engaging mechanics and graphics, while others criticize restrictive controls, overly complex systems, and pay-to-win elements. Time gates and random rewards also frustrate players, impacting the overall experience.

    • “...excellent gameplay, great graphics - keeps you busy”
    • “Support confirmed with me today that this is "a part of the game mechanics and is working as intended." Therefore, if you have an occasion to get a weapon, I would not spend any resources unless you are told exactly which weapon you will be getting and you confirm that you don't already have it - otherwise, you may be spending resources and wind up with nothing to show for it, and the company will not make you whole.”
    • “Making a zombie shooter game where the character cannot be moved during gameplay isn't the best decision either.”
    • “Time gates, random currencies, and cheap pay-to-win cash grab mechanics.”
    • “The game mechanics at the home base and across various screens are overly complicated, making the experience more complex than necessary.”
  • monetization

    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    17% positive mentions, 16% neutral mentions, 67% negative mentions

    The monetization in this game is heavily criticized for aggressive pay-to-win mechanics, intrusive microtransactions, and time gates that hinder progress unless players spend money. Many users view it as a greedy cash grab, especially given its free-to-play label, with frustrating barriers and in-game purchases that detract from the experience.

    • “Microtransactions are not required.”
    • “Time gates, random currencies, and cheap pay-to-win cash grab mechanics.”
    • “Biggest 2GB waste of my life. Shame. If you are this money hungry, why even make it free to play? Name it 'Give me money' or I won't let you pass any mission before I offer 19,900,000 ads or if you don't buy this gun you can't go any further.”
    • “Left to Survive: shooter PvP is a deplorable mobile app dumped onto Steam as a greedy, nasty cash grab by morally void Russian mobile devs. While this looks like some kind of free-to-play FPS, it's a horrid, awful pay-to-win mobile app crapfest.”
  • humor

    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The game’s humor is well-received, combining undead blasting and PvP elements in a way that keeps players entertained and chuckling throughout their survival experience.

    • “A hilarious blend of undead blasting and PvP face-offs!”
    • “This little gem had me chuckling as I mowed down zombie after zombie.”
    • “Who knew survival could be so hilarious!”
  • optimization

    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions

    The game suffers from poor optimization, making it difficult to play smoothly. Improvements are needed to enhance performance and gameplay experience.

    • “Please do some normal optimization, it's impossible to play.”
  • music

    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions

    The music received criticism for its lack of variety and repetitive nature, leading to a less engaging auditory experience.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Left to Survive

Play Times

612h Median play time
612h Average play time
612-612h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Left to Survive is a casual shooter game. Common tags for Left to Survive include free to play.

Left to Survive is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 612 hours playing Left to Survive.

Left to Survive was released on November 18, 2021.

Left to Survive was developed by MY.GAMES.

Left to Survive has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked Left to Survive for its graphics but disliked it for its story.

Left to Survive is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Evolution 2: Shooting games, Left to Survive: Zombie Games, Mech Assemble: Zombie Swarm, Age of Magic: Turn Based RPG, Sniper 3D Assassin and others.