Skip to main content

Left to Survive

62%Game Brain Score
graphics, humor
story, grinding
62% User Score Based on 132 reviews

Platforms

PCPCAndroidAndroidiPhoneiPhoneWeb BrowserWeb BrowserWindowsWindowsMobile PlatformMobile PlatformiPadiPadPhonePhoneTabletTablet

About

Left to Survive is an action shooter game with the post-apocalyptic world setting with a base building feature. Become a hero, challenge other players, join tournaments, raid bases. Would you be able to survive in a dead world?

Left to Survive screenshot
Left to Survive screenshot
Left to Survive screenshot
Left to Survive screenshot
Left to Survive screenshot
Left to Survive screenshot
Left to Survive screenshot
Left to Survive screenshot

62%
Audience ScoreBased on 132 reviews
graphics6 positive mentions
grinding6 negative mentions

  • The game is fun and provides a thrilling experience with zombie shooting and PVP action.
  • Graphics are decent for a mobile port, and the gameplay can be enjoyable for those who like casual shooters.
  • It can be addictive and offers a good time-killer experience, especially when played with friends.
  • The game heavily leans towards a pay-to-win model, making it frustrating for free-to-play users.
  • There are numerous technical issues, including long download times, lag, and problems with updates.
  • Gameplay can feel repetitive and grindy, with limited character customization and a lack of meaningful progression.
  • graphics
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising them as beautiful and reminiscent of PS2 quality, while others note that they feel dated, akin to PS1 visuals. Despite the graphical limitations, many appreciate the visual effects and overall aesthetic, particularly in the context of mobile gaming. However, there are concerns about the graphics being scaled down for mobile devices, impacting the overall experience.

    • “The graphics are beautiful, but you can see it's a mobile game.”
    • “Excellent gameplay, great graphics - keeps you busy.”
    • “In my opinion, a pretty cool third-person/rail shooter zombie game with pretty nice visuals. The missions are short but fun; I really like this game :)”
    • “Feels like playing a really old PS1 game in terms of player movement, but has PS2 graphics.”
    • “The graphics are cut down to cater to the iPhones this game was designed for.”
    • “Graphics: 6/10”
  • story
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is criticized for its lack of depth and flexibility, with players feeling frustrated by the grind and pay-to-win mechanics that hinder progression. While some appreciate the engaging PvP elements and visuals, many find the narrative weak and the missions repetitive, leading to a mixed reception overall.

    • “It's a good PvP zombie shooter game with a good story and cool mutant infected.”
    • “In my opinion, a pretty cool third-person/rail shooter zombie game with pretty nice visuals. The missions are short but fun; I really like this game :)”
    • “✅ campaign / story / expedition”
    • “Your character's story is about as flexible as a Siberian winter.”
    • “Didn't get any further than mission 4 as I did not feel like waiting for upgrades.”
    • “Worst plot twist than the new Star Wars.”
  • grinding
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews indicate that the game features extensive grinding, often described as excessive and repetitive, with some players labeling it as "pay-to-win" and poorly balanced. While some find it enjoyable for time consumption, the overall sentiment leans towards frustration with the grinding aspect, which can take up to 56 hours.

    • “Grindy pay-to-win nonsense.”
    • “Not a character, or a gun... no... grinding out an entire game... then sure, get this to consume your time.”
    • “Horrible pay-to-win junk, poorly balanced, and extremely repetitive grinding.”
  • gameplay
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally praised for its excellent mechanics and engaging graphics, though some users express frustration with resource management, particularly regarding weapon acquisition, which can lead to wasted resources if not approached carefully. Overall, the gameplay rating averages around 6/10, indicating a mixed reception.

    • “Excellent gameplay, great graphics - keeps you busy.”
    • “The mechanics are well-designed and enhance the overall experience.”
    • “The gameplay is engaging and offers a variety of challenges.”
    • “Support confirmed with me today that this is 'a part of the game mechanics and is working as intended.' Therefore, if you have an occasion to get a weapon, I would not spend any resources unless you are told exactly which weapon you will be getting and you confirm that you don't already have it - otherwise, you may be spending resources and wind up with nothing to show for it, and the company will not make you whole.”
    • “The mechanics?”
    • “[h2]• 🐺 gameplay: 6/10[/h2]”
  • monetization
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of "Left to Survive: Shooter PVP" has been widely criticized as exploitative and heavily reliant on pay-to-win mechanics, with players feeling pressured to spend money or watch excessive ads to progress. Many reviewers describe it as a cash grab, highlighting its origins as a mobile app that has been poorly adapted for PC, further exacerbating frustrations with its aggressive monetization tactics.

    • “Left to Survive is an isometric game rebranded for PC, and it features in-game purchases that enhance the experience.”
    • “The monetization model is fair, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend money.”
    • “In-game purchases are optional and do not hinder gameplay, making it accessible for all players.”
    • “Biggest 2 gig waste of my life. Shame if you are this money hungry, why even make it free to play? Just name it 'Give me money or I won't let you pass any mission' before I offer 19,900,000 ads, or if you don't buy this gun, you can't go any further.”
    • “Left to Survive: Shooter PvP is a deplorable mobile app dumped onto Steam as a greedy, nasty cash grab by morally void developers. While this looks like some kind of free-to-play FPS, it's a horrid, awful pay-to-win mobile app.”
    • “Then there's cash grab nastiness from mobile game peddlers like this one.”
  • humor
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is highlighted as a delightful mix of undead action and player-versus-player encounters, with players finding themselves laughing while engaging in zombie-slaying mayhem. The comedic elements contribute to an unexpectedly fun survival experience.

    • “A hilarious blend of undead blasting and PvP face-offs!”
    • “This little gem had me chuckling as I mowed down zombie after zombie.”
    • “Who knew survival could be so hilarious!”
  • music
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The background music has received criticism for lacking variation, with some users expressing dissatisfaction with its overall quality.

    • “Not a fan of the background music; there's almost no variation.”
    • “The soundtrack is repetitive and lacks any memorable tunes.”
    • “The music feels generic and doesn't enhance the gaming experience.”

Buy Left to Survive

Videos

Games Like Left to Survive

ROKH Image
Miscreated Image
Unturned Image
Once Human Image
CryoFall Image
Fear the Night Image
Soccer Online: Ball 3D Image
DeadPoly Image
PostApo Image
Hurtworld Image
This game contains adult content