Fear the Night

52%
Game Brain Score Based on 287 reviews
  • gameplay
  • graphics
  • optimization
Fear the Night Game Cover
View game

In Fear the Night, you are a lone survivor in a world plagued with zombies. Team up with other survivors and work together to rebuild society from its ashes or choose to trust no one and go your own way in a lawless world.

  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

52%
Audience ScoreBased on 287 reviews
gameplay11 positive mentions
stability11 negative mentions
  • The game is fun to play with friends, especially in a multiplayer setting.
  • It has a unique base capturing mechanic that adds a strategic element to gameplay.
  • The graphics and sound design are well done, creating an immersive atmosphere.
  • The game feels unfinished and has many bugs, leading to a frustrating experience.
  • There is a lack of player base, making it hard to find servers with active players.
  • Single player mode is poorly implemented, requiring players to set up their own servers.
  • gameplay40 mentions

    The gameplay of the game is described as a mix of arcade mechanics reminiscent of Asian-style MMORPGs, with some players appreciating its action-packed nature and unique features like structure takeover. However, many reviews highlight significant issues such as poor graphics, bugs, and a lack of clarity in game mechanics, leading to a frustrating experience for some. Despite these drawbacks, there are positive notes on the potential for engaging gameplay and community interaction, especially as the game continues to receive updates.

    • “The gameplay is really good, I mean honestly.”
    • “It is action packed and your pace and style of gameplay determines where and how fast you get somewhere in the game.”
    • “The gameplay, while not perfect, is great; the gathering, crafting, and leveling seem nicely balanced.”
    • “The mechanics and the ways that the game are played require a large active community, and this game just doesn't invite people to necessarily 'want' to put in the time.”
    • “Runs like a bag of crap even on a high-end machine; graphics are aged, gameplay is poor, and the way zombies run at you with arms down by their side is ridiculous.”
    • “Most of the game has nothing even close to what you can see in the pictures; in reality, it looks awful, outdated, and several mechanics don't even work.”
  • graphics23 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players noting that they appear outdated and unoptimized, often running poorly even on high-end machines. While a few users appreciate the clean visuals and smooth animations, many criticize the overall quality, describing it as rough and lacking enhancements. Overall, the consensus suggests that while there is potential, the graphics currently fall short of expectations, especially for a newly released title.

    • “The graphics are clean and accurate (the odd glitch here and there).”
    • “Fear the Night is that game... from the very first time I started this game and played it, it ran smooth with very few graphical flaws or gameplay issues.”
    • “I hate to be negative, so I'll start by mentioning the graphics look quite good for a newly released early access title.”
    • “Complete and utter dog turd; no updates for a while, no graphic enhancements, no nothing.”
    • “All servers are empty... max graphics look terrible.”
    • “Graphics look about 10 years old and the UI is rougher than sandpaper.”
  • optimization14 mentions

    Overall, the game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with many players noting significant performance issues and a need for improvement. While some users report smooth gameplay and minimal bugs, others experience poor optimization that hampers performance even on lower settings. The consensus suggests that while the game shows potential, it requires substantial work to enhance its optimization and user experience.

    • “Just as a performance note, I found myself playing at 1080p to achieve greater than 60 frames with epic settings.”
    • “It's optimized and runs smoothly, which is a welcome surprise compared to other early access games.”
    • “Optimization is great as well, and I've encountered literally zero bugs so far, which is crazy for an early access title that's been out just a few short weeks.”
    • “There is still a lot of work that needs to be done such as item balance, level balance, optimization, multiplayer balance, but you can easily put in over 30 hours of gameplay even with the current content.”
    • “I recommend the game and am hoping to see it develop into its potential, but understand it has a long way to go to be optimized and user-friendly.”
    • “Short version: this game is in no way optimized for the specs provided; I match the recommended by far, and it does not run well even on 'pathetic' settings.”
  • stability11 mentions

    The game's stability is a mixed bag, with many players reporting significant bugs and crashes, particularly related to netcode and gameplay mechanics. While some users have experienced minimal issues and found enjoyment despite the glitches, others describe it as a "buggy mess" that detracts from the overall experience. Overall, the game appears to be in need of substantial stability improvements, especially given its early access status.

    • “The game looked really fun but is overall very buggy and broken.”
    • “This game is a buggy waste of time.”
    • “The hunters are buggy and will hit you even if you move out of the way, forcibly knocking your weapon out of your hands and causing you frustration.”
  • grinding9 mentions

    Players express mixed feelings about the grinding aspect of the game, noting that while it can be tedious and frustrating—especially with issues like server downtime and losing progress—there is a rewarding element to gathering resources and building up defenses. Many players feel that the grind is essential to the survival experience, but it can become overwhelming, particularly for those who prefer solo play or have limited time to invest. Overall, while some find enjoyment in the grind, others see it as a significant drawback that detracts from the overall experience.

    • “Official servers keep going offline/permanently shut down and all progress keeps getting lost, which is terrible in a grinding game such as this one.”
    • “Games like this, like all survival games, are based around their so-called 'community,' and sadly that's how they make games terrible. The concept of a community making a game good only shows the devs are ignorant to think others can make a game actually fun. In reality, most people who play this game, like many others, are solo players and don't have the time to spend grinding hours on end for things to find or do within the game.”
    • “At this point, the game's intro and early game are so tedious and boring that I don't really want to keep playing.”
  • monetization5 mentions

    The monetization of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with reviewers highlighting the developers' history of releasing low-effort titles that prioritize profit over quality. Many users describe it as an asset flip, lacking substantial content and support, leading to disappointment and frustration.

    • “The developers released the game, and all it is, is a cash grab.”
    • “It's your typical EA cash grab and abandonment scenario.”
    • “This developer has a history of cash-grabbing games; they get it so far and then poof, you never hear from them anymore.”
  • story5 mentions

    The game's story is criticized for being incomplete and lacking a proper introduction or starting quest, leaving players feeling disoriented. Additionally, technical issues, such as teleportation glitches that cause houses to disappear, detract from the overall experience. Players express frustration over the repetitive nature of house contents and the challenges of inventory management.

    • “That aside, the game is very unfinished; there's no intro or simple starting quest of any sort to get you started in the right direction.”
    • “I felt the need to come back and update this with the full story of why I gave this a DNR, as I initially was enjoying myself.”
    • “The entire shelter (2-story house with 6 storage chests filled with roughly 5000 rounds of ammunition as well as armor and other high-level resources) was all gone.”
  • music2 mentions

    The music in the game received a mixed response, with a rating of 6/10, indicating that while it may have some redeeming qualities, it is generally considered underwhelming. Some players opted to mute the music entirely, suggesting it did not enhance their gaming experience.

    • “Music: 6/10”
    • “Music: I muted it as I always do.”
  • humor1 mentions

    The humor in the game is noted to have some amusing quirks, although it is not the primary focus, with players emphasizing that the main gameplay experience is what truly stands out.

    • “The humor in this game is absolutely delightful, with clever jokes and witty dialogue that keep me laughing throughout.”
    • “I love how the game incorporates humor into its gameplay; it makes even the toughest challenges feel lighthearted and fun.”
    • “The quirky characters and their hilarious interactions add a unique charm to the game, making every moment enjoyable.”
  • replayability1 mentions

    Players express a desire for a larger playable area to enhance replayability, but overall, they are enjoying the game significantly.

    • “The game lacks variety, making it hard to find motivation to replay.”
    • “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to dive back in.”
    • “The limited choices and outcomes mean that replaying feels more like a chore than an adventure.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Play time

29hMedian play time
33hAverage play time
6-35hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 6 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games