King of the World

About

King of the World is a single player and multiplayer strategy game. It was developed by Contec Games and was released on October 22, 2018. It received positive reviews from players.

"King of the World" is a strategy game featuring balanced gameplay for all skill levels across three unique armies from different eras. The game includes a distinct technology tree for each army and 12-player free-for-all battles, where players can control regions to increase their income. Customize your experience with various skins and team compositions.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

85%

Audience ScoreBased on 85 reviews

gameplay14 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

Engaging gameplay that combines strategic elements with the thrill of diplomacy, allowing players to form alliances and wage wars.
The game features a variety of unit types and a tech tree, providing depth and customization options for players.
Developers are responsive to community feedback and actively work on updates, showing commitment to improving the game.

The game suffers from a lack of meaningful single-player content and a very small player base, making multiplayer matches difficult to find.
Graphics and overall polish are lacking, with many players noting that the visuals feel outdated and the game appears unfinished.
The monetization model includes a cash shop that some players find intrusive, raising concerns about the game's value despite being free to play.

gameplay
30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
47%
43%
10%
Gameplay is generally described as fun and simplistic, with smooth mechanics and decent graphics, though some players note a lack of online activity and potential bugs affecting unit behavior. While the core gameplay is enjoyable, there are calls for better explanations of game mechanics and improvements to the campaign, which some feel lacks depth. Overall, the game offers a solid experience, but players suggest that enhancements could significantly elevate the gameplay.
- “The gameplay is pretty smooth and simplistic.”
- “Decent graphics and great gameplay.”
- “Great core gameplay.”
- “Some things could be explained better, like how much of the map you need to win, a description of each unit, and my archer dies at moments when attacking but not being attacked. I want to know if there is a hidden mechanic that makes that so or if it's just a bug.”
- “The addition of a campaign feels more like a poor attempt to keep players interested than an actual story to add gameplay.”
- “I have no issue with the graphics and character models; it's the controls and lack of them that makes the gameplay horrible.”
graphics
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
37%
19%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players finding them mediocre or dated, which detracts from the overall appeal. However, others appreciate the visuals as decent for the game's genre, noting that they can enhance the gameplay experience. Overall, while there are criticisms regarding clarity and development quality, some users find the graphics satisfactory and fitting for a simple game.
- “The visuals and graphics are pretty good for what the game is.”
- “The maps are of a good size and graphically look very nice, along with some decent background music and sound effects.”
- “Graphics: the graphics are good and I think this might be the first game where it looks better in-game than on the screenshots.”
- “Visually, this has some fairly mediocre/dated looking graphics that will understandably be a turn off for a lot of gamers, and it's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost.”
- “Average graphics, and sometimes the different units are difficult to see.”
- “The game looks raw and underdeveloped... I got stuck on the second mission and there is no skirmish and online seems empty too... horrible graphics and poor content.”
story
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
58%
25%
The game's story has received mixed reviews, with some players finding the campaign to be a charming but ultimately shallow experience that feels more like an afterthought than a fully developed narrative. While the inclusion of cut-scenes and a diversified story mode is appreciated, many feel that the execution is lacking, with issues such as unclear mission objectives and a lack of engaging content leading to player disinterest. Overall, the story aspect is seen as underdeveloped and in need of improvement.
- “I also enjoyed the short but sweet campaign now available in the game. The story is nothing to write home about, but the charm is there, and that's more than I could expect from a game like this.”
- “I mean the game looks nice, has great gameplay mechanics, a diversified story mode, different armies (split in medieval, WW2, future) and gets its updates at the speed of light.”
- “The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design, etc. to the game.”
- “The addition of a campaign feels more like a poor attempt to keep players interested than an actual story to add gameplay.”
- “The single player campaign is neat how it has cut-scenes and a story, but it feels unfinished.”
music
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
37%
25%
The music and sound effects in the game are generally well-received, with many players noting that they fit the game's atmosphere effectively. While some describe the music as "okay," others appreciate its quality and how it complements the visuals and gameplay. Overall, the audio elements contribute positively to the gaming experience.
- “The maps are of a good size and graphically look very nice, along with some decent background music and sound effects.”
- “The music is good.”
- “The sounds and music are okay as well.”
- “The music fits the game.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's humor is highlighted through playful wordplay and amusing character customization options, such as the various "skins" for different armies. Players find the experience particularly entertaining when enjoyed with friends, enhancing the comedic potential, and the community adds to the fun atmosphere.
- “The medieval army has four skins (stop laughing, I didn’t say foreskins), the modern army has five skins, and the sci-fi has one extra skin for you to collect and play with, all to give you a new look on the battlefield.”
- “I played this game yesterday with 5 friends and it was really funny.”
- “I recommend playing this game with at least 2-3 friends to see the funny potential of the game.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Overall, the game is well-optimized, providing a smooth experience with fast gameplay reminiscent of Warcraft 3. While performance is generally solid, some users noted minor FPS spikes during larger battles.
- “Very interesting game that brings me pleasant memories of Warcraft 3. You can play fast games and it is quite well optimized; recommended.”
- “The game runs smoothly, the gameplay seems fair and balanced, and skins are earned in-game with no effect on how a unit functions.”
- “Performance: it ran surprisingly well, although some smaller FPS spikes did occur during larger battles.”
- “While the game ran surprisingly well overall, I did experience some smaller FPS spikes during larger battles.”
- “The optimization is lacking; I often encounter significant frame drops in crowded areas.”
- “Despite the game's potential, the performance issues make it frustrating to play, especially during intense moments.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
150%
Players note that grinding in the game is manageable and not overly tedious, with a balanced RTS aspect that allows for free multiplayer play and access to most cosmetics without pay-to-win elements. However, some users mention that a second life may be necessary for effective grinding.
- “One of my favorite games, the RTS aspect is balanced and not tedious. There's pretty much zero pay-to-win aspects; you can play the entirety of multiplayer for free and get all but two cosmetics for free.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
- “I spent hours grinding, and it felt like I made no progress.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game exhibits some stability issues, particularly with loading and unloading, though the core mechanics function well. Minor bugs and glitches are being addressed through updates.
- “It's a bit buggy with loading and unloading, but core mechanic-wise, props.”
- “Minor bugs and glitches are being fixed.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization of the game is viewed positively, as it is not seen as a cash grab; instead, the developer is committed to providing continuous updates and maintaining a loyal relationship with the community.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
200%
300%
Players appreciate the high replayability of the game, noting that the abundance of maps encourages them to invest time and explore different experiences.
- “The variety of choices and paths keeps the game fresh, making me want to replay it multiple times.”
- “Each playthrough offers new challenges and experiences, ensuring that I never get bored.”
- “You can invest as much time as you want if you wish, as I've yet to see all the maps, adding to the replayability.”
- “The game lacks significant changes in gameplay mechanics, making it feel repetitive after a few runs.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to return, as side quests feel uninspired and repetitive.”