Karnark

About Karnark

Karnark is a multiplayer role playing game. It received negative reviews from players.

Classical MMORPG that has everything to prove your true power!

Genres & Tags

Role Playing

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

33%Audience ScoreBased on 91 reviews

story3 negative mentions

Enjoyable old school MMORPG experience with fair item drop rates and satisfying progression up to a certain level.
Good graphics and smooth gameplay on some devices with easy to play mechanics.
Free-to-play friendly for initial levels with many free players able to progress for some time.

Game suffers from severe pay-to-win mechanics and unaffordable in-game costs especially after mid-levels, forcing players to spend money to progress.
Very poor optimization causing severe lag, overheating, and crashes on many mobile devices.
Lack of character customization with gender-locked classes, limited classes, poor UI design with tiny fonts, and intrusive, long tutorials; also, annoying auto-play mechanics reduce player engagement.

story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 50% neutral mentions, 50% negative mentions
The story and quest structure are criticized for being overly linear, intrusive, and repetitive, with constant forced tutorials and auto-quests that limit player freedom. Players find the quest design irritating and lacking meaningful engagement, contributing to a dull narrative experience.
- “Then tutorials too floody / spam-ish early on, should give freedom to players to act (at least distribute stats rather than forcing linear main quests), then odd skill progression.”
- “The quests that popped up were extremely irritating.”
- “Good graphics but no game mechanics, just a plain old and boring auto quest game.”
graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 60% negative mentions
The graphics receive mixed feedback, with some praising their beauty while others criticize them as low quality or unappealing. Several users report performance issues such as overheating and lag, indicating poor optimization despite the graphical presentation. Overall, the graphics are seen as a weak point due to both visual quality and technical problems.
- “Nice gameplay, beautiful graphics, easy to play.”
- “Good graphics but no game mechanics, just a plain old and boring auto quest game.”
- “Very bad optimization; the CPU overheated after a 30-minute play session. The graphics are poor and my phone overheated significantly.”
- “Low graphics settings make my 12GB RAM phone hot and laggy. Something is very wrong.”
- “Terrible game... boring, unorganized, and the graphics suck.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 75% negative mentions
User feedback on optimization is mixed: some report poor optimization causing device overheating and performance issues, while others praise smooth, lag-free gameplay on mobile. However, there are complaints about a lack of optimization settings to customize performance.
- “The game is well optimized for mobile with no lag. Good job, I like this game.”
- “The optimization in this game is very lacking; it seems like they rushed the game without polishing it.”
- “Very bad optimization; the CPU overheated after a 30-minute play session. The graphics aren't impressive, and for some reason, my phone overheated like . No thanks.”
- “Lack of optimization options!”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67% positive mentions, -34% neutral mentions, 67% negative mentions
The gameplay is generally praised for being easy and visually appealing, but criticized for lacking depth and relying heavily on pay-to-win mechanics and expensive packages, resulting in a repetitive and uninspired experience.
- “Nice gameplay, beautiful graphics, easy to play, though some packages are quite expensive.”
- “Good graphics but lacks engaging game mechanics, mostly a plain and boring auto quest game.”
- “If the pay-to-win mechanics are reduced significantly, I'll revise my review.”
- “Good graphics but no game mechanics, just a plain old and boring auto quest game.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The monetization is criticized for expensive in-game purchases that provide only temporary buffs without meaningful rewards, giving the impression of a cash grab rather than offering genuine value.
- “The in-game purchases are higher than any other game I've seen and offer temporary buffs with no real tangible profit.”
- “Looks like a lot of effort for a cash grab, could have been much more.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Users criticize the music as awful and uninspiring, contributing to an overall negative audio experience.
- “Awful music”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Grinding is often seen as tedious due to repetitive auto-battle mechanics and a slow, text-heavy tutorial that can feel overwhelming.