Hunters Inc

About

Hunters Inc is a multiplayer action game. It was developed by WYLDERZONE and was released on December 19, 2025. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Hunters Inc is a cooperative melee FPS where 1-4 players control Orc hunters battling gigantic, environment-shaping monsters. Team up to track targets across procedurally generated landscapes filled with deadly creatures and hazards. Utilize four distinct classes to fight, craft, and support each other in a savage, ever-changing world.

Genres & Tags

Action

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 93 reviews

gameplay6 positive mentions

optimization2 negative mentions

The game has a solid foundation and offers a fun gameplay loop reminiscent of Deep Rock Galactic and Monster Hunter, with enjoyable combat and resource management mechanics.
The developers are responsive to community feedback and actively work on updates, showing a commitment to improving the game and adding new content.
The movement mechanics are engaging, allowing for fun exploration and platforming, particularly in the open world and icy environments.

The game currently feels incomplete, with many features and content locked or missing, leading to a lack of depth and replayability.
Combat lacks impact and feedback, making encounters feel unsatisfying, and the player models and art style are inconsistent and unpolished.
Multiplayer can suffer from lag and desynchronization issues, and the overall experience can feel like a demo rather than a finished product.

gameplay
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
64%
12%
The gameplay is generally enjoyable, featuring a solid loop of hunting monsters, gathering parts, and upgrading gear, though it currently suffers from repetitive mechanics and a lack of meaningful progression. While the mobility and combat feel refined and engaging, players note that certain mechanics, like tracking and feeding, require better explanation and tightening. Overall, the game shows potential but needs further content and improvements to enhance the experience.
- “Now the early access game is here, and the gameplay is a bit more refined, with a few mechanical additions that make things feel more impactful (the player is more agile, combat feels a bit more visceral), and some more monsters to hunt.”
- “You have lots of mobility, which is exciting and interesting, and the hunting mechanics are good.”
- “This game has a lot of potential, but as of right now, the gameplay loop needs a lot of improvement.”
- “Following the boar around to track a monster is a cute idea, but definitely needs more tightening up mechanics-wise (the bone feeding mechanic is a little poorly explained, for example).”
- “The gameplay loop is pretty solid; you hunt monsters, gather monster parts, upgrade gear, hunt bigger monsters or go higher difficulty, repeat.”
story
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
66%
17%
The game's story is minimalistic, focusing primarily on a mission-based structure where players hunt large monsters and gather resources for upgrades. Players appreciate the straightforward combat loop and the exploration elements, but some express frustration with mission bugs and the lack of depth in character progression and narrative. Overall, it offers a familiar experience reminiscent of titles like Monster Hunter, emphasizing gameplay over a rich storyline.
- “There's a main hub area where you choose missions to go on to hunt different monsters and farm them for parts.”
- “What you do get is a mission-based, drop in/out experience similar to games like Deep Rock Galactic and Monster Hunter.”
- “There are 4 large monsters to hunt along with a resource gathering mission and a few harder missions with extra variables.”
- “I ran through a mission and it essentially boiled down to rapidly slapping at the enemy in front of me until it dies, rinse, repeat.”
- “Mechanically pretty good and objectively a great shell for a game.. however.. there are missions to complete and 4 bases of characters with a single weapon set, yet nothing progressive to complete yet.”
- “Only played 35 minutes of it, did the tutorial and tried 1 mission, the boar kept running into a wall so I just ran around looking for the prey.”
graphics
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the cartoonish visuals and hand-drawn character art, while others criticize the lack of cohesion in the art style and the repetitive design of assets and environments. Many feel that the character models lack individuality, which detracts from the overall experience, and navigation through the maps is described as frustrating. Overall, while there are elements of improvement compared to previous titles, significant enhancements are still needed to elevate the visual identity of the game.
- “I like the cartoonish visuals, how it's 1st-person, and the fact that we get to be orcs, of course.”
- “And graphics and sound are already a huge upgrade from the last game.”
- “The hand-drawn character art of the four orcs is pretty darn cool and fits the low-poly aesthetic.”
- “Half the assets don't even match the art style the game has. The classes don't do anything different from each other and are entirely cosmetic. The bosses have three moves at most and just spam whichever one does the most damage to the player. There's no progression (yes, there is literally none. No getting a reskin isn't progression). The maps are painful to navigate and lack anything beyond 'hallways into hallways.'”
- “Atrocious art style.”
- “Do you wish to play a game that runs well and doesn't require you to use PS1 graphics on low settings?”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's optimization has been criticized for being poor, with reports of stuttering and various bugs affecting gameplay. Some features, such as the "unstuck" mechanic, have also been noted to negatively impact the player experience by removing essential items. Overall, players feel that optimization needs significant improvement.
- “You don’t have to worry about things like potions, gear optimization, or all those overly complicated mechanics that come later.”
- “That said, optimization is currently awful, and it's riddled with bugs and poorly done features (like the unstuck feature taking away all ammo and consumables).”
- “I also had some stuttering, but I'm not sure if that's my PC or the game.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is generally well-received, with players expressing satisfaction and no regrets about their purchase.
- “The music is nice, and in general, I am not disappointed I bought it!”
- “The soundtrack perfectly complements the gameplay, enhancing the overall experience.”
- “I love how the music sets the mood and immerses you in the game world.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the focus on cosmetic grinding, likening it to Deep Rock, but emphasize the need for unique character models to prevent dissatisfaction after investing in cosmetics. They prefer a quicker entry into gameplay, contrasting it with the extensive grinding often required in Monster Hunter.
- “Since a game like this has a replay loop focused on cosmetic grinding similar to Deep Rock, it's imperative they give the player models a unique identity before they invest too much into cosmetics to avoid reworking them to be more in line with the art style.”
- “I like getting into a hunt as quickly as you would a dive and not having to do all the grinding that Monster Hunter requires.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is largely criticized, with users finding it not only unfunny but also poorly executed, leading to a disappointing experience.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players highlight the game's strong replayability, especially following a significant update that introduced new content and progression elements, enhancing the overall experience.
- “A great game that just got a huge update adding plenty to the game for both progression and replayability.”