Hunters Inc

About

Hunters Inc is a single player and multiplayer hack and slash game with fantasy and violence themes. It was developed by WYLDERZONE and was released on December 19, 2025. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Hunters Inc. is a 1-4 player co-op melee FPS featuring rampaging Orc hunters, gigantic monsters to slay and procedurally generated environments teeming with deadly flora and fauna. 1-4 PLAYER CO-OPOrc Together Strong! Work together as a warband to track your target and bring it down as you fight your way through a savage world full of deadly beasts, lethal hazards and valuable resources! HUNT …

Skip User Reviews

72%

Audience ScoreBased on 103 reviews

gameplay7 positive mentions

music2 negative mentions

Fun and addictive gameplay loop combining Monster Hunter style hunting with Deep Rock Galactic style movement and team play.
Strong multiplayer cooperation element; playing with friends enhances the experience significantly.
Active, small indie developer team highly involved with community feedback and frequent updates expanding content and features.

Game is very early access with limited content, missing key features like cooking, gem crafting, weapon upgrades, and progression systems.
Inconsistent and jarring art style with mismatched player models and assets reducing immersion and visual cohesion.
Large, empty maps can feel tedious to navigate; monsters sometimes run off frustratingly fast; audio and technical issues cause discomfort.

gameplay
31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
67%
10%
The gameplay offers a solid and enjoyable hunting loop with good mobility, interactive monsters, and evolving mechanics, though it currently lacks depth, content variety, and some quality-of-life features. While the core systems show promise, certain mechanics feel unfinished or unclear, and the overall progression and class synergy could be improved. Players find it fun but repetitive, hoping future updates will expand and refine the experience.
- “The gameplay loop is pretty solid; you hunt monsters, gather monster parts, upgrade gear, hunt bigger monsters or go higher difficulty, then repeat.”
- “You have lots of mobility, which is exciting and interesting, and the hunting mechanics are good.”
- “Now the early access game is here, and the gameplay is a bit more refined, with a few mechanical additions that make things feel more impactful (the player is more agile, combat feels a bit more visceral), and some more monsters to hunt.”
- “Some systems feel unfinished, and quality-of-life features such as advanced navigation tools or deeper crafting mechanics are still evolving.”
- “Following the boar around to track a monster is a cute idea but definitely needs more tightening up mechanics-wise (the bone feeding mechanic is a little poorly explained for example).”
- “This game has a lot of potential but as of right now the gameplay loop needs a lot of improvement.”
story
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
72%
14%
The story in this game serves primarily as a backdrop for mission-based monster hunting, featuring randomized objectives and expansive maps with varied threats. While there's no deep narrative progression, players appreciate the engaging combat loop and exploration reminiscent of games like Deep Rock Galactic and Monster Hunter. However, some missions can feel repetitive or frustrating due to bugs and limited mission variety, with the core experience focused on gameplay rather than storytelling.
- “Each mission drops players into expansive, semi-randomized terrain filled with roaming threats, environmental obstacles, and a primary monstrous target that must be located and defeated.”
- “There are 4 large monsters to hunt along with a resource gathering mission and a few harder missions with extra variables.”
- “What you get is a mission-based, drop in/out experience similar to games like Deep Rock Galactic and Monster Hunter.”
- “I ran through a mission and it essentially boiled down to rapidly slapping at the enemy in front of me until it dies, rinse, repeat.”
- “After that finding the main hunt monster was near impossible after a 25-minute mission timer.”
- “Mechanically pretty good and objectively a great shell for a game; however, there are missions to complete and 4 bases of characters with a single weapon set, yet nothing progressive to complete yet.”
graphics
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
54%
23%
The game features a stylized, low-poly aesthetic with cartoonish, first-person visuals that some find appealing and improved from its predecessor. However, inconsistencies in art style and character models, along with repetitive and minimalistic design elements, detract from the overall cohesion and progression feel. Enhancing character individuality and refining assets could significantly elevate the visual experience.
- “The visual presentation adopts a stylized, low-poly aesthetic.”
- “Hopes and Dreams: the hand-drawn character art of the four orcs are pretty darn cool, and fit the low-poly aesthetic.”
- “And graphics and sound are already a huge upgrade from the last game.”
- “Half the assets don't even match the art style the game has, the classes don't do anything different from each other and are entirely cosmetic, the bosses have 3 moves at most and just spam whichever one does the most damage to the player, there's no progression (yes, there is literally none. no getting a reskin isn't progression), the maps are painful to navigate and lack anything beyond 'hallways into hallways'.”
- “1.) Character models should resemble the artwork given.”
- “Since a game like this has a replay loop focused on cosmetic grinding similar to Deep Rock, it's imperative they give the player models a unique identity before they invest too much into cosmetics to avoid reworking them to be more in line with the art style.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The music in the game is generally appreciated and adds to the experience, though some users find the maps feel empty and the lack of a dynamic soundtrack during extensive exploration detracts from immersion. Overall, the soundtrack is considered pleasant but could be more engaging.
- “Music is nice and in general I am not disappointed I bought it!”
- “There's a lot of climbing needed, and combing what can sometimes feel like a cubic half mile of map for a few rocks and a well-hidden side objective without a real soundtrack just really doesn't do it.”
- “Large, empty maps, no real soundtrack, and that classes are somewhat unimportant or step on one another's toes.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's optimization is currently poor, with frequent stuttering and bugs impacting gameplay, such as glitches that negatively affect player resources. However, simpler mechanics reduce the complexity of gear and potion management.
- “That said, optimization is currently awful, and it's riddled with bugs and poorly done features (like the unstuck feature removing all ammo and consumables).”
- “I also experienced some stuttering, but I am not sure if it's due to my PC or the game.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game offers high replayability due to its dynamic structure ensuring unique expeditions each time, further enhanced by a substantial update that adds new progression elements and content.
- “This structure supports replayability, as no two expeditions unfold exactly the same way.”
- “A great game that just got a huge update adding plenty to the game for both progression and replayability.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users appreciate a grinding system that emphasizes cosmetic progression with unique character identities, similar to Deep Rock, while favoring quick entry into hunts over the extensive grinding typical of games like Monster Hunter.
- “Since a game like this has a replay loop focused on cosmetic grinding similar to Deep Rock, it's imperative they give the player models a unique identity before they invest too much into cosmetics to avoid reworking them to be more in line with the art style.”
- “I like getting into a hunt as quickly as you would a dive and not have to do all the grinding Monster Hunter requires.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere is effectively conveyed, successfully capturing a sense of scale without striving for hyper-realism.
- “While it does not aim for hyper-realism, it effectively conveys atmosphere and scale.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game was widely criticized as unfunny and poorly executed, leaving players unimpressed and disappointed.