High On Racing

About

High On Racing is a single player racing game. It was developed by SilentFuture and was released on May 25, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

High On Racing is an unique Retro Arcade Style Tactical Racing Game that will warp you into the sky to race against the time.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

43%

Audience ScoreBased on 109 reviews

music4 positive mentions

graphics5 negative mentions

The game has a unique concept that mixes speed and memory, providing a different take on racing.
It can run on low-end computers, making it accessible to a wider audience.
Some players found it enjoyable for short play sessions, especially for those looking to complete achievements.

The game suffers from significant performance issues, including lag and low frame rates, making it frustrating to play.
Level design is confusing and repetitive, leading to a lack of engagement and enjoyment.
Graphics and overall quality are poor, with many players describing it as feeling like a low-quality mobile game.

graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
33%
42%
The graphics in the game are generally criticized for being simplistic, dull, and repetitive, with many reviewers noting poor quality and a lack of variety in design elements. While some acknowledge the game's retro style, it is often seen as an excuse for subpar visuals and clunky gameplay. Overall, the graphics receive mixed ratings, with some appreciating the performance on lower-end hardware despite the low-quality textures.
- “The game uses various graphics styles on the main menu.”
- “Although I wish it would have more levels and maybe a map editor so you could add custom maps, the minimum requirements for graphics say 8600m GT, but I'm running a 8200m G and it runs perfectly over 60fps.”
- “- overall graphic and textures”
- “The graphics are simplistic and dull in nature, with the repeated roads, turning arrows, and ramps that are reused again and again throughout the course.”
- “The trend of calling something retro as an excuse for poor UI design, low-quality graphics, and clunky gameplay is pretty dumb.”
- “The graphics and the texture are pretty bad.”
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The gameplay has been criticized for its poor design, low-quality graphics, and clunky mechanics, with many users finding it unengaging and riddled with bugs. Despite a potentially interesting concept, the execution falls flat, leading to a frustrating experience that feels much less fluid than advertised. Overall, the game is deemed short and lacking in depth, making it easy to complete without much enjoyment.
- “The game also has a jump mechanic that will be used in level 10+.”
- “You can see that in the gameplay and screenshots.”
- “Just look at the gameplay and screenshots.”
- “The trend of calling something retro as an excuse for poor UI design, low-quality graphics, and clunky gameplay is pretty dumb.”
- “Just another bad game with bugs and terrible gameplay; avoid it.”
- “The graphics and the gameplay are bad.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
43%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the retro soundtrack for enhancing the gameplay experience and raising adrenaline, others find it unoriginal and unpleasant. Overall, the quality of the music seems to be a significant factor in the game's appeal, with some praising it as a highlight and others criticizing it.
- “Cute casual maze game, pretty well-made and has nice music.”
- “Great retro music raises adrenaline and makes you improve your results.”
- “Great concept, good music, and easy controls are some of the best selling points.”
- “The background music and sound effects aren't anything new.”
- “Music is not pleasant.”
- “The soundtrack makes me wish I was deaf.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from low replayability due to its repetitive gameplay, frustrating difficulty spikes, and laggy performance, which detract from the overall experience.
- “A poorly made, repetitive game with frustrating difficulty spikes, laggy performance, and minimal replay value.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game's optimization is criticized for laggy performance and frustrating difficulty spikes, contributing to a repetitive experience with low replay value.
- “A poorly made, repetitive game with frustrating difficulty spikes, laggy performance, and minimal replay value.”
- “The optimization is so bad that it feels like I'm playing a slideshow instead of a game.”
- “Frequent crashes and long loading times make it nearly impossible to enjoy the experience.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players generally find that the game does not require excessive grinding for achievements, making progression feel more rewarding and less tedious.
- “The grinding for achievements feels endless and unfulfilling.”
- “I spent hours grinding, only to realize it was all for nothing.”
- “The repetitive nature of grinding makes the game feel more like a chore than a fun experience.”