Harry Potter: Quidditch Champions

About

"Harry Potter: Quidditch Champions" is an arcade game that allows 1-2 players to experience Quidditch as a Chaser, Seeker, Keeper, or Beater in legendary arenas and wizarding world locations. Players can choose from Career Mode, Exhibition Matches, or Player vs Player, either solo or in online co-op with teams of up to 3. The deluxe edition includes house-themed packs and 2,000 Gold, with no microtransactions.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Harry Potter: Quidditch Champions screenshot

78%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,590 reviews

gameplay125 positive mentions

grinding31 negative mentions

The game captures the essence of Quidditch and provides a fun, fast-paced experience.
No microtransactions, allowing players to earn all cosmetics and upgrades through gameplay.
The ability to switch roles during matches adds a layer of strategy and keeps gameplay dynamic.

The game suffers from bugs and server issues, making it frustrating to play at times.
The single-player campaign is short and lacks depth, leading to a repetitive experience.
Matchmaking can be unbalanced, often pairing inexperienced players with highly skilled opponents.

gameplay
332 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
55%
8%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many praising its fluidity, responsiveness, and the engaging mechanics of different roles, reminiscent of games like Rocket League. However, players have noted that the gameplay can become repetitive quickly, and some mechanics feel shallow or unbalanced, particularly in solo modes. While the multiplayer experience is highlighted as fun and competitive, there are calls for more content and improvements to enhance the overall depth and variety of gameplay.
- “The fast-paced gameplay and unique quidditch mechanics offer a refreshing take on wizarding sports.”
- “The mechanics for passing, shooting, and defending are thoughtfully designed, making each match engaging and strategic.”
- “The gameplay is accessible for beginners while having the depth that allows for mastery if you put the effort in.”
- “However, the gameplay loop gets very repetitive very quickly.”
- “After 65 minutes of gameplay, I finished half of the tutorial that required me to restart the game a few times to force the keys to work. I gave up and asked for a refund.”
- “It's fun at first, but once you understand the mechanics of the game, it becomes easy and you get bored of it real fast.”
monetization
121 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
68%
13%
The game has received widespread praise for its lack of microtransactions, with many players appreciating the ability to earn all content through gameplay rather than additional purchases. While some express skepticism about the potential for future monetization changes, the current absence of in-game purchases is seen as a refreshing and positive aspect in today's gaming landscape. Overall, the game's pricing and monetization strategy have been viewed favorably, with many recommending it for its straightforward approach.
- “No microtransactions and everything can be obtained by just playing the game!”
- “No microtransactions is amazing and refreshing.”
- “This game feels like a cash grab for the franchise without delivering on a quality game.”
- “I 100% do not trust developers' claim that this will stay a microtransaction-free game, and I am sure that a cash shop will be implemented after they have made enough sales from the launch promise of 'no microtransactions'.”
- “The absence of microtransactions is a refreshing change, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend extra money.”
graphics
116 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
56%
9%
The graphics of "Quidditch Champions" have received mixed reviews, with many players noting a cartoonish art style reminiscent of mobile games, which some find charming while others consider it a downgrade compared to the more realistic visuals of "Hogwarts Legacy." While the graphics are generally described as decent and well-optimized for gameplay, they may disappoint those expecting higher fidelity, with some reviewers highlighting visual bugs and a lack of detail in environments. Overall, the stylized graphics serve the game's purpose but may not appeal to all players.
- “The graphics and atmosphere are another highlight.”
- “The graphics and art style are impressive, and the controls feel smooth, making for an engaging gameplay experience.”
- “I love the graphics and art style.”
- “The graphics look like they were designed for a 2003 mobile phone.”
- “The graphics of the story mode are abysmal and cheap.”
- “Graphics look like a premium phone game and everything feels like this is a 5-year-old mobile game ported over to PC.”
story
58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
86%
5%
The game's story aspect is widely criticized for its lack of depth and engagement, with many players expressing disappointment over the minimal narrative content and simplistic campaign structure. While there is a story mode that allows for some solo play, it is often described as short, easy, and lacking in meaningful character development or a coherent plot. Overall, players feel that the game prioritizes multiplayer experiences over a rich, story-driven campaign, leaving many wishing for a more substantial narrative akin to other sports titles.
- “I like the game's style simplicity, but would really like a more in-depth storyline that focuses more on the player rather than the team.”
- “The game features both a story campaign, the essence of which is to pass various quidditch championships in different locations, and multiplayer, which gives us the opportunity to compete with other players.”
- “I was really hoping for the career mode to be a simple from zero to hero story like how it sounded in the features trailer.”
- “The story mode is lacking and boring.”
- “There's no real story, or fanfare, just a quick cutscene talking about generic quidditch, then the game starts.”
- “The most story you get is a single chatbox with a character saying stereotypical stuff like 'you may have come out of the shadows Slytherin, but we won't allow you to reach the limelight.'”
grinding
31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of the game is a mixed bag; while players find it fulfilling and appreciate the absence of microtransactions, many feel that the extensive grinding required for in-game currencies, rewards, and seasonal content can become tedious and time-consuming. Some players enjoy the challenge and the sense of progression, but others express frustration over the grindiness, particularly in single-player modes and season passes. Overall, the game offers a nostalgic return to grinding mechanics, but it may not appeal to those who dislike repetitive gameplay.
- “The in-game currencies are also very hard to come by without grinding pretty extensively.”
- “The single-player campaigns are enjoyable, but be warned: if you’re not a fan of grinding, this game may not be for you.”
- “I'm only around level 21 on the rewards pass, and you can't get all the vaulted characters at the moment, and some require so much grinding it's not fun at all.”
stability
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
96%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly hinder gameplay. Players have experienced issues such as freezing during loading screens, matchmaking errors, and problems with multiplayer functionality. While some updates have addressed certain bugs, many users still find the game to be a frustratingly unstable experience overall.
- “The game runs really well; the physics aren't buggy at all.”
- “I haven't experienced any crashes or major glitches.”
- “The stability of the game allows for a smooth and enjoyable experience.”
- “This isn’t a quidditch game; it’s a money grab, a buggy mess, and an insult to the sport.”
- “The game crashes every 30 minutes and some games are unplayable with how buggy it can become.”
- “It's also a buggy mess.”
optimization
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
47%
35%
18%
Overall, the game's optimization is a mixed bag; while many players report smooth performance and compatibility with midrange PCs, others experience significant server issues and persistent stuttering. The graphics are well-designed and run efficiently, allowing for a good multiplayer experience, but server performance remains a notable drawback. Players appreciate the ability to tweak settings for better performance, indicating a generally positive reception towards optimization efforts.
- “The game is very well optimized; you can run it on a very wide range of machines.”
- “The gameplay is smooth, the graphics are impressive, and overall, it's a well-optimized game.”
- “The game runs smoothly, and there are plenty of settings to tweak for better performance.”
- “The biggest drawback, though, is the server performance, which is quite poor at times.”
- “Just one word: stuttering, stuttering, stuttering always and everywhere.”
- “Upgrading your 'performance' can give you an advantage over competition.”
music
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
40%
20%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the thematic soundtrack that evokes nostalgia and complements the gameplay, others find it lackluster and reminiscent of amateur compositions. Overall, the music is generally considered solid but not exceptional, with some players noting the absence of in-game music during matches.
- “Gameplay was solid, music solid, graphics solid.”
- “And, of course, the thematic soundtrack, which perfectly conveys the atmosphere of the game and brings us back to the moments when we first watched the Harry Potter movies.”
- “Fun gameplay, great visuals, good music, very well done commentators and no microtransactions.”
- “And don’t get me started on the soundtrack—it’s like they hired a guy with a kazoo and a synth to make the music.”
- “It's not spectacular, it has a tendency to crash in multiplayer, the music is pretty lackluster and the quaffle mechanics are a little jank sometimes, but there's nothing inherently wrong with the game so much to the point I'd call it bad.”
- “No music while in matches.”
replayability
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
50%
21%
Overall, the game is praised for its replayability, particularly due to its engaging gameplay mechanics and multiplayer options, which enhance the experience when playing with friends. While some reviewers note a lack of depth and diversity that could limit long-term replay value, the solid tutorial and balanced positions contribute positively to the replay experience. The absence of microtransactions and the game's enjoyable nature further support its replayability, making it a fun choice for both casual and competitive play.
- “It's a blast to play, even after many hours, and offers a ton of replayability.”
- “Seems very replayable, and surprisingly contains 0 microtransactions.”
- “Not a ton of replay value though.”
- “In the long term, the game might lack a bit of depth, which could affect its replayability.”
- “Each position feels well balanced and though the campaign is short, there is an element of replayability if only to work at getting skilled enough to take on multiplayer.”
atmosphere
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The atmosphere of the game is widely praised for its immersive and magical qualities, effectively capturing the essence of the Harry Potter franchise. Players appreciate the stunning graphics, thematic soundtrack, and the ability to evoke nostalgic emotions reminiscent of the films, making it a compelling experience for fans. Overall, the developers have successfully recreated the enchanting environment of Hogwarts, enhancing the gameplay experience.
- “The graphics and atmosphere are another highlight.”
- “And, of course, the thematic soundtrack, which perfectly conveys the atmosphere of the game and brings us back to the moments when we first watched the Harry Potter movies.”
- “The developers have done a great job creating the wondrous and magical atmosphere you associate with the franchise.”
emotional
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game evokes nostalgia and joy, particularly through its homage to classic PS1 Quidditch gameplay, which resonates well with players. However, some find the presentation repetitive and feel the game is overly targeted towards a younger audience, featuring cheerful characters and dialogues that may lack depth. Overall, the absence of microtransactions is seen as a positive, contributing to a wholesome gaming experience.
- “Really made me feel like I was playing Quidditch. 10/10.”
- “No microtransactions, PS1 Hagrid mask, and the seeker gameplay paying homage to the PS1 games with flying through the hoops the snitch leaves in its trail really made me feel that this game is in good hands.”
- “Makes me feel this game is targeted at a much younger audience, possibly teens, and tries to be an incredibly inclusive and wholesome experience rich with overly cheery characters and childish dialogues.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game's bugs to be amusing, often adding a humorous element to the experience, particularly in the case of a character named Molly. While these glitches can be distracting, they are generally perceived as lighthearted rather than detrimental to gameplay.
- “There are quite a few bugs that sometimes hinder the game, but they are mostly rather funny.”
- “Don't get me wrong, it's not a big issue, and in the case of Molly, it's hilarious to see.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the character design and express excitement for future developments in the game, highlighting that even after completing the main storyline, there are still numerous challenges and engaging online play to explore.
- “I love the character design and can't wait to see what happens in this game. I've already technically 'beaten' it, but there's still so many more challenges to tackle, and the online play is also very nice and stable.”